What do you guys think about it?
>>60347927
I like it
>>60347927
big businesses would fill the power vacuum of no government
AnCaps correctly identify the state as a tool of repression, but refuse to acknowledge its capacity to be a bulwark against non state tyranny. Communists correctly identify the potential for powerful individuals to become tyrannical, but they too often fail to recognize the potential of the state to do the same. The only sensible choice is to keep both the state and state actors in check by equitably distributing both wealth and political power.
In short, libertarian socialism is the only way to freedom.
I think it's a weird political movement tbqh, because the state is just a corporation that can use legitimized force.
>>60347927
It's just fair. People who want differently are just lazy fags and go for muh welfare.
>>60347927
anything with "anarcho-" in its name is a meme ideology for edgy teenagers
The lack of authority would only end up in another form of authority: end of anarchy. The best option we have is minarchy. The state should be powerful enough to protect itself from internal and external forces, and be a judge, but it's responsibilities should be restricted to these.
>>60348615
true, but the natural state of anarchy would be a capitalistic society in today's world anyway
>>60348068
Equality isn't necessary for freedom, and often equating "differents" mean restricting freedom of at least one of them.
>>60348159
Exactly. Right-Libertarianism and Anarcho-Capitalism are absurd because state oppression is not inherently worse than oppression by private individuals.
>>60349033
Individuals have no legitimized force tho, that's the thing. State oppression and individual oppression differ greatly. The first can use any means (I am taking X and here is some money for it), the second can only try to create situations (I will buy your car for the price you want, but only if you sell X too) to enforce his will
>>60349033
opression this, opression, that
what is opression anyways?
capitalism is the diametral opposite of anarchism insofar as it is built completely on the right (and all rights are given and protected by a state, otherwise they would not be rights) of property. therefore, anarchocapitalism is an oxymoron. it can not logically exist.
(((which als explains why it has never existed))))
what is it?
I'll just leave this here for anybody who's not seen it.. Yes sorry it's leddit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarcho_Capitalism/comments/3ucp8y/i_was_beat_up_by_left_anarchists_in_greece/
more like anarchoCRAPitalism amirite
>>60349033
Right-libertarian is not absurd. It simply wishes to limit the power the state has over the individual, not supplant it completely like in anarcho-capitalism.
>>60347927
capitalism and non aggression are pretty based
>>60348068
the king doesnt righfully own "his" land. first user/ homestaeder owns it or it can be acquired by non fraudulent and voluntarily transaction
>>60348159
how is it legitimized?
>>60350452
people accept it
>>60348058
Sure they would
>>60347927
I will vote in absolutelly anyone that is liberal.
Jesus christ, there is no liberal politician in this country appart from NOVO candidates and based Paulo Batista.
>>60347927
You guys need to expose the Money Printers if you want any justice in society.
As long as they get to decide how much money to print and who get the loans, they rule everyone else.
Focus your energy on them if you want fairness in society.
>>60350108
>https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarcho_Capitalism/comments/3ucp8y/i_was_beat_up_by_left_anarchists_in_greece/
What
a
fucking
joke.
Pretty dumb; it's really just for teenagers that don't realize people will exploit at any given chance.
Not that capitalism is bad, I love it to death; but unregulated capitalism will just result in fiefdoms
