1. Cunt
2. Does your Cunt give a fuck about what two consenting adults do to each other?
3. Your stance on it
>>60574872
Yes, however there is an exception for Muslims. They don't even have to be adults.
I fully support our stance
Moving to Italy lads
People here are brainwashed as fuck. They can't(and actually don't want to) think for themselves. By I don't know what is worse: Europe leftistscum madness or Russian traditional values shit.
1. Funland
2. Will be legal by 2017 if i remember correctly
3 haven't ever really cared so doesn't bother me
Gays should be hanged
>>60574872
1. Flag
2. Yes
3. it should be illegal to be gay. They should be put down or castrated or something.
lmao brits and wogs, you faggots
>>60574872
1.Flag
2.No
3.Fags should get Cancer
>>60575529
Italy legalized homosexual civil unions recently because most of the population were in favor of it. They're still against homosexual marriage though, so it's not happening very soon.
>>60576714
Reported to the German government for hate speech.
>>60574872
B A S E D R U S S I A
>>60576532
>Gays should be banged*
Fixed
>>60574872
1. Azerbaijan.
2. Crane.
3. Crane.
>>60574872
last year
1. Belaruse
2. It doesn't, that's why it doesn't have any stupid gay-fawouring laws.
3. I think that gay people shouldn't be bullied in everyday life, but at the same time shouldn't have a right to promote their lifestyle, marry each other or have any other social privileges.
>>60576822
Based
>>60575731
Doesn't matter which is worse. What matters is how we deal with both plagues.
>>60576941
Why do you think that? Why does it affect you?
Just curious
>>60574872
1. Bolanda
2. not in the slightest
3. they can do what they want, but forcing other people to legally recognise their marriage and grant them privileges previously reserved to mixed sex couples is not cool
protip: if you make a map about what two consenting adults do to each other, you care about it
have you internalized crude propaganda or are you perpetuating it?
>>60578870
>but forcing other people to legally recognise their marriage and grant them privileges previously reserved to mixed sex couples is not cool
Why?
>>60579329
because it is forcing other people to do something
>>60579693
No, no it's not.
Letting faggots get married doesn't force you to do anything nor does it impact you in the slightest.
>>60574872
>Does your Cunt give a fuck about what two consenting adults do to each other?
No, it doesn't. Which is why there's no pointless regulation about fags aside from what the EU compelled us to adopt.
I see however that most of western Europe does care a lot about it.
>>60579868
Italians are the gayest straight people on earth.
>>60579329
>Why?
Because fag couples bring no advantages to society, unlike normal couples who bring kids, so there's no need to give them any privileges to encourage them.
And don't even start with adoption: there's literally more applications than kids already (aside from the big ones, but the fags don't want those just like the straight couples don't), so it's a totally pointless argument.
>>60579910
Yes yes mamma mia butta la pasta boobidi bup.
>>60574872
1. Germany
2. No
3. I don't care about what they do, but I wouldn't give them tax relieves, as they don't really solve the children issue. Benefits belong to people who have children, not to a document which states 2 person are living together, even though they did the same years before.
I-Is Turkey bad than russia?
I don't care as long as we don't get western gay culture. In fact maybe we should just preemptively legalize fag marriage just so it isn't given a chance to fully develop here.
Oh, and churches should not be forced to do it, obviously.
>>60580023
>Because fag couples bring no advantages to society
Nor does the old. And given that most Italians aren't having babies - 8 babies per 1000 people - I think you should worry about other things.
>Yes yes mamma mia butta la pasta boobidi bup.
She can throw whatever she wants. So long as it's not the gabagool.
>>60580161
Turkey has bad english then russia yes yes
> I-Is Turkey bad than russia?
Is Turkey worse than* Russia.
Spain
Nope
I really dont give a shit about what others do, its their life, no mine; so if someone is gay for me its ok, I dont see why I would hate them
>>60574872
Ireland should be much higher.
I've never met anyone who disliked the gays, including old folks.
>>60580218
>implying your priests have no gay orgies
>>60579776
>>60580161
Guy has some balls.
He has my respect.
>>60580289
This is not a picture of the percentage of the people approving of gay people but gay/human rights "situation" in the countries.
The more gay men there are the better, as far as I'm concerned
>>60580240
>Nor does the old.
Old couples already have had kids. Old people benefits were paid by 40 years of work they did. Old people benefited society (in theory) to the point where they can stop doing anything for 30 years and still be in the black, social credit wise.
>And given that most Italians aren't having babies - 8 babies per 1000 people - I think you should worry about other things.
So you're saying that since it's already a problem, we should give up on it and focus on unrelated shit? Are you retarded?
Besides, the reason young italians don't have kids is exactly because of how hard is to start families. All money should be focused on supporting young couples looking to have kids, instead of spreading it around to sterile arsefuckers and fucking niggers.
>>60580348
While I agree churches shouldn't be forced your image does not apply here.
She works for the government, she must obey government standards. If I work for Walmart and am a muslim and am told to stock pork - I'M FUCKING STOCKING PORK. Same thing here. She works as a government clerk she has to hand out government licenses.
>>60580399
do you want to fuck them?
>>60578464
In most countries it affects tax payers. A tradionally married couple get's tax relieves under the assumption that they can get children. Here same-sex people can't marry for this reason. They can only go into a "same-sex union".
>>60576825
>>60574872
>allow same-sex marriages in churches
>score drops
>>60580475
And of the old that never had children? And the young who were just infertile? What of them?
>So you're saying that since it's already a problem, we should give up on it and focus on unrelated shit?
No, what I am saying is that you have to work with the straight people. Give gays no rights - they're still not having children. Focus on the straight people - you've lost the gay already.
>Besides, the reason young italians don't have kids is exactly because of how hard is to start families. All money should be focused on supporting young couples looking to have kids,
The only thing stopping you from doing this is your corrupt government. Gays aren't stopping you from this.
>>60580581
i want to fuck them
>>60580668
D-Do they want to fuck you?
>>60580716
y-yes
>>60578870
>ottoman chaliphate which based on both sharia law and kanun allows fag activity
i smell BS on this map, if there is no local religion that allows homos
>>60580757
h-how often? is it fun? r u a qt?
1. Land of Fun
2. Not really, excluding when it comes to adoption or abusable special privileges, for now at least.
3. I don't care. Those gay pride fags should be hanged with all other loud idiots who make parades or demonstrations about stupid things. I don't think that letting gay couples adopt non-related children is a good idea as that will just create unstable children.
I don't care what people do, marriage is a religious institution though. It shouldn't be recognized by government at all. Civil unions for everybody
>>60580924
>marriage is a religious institution though
How?
>>60580628
Gtfo degenerate faggot marriage is for man and woman
>>60580628
>And of the old that never had children? And the young who were just infertile? What of them?
See the point is to encourage. You can't really force anyone to have kids, but you can use tax breaks, child welfare and employment help to support prospective families held back by their finances.
>No, what I am saying is that you have to work with the straight people. Give gays no rights - they're still not having children. Focus on the straight people - you've lost the gay already.
So you're taking multiple posts to say exactly what I've been saying just to waste my time? Pls read what you answer to.
>The only thing stopping you from doing this is your corrupt government. Gays aren't stopping you from this.
Our government is actually trying to do just this right now. What fags are doing is pushing to be added to the benefit-earning categories, making welfare more expensive. Excuse me if I wanna tell them to fuck off rather than give them free money.
Fags in Italy aren't discriminated at all. What they're fighting for are benefits they don't deserve, and as such wasting time and resources (especially political power) that could be better employed. So in fact yes, fags are stopping us from progressing.
>>60579910
>the gayest straight people
That doesn't sound so bad actually.
>>60580495
Giving privileges costs taxpayers money, I'd rather not have them given away with no good reason
>>60581093
S-So anyway. I agree with you. Sort of, at least.
Your first priority is to get your people fucking. But I disagree that this has to be at the expense of gays. There is no reason you can't help both.
Your welfare system is already very bloated but there's a common ground out there.
And if you're really worried, vote no on the referendum. Renzi will leave and your government will collapse. For the three hundredth time in the last five years.
>>60581250
It does when your men are spending more money on cosmetics than your women.
>>60580844
no fuks had
i actually was until i ate too many pies/drank too much beer, had no idea at the time (girls acted really autistic around me), still above average though
>>60581315
>Giving privileges
What privileges do gays, in the eyes of the law, have over straight people?
They don't. If they did, I'd agree. Equal protection under the law no one gets privileges.
>>60581368
>no fuks had
y-you're a virgin?
>i actually was until i ate too many pies/drank too much beer
How fat are you!? Post pics :^)
>>60581317
>There is no reason you can't help both.
Resources are limited you retarded nigger. Why can't people just understand this very simple fact?
>Your welfare system is already very bloated
You have no idea what you're talking about. Italy has one of the smallest and leanest welfare systems in the first world. For all the typical american talk of individualism, you're much bigger on giving money to pointless people than we are by far.
And I'm not worried. Renzi already gave the far left a lollipop with the civil unions law, so he won't do anything more on the subject anymore.
>>60581521
>Resources are limited you retarded nigger
Well you, stupid Moroccan, resources may be limited but how you spend those resource are what matters. In your case, on corrupt politicians.
>you're much bigger on giving money to pointless people than we are by far.
Believe me, I know.
> Renzi already gave the far left a lollipop with the civil unions law, so he won't do anything more on the subject anymore.
Wouldn't be too sure.
>>60581420
yes
no
just borderline thin enough to be deluded that you arent but are
now who the fuck are you senpai?
this exchange has been cringworthy enough for all those involved
>>60581729
>this exchange has been cringworthy enough for all those involved
Fair enough.
>>60581375
tax benefits, social security benefits, making and implementing new laws specially for them would cost too, civil marriages are paid from taxpayers' money as well
>>60581814
now have a free moroccan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-fF4SnaeRk
>>60581867
None of those are privileges if they're getting the exact same thing as everyone else.
>>60581898
Ew. No. I fucking hate Moroccans.
>>60581937
we're talking about married couples here
>>60581669
>how you spend those resource are what matters
Exactly. So why waste them on fags? To make them shut up? Only worth it when political conditions are downright gruesome.
Also corrupt politicians are inevitable. And we're already cutting down on that anyway, if the referendum passes.
>Wouldn't be too sure.
I would. If there's something you can truly be sure about Renzi, is that he doesn't give a billionth of a fuck about any ideologically driven subject. He just wants to stroke his dick with the presidential standard and keep doing that as long as he can, which means he's not gonna do anything for anyone for any other reason than appeasement. Whether it's the voters, the opposition, or his own party. Helping fags any further would not endear him with anyone other than the extreme left, which is irrelevant, so he's not gonna do it.
>>60582002
>e just wants to stroke his dick with the presidential standard and keep doing that as long as he can, which means he's not gonna do anything for anyone for any other reason than appeasemen
He does seem really narcissistic, tb h.
>Exactly. So why waste them on fags?
Don't waste them. Just make your fellow Italians happy. Give them what they deserve not necessarily what they want.
>>60580023
Its funny to me that italians make it seem like theyre super anti gay while at the same time you cannot get more gay effiminate than the italians themselves
>>60581984
All married couples get those things.
I don't care if I don't hear about it or see gay people kissing in public
>>60582200
But non married people don't. Jesus, that's the whole point of this discussion
>>60582140
>italians make it seem like theyre super anti gay
How? When? We don't give a fuck about them either way. They face no discrimination here.
The only reason we rank low on fag maps is that you cannot rank high unless you actively privilege them.
>>60582115
>Don't waste them. Just make your fellow Italians happy. Give them what they deserve not necessarily what they want.
So basically what I've been saying since the beginning. You really do post pointlessly, don't you?
Also disappearing images captchas are fucking cancer, Jesus fucking Christ.
>>60582347
>So basically what I've been saying since the beginning.
Negative. Give gays the right to marry, m8. Real marriage.
>Also disappearing images captchas are fucking cancer, Jesus fucking Christ.
Fuck, especially the ones with select house numbers. I fucking have to click like 40 images. Fuck you google.
>>60574872
no Vatican in there?
>>60582347
equal rights != privilege
yeah i hate it too, just refresh the captcha until it goes away
>>60582511
They have a population of 800.
>>60582511
do you really need to ask what the vatican church thinks about this
>>60582475
Real marriage comes with benefits. You've already agreed they don't need them.
Benefit-less marriage is just a signature on a piece of paper, and they already have that now, it's called civil union. It's totally absolutely cancerous, since it means the government is regulating a purely symbolic act, but right now they're not worth opposing.
>>60582567
>equal rights != privilege
They already have the right to marry people of the other gender with the benefits it implies, for socially advantageous reason. Now they want to marry people of their own gender, with the benefits it implies, without the advantage for society. If this is not privilege on top of right they already have, I don't know what it is.
>>60582768
>Benefit-less marriage is just a signature on a piece of paper, and they already have that now, it's called civil union. It's totally absolutely cancerous, since it means the government is regulating a purely symbolic act, but right now they're not worth opposing.
You don't know what you're talking about, italian civil unions are literally gay marriage with all the benefits that come with it except for adoption.
Really says a lot about your education.
>>60582768
>You've already agreed they don't need them.
Nope. I agreed they don't need the SAME benefits. They still get some.
>Benefit-less marriage is just a signature on a piece of paper,
Inheritance law is influenced by marriage.
>>60582475
>Real marriage
real marriage is a an union between people of opposite sex. No one forbids gays to form couples, I just don't get why the insistence on calling it "marriage"
>>60582912
Don't listen to him, italian civil unions already provide all the benefits that marriages give. This is the reason why civil unions aren't permitted for heterosexual couples, they are supposed to be only for gays.
>>60574872
USA is gay
>>60582768
>>60582907
Uh-oh! Wop fight! WOP FIGHT!
>>60582993
>This is the reason why civil unions aren't permitted for heterosexual couples, they are supposed to be only for gays.
So they get marriage. You're just not gonna call it marriage? That's fucking retarded.
>>60582768
but what about the social benefit of treating people who are equal equally, isn't legal equality the foundation of a secular democratic society
>>60583039
>So they get marriage. You're just not gonna call it marriage? That's fucking retarded.
Well, the name is an important thing for christian zealots here in Italy. I still remember my law teacher saying that she was against gay marriage because "marriage" was a sacrament, but if they wanted they could do a similar thing with a different name.
>>60583125
That's fucking retarded! Are all Italians this stupid?
>>60582907
That actually only strengthens my point. Fags are literally out of things to complain and they're already being outright privileged.
>>60582912
>They still get some.
Why? The only reason I can think of is to shut them up. Which benefits?
>Inheritance law is influenced by marriage.
Inheritance law is as cancerous as it gets. It needs to be totally reworked, together with all family law, starting with marriage, divorce and custody.
>>60583119
Gay marriage is not about giving rights to people who don't have them. It's about giving privileges to people that already have the same rights as anyone else. Nobody is gonna stop a fag from marrying a woman.
>>60583221
ok this guy's too retarded we can't win this lads, shows over
>>60583221
>Why? The only reason I can think of is to shut them up. Which benefits?
Citizenship? Inheritance? Custody?
>>60574872
>Croatia.
>>60576825
>Croatia
can confirm; am gay
>>60583169
It's even more retarded if you think of the fact that marriage wasn't even invented by christians.
BTW, I wouldn't say that a lot of italians are like that, nor that the majority is against gay marriage, but catholicism and its formalities still play a big role in Italy and its politics. Whatever the Pope says and does, you can be sure it's gonna be on the news.
>>60583221
>Civil Unions were legalised the previous month
>MOOOOOOOOOOOM WHY DO THE GAYS COMPLAAAAAAAAAIN
Wew you really are retarded.
>>60583381
Why is Croatia the best Balkan state?
>>60583395
>BTW, I wouldn't say that a lot of italians are like that, nor that the majority is against gay marriage,
So overall how it? Are you gay? How's it for you?
>Whatever the Pope says and does, you can be sure it's gonna be on the news.
When are you getting rid of this pope? His stance on immigration is gonna destroy you.
>>60576825
>Greece rose 19%
Wut!? did i miss anything other than allowing civil unions for homos ?
>>60583395
>Wew you really are retarded.
Fags everywhere complained that the law was not nearly enough, and well you know it. Everyone called the law "butchered" in spite of it being basically marriage, as you yourself admitted.
>>60583357
>Citizenship?
Needs to be removed from straight marriage
>Inheritance?
That's what wills are for.
>Custody?
Of what? The kids they can't beget?
>>60583395
>>60583347
>>60583169
>let's call our adversary retarded, therefore we win the argument
>>60583567
What else do want them to do, be rational? If they were willing to be that, the argument would have stopped at the point where the american admitted I was right.
I find the gay pride parades and all that shit abhorrent, but I'm no one to decide what two persons can do consensually in their intimacy.
It's not that I don't care or if I find it normal or not, it doesn't matter, it's that the idea of someone policing the intimate lives of others disgusts me, ¿who the hell do these people think they are? Get the fuck off from other people private lives you fucking subhumans. And anybody who truly values individuality, personal dignity and freedom above all, should be disgusted at the idea of these "moral kommissars". Fucking disgusting pieces of shit I won't obey you, you fucking bastards.
>>60583558
>Needs to be removed from straight marriage
Aren't you a little ball of edge.
>That's what wills are for.
I'll write one when I'm 50. If I get married before than though I want everything to my spouse.
>Of what? The kids they can't beget?
It's $currentyear + 1, they can be begotten.
>>60583567
what's your argument senpai?
In Spain it's quite accepted.
And that's weird. I mean, my parents were born in a fascist dictatorship
>>60583641
Yeah, I'm not a big fan of PDA either.
>¿
Sir, you can take your obscure upside down mexican question exponential equation marker off of this taiwanese gpu manufacturing forum and pls don't come back.
>>60583648
>Aren't you a little ball of edge.
Aren't you out of arguments.
>I'll write one when I'm 50. If I get married before than though I want everything to my spouse.
So you're willing to sign a piece of paper declaring you a couple, but not one declaring your possessions should go to your hubby in case of death?
>It's $currentyear + 1, they can be begotten.
No they can't. They can buy a kid from a woman at best. And at that point, there's no question of custody: it's the mother's and father's. If they're both unavailable for whatever reason, there's the wider family or orphanages. If the mother doesn't care and the dad is adamant that he wants the kid to stay with hubby, he can appoint him legal guardian.
>>60583835
¿Sorry¿
>>60583866
>Aren't you out of arguments.
I'm not out. I just don't feel like typing.
>So you're willing to sign a piece of paper declaring you a couple, but not one declaring your possessions should go to your hubby in case of death?
You're really supposed to get a lawyer to do it. I don't want to spend money on a lawyer.
> it's the mother's and father's.
Right. And the faggot can be the father but rubbing one out into a jar.
>>60583901
REEEEEEEEE
>>60583558
People complained about the scrap of the step-child adoption article. One can be for or against it, but don't come and complain about the fact that gay marriage doesn't provide the social benefit of "reproduction" if you don't even want to allow them to adopt children. Just admit that you're anti-gay tout-court. I mean, everybody has its opinion and it DOES have moral implications, but you just sound retarded like this.
>>60583465
The church is already losing its influence, it's just a matter of time before we become as secularized as France.
BTW yeah I am, I think that things are changing really fast, I am from Rome and I freely hold hands with my bf, even though I prefer to avoid doing that in the poor neighbourhoods. Overall the further north you go, the less people care (Except for some rural backwards areas)
>>60583641
the whole point of the parades was to create the idea of a gay identity, to give a group of people with nothing in common apart from being a "pervert" something to bond/unite around (their own culture) without this gay rights wouldn't have got anyway near as far as they have now because they are too diverse a group
it can be offputting, cringeworthy and over the top but if i had to pull a whole culture out of my arse almost insantaniously it wouldn't be much better
If homosexuality is wrong, how come homophobes are fucking retarded?
Evidence: >>60582768
>>60584006
>>60583641
Gay culture is dying out anyway. it has become an issue in Castro, San Francisco recently.
>>60583985
>The church is already losing its influence, it's just a matter of time before we become as secularized as France.
That's a bit far. Aim for the US, not france.
>Overall the further north you go, the less people care
I didn't have problems in Napule.
On another note, aside from gay stuff where do you lean politically?
>>60574872
I give a fuck when "being gay" is something you have to flaunt like you are some sort of elevated being that ascended to another plane and must show everyone even my 8 year old kid two bearded men smunching all over each other in a public park.
Otherwise I am totally ok with gays, they are pretty cool people, I actually wish I was a lesbian, all would be MUCH simpler (like, having sex and then going shopping togheter without dragging you).
>>60583641
>but I'm no one to decide what two persons can do consensually in their intimacy.
>It's not that I don't care or if I find it normal or not, it doesn't matter, it's that the idea of someone policing the intimate lives of others disgusts me,
does anybody really do that though? interfere in intimate lives of gay people? They are the ones making demands to other people
>>60583947
>I'm not out. I just don't feel like typing.
Doesn't look like it, since I'm seeing more posts.
>You're really supposed to get a lawyer to do it. I don't want to spend money on a lawyer.
So what you want is for the government to pay in your stead? You need money for marriage too you know.
>Right. And the faggot can be the father but rubbing one out into a jar.
Exactly. Only one of the faggots can be the kid's parent. Thank you for confirming my point.
>>60583985
>don't come and complain about the fact that gay marriage doesn't provide the social benefit of "reproduction" if you don't even want to allow them to adopt children
Adopted children are there regardless of whether or not they get adopted, so fags adopting would be demographically irrelevant. The waiting lists for adoptions are already longer than the distance from here to the moon anyway, only old kids don't get adopted and you can be sure that fags would only want infants same as all other couples.
The rest of your post is not an argument and you know it.
>>60584154
>I actually wish I was a lesbian
L O N D O N
O
N
D
O
N
>>60584173
>They are the ones making demands to other people
In what universe?
http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/canadas-ridiculous-ruling-that-oral-sex-with-animals-is-legal-shows-need-for-new-bestiality-laws?utm_source=vicefbca&utm_campaign=global
This is what gay rights leads to. Canada legalized beastiality.
>>60584224
>This is what gay rights leads to. Canada legalized beastiality.
This is what dumbfucks actually believe.
>>60584199
>Doesn't look like it, since I'm seeing more posts.
I meant didn't want to type lengthy posts. A sentence here and there doesn't bother me.
>You need money for marriage too you know.
There's a filing fee in the US. That's it. $40 for NY.
>Exactly. Only one of the faggots can be the kid's parent. Thank you for confirming my point.
Still, one is the parent.
>>60584292
Slippery slope is real. Gay rights leads to beastiality confirmed.
>>60584120
>US
>secularized
Wat. Republicans always babble about muh Jeezus.
About Naples, dunno, but I'm pretty sure that Florence and Milan are way better than Rome on this issue.
I tend to be right-wing on economic issues but for obvious reasons I'm also a supporter of civil rights. Here in Italy I therefore lean "center-left", but it would be left in the US.
>>60584297
>There's a filing fee in the US. That's it. $40 for NY.
It's like 100-200€ for a will, big whoop.
>Still, one is the parent.
And that one can have custody. And appoint the other fag as legal guardian. What do they need marriage for?
>>60574872
1. Flag
2. No. A considerable number of people do have a problem with it though.
3. I'm bisexual myself, I don't have a problem with it. But I don't know if I agree with gay adoption and things like that
>>60584380
>Wat. Republicans always babble about muh Jeezus.
I meant our stance on secularization. France bans religion in public areas, laicite. The US let's you do whatever the fuck you want so long as you don't try to bring it into law. It's freer this way.
>I tend to be right-wing on economic issues but for obvious reasons I'm also a supporter of civil rights.
And immigration issues?
>>60584423
>It's like 100-200€ for a will, big whoop.
That cheap? Damn, I need to make one. Still, things change. I'm not gonna update my will frequently. So it should be a 'living' will.
>And that one can have custody. And appoint the other fag as legal guardian. What do they need marriage for?
But under contemporary Italian law, one parent dies, the fag husband is losing his kid.
Being gay might be a mental illness, but ultimately they don't bother anyone, so who really cares
>>60584614
Stupid leaf
>>60584620
Stupid towel pattern.
>>60584596
>Still, things change. I'm not gonna update my will frequently. So it should be a 'living' will.
Do you mean you intend to change your husband often?
>But under contemporary Italian law, one parent dies, the fag husband is losing his kid.
Only if daddy doesn't choose to appoint hubby legal guardian.
>>60584620
your not even a real country
>white russian is a fucking cocktail
>>60584733
You are just jealous because we are not a US puppet.
>>60584691
>Do you mean you intend to change your husband often?
M8, I'm not gay. And no.
>Only if daddy doesn't choose to appoint hubby legal guardian.
Or, and just hear me out, choose hubby as father.
>>60584596
>And immigration issues?
Don't really give a fuck, but the amount of immigrants coming these years is just objectively unsustainable, especially considering the fact that we already have unemployment issues.
>>60584749
im really jealous i wasnt born in belarus tbqhwy
>>60584749
what the fuck are you then putin's condom?
>>60584806
Go get shot, put in prison, get aids from being raped by a black man and then go bankrupt from medical bills.
>>60584852
White Russia.
>>60584804
Kick the fucking Moroccans out! That's all I wanted you to say. Fuck Moroccans.
And not to mention the poo-in-loos and negros who peddle shit in your streets. It's disgusting.
Mussolini parte due, quando? Seriously, m8. End this shit.
>>60584879
ok i will thx
>>60584756
>M8, I'm not gay. And no.
Then what was the point about changing the will about?
>Or, and just hear me out, choose hubby as father.
There's only two kinds of father: biological (which the hubby ain't) and adopted (which the hubby can't be while the biological one is alive and in charge of the kid). This regardless of gay marriage. The stepfather is not automatically the legal guardian of the kid unless he adopts it in a straight marriage either.
>>60574872
>1. Cunt
flag
>2. Does your Cunt give a fuck about what two consenting adults do to each other?
no
>3. Your stance on it
as long as i dont have to watch them do it, i dont give a fuck.
>>60584913
>Then what was the point about changing the will about?
Not changing. Evolving.
>There's only two kinds of father: biological (which the hubby ain't) and adopted (which the hubby can't be while the biological one is alive and in charge of the kid). This regardless of gay marriage. The stepfather is not automatically the legal guardian of the kid unless he adopts it in a straight marriage either.
Let's say I'm adopted. To me, my parents are the ones who raised me not the ones who unleashed me from their loins.
>>60584879
fuck off traktorovich your a fucking cocktail ruled by a dictator
>>60585022
>fuck off traktorovich your a fucking cocktail ruled by a dictator
>>60585079
kek
>>60584981
>Not changing. Evolving.
The difference being?
>To me
Noone cares. From a legal point of view (which is the only one that matters to the public eye), your parents are whoever the law says they are. Which would be your biological parents, or in their absence, whoever was appointed your legal guardian.
What you feel is your own business and not the government, stop forcing other people to give a shit about you.
>>60585079
ok you win im a degenerate
>>60584906
Muzzies are worst-tier immigrants but their children tend to assimilate pretty well (Even though they often end being the "thug" children, compared to the asian nerds)
>>60574872
>May 2016
>just in the month we legalized civil unions for faggots
>no increase
???
>>60574872
Yes
Yes
I don't think they should be allowed to get married in a religious ceremony but they should have same benefits as married couple.
>>60585276
God dammit, m8.
>>60585448
????
>>60585496
Just tell the immigrants to fuck off.
>>60585079
>>60576532
>>60590029
What does that mean?
>>60574872
>I DON'T LIKE IT, THEREFORE IT HAS TO BE ILLEGAL, OR ELSE!
>IT'S LEGAL, THEREFORE YOU HAVE TO LIKE IT!, OR ELSE!
What's wrong with the rest of Europe? Why can't you separate your laws from your feefees?
