>French ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''Engineering''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>no subject
well done moron
>German ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''Engineering''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
actually, it was american tyres hitting a bit of american plane that was left behind
once again yanks go and ruin it for everyone
>>59873454
>tfw their will never be a supersonic transatlantic transport plane again
Fuckin Americans and their trashy planes
>British """"""""""""""""""""""""""""Engineering"""""""""""""""""""""""""
Let me correct this
>>59872996
Concorde wasnt a franco-british programm?
>>59874744
not seeing a problem there
>>59875201
Meh come on, french mainly did the thing.
They can't even produce their own jetd.
>>59872996
As you already know, it was engineered by France and the UK.
>>59873454
This
It was DC-10 which "lost" some metal bracket and concorde just drove over it and it went flying up into one of the gas tanks and that was all it took. THANKS AMERICANS FOR KILLING FASTER THAN SOUND FLIGHT FOR CONSUMER MARKET
>>59875303
Bravo estonia.
why is this shit still banned
you faggots
i don't see them banning 747s from the numerous times it crashed
>>59875328
;^ )
>>59875364
Best ally tbqh.
>>59872996
I hope you like French engineering because we are building your nuclear plants
>>59875343
Some competing company probably took the chance to get rid of the competition
>>59875288
Rolls-Royce seem to do quite well in their aviation engines.
>>59872996
>engine tested on a british bomber
>>59875343
Because it's too fucking loud.
>>59872996
It was another sabotage by the CIA to ruin french economy and keep us USA-dependant.
They asked their agents to left some shit on the take-off path
>>59875343
Wasn't it because it was too expensive to run?
>>59875508
Too fucking expensive*
>>59875343
It isnt banned but when it crashed airlines that operated it pulled them off and for some FUCKING REASON everyone one was scared to fly in concorde anymore so they were scrapped
also it was old as fuck tech
>>59875526
Corncorde was extremely expensive to build, fuel, and maintain. Nobody was making much money off of it.
>>59874744
what's wrong with that
>>59875489
Thanks god you had something for you.
I must admit that you have an important part in aviation engines, for Airbus too.
>>59875549
>>59875558
>>59875576
t.CIA/Boeing shills
>>59874744
Still better than toast sandwhich I guess
>>59875558
It literally wasn't allowed to fly over populated areas because of the sound it made.
FFS you stupid yuroniggers go actually learn what concorde actually was like. Literally nothing good came from this dogshit excuse for an engineering project.
>>59875576
That's true. Otherwise after the crash it appeared thar tires weren't exactly how they had to be. So the whole remplacement was an obvious reason to stop the thing.
>>59872996
>Italian ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''Engineering''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>>59875645
Aaaand the first one to actually be mad is an American
Colour me """""surprised""""""
You are right too but the fact remains, the tickets would have been really expensive
>>59875645
spooky
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=annkM6z1-FE
>>59875645
>Literally nothing good came from this dogshit excuse for an engineering project
It was a Anglo-French project born through love <3
I wonder if they'll make these engines adaptable for commercial flights to other countries other than just space.
http://www.reactionengines.co.uk/space_skylon.html
>>59875741
Soon, m8. Soon.
BIG
BOEING
COCKPITS
>>59875771
Why are we so good at science and everyone else is shit?
freench drivers fort
>>59875847
Honhonhon
Are you even trying ?
>>59875847
>Why are we so good at science and everyone else is shit?
because you buy missiles from us and you have no space program
and your carriers have ramps
>>59875141
You guys have been building a reactor in Finland for a 11 years now, and the cost is over 3 times the original budget.
"""""""""""french"""""""""""""""""""""engineering""""""""""""""""
>>59875990
>and you have no space program
We've got a pretty big and world class satellite industry and build a lot of stuff for the European space agency.
>>59875991
That's actually the first one, we have to deal with new features everyday.
You know, a pressurized nuclear reactor isn't a bicycle, and this one will be thé most reliable and securised in the world.
>>59875990
Even the missiles we buy from you get altered here.
And we do have a space program, albeit it's very new, we've never bothered with space but in the last 10 years of actually bothering with space.
>EM drive
>SABRE engines
>Higgs particle theorem and shieeeeeet
Mother fuckers need to catch up, and our carriers have ramps because ramps look sexy, it's all about looking sexy on the high seas, not that you faggots ever win navy battles you useless shits.
>>59875991
>You guys have been building a reactor in Finland for a 11 years now, and the cost is over 3 times the original budget
Basically the same here with what EDF are trying to do.
>>59876017
Pro tip : ESA stands on the french space program.
>>59876067
#StrongerTogether
>>59876034
Wee everyone is criticizing the quality of weldings and in the building itself. There are so many groups of workers who don't communicate with each other so the construction site is really chaotic.
>inb4 new Chernobyl accident
>>59875990
>you have no space program
Do you really believe that?
>>59876067
>>59876088
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inmarsat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skynet_(satellite)
Aren't we building a launchpad in Scotland?
>>59876088
Try again skinflint
>>59876173
That how many migrant rapes happen per day?
>>59876132
>Wee everyone is criticizing the quality of weldings and in the building itself.
That's exactly the reason why the reactor will be the most securised in the world.
There are a lot of eyes on it.
You just can't compare with russians, japanese or americans stuff which are litteraly third world tier.
Here the CEA is looking for the least detail and that's why it seems a little chaotic, they don't want bad ad for the french nuclear industry, which is the strongest in the world.
>>59876173
Yes that's the ESA budget, though the ESA still get the UK Space Agency to build lots of stuff which was what the original post was about.
>>59876160
>launched by Ariane 5
Kek
>>59876260
Wow, 10 satellites that's it ?
>>59876324
Not just satellites but components, research and development benefits etc. It's worth a lot of money.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/engineering/11734494/UK-space-industry-punching-above-its-weight-in-the-global-market.html
>>59876324
We've never bothered with space.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_commercial_spaceport_competition
I don't know if the winner of the bid has been announced yet?
Thanks for letting us use your tech tho, saved us a lot of money.
>>59875343
It's not banned. It's just not worth it compared to planes which can carry tripple the passengers while using half the kerosine.
>>59875508
This is true.
When I was younger I lived in the city with the largest military airbase in Brazil, I've seen glass break due to the sonic boom more than once.
>>59876399
Just like India, in fact.
ESA provides 50% of the commercial launchs in the world which makes it the first launcher.
Thanks mainlyto french and germans.
What would youdo with your launchpad ?
>HURR DURR WE can has Rockets too
?
That sounds quite retarded tho, launchpads are often placed near the equator line. It seems weird, in scotland.
>>59876604
It only went super sonic over the ocean for Trans-Atlantic routes and on Europe to Australia via Singapore, it only went supersonic over low density areas. Plus it cruised at 60,000 feet, so it's not like it constantly burst windows
>>59876716
Not him, but I think the idea of a Scottish launch pad is for Polar orbits
>American ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''Engineering''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>>59876716
I never mentioned rockets, and you're missing the point I'm making in that the UK punches well above its weight and produces many quality shit for the ESA.
>>59876772
But even from guiana you can launch for polar orbits. There are two possibilities, unlike cap canaveral or Baïkonour.
>>59876881
You sure are contributors, it would be a lie saying otherwise. But admit that the french are way superior in this domain, for my hairy dong.
>>59872996
yes we are the best
>>59876806
always loved Jenga
>>59872996
>British space program
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2015/07/indian-pslv-launch-five-british-satellites/
>>59877754
Désigné
>>59878041
Scheiß
>>59878180
شارع
>>59878041
Designed?
>>59877754
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-36366733
Why send poo in space when you can't even keep your most significant cultural landmark clean of poo?
>>59872996
that was half designed by us
also it crashed because of
>american engineering
>>59877754
>only 2 boosters
do they even KSP?
>>59877754
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ScatSat-1
>>59878406
>Currently India is dependent on NASA’s ISS-RapidScat
>>59878406
Does Brazil even have a space program?
>>59878503
We had until we got CIA'd, killing all our scientists and engineers related to the program. Having to deal with china to launch or satellites has been a pain since.
>>59872996
>american engineering
>>59878705
well done america!
>>59878705
>>59878406
>when you discover the memes are true.
>>59878705
bravo
>>59878474
>German gets excited on hearing "scat"
Nothing new
>>59878641
Sad.
>>59876132
>>inb4 new Chernobyl accident
that's the plan
*hands pressed together in an ominous fashion*
>>59872996
French plane surrendered.
Why does not suprise me.
>>59875663
No no this American engeneering whit napoletan sailor
>>59879302
Fuck you forgt in your ass
>>59875990
>because you buy missiles from us
You realise America buys foreign equipment as well, right?
Of course you don't, utter daft yank.
>>59879302
>this kills British """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""Engineering""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
>>59885622
There was literally nothing wrong with the Titanic's design, the captain was retarded for speeding the ship in iceburg territory.
>American ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''engineering''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>>59885907
>british """""""manufacturing""""""
>>>59885966
>American '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''engineering'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_LEwNr_LGw
>>59885907
>british """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""transportation"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Nice meme https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbec0drdZJw
>>59878705
kudos to america
>>59875991
Serves you right to hire cheap polish workers that needed everything to be redone instead of expensive french
pls respond
>>59885768
ah, yes, nothing wrong. I mean, who needs watertight compartments on a ship anyway ?
>>59886965
jej
>>59886965
Titanic did have watertight compartments, they just couldn't resist water pressure and breached
>>59887170
so they weren't watertight then
>>59887170
They had a massive conception flaw preventing them from being properly watertight.
The fact that at some point the water level got above the said compartments didn't really help
>>59887561
>>59887913
british """"""""""""""""""""""""""engineering""""""""""""""""""""""""" innit
>>59873454
To be honest, the exploding tanks when hit by shit left by a prior plane problem was known but in a typical french way, they went full "fuck it, will never happen, we're totally safe"
>>59876806
Our jet fuel is so superior it melts steel beams.
