good or shit ?
>>2280947
anatomy is pretty decent, you have some nice details but lack some major ones which shows you don't have some anatomical knowledge that could help your piece.
The foreground and background have nice colours but the very bottom of the canvas is looking a little flat/dull.
By the look of your canvas, you are working pretty small which is limiting you, but over all pretty nice :)
I like it a lot just i'd have put more details on the face
>>2280947
question how did you get that skin tone, its good imo but im bad who doesnt know how to get flesh tones
>>2280947
shit
>>2280947
The color palette is lovely, and the anatomy is decent. It's pretty clear that you are afraid of going to details - you hid both hands and feet and the face is not detailed at all. The pose is nice and you got the skin tones and lightsources done nicely.
Start practicing on details like faces and do more hands / feet if they are causing problems now.
>>2281687
Post your work senpai.
>>2280947
>porn
>good
cmon son
>>2281715
my work is even worse
It represents the subconscious desire for sex pretty well. Romanticized and playful. A little lacking in some details.
I'm going to say 6.5.10
Not quite fap material.
>>2280947
Nice, OP. I might buy it if I saw it at an art fair.
pls b safe op
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PiqC-vfYLw
If the orange looked more like hair or more attached to the head it would be beautiful and I would pay for it.
But i'm just going to save it and alter it myself, thanks OP
>>2280947
Looks like he got lazy at some point and didn't finish it.
>>2280947
You did the body really well but everything else is really messy. You might want to work on that.
>>2280947
it would have been considerable better if you did it on a bigger canvas.
The biggest mistake beginners have is that they always paint on tiny fucking canvas. It's just simply not big enough to put in details. Even if you paint super rough it's going to be considerably more interesting larger.
This just looks like a study for a larger painting.
>>2280947
i like it OP you done good
Fucking shit looks like mud. It's supposed to be erotic but rubs off as pretentious.
It looks like you avoided adding features to the body, hands feet and face. Maybe some construction practice would give you the confidence to add them next time
>>2280947
face is too simple, you really only used like three lines for her facial features. Overall, id say it's too pornographic to look 'artsy' and too artsy to be porn.
>>2280947
i'd buy it
>>2281632
yellows and greens were sparingly used in the shadows to get that 'warm' sort of look.
>>2280947
>female
>upside down triangle body
dont
>>2286684
Shitty comment makes assumptions about construction based on results. Don't be that guy.
>>2280947
good shit
