How does he think he's going to get away with this?? he needs to watch his tone
The Prime Minister again condemned the presidential frontrunner's call for Muslim immigrants to be banned from the United States, describing his remarks as divisive, stupid and wrong".
At Prime Minister's Questions Labour MP Tulip Siddiq urged Mr Cameron to use anti-extremism legislation to block Mr Trump from entering the UK.
“In our country, we have legislation that stops people entering the country," she said. "Does the Prime Minister agree that the law should be applied equally to everyone, or should we be making exceptions for billionaire politicians?”
Mr Cameron responded by saying he too was "proud of representing a country which I think has some claim to say we are one of the most successful multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-faith countries in the world" but said he disagreed with her over banning Mr Trump.
"I think his remarks are divisive, stupid and wrong and I think if he came to visit our country he'd unite us all against him," Mr Cameron said.
Why should the PM be bothered about Trump? He's a joke, and if he does become President then the US will be (even more of a) joke, so who cares. What's the US going to do to us?
>britc*cks
>>52219662
Don't worry, we pretty much all hate him too. We haven't had an uncucked candidate for a very long time apart from Farage, who was doomed the first time someone called him racist.
>>52220060
Also this, the entire island is full of cucks and disgusting fucked chavs and shitheads of all kinds.
>>52219662
As a Muslim I like Cameron a lot.
Also, tip tok kek
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-35106581
>>52220110
>Don't worry, we pretty much all hate him too
Speak for yourself. I'm not >>52220124 btw
>don't block terrorists and paki rapists
>white people with mean opinions are the real threat
This is why Islam will BTFO the UK in my lifetime
>>52219662
>Trump wants to ban foreign Muslims who in the past have attacked us from entering the country
>Britain's future brown overlords want to ban someone because they think he's mean.
Besides his mother is a Brit he should just get citizenship and laugh in their faces.
What kind of insult is that supposed to be
So pathetic
I hope he's also going to ask these nations why they ban Israelis.
>be Brit
>fuck pig
You can dislike Americans as much you like but you know they have always been right when it comes to freedoms. They were right about Nazis. They were right about commies. They're right about Islam, which is also a totalitarian ideology that tries to take over the free world.
Brits used to side with them. Sad that such times are over.
>>52220338
he already has british citizenship.
>>52220110
Speak for yourself lad, maybe people in the poor shitty working class areas don't like Cameron but everyone who lives in a nice area does.
>>52220468
You realise the majority of Americans don't like Trump, right?
>>52220544
"Majority of Americans" also thought Reagan would never get elected.
>>52220491
>upper class c*cks like cameron
and you think this is news why?
>>52220450
Not just fuck. It's just a normal university rite of passage Hans. I knew a veterinary science course where freshmen initiates had to drink pints of pig jizz.
Personally, the closest I got at uni was having to eat a roasted pig's eyeball. But I did go to a party in an SS costume.
![ABCWashPostPolls_1110_PopAmericans[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/YMiH0m0.png "ABCWashPostPolls_1110_PopAmericans[1].png")
>>52220585
No they're actually polled Americans and asked them. Almost 2/3rds don't like Trump. People here jack off in their echo chamber, oblivious to sentiment in the real world. That's why /int/ gets everything wrong when it comes to election time in every country.
>scotland will be independent
>FN will win regions in France
>Ed Miliband will be Prime Minister
And now Trump.
You are pathetic and delusional
>>52220615
I don't like Cameron, I just think he's the least worst option.
Trump can't be stumped, and Cameron knows this.
He's going for the easiest points he could possibly score by saying the most safe things.
>>52220665
you're embarrassing yourself right now and don't even realize it.
>>52220657
>>>/bullingdon/
>>52220682
no, thats ukip.
>>52220838
Explain
>>52220665
the system is corrupted tho'
>>52220895
Douglas Carswell, sure. The rest of them? No thank you.
>>52220895
You're the Irish guy who said he hates England and you want the UK to break up, of course you'd say that
>>52220932
But Douglas Carswell is exactly like the rest of them
>>52220906
The system has been like that for a long time, you're only complaining because your favoured party failed, you're just like the Kippers
It was obvious to anyone with a brain that in the second round, the centre-left would lend their support to the centre-right (and vice versa), to try and block FN. Why was it obvious? Because exactly the same thing has happened in France before.
>>52220897
your poll has no listed methodology, sample size or date. furthermore the washington post/ABC isn't indicative of the american public opinion. polling done by the media tends to vary wildly depending on the outlet. you simply can't trust it.
we take statistics very seriously in this country. if you're going to post polls to make a point at least pick one from gallup or pew.
Im pretty sure if the british were forced to take in Mexican migrants they'd quickly learn to stay clear away from amerika's internal politics.
>>52221022
I'm complaining because this system is stupid and undemocratic, only a totalitarian leftard loves it
>>52221102
This is why you should've gone with our system
![svhfebmgyeyuqrfhhsd8tq[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/QdtpPPD.png "svhfebmgyeyuqrfhhsd8tq[1].png")
>>52221082
> if you're going to post polls to make a point at least pick one from gallup or pew.
Here you go, a Gallup poll because you're too stupid to google it yourself. What are you going to come up with next? All the polls are wrong except the ones you agree with?
If you can't use the internet you could try using your brain
>banning ppl is wrong, lets ban him!
>this is what Islamic Europe believes
>>52221234
>lets ban him!
>"but said he disagreed with her over banning Mr Trump."
???
>>52221278
Are you ignoring that petition that is going to be addressed in your parliament soon
>>52221102
>I'm complaining because this system is stupid and undemocratic
That's the point of the 5th Republic, it's the future France chose. The 4th Republic was more democratic but it yielded messy results, and the French craved more authoritarianism so De Gaulle obliged.
>>52221234
Except the British government doesn't want to ban Trump.
That's the same dumb logic as the retards (95% of /int/) who think that Trump speaks for America because he's leading the Republican polls. How stupid can you get?
>>52221323
>Are you ignoring that petition that is going to be addressed in your parliament soon
How many people signed the petition? What is the population of the UK?
You capable of finding those numbers by yourself, dumb fuck?
>>52220585
Reagan? That actor?
>>52221371
Yes
>>52221323
>Are you ignoring that petition that is going to be addressed in your parliament soon
So is the petition to ban all immigrants, to open the borders for all immigrants and so did the petitions to ban Boxing Day sales and the proposal to legalise marijuana, they'll get some meaningless rhetoric and told to stfu.
>>52221370
So you are the poll autist.
>>52220657
Brits confirmed for zoophiles
>>52219662
>multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-faith
>>52220665
>scotland will be independent
>FN will win regions in France
My sides didn't have to suffer that much
>>52219662
Trump won't be president.
He will probably suffer an "accident" before that.
Calling it now.
>>52219662
>Conservatives proud of "proud of representing a country which I think has some claim to say we are one of the most successful multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-faith countries in the world".
What. The. Fuck.
>>52221438
Immigrants mean cheap labour mate so it keeps companies happy.
of course his comments are stupid and i'm not saying this a pro-islam sense. Who the fuck makes such discriminatory statements especially in a time where political correctness is at an all-time high? One of the key traits of a good politicians is diplomacy. a good diplomat is a good politician. Trump knows fuck all about being a politician. He's not fit to run a great country like the USA.
>>52221481
Why are all our political choices complete and utter fucking shit?
>>52221538
>>52221538
You're completely right but you'll probably get shouted down on here
>>52221538
Except people are sick of political correctness
>>52221562
my mistake. shouldn't have expected better from /int/
>>52221546
Because our system is based on local candidates rather than overall.
Just because Kevin would be good as an MP for Bigglingford West doesn't mean his party should be in power.
>>52221538
Good point UAE.
When are you going to let Israelis into your country?
>>52221538
>that flag
>that post
>>52221481
We are taking the next step
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/news/world/finland-to-put-refugees-in-slave-labour/
>>52221603
>>52220045
Trump >>> Obama desu
also fuck islam, it doesn't belong in 21th century Europe
>>52221590
not completely, i hope
>>52221591
i think you're correct in saying that people are beginning to get sick of it. especially after this one poll i saw where they asked people if trump had gone too far with the "ban all muslims" comment and a lot of the participants were okay with it. but it's not just about americans. A country like the USA has close ties with a lot of Islamic countries. A major example is KSA. if there does come a day where America bans Muslims (which is a laughable assumption to begin with), its geopolitics will be all kinds of fucked up. Turkey is another one of NATO's members. how do you think they're going to respond?
I'm not saying they can do anything to fuck with the USA. the USA is leagues ahead of any sort of threat countries like Turkey and KSA can pose. But I'm sure USA doesn't have to strain its relationship with any more countries than it absolutely must.
say what you will we're never going to see an America where Muslims are banned. Not as things stand currently anyway.
>>52221644
UAE =/= USA
surely you agree? the UAE can afford to do this because they're not major players in the global scale.
>>52221854
I think this debacle already has started to damage the USA's image abroad
>>52221705
gunna watch that move this evening
>>52221678
GULAG
U
L
A
G
>>52221968
It's not Gulag. They're coming on their free will. No one is forcing them to stay.
>>52221933
Not really, if Trump loses it'll blow over and if he wins then they'll be too busy to care.
>>52221328
Even if France would have our system which supposed to be more democratic... then the other parties start a "cordon sanitaire" against FN, blocking them from any positions of governance. We've had that situation for 20 years, the only party who was heavily against migration blocked and condemned as racists, thereby also condemning a great part of the population.
The islamisation is already a certain thing. It will only create more resentment. No matter how much the media tries to put up a show, more and more people will wake up to what is happening. More and more people hate islam and the intruders who force their ways upon us. Tesion will continue to rise, what will the final outcome be you think?
>>52221854
Trump should have said he'd ban people from the countries that ban Israelis, unless they change their position. Then said he was doing it for reason of equality and that America couldn't stand by while Israelis were discriminated in this way. It would have been more PC and achieved his aims.
>>52221933
USA's image has been damaged since 2003 who cares
>>52222107
lmao cheeky. i can already imagine /int/ exploding with memes about how the Jews are controlling America
>>52219662
> Labour MP Tulip Siddiq
You JUST can't make this shit up. So tolerant!
>>52222111
This
I wan't to see a US that turns cyberpunk evil in my lifetime. Like when superman or raiden got sick of everyone being worthless faggots.
>you will live to see a nationalist dictatorship in America--and then be killed by it.
>>52222111
>>52222414
Hillary's America will be even more hated because she loves the eternal war state and that's the #1 reason America has bad image.
>>52222542
What makes ppl say Hildodildo loves war? I dont get this meme
>>52222664
She wants to peg Assad with a cruise missile
>>52222687
That is what should have been done in the first place
>>52222664
War between sexes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GzGAW7k2V8
>>52222093
>Tesion will continue to rise, what will the final outcome be you think?
In the short term I think tension will continue to rise, at least before we've dealt with IS and made them irrelevant. There will always be some threat of terrorism though, whether from religion or something else (like the Irish). British people have lived under the threat of terrorism for several decades, since long before Islamist terrorism got big. People just carry on with their lives.
I don't buy the Islamisation thing, at least not in the UK. I think what we will end up with are a large number of "Muslims" who don't believe the more extreme parts of the their religion, because I have noticed that the children of Muslim immigrants in the UK tend not to take their religion so seriously. In terms of actual immigrant, we get FAR more Christian immigrants than Muslim immigrants, like orders of magnitude more of them. Our largest Muslim immigrant group is Pakistanis - they're the 12th biggest immigrant group overall.
>>52220665
>SD will win a bunch of seats
>Republicans will win senate
>Trump will be #1 in the polls
>Tspiras is going to win
>Greek referendum will BTFO "no."
>UKIP would win EU polls
>FN will win EU polls
4chan's edge gets a lot of shit right as well.
FN almost won. Scotland almost became independent. The majority of us never thought the Milipede Paki would run the UK, we just thought UKIP would win seats.
>>52221214
If Trump wins the nomination he will automatically get 45% of the vote.
Nominating a weak cuck establishment candidate isn't how we win this election.
Reagan got laughed at nonstop by the media when I was growing up in 80'. He got called a "cowboy", "dumb actor", and "extremist" who would "ruin the detente with the USSR."
Now he's seen as one of our top ten presidents.
Maybe you should do something about your current Muslim president.
There is going to be a Love Actually moment where Cameron tells off Trump in a joint press conference, but instead of coming off as a British hero standing up to a bully he's just going to come off as a petty autist who is undermining one of the most important alliances in the world for cheap multicultural cred.
Calling it.
>>52222989
SPICS OUT!!!!!
>>52222664
>90's
>Iraq war
>afghanistan
>libya
>Assad 2013
Yeah.... She's a hawk
>>52220665
But Scotland will become independent.
>>52223239
UKIP won one seat or something like that though
first past the post, not even once
>>52223239
The majority of people don't talk or indeed think about minor shit like your senate elections or EU elections. Trump will be #1 in the polls? What kind of prediction is that, in every US primary cycle nearly all of them top the polls at some point.
FN did not 'almost' win. For example their best chance, Le Pen herself, lost by 58%-42%. That's almost a win to you, seriously? Talk about delusion.
Also the Nationalists lost the Scotland referendum by an entire 10%, and they lost in almost every region of Scotland.
>>52221438
>we know plenty of wonderful people who are, unfortunately, black...
>>52223374
That's because Reagan was the last truly American president US had. Republican burgers don't want conservative anymore they want American president.
>>52222989
>In the short term I think tension will continue to rise, at least before we've dealt with IS and made them irrelevant.
Do ypu realize how many muslims there are in Europe nowadays, and how many of them, either openly or secretly, support the jihadists?
"making IS irrelevant" it can easily take 20-30 years.
>>52219662
>we are one of the most successful multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-faith countries in the world
This is what the commie party here kept repeating over and over again until Yugoslavia burned down in the flames of genoide. Even had a cute motto:
>six republics, five nations, four languages, three religions, two scrips and one party
Race war soon.
>>52223374
You remind me of pic related. Please do indulge yourself in your fantasies, that will only make the spectacle more entertaining for the rest of us.
>>52220585
>>52220544
Elections are often decided by the economic conditions right before the election. Gore was ahead of Bush in 1999-2000 because of the huge economic boom, when it and the 90's dream crashed in late 2000 Bush jumped up at the last minute to make it a close one
>>52223573
>Also the Nationalists lost the Scotland referendum by an entire 10%
...you say that like it's a lot.
>they lost in almost every region of Scotland
By as little as 0.1% in some cases.
Even then, the UK government have pissed away a lot of good faith by failing to grant any meaningful powers. A lot of Scots voted no with the understanding that if they didn't get Devo Max, they'd get something close to it.
>>52222989
>because I have noticed that the children of Muslim immigrants in the UK tend not to take their religion so seriously.
Nonsense mate. And children may not take it very seriously, and be chill and drink and smoke, fuck bitches etc when adolescent, often they go full religious 10 years later.
I have witnessed it time and time again (I lived 15 years in a Turkish neighbourhood). Religion is not something any child takes serious. Also islam is more than just a religion.
>>52223573
Not to mention that a lot of dyed in the wool Unionists were 60+. How many of them are going to be around in 10 years time?
>>52221082
>>52223374
You are just like /pol/ in 2012 who clung to that "unskewed polls" website that claimed the polls were wrong and Romney would win. Then the election happened, Gallup and other polls were within a couple points of accuracy, and the unskewed polls webmaster had to resign in shame for being like 12% off
>>52221854
>geopolitics will be all kinds of fucked up
For you maybe. I'd love to see what the middle east would look like if we stopped propping up degenerate dictatorships that do nothing but export terrorism.
There is NO FUCKING REASON that we should be as involved as we are in the muslim world.
![_85611881_untitled-4[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/HIx8i06.jpg "_85611881_untitled-4[1].jpg")
>>52223886
>...you say that like it's a lot.
It is a lot. How can you argue the result was close when the victors have a double digit percentage point lead?
>>52223975
>Not to mention that a lot of dyed in the wool Unionists were 60+. How many of them are going to be around in 10 years time?
Younger Scots are more Unionist and older people will always think about their pensions. Source for pic
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-34283948
This is pathetic to see. An independent Scotland would be a disaster if it had happened, with a yawning budget deficit and crippling austerity because of the drop in the oil price.
Your prospects are getting worse. Younger Scots are becoming more unionist, there is no economic argument for an independent Scotland (it's impossible for them to pretend oil will keep rising, which was the basis for the SNP's 2014 argument), and due to a shitty economy in Scotland the governing SNP party will be forced to make unpopular cuts.
You're fucked and the best part is that you're in denial about it. The only result of your deluded ranting on 4chan will be as entertainment for the rest of us.
>>52223886
In elections 10 % is fucking huge. 60 - 40.
>>52224024
we're nowhere close to the election. everything right now is pure conjecture and wild speculation.
i don't know why everyone is acting like we're even out of the fucking primaries yet.
>>52223573
They lost by 5% you stupid fuck.
>>52224241
The oil would have been the cherry on the cake. It wasn't even going to be used for day to day spending, we'd have set up a sovereign wealth fund.
>>52224387
That's actually wrong, it was an essential part of the SNPs budget. However the fixation over that particular SNP budget being the only possible one that Scotland could have ran is pointless. All that would have happened is that services would be slashed.
>>52224363
>They lost by 5% you stupid fuck.
Do you know how to read?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/events/scotland-decides/results
>Scotland has voted against becoming an independent country by 55% to 45%.
What's 55 - 45? If you're using a laptop or smartphone it should come with a calculator, if you need help.
>>52224526
What's 50 (threshold for independence) - 45 (actual vote)?
Did David Cameron just declare war on us?
>the SNP
>>52224830
>Did David Cameron just declare war on us?
He specifically said he doesn't want to ban Trump like the Labourites do.
>>52224874
ok but is he going to apologize? Because what he said about Mr Trump is messed up.
>>52224241
> How can you argue the result was close when the victors have a double digit percentage point lead?
Because it is the smallest double digit percentage point lead it is possible to have, and polls have been showing a steady increase in support for independence since September. The most recent I can remember actually put it at 53%.
>This is pathetic to see. An independent Scotland would be a disaster if it had happened, with a yawning budget deficit and crippling austerity because of the drop in the oil price.
>Your prospects are getting worse. Younger Scots are becoming more unionist, there is no economic argument for an independent Scotland (it's impossible for them to pretend oil will keep rising, which was the basis for the SNP's 2014 argument), and due to a shitty economy in Scotland the governing SNP party will be forced to make unpopular cuts.
>You're fucked and the best part is that you're in denial about it. The only result of your deluded ranting on 4chan will be as entertainment for the rest of us.
>hello, I am an incredibly butthurt unionist
Additionally, the BBC's poll is queried, others have suggested the precise opposite, that younger Scots are more nationalist.
>>52224260
Chigau.
>>52224526
5% swing, you daft fudrick.
>>52224668
It's not the number they lost the referendum by. If you remember, the referendum was a question with 2 answers. 55% voted NO, 45% voted YES.
That means the YES campaign lost to NO by 10%
You can't pretend it's the same thing as 5%, because there's a difference between converting a NO voter to a YES voter, and converting someone who previously wouldn't have voted for either (turnout was 85%)
>>52225179
>polls have been showing a steady increase in support for independence since September
And prior to the referendum polls showed a steady increase in support for independence and they showed Yes winning, indeed they showed a much tighter race than 55-45.
>>52225058
I wouldn't count on it. Do you think Trump will apologise for the "messed up" things he's said regarding just about everyone? Would you want him to?
>>52225179
Parties react to STV poll suggesting 53% in favour of Scottish independence - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-34128939
>>52225418
>let brainwashed 16-17 year-olds vote
>still lose
>>52225328
>You can't pretend it's the same thing as 5%, because there's a difference between converting a NO voter to a YES voter, and converting someone who previously wouldn't have voted for either (turnout was 85%)
>these rationalisations
>And prior to the referendum polls showed a steady increase in support for independence and they showed Yes winning, indeed they showed a much tighter race than 55-45
Yeah, then they released the Vow, and people's opinions changed.
Three different polling agencies have released something like 15 polls since September, they ALL say support for independence has been rising.
>>52225565
>pro-independence teenagers are more brainwashed then pro-union teenagers
>>52225418
Your pic is a Lord Ashcroft poll rushed just after the referendum. Lord Ashcrofts constituency polling in the general election was mostly wrong.
If you believe that shit over the Scottish Referendum Study results I posted earlier, I actually feel bad for you but I guess you have the keep your fantasy going somehow
>>52225596
Yeah, ok, sure. You keep saying Scotland will go independent, why doesn't it happen?
Why hasn't the SNP asked for another referendum yet?
>>52225734
>Lord Ashcrofts constituency polling in the general election was mostly wrong.
How so? Even if that's true, why is THIS poll wrong?
>Why hasn't the SNP asked for another referendum yet?
Because they feel they don't have a democratic mandate to do so yet, and if they pushed for a referendum now it would mean going back on their campaign promise that a vote for the SNP in 2015 GE was not a vote for another referendum. Basically, because the SNP actually have some integrity.
All the political commentators worth their salt (and 70% of Scots) feel independence will happen within 10 years.
>>52225973
>How so? Even if that's true, why is THIS poll wrong?
Because it's contradicted by the far more well-respected and comprehensive Scottish Referendum Study
http://www.scottishreferendumstudy.com/about-the-srs-team/
>their campaign promise that a vote for the SNP in 2015 GE was not a vote for another referendum.
I see, so you think they're going to wait until 2020? Kek that will be even better, they'll probably lose by a bigger margin at that point.
Well we can only hope. I'd love to see you nationalists defeated twice.
>the SNP actually have some integrity.
See pic related, there's your integrity. A confident prediction of an oil boom when Scotland would become independent. Based on nothing except a hunger for power. The Scottish nationalists are truly the smallest minded people on these Isles.
>>52226349
>far more well-respected and comprehensive
Respected by who? Because after about 4 years fiercely debating independence, I've never even heard of them.
>so you think they're going to wait until 2020?
No, Sturgeon has stated a referendum shall be held if there is some substantial change to the Union, I.E. if the UK leaves the EU. Support for the EU is about 70% in Scotland, and Cameron has confirmed Scotland will not have the power of veto. If the UK votes to leave the EU, and Scotland votes to stay (which it almost certainly will) a massive surge in support for independence is guaranteed. Again, a big reason why many Scots voted No was because they felt Scotland's EU membership was safer in the Union.
>they'll probably lose by a bigger margin at that point
That is not what the polls or political commentators suggest.
>See pic related, there's your integrity. A confident prediction of an oil boom when Scotland would become independent. Based on nothing except a hunger for power. The Scottish nationalists are truly the smallest minded people on these Isles.
>I am still an incredibly bitter and butthurt unionist
>>52226349
Additionally, who's to say the Scottish Referendum Study's poll isn't a fluke?
Give me three different polls from three different, well respected polling agencies from roughly the same period of time, which all saying the same thing and I'll concede that Ashcroft's poll was wrong.
>>52226349
But then it's not even a question of "is independence the way to go", the fact of the matter is most political commentators and most if not all polls are suggesting that independence is, if not inevitable, extremely likely.
>>52226838
>after about 4 years fiercely debating independence, I've never even heard of them.
That says an awful lot about you, and nothing about the SRS
Yeah the EU is your only real chance, but again it's so unlikely that the UK will vote to leave it, despite the polls being close at the moment.
>That is not what the polls or political commentators suggest.
The commentators "worth their salt" right? i.e. the ones you agree with.
You don't realise what is happening in Scotland, this chart >>52224241 should have given it away. The main support for independence is with the late 20s -> middle-aged Scots, because they have beef with the old Labour political establishment of Scotland. The independence movement is a reaction against those perceived grievances.
For the people under 25, none of that applies. For them, the SNP is the establishment. The Nationalists' constant bitching at Labour/Westminster/London doesn't have the same effect on them. With every year that passes with the SNP in government in Scotland, with more responsibilities (and therefore blame) than ever, your lot are going to have problems.
>>52226957
>Additionally, who's to say the Scottish Referendum Study's poll isn't a fluke?
It was a survey of 5000 Scots (regular Scottish sample size is 1000) asked what they voted and why, after the referendum. It took several months to release because it was done by academics who went over the data carefully.
If you want to believe it is a fluke then please, be my guest.
>>52227179
>the fact of the matter is most political commentators and most if not all polls are suggesting that independence is, if not inevitable, extremely likely.
It doesn't matter how many times you repeat what your political commentators say, it won't make a difference. How many political commentators predicted a Tory majority in the general election?
>>52220045
>t. alberto barbosa
>>52220942
>You're the Irish guy
he's not irish
>>52221371
Lol based back to the future reference
>>52219662
>Mr Cameron responded by saying he too was "proud of representing a country which I think has some claim to say we are one of the most successful multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-faith countries in the world"
this nigga just went full cuck
>>52220045
t. British Muslim
>>52225328
You can keep pretending saying 10% matters when in reality only 5% was needed for victory. It doesn't really matter, we both know the reality of the situation.
>>52225678
The person you are replying to is one of the delusional loyalists who thinks they are a rational moderate when in reality the are just as emotional as the Scottish Resistance nutcases.
>we are one of the most successful multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-faith countries in the world
>>52228588
>It doesn't really matter, we both know the reality of the situation
Yeah, you lost
I like based CamCam, but it is wrong to attack a fellow rightist.
GOOD LUCK TRUMP
>>52229360
I never lost anything. I voted no.
However I'm not some delusional cunt pretending it wasn't close.
>>52221933
USA's image abroad has been damaged for the past decade and a half. Where have you been?
>Mr Cameron responded by saying he too was "proud of representing a country which I think has some claim to say we are one of the most successful multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-faith countries in the world"
What a joke, Northern Ireland is part of the UK
>Labour MP Tulip Siddiq
>>52219662
>"proud of representing a country which I think has some claim to say we are one of the most successful multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-faith countries in the world"
Did he really say that?
>>52232666
To be fair, he's right. Add multi-national to that list btw.
>>52231630
David Cameron and his ilk can't register reality outside of London
>>52219662
i cant believe that still a bunch of amerifats supporting that unfunny meme guy. im already totally got bored of his shows with the same cliches. hes so repetitive.
>Most people don't like Trump
>Media constantly bombarding him
>Anti-Trump going full blown retarded
>Still leading the poll
At this point I don't know what will stop this meme master.
>>52219662
Didnt you post this on /pol/ yesterday?
>>52222989
>I have noticed that the children of Muslim immigrants in the UK tend not to take their religion so seriously
As someone who lives nextdoor to an enormous muslim community, you're talkin shit now.
>>52220769
>Trump can't be stumped
Your glorified seagull already did it though.
>>52219662
>Britain
>one of the most successful multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-faith countries in the world
What a fucking joke.
