>England had a French king
CAN'T
MAKE
THIS
SHIT
UP
USA has an African president
Spain has a french king.
> the netherlands HAS (atm) an argie queen
>>51650388
CAN'T
MAKE
THIS
SHIT
UP
>>51650388
>There are actually any difference betweeen europen "states".
French kings*
england is, and has always been a bastard, COWARD (yep, that's what i just said), historyless country inhabited by degenerate treacherous inbreds.
Don't forget England's court decisions were written in French for quite some time
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_French
>>51650537
It's no secret we are basically a bunch of oiks under foreign kings. I guess it's fun to 'reveal' it like this on /int/
>>51650562
rude
>>51650562
>England
>Island
>Conquered by bare mainlander foreigners cuz
>inbred
EL EM AY YO
>>51650562
S A V A G E
>>51650356
They are keked to this day
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/8424904/People-with-Norman-names-wealthier-than-other-Britons.html
>>51650919
Quite. The coveted real estate in London's wealthiest neighborhoods (Kensington, Chelsea) is actually owned by descendants of William the Conqueror. Even the most successful, wealthiest citizens can only hope to buy a leasehold from the descendants of the conqueror.
U T T E R L Y C U C K E D
>>51650356
>America had an English king
whos keked now
>>51651679
well we were a colony, don't think that's deniable. think winning independence in a war and not being part of the commonwelth negates that though.
>>51651679
>his queen abdicated
Same with Sweden
>>51650356
>america has a kenyan warlord president
lol
>>51651749
no it doesn't, you are cvcks forever
>they had kings n shiiet, instead of great qaghans, the sons of sky
>sometimes they were ruled by WOMEN, some of them is ruled by WOMEN now
>had kings from other nation
literally kekolds
