Memes aside, how do Uralic and Turkic /pol/acks feel about Turanism? I want to see if anyone actually supports it outside of fingol memes.
1: ethnicity if ethnic group doesnt have own country(ie Tatars, Karelians, Komi)
2: Do you support the unification of the Uralic peoples?
3: Do you believe that all Turkics should be united?
4: Do you believe in the Ural-Altaic family group?
5: Do you want Ural-Altaics to be unified?
6: If your ethnic group isn't Asian looking( ie Finns, Estonians, Turks, Azeris) do you believe that you are descended from Asians?
7: Do you think Hungarians are Turkic or Uralic?
8: If Turan/pan Turkic/pan Uralic nation was created. how decentralized would you want it?
Nobody?
1. tatars are not turkic
2. are you serious?
3. i dont give a shit
4. "believe", its not a family group
5. are you serious
6. you are stupid
7. we arent turkic, fuck off mehmet
8. fuck this turkic meme
fuck off
In order to understand the logical foundation you would need to study Turkic culture and principles of human migration in general.
>>59777707
>Tatars are not Turkic
Wat
>>59777390
>turanism
rolf kek.
>>59778170
prety much this. fun part is that tatars were forced to speak this shit language by mongol left overs.
>>59777390
>Uralic nation
rolf kek.
its like turkish neonazi education weat dream list
Japan(the3th GDP,only the country beated modern euro army)
korea(copy of japan,strong nationality)
china(next superpower,5000years history)
turkish(leader of arab,strong army)
russia(rival of US,the biggest area,manly people)
finnish(stable society,super good at math and sience)
hungarian(the most beautiful capital city,super good at math and sience)
CA countries(good anti US sprit)
sound good actually
>>59777390
>ethnicity if ethnic group doesnt have own country(ie Tatars, Karelians, Komi)
Idioto, they hae own republis with own constitutions and presidents.
>>59778597
>russia
>modern euro army
>>59778635
>they
Majority in "their" republics are russkies. Although you're right. It's like loads of tiny Ukraines in Russia.
>>59778673
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8B64gmKWn8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2TQ0wAfRts
Do you have anything similar?
>>59778256
No Tatars are turkic.
>>59778703
1900 russia
>>59778703
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQinARpbru8
>>59778740
>No Tatars are turkic.
no! they are ariens.
>>59778759
You're just Russian oblast, comrade Peka.
>>59778841
i'm defending russia here you fucking moron. russia was in the worst condition it has ever been when some colored country sank a few of its ships
>/pol/acks
GTFO.
>>59777390
Can someone post this pic's version of texas?
I've looked for it, but can't find it.
All Turanians, especially Jews, should be sterilized.
>>59777707
>tatars are not turkic
>>59777390
hungarian here.
i pretty much prefer turanism, mostly of cultural, archaeological, folklore etc. reasons.
1. hungol
2. no but a cultural and/or economical community would be nice
3. turanic=turkic+uralic+altaic and see 2.
4. see 3.
5. see 2.
6. not asians like mongols or chinese, but more like kazakhs, tuvans. somewhere between european and steppe asian. hungarians were like this before the middle age when we blended up with slavs and german-saxons and became fully european-like
7. somewhere between but more like uralic
8. NO. I prefer nationalism and nation-states but the acknowledgement, awareness, respect, help and cooperation between nations' brotherhood should be mandatory
>>59780067
you will never get your furniture empire back no matter how hard you shill this turkic maymay
>>59780555
stfu cousin. we will integrate your ass in near future.
>>59777390
Jesus Australia, it's a fucking maymay not something that warrants serious discussion.
>>59783498
This desu
>>59780471
>I prefer nationalism and nation-states but the acknowledgement, awareness, respect, help and cooperation between nations' brotherhood should be mandatory
this.
>>59777390
It's a an outdated theory and nobody believes in it anymore, autist
>>59792174
>let me just bump this thread that was about to 404 for you
2. Greater Finland should have been created a 100 years ago and it should have included the Finnic peoples to the north and to the east of Gulf of Finland. Estonia was already too different.
3. Yes and their united turkic country should be located to the east of caspian sea and west of mongolia
4. that's bs
5. No. Let the turks turk and us Finns be Finns
6. We are not asians like east asians but before we settled in Europe (4000 years before the indo-europeans) our ancestors might have lived in western Siberia
7. genetically they are like the others peoples around there but their language belongs to the ugric branch of Uralic languages and it's closest relatives are the Khanty and Mansi languages. Genes and languages don't always move together
8. I couldn't care less about the centralisation of the panturkic nation in central asia
Pan uralic wouldn't work. There are too many different groups in the uralic family.
The samoyedics are completely different from the rest.
Finno-Ugric divides to the ugric branch of hungarian, khanty and mansi and the finno-permic branch.
Permic udmurts, komis and maris have little common with the Finnics and Samis
Pan Finnic state could have worked out if it was created 100 years ago
>>59777390
its an an excuse by t*rks to steal more land. as if north cyprus wasn't enough.
Apparently half of central asia is turkey which is clearly bullshit.
Maybe a few countries near turkey but not as much as it claims.
