IT'S OVER, AMD IS FINISHED.
If you care about value then the 1070 is the go to card, if you care about performance then the 1080 is the current king.
Anything less than that is just poorfag tier and not worth buying unless you only need extra video out ports in your pc.
>>55081698
(you)
>>55081698
>380
>care about value
minimum monthly income in my country is 350
So i can get 980 performance for 200$ and thats a bad thing? With some OC im sure itll get closer to the 980ti.
RX 480 will be my next purchase undoubtedly now (I play at 1080p)
>>55081698
>better than the 390x
Thank fuck I decided to wait.
OC is what is impressive. Other benches show up to a 50% performance increase.
>>55081698
>If you care about value then the 1070 is the go to card
Sorry, I'm not paying €500 for a gpu.
>>55081698
>380$
>value
what the fuck are you talking about
>GTX 1070
>$379
>44% fatser
>8GB
>RX 480
>44% slower
>4GB
>but only $199
Hmm
>>55081806
>better than a factory overclocked 3 year old GPU
Are the standards for all AMDrones this low?
>>55081903
>$379
kek
>>55081913
It still costs way more.
Although most of the cards are not $380 I still bought gigabyte g1 1070. Not the best value but im not a poorfags so there's that.
>>55081918
This
>see the pic
>oh some amd fag started a thread
>actually op trying to trow shit at amd
you uploaded the wrong pic buddy
>>55081903
1070 vs 480 = 45% difference in performance
1070($379) vs 480($199) = 90% difference in price
1070 ($450) vs 480($199) = 125% difference in price
1070 ($450) vs 480 ($249) = 80% price difference
>>55081698
>If you care about value
Return to shill when we can buy cards that are not fucked edition, value-kun.
>>55081903
>>55081988
If you pair an AMD GPU with a cheap/budget cpu, you're not going to get your promised performance anon.
If you're too poor for a 1070 then I feel bad for you.
>>55081970
>r9 290 on sale from newegg for $199 last year
>same performance
>>55081981
Nvidiots don't care about cost or value when it doesn't benefit them. In this case the RX 480 not being able to beat the 1070 or 980 is a major victory regardless if the thing costs about half as much.
>>55082007
>If you pair an AMD GPU with a cheap/budget cpu, you're not going to get your promised performance anon.
When you buy Nvidia you're more likely to have to settle with a budget CPU than when you buy AMD and have another $150 to spend.
>>55082028
especially if it can't beat a 1060 for like $50 more
>>55081918
I don't give a shit about the founders edition.
>>55081698
>>55082060
>gtx 970 with an i5 4460 destroying an r9 290x with an overclocked i7 4770k
>thinking having an extra $150 for the cpu will actually make it worth it
If you honestly cared about value, you'd get the 1070 with an i3 6100. If you cared about performance, you'd get an i5 6600k or i7 6700k instead, and if you have enough money to blow, you'll get the i7 and a gtx 1080 for 4k gaming.
>>55082080
no one is going to release a $379 card when idiots are snapping up the FE for $80 more
>>55082076
Did you even read the post? Because I was shittalking nvidiots and their "This GPU that costs almost twice as much despite not even being anywhere near that much faster definitely is a victory"-stupidity.
>>55082111
It's faster than a Fury X which also costs $600.
I'm a stupid biased ass consumer who has no idea how competition in the economy works, AMD is dead, NVIDIA can monopolize yaaayy.
>>55082111
woah scalpers on amazon who knew
>>55082126
An i3 is most definitely going to bottleneck a 1070 while something like a 6600k (which you should be able to afford with the difference) is not going to bottleneck an RX 480.
>>55082111
b-b-but anon, that is just price gouging
n-nvidigoy will save pc gaming anon
you are just AMDelusional anon
>cantholdallthesememes.webp
>>55082158
Who the fuck is talking about the Fury-X? Everyone is talking about price performance of the RX480.
>>55082111
>amazon
>>55082219
Except it will. Amd drivers are so bad a 290x is bottlenecked by an overclocked 4770k.
I3 6100 is the king of budget performance right now and considering most games are gpu bound, and upcoming games are dx12, the i3 won't hold the gtx1070 back.
The 480 is going to be a fucking hit internationally. Nvidiots know it, can't stop it, and are mad as fuck about it.
I still cannot tell if people are genuinely "fans" of nvidia and/or amd, or if this is just a constant stream of bait and shitposts
>>55082291
I don't know jack shit about GPUs, how do I learn to tell the difference?
>>55082233
The RX 480 is already too slow for games today.
>>55082346
>>55082346
only for few unoptimized titles like ubisoft games, but next year it will struggle to play 50% of AAA games and in 2 years 90% of games won't be playable at 60fps.
>>55082374
Funny how nvidia cards won't have this problem :')
>>55081698
So this is probably b8, but scoring around a 980/390X is pretty amazing for a $200 mid-range card. Obviously it won't compare to the 1070 considering it costs twice as much. The high-end RX cards (Vega/Navi) should compete with 1070/1080, not the RX 480.
>>55082241
>bad amd drivers meme
>>55082469
Not a meme when it's true. Why do you think they're pushing dx12 so hard?
>>55081763
Shhhh, don't use logic here. They don't understand. If you don't buy tech you don't need, you're a poorfag.
1.44 times 200 is 288 retard. AMD RX 480 is literally quantifiably more valuable. What a fuking twat. And I'm not even from the UK. Autistic fucktaed.
>>55082346
Oh cool, are you able to post benchmarks taken from current generation games for me, please? I'm super interested to see them, and I didn't know AMD released test versions 14 days before the official release.
>>55082489
Anon, I'm sitting on 2 780s that I can almost never update the drivers for because while SLI will (barely) work in a new game, they break performance in about 20 other games. I literally haven't purchased DOOM because of this.
Meanwhile, the 290x that I have -- granted, it's not my daily driver system -- hasn't had a problem since I got it. It's a PCS+ 290x and I had some shitty GPU utilization (it's paired with my old 4.8GHz 2500k), but it got fixed within a week of having it.
tl;dr confirmation bias -- everyone conveniently ignores bad nvidia drivers
>>55082525
Not him but you need 2 just for AoTS. I'd say that's pretty shit.
And let's not forget how bad drivers will be on launch. You'll need 6 months before the 480 will be performing competitively, which means nvidia can release a gimped 1060 and get away with it.
>>55082525
The RX 480 is as fast as the 290 (minimum VR specs) which only gets 35 FPS in modern games which is just not enough to have any fun.
>>55082549
> it takes two mid-range cards to match a single top-tier card
Stop the fucking presses.
>>55082565
You could also turn down the settings. But you'd have to not be fucking retarded, so that's not an option for you
>>55082565
But...why does everything need to be on Very High Quality or Ultra to be enjoyable? I was playing Crysis 3 with no AA and everything on Medium and it still looked beautiful, especially compared to console variants.
Higher quality is always nice, but it should've be the make or break for game enjoyment. If your enjoyment of a game entirely hinges on how pretty it looks, it's more often than not a poorly written game.
>>55082565
>1920x1080
>780ti getting 39 FPS
Those benchmarks are so hilariously inaccurate.
A single one of my 780s gets 60FPS+ (1150core/3500mem) at 1080p in W3, so those benchmarks are either wrong as fuck or with shillworks on.
>>55082598
> should've
I meant 'shouldn't be the make or break'
>>55082007
>>r9 290 on sale from newegg for $199 last year
>>same performance
Same performance as RX 470. Runs much hotter, no support for HEVC / 4K60FPS. Cost more 50$+ more.
>>55081698
>8327 / 380$msrp = 21.91
>5708 / 200$msrp = 28.54
Heres your (you)
>>55082565
>The RX 480 is as fast as the 290
>citation needed
Why get a Lamborghini when you can get an Accord for way cheaper? You get way more horsepower/dollar. :^)
>>55082625
>implying it's good value to buy a card that can't even get 60fps on last year's titles
ITS OVER
AMD IS FINISHED
>>55082683
>480 overclocks 30% in synthetic benchmark
>meets the performance of a card 200$ more for free
damn, start selling those AMD stocks now guise, they're done 4 !!
>>55082241
>he doesn't know what a command processor is
Topkek. They added one for Polaris.
>>55082598
>>55082594
B-but then i-i won't be part of the masterrace.. and muh bragging rights..
>>55082683
Third time I have seen this. IT'S FAKE!
>>55082698
Fake, it's the Titan X
>Had an 280 from Sapphire
It was good, but a bit hot
>Had a 380 from Gigabyte
It was okay, but the fan RPM was broken
Who should I try next? MSI cards looks nice
>>55082700
>amd added a command processor
>amd copying nvidia yet again
Why buy from the brand that can't even innovate or afford to write drivers?
>>55081698
its cheaper and offers a better performance per dollar whats the problem? and in the least your money wint go to supporting a company that tries its hardest to monopolize the industry kek
>finds thread about GPUs
>Still has a GeForce GT 745m
>Still a decent gaymen laptop desu
>>55082742
MSI cards have never let me down, but I'm not sure about them on the AMD side.
>>55082742
Broken as it displayed wrong RPM
>>55082780
I know Gigabyte doesnt care jackshit about optimizing the heatsink for AMD. They just copy paste it from Nvidia.
>>55082779
Poorfag. You don't deserve to call yourself a PC gamer.
>>55082804
That's asus...
Gigabyte uses thicker heatsinks for amd last time I checked
If I want more power but still want to stick to AMD, is it stupid to want the r9 Fury?
>>55082904
Why not buy a 480 now and then another one later?
>>55082973
Multi gpu is still shit, don't do this.
You'll be the victim of developers, especially with dx12
>>55082989
Could I get the opinion of someone who isn't a tripfag?
>>55082973
What this anon >>55082989 said, I'd rather have one good GPU over two okay GPU's. There's no denying the 480 is a great price/performance card, but considering I have a 280x that's still going strong, I want a bigger leap in performance.
>>55083002
>>55082973
Multi gpu is still shit, don't do this.
You'll be the victim of developers, especially with dx12
>>55081698
I don't really care. I'm wet thinking about a cute itx card thats as good as a 980, all with >150 watts.
>>55083011
Honestly it's best to wait for 490 for that, since hopefully it'll be fury x performance.
>>55083043
Why didn't you get the nano? Cute as fuck gpu too.
>>55083071
>150 watts
>@ 200 burgers.
>>55083071
Are there any rumors saying 490 will have HBM?
>>55082668
If you have that kind of money then go for it. No one is stopping you
>>55083126
The upcoming Vega line was always supposed to have HBM2 according to AMD roadmaps.
The only thing we know now is that anything named 490 and above will not be a Polaris based chip. 460, 470, 480 are it for Polaris. There's the $100-$300 right there.
>>55082076
We both know that's never happening.
>>55083223
So then to have HBM 2 and competition for the 1080/1070, I have to waitfag some more to avoid jewish tactics of nvidia? This sucks
>>55083264
AMD targeted the largest market share first.
Nvidia targeted a tiny niche first.
>>55083298
Do you know how much the 480 needs? I have a dual fan 750 ti, and was wondering if I should upgrade.
>>55083329
Isn't it a single 6 pin?
>>55083017
Why is multi gpu shit?
>>55081698
Where are the 480X benchmarks? That's the one with true value for cost
>>55083340
Yeah, just one
>>55083405
It either doesn't work at all, or scales like shit. You'll rarely find a game that scales well like bf4 or AoTS. And with dx12 multiadapter is even harder for devs to implement it.
>>55083405
It sounds like a great idea on paper but what's going to happen behind the scenes is a ton of money being thrown around at developers either way to get it implemented or not implemented (depending on who is paying) that's going to determine mGPU's fate.
mGPU as a technology isn't shit. Ashes of the Singularity showed that a second GPU scales at something like 83% bonus performance on top of the first GPU. That's a pretty good indication that the technology itself can work but whether devs invest in it or not remains to be seen.
>>55082841
> yes goyim, buy a new laptop even though you don't need it :^)
>>55083471
There is no 480x. Just a 4GB and an 8GB version of the same chip, RX 480.
>>55081698
By the look of that chart, they just put out a $200 GPU that gives you performance within a couple percent of a $500-$600 GPU. Is this right?
>>55083669
>Is this right?
It's impossible to prove until legit benchmarks come out on the 29th but it seems to line up with what little we know so far.
>If you care about value then the 1070 is the go to card
>>55083606
err yea that's what i meant, 8gb version will have some long term staying power
>>55081698
>RX 480 offers 80% of the 1070's performance at 33% the price.
Should I buy one GTX 1070 or three RX 480s for the same price? Or should I buy one RX 480 and use the leftover money to hire an AIDS infected nigger and send him to fuck you up the ass, OP?
>>55082489
It was true in like 2006
>>55083892
It was true in like 2012 too.
Not so much now though.
>>55083848
Buy one 480 and put the rest into Zen or Zen+, homie
>>55082489
it's so bad right now that even cards like the 750ti beat out AMD's entire low end segment.
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=398858
>>55082565
>posting an old benchmark
I have a 290. I get playable framerates on ultra on Witcher 3.
>>55081698
> $400-$450 is "value"
Excellent bait, but I learned my lesson about trusting in the long-term value of higher-end Nvidia cards with my GTX 670, thanks.
After getting left in the gutter to die for the sake of prioritizing Maxwell, it will warm my cold black heart to see the pain in 970 users this fall after they stop getting optimizations too.
>>55082489
all true things are memes. That's the very definition of meme.
>>55082444
>Navi
nigger that's like 2018 best case.
> uses post-HBM2 "NextGen" memory, probably some crazy direct-on-die stacked shit
>>55082668
>>55084065
'nextgen' memory is just HMC, AMD didn't use the HMC name because it's owned by intel and they don't want to market for a competing brand's superior technology.
>>55084087
HMC is shit, meant for density at the expense of power and latency.
It uses high-clocked serial buses like Rambus did in the Pentium 4 days and potentially multiple buses with mesh topology routing.
The only thing it has in common with HBM is the stacked memory with the through-silicon vias, and the external interfaces are completely opposite in philosophy.
>>55082668
>I need a car to commute to work
>well, you'd better buy this Hummer, it's really nice
>but I can buy a Civic for half the price
>WHAT THE FUCK, ARE YOU POOR OR SOMETHING, YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT HONDA SUCKS DICKS. DO YOU LIKE SUCKING DICKS, FAGGOT?
>... I just want a car to get me to work
So should I get a 480 or not, you faggots??
>>55082111
>implying scalpers would not take advantage of RX 480 releaae
>>55084193
What's your current card, and what resolution and refresh rate does your monitor support?
Please stop with these posts, it's a good value for the performance, this is coming from a Nvidia guy.
>>55084224
Radeon HD 7950, 1080, and I don't know what my monitor supports, It's a LG 27MP33
>>55082111
FOUNDERS edition you dumb fuck
christ i hate this fucking board
>>55084304
Yeah you fag. Anyone below the 390/970 performance line should be looking at this card.
>>55084372
Thanks mate.
>>55084368
There's only one other cooler out and it's around the same price.
>>55084165
>not getting the most expensive car to compensate for your absolutely tiny penis
My Bugatti Veyron Founder's Edition let's everyone know that I can buy them an island if they suck my 2 inch dick.
>>55084426
>let's everyone know
>let is everyone know
does it let them know you failed 3rd grade english?
>>55084446
> implying English matters when you have enough money to just dictate your shitposts to a Mexican immigrant who types them for you
>>55084446
It let's is allows them to know I never took 3rd grade English. It's not everyone's first language.
>>55084461
>implying 6'0" isn't still manlet tier
If you aren't OVER 6' you're still a manlet, sorry.
>>55084461
And now for the actual truth
>>55084484
>being anything under 6'2"
Hope you remembered to stretch today, little man
>>55084564
>MFW having a Radeon RX 480 is like having a little sister who will call you onii-chan
I'll take two.
>>55084684
That's not a little sister. That's a house fire.
>>55084694
It's a little sister that's extra warm when you hug her~
>>55082489
>when the abortion fails
>>55084694
>>55084704
>>55082489
>mfw AMD wrote Mantle and gave it away for Vulkan and DX12 so they don't have to kill themselves writing drivers
>>55084704
Good point.
It's why I love my AMD laptop so much, keeps me warm in the winter.
>>55084629
Joke's on you, I'm 5'5".
>>55082683
Please stop posting this shoop
>>55082565
No way this is correct.
Running a 5820k 4.1 OC/290/DDR4 2600 and I get avg. 55 FPS with max everything but foliage distance (high) and hit 60 often and rarely fall below 45 in cities.
Nvidia shilling confirmed
>>55081869
talking about not being poor
>>55084201
>Implying a chip that's been in mass production for months is going to be in short supply.
>>55084304
Hey wait a second, you're not me.
>>55084704
>>55084744
