[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Who would win?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /int/ - International

Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 5
File: image.png (76 KB, 2214x959) Image search: [Google]
image.png
76 KB, 2214x959
>me
>Roma Victor
>Yellow rats cannot match western civilization.
>>
>chinese
>win a war against the west
>>
White people always win.
>>
China
>>
File: image.jpg (2 MB, 4940x3740) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
2 MB, 4940x3740
>>52635906
Chinks can't even produce fucking metals.
https://en.m.wikiversity.org/wiki/Comparison_between_Roman_and_Han_Empires
>>
File: 1445802426564.jpg (646 KB, 1920x1131) Image search: [Google]
1445802426564.jpg
646 KB, 1920x1131
>>52635670
It's all about organization and numbers to be honest. The chinese often fought with 100,000+ soldiers if I'm not mistaken.
>>
>>52635952
but not today
>>
>>52635670
Do you want to know who the real winners here would be?
The Steppe nomads, the Germanic tribes, The Celts, the Turkic tribes, since they could easily riot and fucking everything over while the armies were busy killing each other. Also Persia would probably find a way to profiteer from this conflict.
>>
File: image.gif (639 KB, 765x759) Image search: [Google]
image.gif
639 KB, 765x759
>>52637178
>>
There would be no winner, both would be anihilated because of nukes.
>>
>>52637053
Didn't 10,000 Romans beat an army of 200,000 in Britain once? How well organised were these Chinese people?
>>
>>52635670
Chinese. Time and time again, Romans were BTFO by steppe cavalry. If the Chinese could round up some proto-Mongol auxiliary troops, they would massively win.

Roman communication and transportat was also based on sea access. They wouldn't be able to fight in Central Asia at all.
>>
>>52637306
No, Persia would be destroyed because much of the fighting would be in their territory.
>>
>>52637551
I have no idea but I do know that the romans won countless battles against much bigger numbers.
Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 5

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.