China's gonna get you...
>>60801582
oh yeah? because they are taking their time.
>>60801582
>a fucking ramp
Chinese people are friendly and honorable. I respect the almighty republic of China and their leaders.
I wouldn't mind if China invades the whole western world and kill us all in the name of glorious Mao Tse Tsung. It would be great and we deserve it.
Here is a real one, complements of the USN
>>60802344
Ayy China is still 2nd world so they are doing well all things considered.
>>60802344
Submarines are surprisingly big
>>60802221
chino de mierda
>>60802344
this is one battlegroup though, with like 90 planes max. china's already 1/3 the US's military budget and they are undergoing their largest military and naval expansion in history due to the south china seas.
one or two carrier battlegroup won't match them here, and they are pretty determined to not back down. a coalition of navies will btfo them though unless they succeed with divide and conquer and cucking philippines/indonesia/malaysia into their orbit.
>>60802705
Well, yeah. They gotta host a bunch of dudes and enough suplies/weapons to operate on their own for awhile.
This is now a US military thread
>>60802934
WHY IS THE NUMBER OF NUCLEAR SUBS NOT KNOWN FOR JAPAN. DON'T PEOPLE REALIZE THEY WANT REVENGE FOR HIROSHIMA.
>>60802716
MIS CHINOS SON ARGENTINOS
http://thediplomat.com/2016/06/china-commissions-new-submarine-killer-warship-for-south-china-sea/
china has deployed ICBMs, thousands of jets, anti-ship, anti-air, and a fuckton of other weapons in the south china seas.
the US are trolling the fuck out of them by sailing right by its disputed islands while vietnam, japan and philippines are undergoing huge naval expansions.
this literally looks like the arms race between britain and germany that led to ww1. its going to be amazing.
>>60802982
nah, they are usually in battlegroups. its not too bad.
>>60803132
If things happen subs can fuck off for weeks without requiring resupplying.
so advanced it had to be towed to the british naval review at george 5 coronation
it tends to happen when you cram late war heavy cruiser tier firepower in a 3500 ton barge
>>60803075
shh, it's a surprise
>>60803132
>china has deployed ICBMs, thousands of jets, anti-ship, anti-air, and a fuckton of other weapons in the south china seas.
(Citation needed)
>the US are trolling the fuck out of them by sailing right by its disputed islands
No we are not trolling them in any way. We also explicitly stated they were naval maneuvers. Not FON operations.
Finally, we have done these operations in every claimants territory. Not just the Chinese.
See China (and Taiwan) aren't the only ones with unreasonable claims.
China's just the big bad meanie-face guy.
>while vietnam, japan and philippines are undergoing huge naval expansions.
HAHAHAAHAHAHA WHAT HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAJJAHAJAJAHAHAHJAJJAAJAJAKJAJAJAJJAKAKAKAJA
(Citation needed)
>this literally looks like the arms race between britain and germany that led to ww1. its going to be amazing.
Hahahaha nope. China spends 1.8% of GDP on their military.
America spends 3.5%.
We are nowhere near leading up to WW1. That would be win war production hits 10% of GDP or more.
This is a meme fight. No one actually is going to attack each other and send the world economy into a global depression.
>>60801582
they gonna get you first mate
>Obongo is a pussy who is not respected and feared by China
>Donald prefers isolation and leaving every ally save for Israel in the dust
>Hillary is another Obongo clone
China wins in every scenario.
>>60803401
Good thing u have a based meme president, right?
>>60803344
Already have
Thailand is like 30% Chinese
>>60803401
Yep
Durerte is also gonna work with China more
Democracy = China's greatest ally
>>60803237
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/26/china-send-nuclear-armed-submarines-into-pacific-us
http://www.morningnewsusa.com/south-china-sea-ww3-china-deploy-nuclear-missiles-disputed-region-2380365.html
>No we are not trolling them in any way
they are called freedom of navigation exercises you fucking dunce. this is explicitly done to tell them to fuck off with their artificial islands because nobody accepts their maritime jurisdiction.
>navy buildup
http://thediplomat.com/2016/03/vietnams-quest-for-a-greenwater-navy/
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/03/world/asia/us-proposes-india-naval-coalition-balance-china-expansion.html
http://www.businessinsider.com/r-japan-expands-army-footprint-for-first-time-in-40-years-risks-angering-china-2014-19
>gdp nonsense
china has been picking up its defense spending by 7-8% each year, they are militarizing hard since their government is becoming more autocratic.
you are actually retarded, world politics doesn't work because you happen to believe it.
>>60803490
>based meme president
You mean shitty Maduro-tier dictator.
>>60803344
They already have us. :)
There are more of them here than in any other country outside China itself.
>>60803513
That source states "will deploy ICBM's".
Not "has deployed ICBM's".
>they are called freedom of navigation exercises you fucking dunce. this is explicitly done to tell them to fuck off with their artificial islands because nobody accepts their maritime jurisdiction.
No. We explicitly have stated they are not FON operations you absolute faggot.
No one accepts their maritime jurisdiction?
About five ASEAN nations have already agreed with China's views on the SCS.
None of your three "naval" sources fulfill this claim
>vietnam, japan and philippines are undergoing huge naval expansions.
Good try though.
>>60803401
>>60803493
to be fair, nobody takes philippines seriously. they have such a joke navy and airforce and really is only useful for its bases. china sends its fucking coastguards to deal with the filipino navy.
china's more concerned with vietnam and japan since they are much more modernized
>>60803692
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/china-confirms-multiple-warhead-missile-test-south-china-sea/
they have tested it. you cannot make shit up and believe it.
>five asean nations
nope they issued a join declaration for freedom of navigation, but recently reneged it.
only two countries agree with china's stances, laos and cambodia, partly because of their own concerns with vietnam. the broader east-asia sphere is more staunchly against them.
i'm done, you are a fullblown moron.
>>60803795
The source states "tested near the South China Sea" and that it was launched from Central China.
You stated "ICBM's deployed in the SCS."
Which is wrong.
>only two countries
You are forgetting about Brunei.
Keep shitposting leaffag.
>>60803795
It's role reversal. We got Chang in the US downplaying everything around China and we got a white Canadian debating with a chink.
>>60801582
i hope so
they wouldn't put up with all these unruly minorities and white guilt traitors
the ASEANs are threatened by the chinese that's for sure.
they have a youtube commercial that literally says. 'kill kill kill'
Goldman Sachs estimates China's GDP will be 80 trillion by 2050. By contrast the US is estimated to get to around 40 trillion by that time. We only give 3.5% of our GDP to our military and China will be able to do the same. In fact China could spend about the same percentage wise we do and still far outspend us. In other words... CHINA WILL GROW LARGER
China is fucked
Their insane Orwellian slave labor economy has hit the roof, They're going to have to start playing by the rules
>muh carrier killer icbm's
>>60801582
You call all that Russian copy shit a military?
>>60802221
>Zhang WaiLee
>western world and kill US
>Western...us?
>>60802934
Comparing yourself to a disarmed nation?
Japan is banned from having aircraft carriers. What the fuck kind of comparison is this?
The fucking French Navy would destroy the PLAN.
Also, this obviously doesn't take into consideration the ability, technology, and professionalism of each navy.
>>60806194
Having just read SSN by Tom Clancy, I can tell you right now that China will be fucking destroyed if they try anything. Our technology, especially in subs, is far superior. We could blast the chinese navy from its ports before they got underway, and China has zero wish to fight the US on equal terms, because it has a great chance of losing. ESPECIALLY if they involve nuclear weapons. 500 vs 4600 in terms of warheads.
>>60804652
>Goldman Sachs
Stopped reading there
>>60803714
>china sends its fucking coastguards to deal with the filipino navy
Because we know that sinking them is gonna spark something nasty?
China probably couldn't even take India, much less a real military power.
But they won't even try India, because they're fucking cowards who only target tiny developing countries on their borders to steal their land and brainwash their people into believing they were part of China all along.
Can you Americans just btfo the chinks already?
Literally worst asians.
>>60801582
>ramp
>>60803093
>Estimated 10 years to extinguish oil well fires
>Canadians show up and put them all out in 8 months
