Why the historical grievance against turks from europeans? Turks
You are currently reading a thread in /int/ - International
Why the historical grievance against turks from europeans?
Turks actually treated christians and pagans better than how christians treated other religions.
designated
shitting
Streets
>>53434546
>>53434611
>>53434651
>>53434546
>>53434611
>>53434651
>>53434515
Lel sure ask the Chaldeans or Yazidis
It's just banter, everyone here knows that Turks are based and friends of the west.
>>53434515
>Turks actually treated christians and pagans better than how christians treated other religions.
>>53434546
>>53434611
>>53434651
alright that was pretty quick
/thread
>>53434745
no they're not, fuck off
>>53434842
Yes they are Chang, the joke must have past over your head.
>>53434763
better is the keyword here.
Ottomans let christians be while church was thorough in removing paganism in the late antiquity.
>>53434515
I posted this over 9000 times but I can do it one more time.
This is the literacy rate in yugoslavia in 1931.
You can literally see the former austrian/turkish border even after 60 years of turks GTFOing
cont.
>>53434515
Half true desu. Turks let Christians keep their religion and traditions under the Ottoman Empire, but tried to brainwash and genocide them via the Janissaries and treated them like shit after Greece's independence.
They were more kind than arabs were in the conquests, just ask traditional berber or nestorian people. OH WAIT, arabs killed them all
>>53434763
Yeah we're sorry that we saved you from Catholic Venetians.They would probably impale your ancestors ass until all orthodox people convert to catholicism.Oh we're also sorry that unlike "white"people we treated our slaves like humans.We should have cut off your hand like Belgians did to niggers,instead our balkanic "slaves" became great soldiers or statesman.Fucking ungrateful retards
>>53435068
here are the GDP indexes for 1984.
So, even after 110 years and heavy subsidies from both Slovenia and Croatia, Belgrade (the capital city) is behind Ljubljana and Zagreb (slovene and croatian capitals) and even other random croatian cities.
Don't forget to take into account that capitals are almost always the richest parts of the country because of how centralisation, economic markets and so on work.
Almost always, that is, unless you were ruled by the Turk.
>Turkey
not even once
>>53435183
>this is what retarded t*rks believe
>>53435183
You fucking invented impaling you faggot
>>53435352
Are you implying most statesmen didn't come from devshirme ? Because that's historically wrong.
>>53435159
The alternative would have been- being annexed by Italian or Frankish states. Ironically, orthodox church had better chance of survival under the ottomans I think.
>>53438960
I would give anything to be conquered by Venetians instead of Turks. In fact large parts of Greece were under western powers instead of Turks. They turned out much better.
>>53435183
The Ottomans kidnapped a lot of white children in the Balkans though.
>>53434546
>>53434611
>>53434651
noice, quick and to the point.
>>53434745
>Turk
>Based
Pick one
>>53435183
>Yeah we're sorry that we saved you from Catholic Venetians.They would probably impale your ancestors ass
Is this sarcasm? Impaling, mutilating and skinning was exactly how the turks dealt with the venetian garrisons of Cyprus and Candia.
>>53434515
>Turks actually treated christians and pagans better than how christians treated other religions.
Yeah lemme go ask the large numbers of Assyrians left today.
Oh
>>53434515
>French colonization, British colonization, Spanish colonization, German colonization
>Ottoman colo...conquest
>Mughal co...ahem, expansion
>Chinese...cough cough...sphere of influence
>Mongol...cough cough cough snortle...invasion
>Al-andalus...cough snortle cough cough barf cough...golden age
>>53441324
Are you trying to say that brown people can do wrong?
Inconceivable! Don't you have any white guilt?
>>53441324
fucking nazi
>tfw no qt naan bread-eating indian professor
>>53441324
Yeah? Ottomans, Mughals, and the Mongols didn't colonise the places, they conquered them, and ruled them directly. Do you even know what colony means?
>Christians
>Humans
The ensuing massacre was indiscriminate: neither women nor children were spared, and Latin patients lying in hospital beds were murdered.[4] Houses, churches, and charities were looted.[4] Latin clergymen received special attention, and Cardinal John, the papal legate, was beheaded and his head was dragged through the streets at the tail of a dog.[3][13]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_of_the_Latins
>>53441324
Chinese conquest was actually the other way around.
There's a saying about this:
For example if you're a Mongol and invade China, China doesn't become Mongol, you become Chinese.
>>53435183
>Castration
>Human
I want to be human with you right know
>>53441197
>basing the empire's history on the final few years under regime where the sultan had no power
