Why won't America sell some of these dank carriers?
I bet Germany could use a couple.
>>52351318
what for?
>>52351364
immigrant housing
>amerinoramps
>>52351364
Carry immigrants back to their homes
>>52351364
Bombing immigrants
>>52351364
Retrieving immigrants
Lend them to us, USA
Imagine the glory of a giant, floating bridge made of lined up carriers that goes from Sicily to Libya, with millions and millions of Africans crossing it daily, trains packed ready to departe with giant signs on them "Paris" "Berlin" "Wien" "Amsterdam" "Oslo" "Stockholm"
Glorious
>>52351318
Our defense budget is way too small. We can't even maintain what meagre airforce we have.
>>52351318
why werent nips smart enough to attack pearl harbor when it was full like this?
>>52351489
As soon as they shit up the rest of Europe they'll just move to Italy, you know that, right?
>>52351535
That would require forward thinking an patience, Japs unfortunately possess neither of these skills.
>>52351537
We'll earn the badge "bantz masters" and "last man", at least
it's not so abundant as to sell.
as they need maintenance, roughly a half of them are actually operational while america deploys them on several areas.
>>52351318
I wonder how many navies are less powerful than that.
>>52352100
Most
>>52351364
helping immigrants cross the sea
>>52351535
Certainly the carriers were the primary targets, but the longer they waited around Hawaii, the higher chance of getting detected especially when it was such a large fleet. It was almost a miracle that they had been spared from detection for as much as some 10 days of journey, so they had no choice but making use of that fortune at that point. Plus, carriers became a crucial matter after PH - before that battleships were still the kings of sea.
>>52351364
Move Germans there so that poor refugees can stay at Germans' houses.
>>52351318
>Why won't America sell some of these dank carriers?
you wouldn't be able to handle it buddy
>US Navy
10 commissioned carriers
>Chink Navy
1
Kek, and you think you people think China is set to surpass us.
>dat fleet though
>>52351364
take refuggees in
>>52352725
reminder that china couldn't build their own carrier and had to salvage a russian one
>>52352927
even Spain and Shitaly have building their own carriers. do you really think that china cant buid one??
o man, dont be ridicolous. If China wanted, they could to build 10 or 12 without problems.
if they still havent one, is because its no interesting for them in this moment. if they needed 20 carriers, they will build 20 carries, dont worry about this.
