Why is this allowed?
>>52110137
White Brits want to avoid alimony and usury through Islamic courts and banks
>>52110137
Well you see, there aren't any actual islamic courts, however, if both parties agree to it, as part of the arbitration process, they can request to see an islamic....
Oh wait, it's an Australian, nevermind.
>>52110137
>tfw your cunt cracked down on this years ago
>>52110178
Nice save m8
Bring end times
>mfw someone is tried in a kangaroo court
>>52110178
And the arbitration the third party comes up with has to follow British law too. It's hardly YES.
>>52112829
So, an australian court?
>>52112706
I want islamic banking desu
>>52110137
Because they are çucked into oblivion
>>52110137
>mfw there is a literal sharia zone in Greece since like 1920
Islamic courts in an Islamic country.
Whats the problem?
>>52110137
It's by no means a mandatory process. The rulings are only binding if both parties mutually agree to have whatever issue they have arbitrated by the "sharia court", and even then they are subject to limitations given by British law.
>>52112829
Underbuttered toast
>>52115851
>It's by no means a mandatory process. The rulings aren't binding.
I fully agree my shit skinned camel jockey friend.
>>52117651
why are you so butthurt family?
>>52115851
>don't agree to follow sharia
>get beheaded for apostasy
