Did you know that thousands of Russian and British law enforcers don't have guns? This is because the U.K. and Russia are poor and powerless countries.
I thought it was because they were c*cks
>>52079804
>cunt where cops perform random executions on citizens to keep them in line not poor and powerless
>>52079804
>>52079922
in a healthy society a policeman can contribute without carrying a firearm
No, it's because cops don't need to shoot people in those countries.
>>52079933
sounds like its powerful to be honest family
>>52079804
I thought it was because our citizens didn't run round shooting people everyone hour of ever day?
>>52079804
But guns are evil you nazi
>>52079972
Oh man, I can't wait until you guys start getting enriched.
>>52079972
What is healthy about replacing 25% of your population with muslims all within the span of 5 years?
>>52080062
afaik our police always carry a pistol (and the enrichening is taking place atm)
>he can't own gold bullion in his country
It's a lot more to do with the history of the police and their relationship with the government, state, politics and the Army in those countries.
>>52080144
Whats wrong with muslims? You filthy racist.
>>52080144
Who did that?
>>52080174
But they do, plus chainsaws
>>52080174
Those are internal troops, a sort of gendarme. Russian street cops don't carry guns for the most part.
Same in Ireland, UK, Japan and a few other places.
>>52080258
Sweden.
Though not exactly "muslims" as much as "various shitskin and negroid peoples"
>>52080300
Fug, forgot pic
test
>A Policeman's primary job is to patrol the streets being friendly and keeping the area secure
>a gun is required to do this
???
>>52079804
This is how I imagine you.
>>52080426
Better safe than sorry.
>>52080426
>Muslim with a machete
>P-pls stop, I am an officer of the law
>>52080529
>firearms unit is deployed
>problem solved
>>52080472
In all over the world, people doesn't carry guns and be psychopaths, like USA.
>>52080529
He was shot though, meanwhile in America you give muslims guns so they do mass shootings haha
>>52080426
Britain was probably the most stable country in Europe for all of the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries. No civil wars, no coups, no downfalls. As such you had no real reason to routinely arm cops.
IMO you still don't. Anything serious will get sorted by your SAS, who are more capable than any policeman. For armed criminals you have armed officers. Other countries are similar, but historically the police were used a lot more in conflict or generally seen as a political tool.
>every cop in new york has a gun
>they all failed to prevent some brown people blowing up the twin towers
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-ff-nonlethal-force-20151124-story.html
we should have something like this though
>>52080529
In America they would have been shot dead
In the UK they were tried and imprisoned for life
>>52080572
Americans live in Die Hard movies, where one man with a sidearm can take out terrorists with ease.
>>52080653
>every cop in Boston had a gun
>literally let two children plant bombs, kill people then run away
>cops then try shooting the public in house raids
>>52080472
>better dead than kinder egg
>>52080693
>Dude with a machete isn't going to be taken out by someone with a handgun
Ever shot a gun, Adolf?
>>52080677
there is nothing wrong with killing muslims
if the UK wasn't so keked by them, you'd understand
enjoy becoming part of the caliphate once the queen is dead
>>52080852
t. enslaved by a kenyan for 8 years
>>52080852
they literally want to be killed you idiot
Imprisoning them with a load of skinheads and having them come to terms with what they did is a far greater punishment
>>52080764
I did conscription and shoot competitively, so yes.
Mass casualty attacks (Mumbai, Paris, Beslan, average American high school) are not going to be prevented by officers with sidearms. The shooters will hit them first and use weapons capable of much greater range. The only way of responding is with Army/armed police units, with rifles and armour of their own.
In practical terms your average armed cop is no better suited to preventing a terrorist attack than an unarmed one.
>>52080472
This sort of mentality is why your country has so much police brutality.
I still remember when my state introduced armed cops. It completely changed the dynamic between cops and citizens.
baka desu senpai kek
>>52081009
Clean your feet first, whore
>That feeling when Ameritards are scared of a fucking clock
>>52079804
the UK is literally a police state. if you speak out against muzzies they arrest you. keks.
>>52081101
>>52081129
>literally a police state
>>52081343
>literally a police state
>posts picture of US police
>thinks it's a police state bc US has police
kek. UK is a police state because you can get arrested for speaking against the popular political climate.
>mfw all of these butthurt Brits
>>52081452
>it's perfectly normal for the police to be in a military vehicle, in military attire, pointing guns at everyone.
3rd world warzone confirmed.
>>52082739
it was a manhunt for a terrorist
its not like you see military humvees going around the usa and issuing parking tickets
>>52082810
>>52082904
Better safe than sorry.
>>52080750
They banned the eggs because you're dumbass children don't know what they can and can't eat
>>52083018
lot of good it did you guys on 9/11 and the boston bombings, right?
>better dead than kinder egg
THE PRICE OF FREEDOM
>>52082904
you're just jealous of our police cars
>>52079804
Wut? Patrools have pistols and AKMs. Detectives keep em in safes in the kabinets mostly
>>52083344
He's just stupid
>>52083298
>Europeans jealous of US "cars"
>>52083298
>0.3 miles to the gallon
lol
>>52083298
>get in car chase
>lose the criminals because you need to fill up the tank
brilliant
>>52083400
>Putting britkeks on the same level as the rest of Europe
>>52081144
Wow
When did plane wrong start feeling so right
itt euros can't afford the price of freedom
>>52083678
But they will pay the price for slavery
>>52083714
kuked
>>52079804
policeman shot drunk attackers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgQPo3vhEfg
>>52083714
that kid in the front is planning genocide
>>52083714
>that girl in the back with the african drum
wow
>thousands of executions per year by government officials is freedom
>>52080144
>What is healthy about replacing 25% of your population with muslims all within the span of 5 years?
meme
>>52080426
>A Policeman's primary job is to patrol the streets being friendly and keeping the area secure
A policeman is literally as useless as any other civilian if he/she doesn't carry a gun.
>>52080572
>police are by definition always late to the crime scene
>suggesting an even slower response
Retards, all of you.
>>52080587
>In all over the world, people doesn't carry guns and be psychopaths, like USA.
That's because americans aren't cu cked beyond belief - yet. The right to bear arms was a central part of european enlightenment ideals, but unfortunately became scrapped by power-hungry psychopaths (politicians) who were too scared of an armed public capable of overthrowing them.
Being disarmed is nothing to be proud of.
>>52084081
feels good
Armed police is okay because they clean out the trash.
>>52083793
sheeet, context?
>This one lard who makes gun troll threads every single day
>>52084117
We aren't native to America and almost none of those people are Muslims so there isn't anything wrong with this.
>>52080953
> The only way of responding is with Army/armed police units, with rifles and armour of their own.
Wrong. The only way of responding is to limit "gun free zones" to federal courthouses and congress (and equivalent buildings), where armed guards are to be stationed.
>In practical terms your average armed cop is no better suited to preventing a terrorist attack than an unarmed one.
Guns are not owned or carried to prevent anything, they're carried to be used as response to something. Fuck off with the strawmen.
>not being free
>>52084124
being chink is nothing to be proud of either, but you seem happy with it.
>>52081024
>This sort of mentality is why your COUNTRY has so much police brutality.
No, it's why they are free men.
>I still remember when my state introduced armed cops. It completely changed the dynamic between cops and citizens.
Of course it did, because your public are mostly disarmed serfs. Most americans, on the other hand, are on equal standing with cops.
>Not living the greatest country on Earth
>>52084081
The government doesn't force you to commit first-degree murder, anon.
>having a queen
>>52084302
I'd rather be a Chink than a Brit. That ought to say a lot about your country.
>>52080426
>>52080953
>I was a conscript and shoot a 22 some times
Ok so you know nothing then
>>52084439
>That ought to say a lot about your country.
that a little autistic suicidal chink doesn't want to be first world?
lol
>cheque book
>>52084531
>shooting gallery
>>52084117
holy shit is there really that much black people, i tought america was white
>Americans constantly go on about right to have guns, freedom and fuck the police
>'oh mah gahd your police don't have guns? oh mah gahd'
I would thought yanks would be FOR unarmed police.
>>52084486
>first world
You haven't been first world since the Empire broke down.
>>52084634
>Americans constantly go on about right to have guns, freedom and fuck the police
It's almost like America isn't one person
>>52084531
>buoy
>pronounced 'boo-ee'
Literally why?
>>52084653
lol chink
or should it be ror
>>52084727
How do you pronounce it?
>>52084634
>I would thought yanks would be FOR unarmed police.
Why would they be FOR a stupid concept? If the police is partly supposed to protect the public, making them inept at that very task by disallowing firearms is a recipe for disaster.
If I can't carry a gun, I atleast expect government goons to arrive as quickly as possible with as powerful arms as possible.
Your policing model worked just fine until you got rid of the right to keep and bear arms during the 1920-1930s.
>>52084753
You tell me, I'm not the one who recently surrendered a chink colony.
>>52084843
>recently
is chink internet still on dialup, wong?
>>52084789
'boy'
>>52084949
huh
>>52084794
>>If I can't carry a gun, I atleast expect government goons to arrive as quickly as possible with as powerful arms as possible.
They do when required. I don't see what the problem is.
>>52084457
those are CSOs, not police
Russia is richer than the USA
>>52084204
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Flenta.ru%2Fnews%2F2013%2F12%2F06%2Fhabarovsk%2F
Four drunks made problem and security guy called police. Drunks attacked policemen, one got broke nose, another got crakc in jaw bone. Police shot, one dead, one wound. Policemen not found guilty. Drunks (6 people) arrested.
>>52084916
>he has trouble with basic reading comprehension
Yes, recently.
Are you by any chance an uneducated chav living on benefits?
>>52085112
Not defending that shit but the bloke who shot a burglar only got done because the burglar was running away and he shot them in the back.
>>52085036
>They do when required.
But they do not, as evidenced by le machete meme and many other horrific events.
> I don't see what the problem is.
Don't you worry, it'll dawn on you once you experience violent assault firsthand.
>>52085376
neat
>>52085489
Makes sense
>>52085490
>you once you experience violent assault firsthand.
toplel I suppose armed police will intervene before the assault happens?
What are you on about.
>>52084916
>is chink internet still on dialup, wong?
you tell me, abdullah
>>52085489
That shouldn't be possible to "get done" for in the first place. The home is a sacred place. Those who unlawfully enter it deserve nothing less than a pile of lead in their face.
>>52085575
>toplel I suppose armed police will intervene before the assault happens?
What?
>What are you on about.
>spot the mental defective
>>52085611
I know. Was just saying. We do have self defence laws, I actually think they were relaxed a bit recently. But they only work in defence, not just shooting people in your home.
>>52084226
>damage control
>DAMAGE CONTROL
>>52085691
If a shooting happens in the UK armed police respond. How is that any different to having armed regular police responding?
>>52085745
here you go
>>52085709
> We do have self defence laws
Which are de facto worthless as long as you can't carry guns in public - except in home defense scenarios, of course.
>But they only WORK in defence, not just shooting people in your home.
Shooting trespassers is defending yourself. Why should you, the victim, have to assume that a home invader does not present an immediate lethal danger to you?
>>52085832
Look mate I don't like the laws but I really can't be bothered arguing with you.
>>52085750
>How is that any different to having armed regular police responding?
How about starting off with the obvious: "armed units" respond far slower, since they are few in numbers.
>>52085832
>implying self defence laws are any better here
if you shoot someone in self defense you would most likely go to prison
>>52085868
>Look mate I don't like the laws
Good for you.
> but I really can't be bothered arguing with you.
You don't have to argue with me. Take my questions as statements and we can leave it at that.
I wander if more people would get killed/hurt if UK cops had guns or less, given how accidents happen and how little they need the guns, my money is on "more".
>>52085940
>implying self defence laws are any better here
>implying I implied they were much better here
>if you shoot someone in self defense you would most likely go to prison
No, you wouldn't (we have a surprisingly strong right to use deadly force in self-defense)), and you most certainly won't risk murder charges, unlike britkeks. Worst case scenario: manslaughter charges resulting in a 4 year sentence. You'll be out in two.
>>52086097
>I wander if more people would get killed/hurt if UK cops had guns or less
The amounts are negligible either way.
> given how accidents happen
This is not a reason to restrict firearms.
>and how little they need the guns
Who, the cops or the public?
>>52085709
>We do have self defence laws
You have particularly strict conditions though..
>But they only work in defence, not just shooting people in your home.
Why not? Shooting people in your home or business should be justified when you reasonably fear for your safety or your belongings... It is in most continental EU states anyway. It may even be justified when you're being mugged on the street or in the hallway of your flat.. There's caselaw that supports that in this country. Britains system seems to place a lot of limitations on the victim of the assault/robbery..
>>52085750
First responders tend to be cops on patrol. It literally makes no sense to NOT give them the tools they might need in a violent situation they've been called to.. Why not just arm every policeman/woman that doesn't ride a desk all day and has had the proper training?
it haz something to do with ruling.
there europian bees and african bees, the queen of europian shoots some Kind of hormones to make the workers do their Job and tha african simply bites the workers.
african bee is more primitive and europian bee is advanced
both work to same Goal the methods are different. some are more advanced.
>>52086315
>Why not just arm every policeman/woman that doesn't ride a desk all day and has had the proper training?
why not just wipe out humanity so crime can't happen?
>>52086097
>I wander if more people would get killed/hurt if UK cops had guns or less
The question is WHO would be killed or hurt... It's like those Americans anti-gun-activists that love including suicides and justified shootings by police and citizens in their 'firearm death' statistics.. But if the person that died was a criminal in the process of a crime, that was stopped because of that, I'd say that death should not be used as an indication that armed police are a bad thing.
>>52086341
what iam trying to say is, that violence is for primitive, "WILD WEST" america is very primitive Country only about 200 years old. it was founded on genocide of the natives(also primitive) so few houndered years and they wont have weapons, maby like tazors or other chemicals.
>>52086360
>why not just wipe out humanity so crime can't happen?
Because that defeats the purpose, you silly lad.. We fight crime to make this world more pleasant for humanity. Without humanity, crime wouldn't need to be fought. Are all you Brits so irrational about arming police? You do realise most police in the EU are armed, right?
>>52086420
>it's ok to kill people if they are criminals
edgy
>>52086508
So you admit that humanity is the cause of crime?
>>52086533
Not saying it should be the go-to solution, like it sometimes seems to be in the US.. But it is definitely justified in certain cases, especially if the person doing the shooting is a police officer.
>>52086506
>what iam trying to say is, that violence is for primitive, "WILD WEST" america is very primitive COUNTRY only about 200 years old.
>says the kraut, whose deceased countrymen very recently gassed the joos and caused a world war
Top kek.
>so few houndered years and they wont have weapons, maby like tazors or other chemicals.
Americans will never let themselves be disarmed. It's gone too far now, you can't confiscate 320+ million unregistered firearms.
>>52086641
Laws are man-made (if you don't attach value to God-made or Natural law).. Obviously crime is something related to humanity.
>>52086508
what about those who have all the power, claim to be fighting crime, but reality is they're the source of all crime and crime is the source of their living, so they create crime to fight it and get paid for it. a good example is
>be a lowlife cop
>stop someone driving
>tell them open the window
>tauce a 2g baggie
>arrest poor fag for possession of narcotics
>get bumps for next promotion.
>>52086533
>edgy
The correct words are "common sense".
Your ancestors would laugh at you if they knew how weak and pacified you've become.
>>52086751
>what about those who have all the power, claim to be fighting crime, but reality is they're the source of all crime and crime is the source of their living, so they create crime to fight it and get paid for it.
You're describing the drug war, and it's got nothing to do with the subject at hand.
>>52086751
What you are describing is rather typical for North American, I'm afraid....
>arrest poor fag for possession of narcotics
>get bumps for next promotion.
>Implying you get promoted for a possession charge in this country
Unless it was a bycatch from something serious, you'll likely get reprimanded for not having your priorities straight. Possession of drugs is largely decriminalised here..
>>52086762
>civilization weak, muh heritage, me strong, me smash
>>52086762
>steal a loaf of bread to feed your starving family
>bullet to the head
>0.5 miles over the speeding limit
>bullet to the head
>send a kinder egg to america
>bullet to the head because the FBI demanded it
wew wang, that's some proper police state you got there.
>>52087102
You're welcome to surrender yourself to rape, assault or worse. I'll fight back and take my chances.
>>52087182
>I'll fight back and take my chances.
you already lost than one zhang.
>>52087180
You're welcome to use your brain when defining a "crime where lethal force is justified".
>>52083298
yeah we are
