How come no one has made a sentient AI yet?
Are people just afraid of muh skynet boogeyman?
>inb4 pedants start arguing about the definition of 'sentient'
you know what I mean
>>55550723
>you know what I mean
nope i dont. i'm afraid you're going to have to define it.
if you insist on not defining it then i will insist that as the turing test for AI was passed last year then sentience has in fact been achieved. check mate. game over.
>>55550981
ha! i was wrong, it was not even last year, it was 2014
Because we are all too busy running a train on your mom.
>>55550723
Google markov chains and figure it out for yourself.
>>55550723
We don't know what sentient means and that is part of the problem
>>55550723
Yes, engineers who have seen terminator are the sole reason sentient AI doesn't exist. Not the near impossibility of creating such a thing.
Functionally all it requires is a sense of past, present and future.
>>55550723
I did make one a couple of weeks ago, but I balked at the ethical implications, so I never powered the thing up.
