Are media objective in your cunt?
>>51560827
No. Leftwing propaganda
Not on the whole, the papers more interested in money than reporting honestly. Having said that I haven't read all of them so there might be one or two with journalistic integrity.
TV I would say is slightly left biased, but they clearly at least try to be balanced.
>>51561379
Sky News is the only non left biased TV thing I can think of. ITV are actually worse than BBC.
99% of tv stations and newspapers are in control communists agents mostly jews like this cunt
>>51560827
Taken together, kind of, they balance out. One media company is so unashamedly right wing that it makes even the other company's financial sector newspaper look positively socialist by comparison.
>>51560827
Nope
>>51561464
Don't have Sky so couldn't comment. Channel 4 is also worse than BBC for kekery.
>>51561789
Neither do I, Sky News channel has been on freeview since freeview existed, and now freeview is normal TV lel.
Swear most of the news readers on Channel 4 are Indian.
>>51560827
>media
>objective
oxymoron 2bh faam
>>51560827
Soon will be.
New government cutting off all commie-lefists media.
Only right, catholic media are good.
>>51560827
The TV news try to be objective in their news reports, maybe not so much in the news selection itself.
Newpapers on the other hand are private owned and tend to be biased towards the ideology the group/person in charge wants to promote.
>>51561825
Weird, don't remember ever seeing it. I do check out what's going on on Al Jazeera every now and then, now that's an eye opener.
our major news networks are about as impartial as rt, but at the same time we have some of the best independent news
>>51560827
Of course. They are free.
>>51562045
And they are never dishonest and mistaken, how could they be, they're kreesteean, right?
>>51560827
Objective media doesn't exist anywhere in the world.
It's basically propaganda now. So no.
>>51560827
Which one would you fuck. I'll take the green radio chick.
>>51562939
this
