Let's look up the websites of our capital cities.
Notice that top-tier countries (UK in this example) contain
>clean designs
>regularly updated
>fully mobile responsive
The shit-tier example (Nigeria) is
>10 years out of date
>barely updated
>confusing
>not mobile responsive
With this - we can determine the tier of a country through their capital cities official website
Another example
The Helsinki website demonstrates a prime example of classic Finnish design - up to date with current trends.
The Moscow website looks alright, but it's no longer 2005 - almost like they don't give a fuck what it looks like today? - as long as it has the relevant information...
What do you think? Check out your current country's websites for capital cities and more...
not the capital city but the most relevant city
and my city too
not that bad desu
>>52763555
>many languages
>useful info
>easy to navigate
>has a list of useful mobile apps
>>52763719
>thinking anyone outside /int/ knows any other city but rio
Noticed some cities don't actually have website but the countries do - so these are acceptable too
In the case of Moldova...
... Yeah, looks pretty welcoming don't cha think?
Uganda...
So close, but no cigar.
Milan
>>52763840
being known by normies doesn't make it relevant
são paulo's turism is business focused my paki friend
http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/site/index.php
it's alright I suppose
GAMBIA
>>52764304
http://thisisedinburgh.com/
no wait, I suppose this is the actual one, the one I posted before is just the council site
>>52764367
>http://thisisedinburgh.com/
either or, i mean it represents your city and your people la
Looks alright, I suppose.
>This is the website that is supposed to make me want to visit Mauritania
>>52764508
I find it quite appealing
>>52764592
wew
>>52764592
based alberto
>>52764592
wew
Clean but very formal. Doesn't feel welcoming desu.
JUST
>>52764860
Oh wait, there are two of them actually. I think this one is for tourists.
>>52764990
kek'd
