Should have let him drown
>monarchy
what a fag
Oh God it's spreading south, even Danes look like fuccbois now.
BUILD WALL
>>52431093
>implying it didn't spread from south to north
Build wall all around Germany and stay in.
Don't fuck with the Scandinavian kings you donkey.
>>52430788
Monarchy is based tbqh. Only Communist and Republican shitholes are against Monarchy.
>>52431808
Monarchy is only for cucks.
Like really you'd have to be a huge faggot to believe in monarchy
>>52432156
t. Republican shithole
>>52432196
Can you rationalize believing that someone is worth more than the rest of the population because he was born to royal (read: inbred) blood?
>>52432274
>Can you rationalise believing that a nigger is worth more than the rest of the population because he was voted for by a bunch of other niggers?
>>52431791
>mfw Swedish royalty used to be french peasants
The cucking goes back for centuries
>electing partisan political kings
>>52432156
In the UK at least monarchy is actually beneficial, I think they did a calculation or some shit that the average tax-payer pays 10 pence less in tax money because of the amount of tourism UK makes of the monarchy.
The same can probably not be said in Sweden, but still. And there are many other benefits than just milking cash from the monarchy.
>>52431808
>America
>communist
Monarchy is statism which is leftism.
t. American politics pro
>>52432376
The king is a descendant of Vasa.
>having a figurehead monarchy
>literally WE
>>52432433
I said Republican shitholes. Such as America.
>>52432345
So you cant?
And by the way I'm not a unitedstatian nor do I believe in democracy, specially not in the shitty 2 party system these retards have.
So are you going to reply or just continue with your ad hominem bullshit goddamn retard
Wow how can you be so cruel
He's just a little boy
>>52432427
>using government as a tourist attraction
Holy shit senpai
>>52432433
Monarchy is conservatism. You, sons of the revolution, are the leftists.
>going to war to remove ruling class
>class war
>marxist
murricans = marxists tbtfhwyf
>>52432596
>implying he won't grow up to be a douche leech worse than 1000 niggers.
The monarchies exist for tourism and economic purposes. I'm not sure why Denmark still has one because no one cares about their royal family. But the UK one gives massive benefits.
>>52432661
>Implying Mexicans are not by default worthless niggers
>Americans talking shit about Monarchy
Funny considering America is a Oligarchy. Fucking idiots. Our Royalty is just for show, meanwhile yours run your country
>lifeguard just sitting around
>accidentally a young boys life
I wish I could do my job without knowing about it
>>52432688
>>52432638
>>52432345
You sure have great arguments, lel.
I guess it would be near impossible for someone stupid enough to believe in monarchy to think rationaly.
;_;
>>52432662
Its also tradition, part of the cultural identity and representative purposes
Our monarchy isn't just good for tourist bux
Since we have a parliamentary system, we need a head of state. It's either going to be a monarch or a president. Presidents also cost money.
If we got rid of the monarchy we'd still be paying for a president and his/her family's security, we'd still be paying for upkeep of various buildings, etc.
So, rationally, there's no good reason to get rid of the monarchy
>>52432750
The whole world is run by an oligarchy.
>>52432811
We have our arguments. Republicans have no arguments, they just default to "well I don't support that".
I cried so much when princess Diana died
>>52432879
Yeah, and most of those are American.
Why can't you guys just keep your shittyness to yourself instead of infecting the rest of the world with it?
>>52432638
Conservatism is different depending on the culture the conservative is in. In America, monarchy is against conservatism since it is against our traditional values. Hell, I think our liberals are probably more fond of the British monarchy and more likely to think succession from the British empire was a mistake (mainly because Britain wanted to maintain more positive relations with the natives by not expanding west in order to keep them allied with them against France, Britain ended the slave trade earlier, etc etc that would make us more progressive if we stayed with Britain).
>Their economy is so poor that they have to make money from celebrities
>>52432917
Your arguments are that you apparently NEED a head of state and that it also costs money to have a president. Therefore fuck having a democratically elected head of state who has the consent of its people to rule and just keep the royals who were obviously born with the divine right to rule over us cuckolds and peasants?
And I don't even believe in democracy. But those are your arguments.
>>52432811
Considering that most of the top free, least corrupt nations in the world are Constitutional Monarchies, I think the argument speaks for itself.
The system works very well and there is no logical argument against it other than emotional/ideological arguments
>>52433020
Fuck off, we aren't the source, we were invaded by the Rothschilds.
see: Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Jackson, JFK
>>52433050
If the Head of State doesn't have power why does it need to be democratically elected? In Britain, power is invested in the House of Commons. The legislature has supremacy.
It's completely different to the USA where the Head of State has power
>>52433058
Constitutional monarquies? So "monarchies" "lel our nation's government is a joke and a tourist attraction"
What about real monarquies like Saudi Arabia? Much of europe before modern times? North Korea? Hardly would call them anything but shitholes.
>>52433050
>rule
Our Queen doesn't rule anything.
The British Monarchy was cUcked by British parliament a long time ago. It's funny seeing Americans thinking that the Queen is some all powerful figure that controls the country, when in reality she is simply a show piece that has some ceremonial power to make her still look relevant.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8sQIti_9-A
>>52433058
There is no logical argument for it except emotional or doing it for the shits and goggles
>muuuuh old shity form of governance is my culture
>tfw no Danish gf
That Danish Youtuber is so qt.
>>52433197
North Korea is a Republican Dictatorship. Saudi Arabia is a Muslim theocracy first and a monarchy second. Most of Europe was fine under Monarchs.
>>52433197
>monarquies
hello juan, do you think it's hard to find shitty republics without going back hundreds of years in time?
>>52433035
Yeah, anti-colonialist US '''''liberals''''' love the empire and queen lad
>>52433227
p sure she's reptilian head of iluuminati senpai
and she owns all the swans in england, that's a lot of bird
>>52433264
>>52433197
Non-white republicans detected
True Anglos are monarchists and redpilled on the treason of 1776
>>52433227
I know your queen doesn't rule shit, as I stated above your system is more like a joke and a game than a real government
And im not a dirty unitedstatian, respond to my post rather than insult me based on what nationality you think I am you dirty fuckin jew
>>52433197
"Real Monarchy"
No such thing, retard. A monarchy is a monarchy. The power it has in it's respective country is irrelevant. It's still a fucking Monarchy by definition.
Absolute Monarchies are objectively bad which is why European countries either got rid of them or reformed them into Constitutional Monarchies
>>52433264
I just fucking said that it speaks for itself. The most democratic, least corrupt nations in the world are Constitutional Monarchies.
Absolutely shit tier reply
>>52433264
The public prefer the head of State to be a figure of continuity and a living link with our history, rather than the result of a pointless popularity contest.
As I said >>52433138, if the head of State is a mere figurehead, why does it need to be democratically elected?
>>52433353
>Yeah, anti-colonialist US '''''liberals''''' love the empire and queen lad
I knew a super liberal feminist Indian girl who was a Britboo, it was the most confusing thing ever.
>>52433197
>north korea
>monarchy
Saudi Arabians generally enjoy a high quality of life, Europe was fine under absolute monarchy.
Constitutional monarchy doesn't mean that the monarch is purely ceremonial (though that can be the case). Liechtenstein and Jordan are examples of constitutional monarchies where the monarch exercises real executive power.
>>52433379
How is it a joke?
The system works and has worked for 100s of years. What is the issue?
The Royal family is a figurehead, what's the point of democratically electing a figurehead? Did Americans vote in Uncle Sam?
>>52432869
It also gives us a powerless figurehead who cant translate their position into political power, like Putin or Obama.
Theyre basically really comfortable slaves, whose life is chosen for them before theyre born. But no republican has ever used that argument, because they only care about money, not human beings.
Friendly reminder the Denmark royal line will forever be cucked with Anglo Australian bogan blood
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LL633iypm4
Americans are jealous because they will never have power like this that unites them together, you have president that represents one extreme side so you will never be united.
>leaders who win popularity contests are magically better better because ???
Honestly I can't believe republicans eat this horseshit.
>Britain why are you destroying your nation?
>Britain why do you have a monarchy?
>>52433436
Saudi Arabians only have a high quality of life because of the oil money. And for the aspects of life that the government has influence over, it's shit for most people in Saudi Arabia. I highly doubt women, immigrant workers, non Muslims*, etc etc would be treated so badly in a comparably wealthy, secular democracy.
*which includes Muslims that don't fit Saudi Arabia's extremely strict definition
GOD
>>52433477
This desu
In many countries with ceremonial presidents, the people don't give a fuck about the head of state. Most don't even show up for presidential elections. Literally irrelevant.
Might as well have a neat relic of the past as a symbol of continuity and stability at the head.
If the UK didn't have the Queen then who would their edgelord comedians make fun of?
>>52433353
>the US president will never EVER own as many swans as the Queen
take THAT republishits
>>52433593
So how about Netherlands, Scandinavia and Luxembourg? You're making an absolute fool out of yourselves, it's clearly working and has been for years. Literally no real reason to change it.
SAVE
>>52433332
Fuck, forgot "qui" doesn't sound like "kee" in english.
It's José btw and I'm done arguing with you people
>>52433368
You really ought to use a tripcode or fuck off back to /pol/
Check these repeating digits royal dick sucking muthafukas
>>52433682
I was clearly talking about absolute monarchies. I actually like countries keeping their monarchies for ceremonial purposes.
>>52433693
>>52433636
fuck thread is too active oh well
>>52433693
>muh correlation implies causation
I know you royalists cucks hate logic and only make baseless arguments but goddam it annoys me.
>>52433636
>>52433693
>>52433784
God save the Queen, lad
>>52430788
>royal not being able to swim
shameful, are we sure he isn't the prince of detroit
>>52433693
>correlation = causation
I think that can easily be explained by the most undeveloped countries being ex colonies that had their monarchies destroyed when they were colonized by Europeans. Countries that managed to keep their monarchies were more often than not the colonizer, so of course they're more developed.
>>52433593
Salafism can be blamed for the issues. Oman is an example of a more traditional Islamic monarchy and it also enjoys a very high quality of life. Absolute monarchies are perfectly fine, I think westerners have just been brought up to hate nobility and the idea of duty.
>>52433709
Yes, it's easy to back out of an argument when you are clearly losing it.
>>52433852
Leave them be, they don't care for logic
>>52432610
I went to DC a couple years ago to see all the great culture they have there
>As if
>Danish royals were at my local beach
>I could have thanked Danish royalty in person for Danish tin biscuits where I keep my sewing stuff
Aww
>>52433852
>correlation = causation
just fuck off back to reddit m8, there you''ll get a bunch of americans upvoting you
Getting rid of the monarchy is a leftists wet dream
this is why I support it wholeheartedly
A neutral icon for country is important. For some it might be an eagle, for some it's a royal family.
>>52433381
>I just fucking said that it speaks for itself. The most democratic, least corrupt nations in the world are Constitutional Monarchies.
Feels good to be the exception to the rule. (Along with based mountainjewland)
>>52433880
I don't believe in arguing with people who don't believe in logic and reason
>>52433870
I'm not denying that some (absolute) monarchies can be good, but the problem is when you have a bad one and can't vote them out of power.
>>52433941
What was so reddit about pointing out his logical fallacy?
>>52433980
There are plenty of elected leaders who couldn't be elected out either, I don't think that democracies are exempt from the problem. Whatever sort of government countries are only as good as the people in them.
>>52434025
As I said above they don't believe in logic.
Its best to stop arguing with them and post dubs
>>52433368
Enjoy you're "redpills" you traitorous shit
>>52434060
>democracies can become undemocratic so therefore non democracy is just as good as democracy in the first place
Ebin
>>52434025
No one has seriously implied that the reason they are democratic and free is because of their monarchies. It's just a post for show, like reddit.
>>52433805
It's more cuck to have a islamophilic anti-Anglo kenyan rule over you than someone of the same ethno-linguistic-cultural group tbqh
Monarchists are ruled by their own kind, republicucks enjoy being ruled by kenyans
>>52434211
Except for right here >>52433636
>his country doesn't have a monarchy
barbarism-tier
>>52434182
Elected leaders can be fucking awful and voters can be stupid enough to vote them over and over. Nether system is any "better" (whatever that means)
It almost amuses me how royalists and zionists seem incapable of responding to an argument without some shit like "b-but you're a sand nigger lover" "but y-you have a nigger president"
Alot funnier when I'm not even a unitedstatian lel.
>>52433020
>Bankers
>having any loyalty to nations
>>52434369
Meant for >>52434225
>>52434316
>monarchy haters are non white.jpg
Ah yes, a very serious addition to the discussion
>>52434165
>>52434316
The only anti-monarchy argument that fat Republipakis have is "It's undemocratic!" when constitutional monarchies usually show otherwise. The only countries that can handle Republicanism are west Euro ones
>>52434369
>not even a unitedstatian
Was the Rio Grande chilly?
>>52434506
I know, he took it a lot more seriously than I would have thought lmao
>>52434506
Did you read the caption in the picture? It literally said constitutional monarchies tended to be more developed. I wasn't comment on the race of anti monarchy people. I already said, I'm in favor of keeping monarchies for ceremonial reasons, but I don't believe having one is the reason why those countries are more developed.
>>52434369
But there are no arguments from the people claiming we should get rid of them. They have no power and only work as representatives in the way Finland and Germany's presidents do. In Norway's case there are plenty of arguments to be made against constitutional monarchy, but none of them are adressed on here, because you're simply clueless about the situation.
>>52434512
I don't know, I snuck in with through NM.
Does an english man's dick feel warm in your mouth?
>>52434512
I simply explained that I don't think having a constitutional monarchy is why those countries are more developed/democratic, it's just those countries managed to preserve their monarchies more often because they either weren't colonized recently, or weren't communist.
>>52434510
>cucks
ayy lmao
We chose our God Emperor, you've just been brainwashed to love yours.
>>52434510
I don't think lot of Americans worship Obama right now
>>52434775
Quite a few did when he was elected. Was quite weird. I guess people thought he'd end up not as awful as Bush.
>>52434673
>Responds to me supporting the good guys of the revolution with penis fantasies
lewd dude
>>52434775
It was a joke la, the Queen doesn't make royal decrees here either
>>52434881
m8, those are clearly your fantasies. No homo on my part
>>52434881
I guess black people saw him as some kind Jesus Christ
>>52434512
>English "democracy"
>No term limits for MPs or PMs
>democratic
>>52435064
What do term limits have to do with democracy?
>>52435064
How are term limits democratic you moron? Would really love to see your argumentation here. They literally restrict the will of the people.
>>52430788
Republicanism is sure going well for Mexico isnt it?
>>52435161
The mexican monarchy did much better?
Fuck off cuck.
>>52434993
http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeew
>>52435149
america is literally the text book definition of democracy
>>52435199
Sounds like you know a lot about your home countries' Monarchy
>>52435199
When you kill your monarchy things dont tend to go well. Theres no need to be mad of your inferiority :^)
>>52435116
>>52435149
It literally provides the framework for eventual full control of power and dictatorship.
>>52435217
But m8, I'm not a unitedstatian. Its like the 8th time I've said so itt
I think the US has a very shit system, probably hate its government more than you ever could
>>52435326
How come?
>>52435326
Your mum being a whore provides the framework for your newest brother to be calling me daddy. Restricting the will of the people because something "might" happen is how people justify banning political parties and ideals.
Term limits were relevant back when Americans would've gladly had a new king, they haven't been relevant for a long time since
>>52435486
Look at stuff like Burundi m8.
Or scarface.
Power corrupts
>>52435416
>Not from the US
>Anti-Anglo republican
Hmm, I'm guessing Ireland?
Calling the paddywagon, micks out
>>52435544
>44
Ohh shiit
This is now clearly a dubz thread
>>52435544
Nice, no arguments.
>>52435595
The way he uses United Statian I'm assuming spic
>>52435595
Not republican, not anti anglo, not Irish.
Like lmao, when do irish call you people unitedstatians
Doesn't matter what I am nor what I believe. Isn't the whole purpose of an anonymous imageboard not to insult people on basis of status, nationality, etc but rather to insult them based on what they wrote?
>>52435326
The only reason why America has term limits is because George Washington didn't feel like serving more than twice and everyone else just went ahead and copied him.
>No term limits for MPs
The American equivalent to those are called senators and representatives, and they don't have any term limits.
>>52435696
>Isn't the whole purpose of an anonymous imageboard not to insult people on basis of status, nationality, etc but rather to insult them based on what they wrote?
ahahahahaha
>>52435599
>>52435599
>that 99
Royalists btfo
>>52435766
Nice 66 m8
>>52432376
>peasant
>his father was a prosecutor
>>52435726
>Doesn't even know the history of American Term Limits
The only reason we have term limits is because FDR got six consecutive terms in office because of and everyone was fucking tired of it.
>>52435696
Referring to Americans as United Statians definitely makes you a spic.
>>52435996
Bingo. Was it that hard to figure out my judeo-anglo friend?
Also > 996
If you had waited a second or two to hit "reply" on that shitty post you could have gotten trips. What a waste
>>52435326
Kek,it allows them to actually make some sort of progress, instead of desperately sucking dicks to sray in power.
That's why America failed as a superpower.
>>52435884
>because FDR got six consecutive terms in office
3 and a bit
>and everyone was fucking tired of it.
Is that why they kept voting for him?
>>52433936
Kek, next time you go to D.C go to anncostia crossing. Get a taste of the real D.C.
>>52431093
>12 year olds look like fuccbois
More news at 6.
>>52439049
I want a 12 yo girlfriend. Tbh I wouldn't even care if she was male, just as long as she's cute.
>>52439186
m8
