What do you think of my theory /int/ ?
>>59831132
we arent nationalists and usa and england are more nationalist than france
>>59831132
Germany/France >>>>>>>>>>> USA
>>59831132
Good country in your point of view is cucked country with no go zones and media censorship?
>>59831210
usa has higher gdp per capita than both of them even tho it has a huge population and alot of other problems
>>59831132
shit country = many nationalists
many nationalists =/= shit country tb.h
>>59831268
you are saying the butthurt belt , russia and muslim cunts dont have censorship ?
>>59831269
>usa has higher gdp per capita
huge wealth gap makes averages meaningless
>>59831303
But they don't saying about lack of free media and lack of democracy in other countries...
Look at germany or sweden they saying that our democracy in danger, because we elected for normal catholic-nationalistic goverment and hur dur free media are in danger.
but desu in poland we have more freedom of media than in this countries.
>>59831132
It's the shitiness of the country that causes nationalism, not the other way around.
>>59831132
>Y=-X
It's not
>>59831132
It's bad. England is shit
>>59831203
maroccans are the most nationalistic and insecure people of the planet, but yes, that is only part of magreb
>>59831132
England is extremely nationalistic m8
Especially in fucking Cornwall for some fucking reason
>>59831132
> Y=-X
>If the country is a utopia its nationalist population is negative
>tfw you will never have an anti-matter minority in your country
>>59831132
>USA is less nationalistic than krautistan or france
>y=-x
I'm going to beat your shit when I find you
>>59831132
>y=-x
>>59831132
That's not a theory, just an observation.
A theory would explain this phenomena.
Does X cause Y? Does Y cause X? Are they unrelated?
>>59831269
Nice meme measurement
