Question to Americans here: Did female slave owners fuck their slaves as well during slavery times ?
>>61620948
Probably
>>61620948
ask one
>>61620998
how???
>>61620985
Like who?
>women
>owning anything in the 1700s and 1800s
Okay maybe they did but not really.
The USA are a shit country. I shit on that country, its foreign policy and its degeneracy ideology.
>>61621662
Okay Muhammad
Apparently that's where the whole cuck thing originates from.
America really is a disgusting place, all memes aside. Say what you will about my shithole, but I'd never want to live in America.
Gross people, gross culture.
>>61620948
Definetly not in the open atleast. A woman would probably get lynched along with the slave if she was caught fucking one of them.
>>61620948
I don't think it was as well. It was probably ruined by the power dynamic.
>>61620948
You've been looking at porn on the internet again, haven't you?
>>61620948
>female slave owners
Sorry for the dumb question; did you mean a female who owns a slave or a man who owns a female slave?
>>61621856
You're just mad because your country doesn't know how to filter out the good or the bad in the culture we export.
>>61620948
Women back then were expected to stay virginal until marriage. If they got caught with any man, let alone a slave, it would have been a shitstorm.
But it definitely still happened a bit.
>>61621986
a female who owns a slave
>>61620948
only reason they fuck them now is because of either fetishism or because they look nigs as equals(because nigs have same status/money nowadays). So I would say some did, but very very few(i.e those fetishists). Those who got caught got killed probably.
>>61621856
ah yes, distinct canadian culture.
>>61621574
they did actually
due to luck a woman could be the lone child or without any males in the family she could be the matriarch
or she could just inherit money from her dad and own slaves
t.luisiANO
>>61622136
I don't think there were many female slave owners. The estate and the slaves tended heavily to being the sole property of the man. The woman, too.
>>61622298
>>61621856
>>61621912
>>61621978
>>61622136
>>61622185
Ok lads. Cause I was reading up on some old American history where there was a little reference to the daughter of a young slave owner who got impregnated by one of the younger slaves. She wasn't allowed to breast feed the kid (apparently she still wanted to keep it) and the baby was snatched from her and sold into slavery. I don't know what happened to the girl but I doubt she was punished as it would have been mentioned. I know it happened to the men so I was just curious about how often it happened to the women.
>>61621923
>power dynamic
There still would have been a power dynamic. Women were kept under heel in those times by men who were allowed to do anything, so the prospect of having a living toy to have complete control over probably would have been appealing to some.
It probably happened but they def used contraception. Having a half black child as a white mother would ruin your reputation forever.
>>61622634
No, what's actually going on is that you're casually spamming interracial pictures
>>61622634
Yeah, sounds about right.
>>61622642
This, that was the way it was back then.
>>61622708
What interracial picture? Apart from my main one which was so my question could be answered.
>>61622825
sure
Could have posted any type of picture, from old timey slave-slave owner pictures to well known interracial couples that would pop up on google images, but you randomly chose a picture in the format of every interracial picture that gets spammed here, the modern day unknown happy couple posing for social media
but nothing to do with the amount of casual interracial spam that's been going on lately here
>>61622961
wew lad
I posted this a while back but nobody answered. It's not my fault that interracial pictures trigger the shit out of this board but I'll make my best of it.
>but nothing to do with the amount of casual interracial spam that's been going on lately here
It's b8.
