>1440p
>144hz
>freesync
>IPS with 100% colors
This monitor seems too good to be true
is it, /g/?
post name fag
>>54964400
Nice! Fuck, thats a sweet one, get it, I just ordered a 1080p 144Hz FreeSync monitor the other day.
>inb4 1080p 2016
Framerate and detail/quality > resolution, personal preference, can't afford two 980 Ti's to play Witcher 3 at 1440p at ultra at high framerate.
>>54964400
I have one. It's great. 144 Hz is silky smooth and the viewing angles and colours are way better than those of my old TN.
Isn't this the one that can only do Freesync up to 95hz or something? Not a big deal, though.
>>54964501
MG279Q
Not to be mistaken for the 278q which is a shitty TN panel
Backlight bleed
The TN version (pg278q) apparently has better colors than the IPS (pg279q) version, and is 1ms response time.
The only thing this IPS panel has going for it is viewing angles.
>>54964400
How much is it?
>>54964718
>TN
>Better colors than IPS
Explain
>>54964400
But freesync is pretty useless with an Nvidia card.
>>54964400
>horrible qc
>freesync only on 35-90hz, can be lowered via hack but this is panel dependable
yeah no
>>54964400
>not 4K
it's either 1080p or 4K
anything in between is waste of processing power
>only 72% sRGB
Fugg
Are there any Gaymer monitors that also have good colors?
I've been debating getting this but the whole Asus quality control issue has me spooked.
Apparently it's a lottery to get one with minimal bleed or other problems.
>>54964792
You can tweak all the FreeSync drivers to go to almost 9Hz, depends on the chip tho, but the cheap monitor all support a wide range.
>IPS with 100% colors
what a bait!
IPS does not automatically mean it will be good
and afaik all 144Hz IPS actually is "IPS type"
it's not the real IPS
>>54964400
>with 100% colors
What does it mean
100% of AdobeRGB or Profoto?
30bit color depth?
>>54964400
>1440p
What a shame
You will always have to find a compromise between quantity and quality. It's just not possible for a monitor to have great colors *and* go up to 144hz *and* be over 1080p. If something like that were available for a price like $600 then there would barely be competition since it would outcompete everything, especially with a company that advertises itself to the community so well like Asus.
>>54964917
100% sRGB
Should be enough if you're not working with photography
>>54964400
I have one, it's pretty great. I got it on sale for like $400, so it was worth it.
>>54964886
more longer crystals stays polarized more chances to get dead pixels
>>54964745
Are you one of those normies who think moar megapixuls = better camera?
I might get one of these then. Does it scale well down to 1080p?
>>54965011
But it will take a while, you will have a new monitor by that time.
>>54964400
>16:9
Pure trash.
>>54964400
got one last month, shit is hella dope and i dont even have an amd card for freesync yet
i was a bit worried about all the qc reviews but i guess i got lucky because the panel is perfect
>>54964400
PG279Q is superior. The freesync is limited to 90 Hz.
http://us.hardware.info/reviews/6486/asus-mg278q-mg279q-and-pg279q-review-three-144hz-wqhd-gaming-monitors
>>54964903
Because "IPS" is basically LG's own brand name for their panels and the technology. Samsung uses PLS, AU Optronics uses AHVA etc, both of which are very similar in principle so these monitors are just generally referred to as "IPS type".
$600 on amazon
no thanks
>>54965187
$750 is insanity for a monitor. I can't justify paying that much for only 27"
Looking for a good, relatively cheap 27'' 144hz gsync monitor.
What does /g/ think about Acer Predator XB271Hb ? This is the cheapest I've found with gsync, 144hz, 27'' and 1ms response.
Any other, better alternatives ?
>>54964400
>IPS with 100% colors
>Be ASUS marketing department
>Advertise a standard sRGB gamut panel as "100% sRGB"
>Faggots like OP jizz all over their pants because 100%!
>100%
>1
>0
>0
>%
Fucking brilliant.
>>54964400
Is it just me or has everyone forgotten freesync is amd exclusive
>>54965386
FreeSync is an open standard
G-Sync is proprietary
>>54965284
Yea had to pay 900e for it. There's no other monitor on the market with specs like that tho so the price is kinda acceptable with no competition but it is pricey.
>>54965386
Free sync is VESA standard, nvidia is just pushing its own proprietary standard.
>>54964718
>The TN version (pg278q) apparently has better colors than the IPS
Is this nigga serious?
>>54965622
It has amazing out of the box colors but all of that skews if you view it from an angle like with all TN panels.
>>54964718
>The only thing this IPS panel has going for it is viewing angles.
And lower total display latency time in the case of the PG279Q. It's the better monitor in practically every respect aside from the individual pixel response times which are extremely good even on the IPS version and you'd be hard pressed to notice any kind of ghosting on it, especially with ULMB turned on.
>>54964400
The ASUS free-sync 144hz IPS display is shit because it only works up to 90hz
You want the model from Acer, that runs from 30hz-144hz
>>54964400
>IPS
Enjoy your poor response time
>>54964400
>>IPS with 100% colors
sRGB or AdobeRGB
Hint, only AdobeRGB matters.
>This monitor seems too good to be true
Horrible quality control. RMA hell is real.
hope you like playing AUO's insane panel lottery
>>54966745
i played and won my first try
git gud
>>54964400
>1440p, 144 Hz
>AMD FreeSync
You do know you're not going to be gaming in 1440p@144 Hz on any AMD card, right?
>>54966527
FUCK off kid. IPS is objectively better than TN, period. Literally not a single person other than a couple CSGO lottery kids can tell the difference in response time.
IPS > TN.
Waiting for 4k IPS HDR 144hz panel from Dell as they make the best monitors and best no dead pixel policy.
>>54966818
Neither are you with a Nvidia card
>b-but 980ti gets 5 fps more in gameworks games!
>>54966818
Crossfire Vega can do 144hz 4k easy, screenshot this post you heard it here first.
>>54965356
Isn't it higher than regular monitors though?
I know my "100% srgb" monitor was a huge upgrade from my old TN in terms of colors
>>54966464
Isn't there something about "no overdrive witch Freesync on" so there's motion blur or ghosting or something?
First person to reply decides my fate.
I'm at microcenter
Y/N pg279q
>>54964687
only up to 90hz
>>54966841
>>54966859
Fools.
Everyone with a functioning brain knows HBM2 will destroy GDDR5X at anything over 1080p.
You took some weak bait.
>>54966745
would it be more risky to buy a new one or a used one that claims to have no problems?
I've got a regular 1440p monitor but I'm wondering if it's worth it to drop to a 1080p 144hz freesync. I don't want to drop a fat chunk of change for the 1440p ones especially if the TN gaming monitors only have issues with viewing angles
>>54966936
I'll post the receipt when I'm done
>>54967048
I kind if want to suck your cock, in a non gay feminine way desu senpai.
>>54967079
As promised and thanks.
I hope I win the pane lottery today. 15 days to decide if I should keep it.
>>54964400
>This monitor seems too good to be true
is it, /g/?
Yes, it's an ASUS.
>>54964400
>tfw no 4K 144hz
>>54968065
maybe in 5 years when a card comes out that can actually break 30 fps in 4k
>>54968085
my 2 titan X can
>>54967972
Some lucky shit got a perfect Acer one supposedly for 500
>>54968338
How. I went through 5 of them for 800...
>>54968013
I've had my trusty Pb238q for awhile
I don't get why people shit on Asus
>>54964400
>giant bezels with buttons on the side
No thanks. I'll stick with my Ultrasharps.
>>54965386
>freesync is amd exclusive
>implying it's not that Nvidia refuses to adopt it
Even Intel will support freesync, it's only a matter of time until Nvidia caves.
>>54968065
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/news_archive/35.htm#asus_prototype
>>54966464
Isn't FreeSync only needed for screen tearing
I doubt you'll get any if you're actually running a game at 120hz
>>54964400
>$2 have been added to your AMD Account
100% colors huh?
I would hate to spend money on a freesync monitor for a card without working drivers
G-Sync monitors and Nvidia GPUs are worth the extra cost considering I will never have driver problems
>>54965422
What happened to the Korean IPS Monitor meme? I remember people pushing 1440p at 120hz on those couple years ago.
let me get this straight... 100% colors?
>>54964542
which one?
>>54969128
he means the shitty aoc one
>>54964542
>detail/quality > resolution
wh...what
retard
>>54969092
It died when people realized how shitty they were. >10 dead pixels, backlight issues, terrible longevity, etc.
>>54964826
what is wrong with your brain
too expensive
>>54969092
>>54969187
I've still got one and still love it, zero dead pixels, colors are great, had it running at 110hz since I bought it almost exactly 2 years ago with no issues or complaints. $300 then and I wanna say I've seen em for ~$200 more recently
>>54964400
>not gsync or ultrawide
>>54969379
>G-Sync
shoo Nvidia shill
>ultrawide
Have fun being able to play on 5 games on it
>>54968957
20 ruppees have been deposited in your Nvidia account
>>54969451
Gsync is objectively better and game syou can play in ultrawide is worth it
The XF270HU is the same, but it 1. Costs less 2. Has a full 144hz range unlike the Asus one.
>>54969800
>Gsync is objectively better
Name one way Gsync is better aside from "dude its nvidia its just better"
>>54969849
It may be cheaper but damn am I going to have to replace that fuck ugly stand.
>>54964745
Pretty sure there have been cheap IPS with low color gamut for years now
>>54970573
no, but really, anything nvidia is better
>>54964400
>not 4k
>ITT: faggots too poor to afford an Eizo Foris FS2735.
You shitfucks disgust me!!!!!!!!
>>54971068
>Eizo Foris FS2735
Not even 34 inch or 4k
> freesync
> IPS
This monitor sucks buddy.
>>54971101
>34 inch
>4k
What's the matter anon, your porn just isn't immersive enough form you anymore?
>>54971208
No not really, have a 4k 70 inch TV now just need a good one for gaming.
>>54964826
You're a special kind of stupid
>>54970573
Gsync actually communicates back and forward with the gpu, whereas freesync listens to it
>>54971274
>Gsync actually communicates back and forward with the gpu
>whereas freesync listens to it
Did you just come up with that mess of buzzwords or did Nvidia's marketing team do it for you?
>>54964718
Can confirm. Beats any other 144hz monitors on the market by far
>Only 3 Freesync monitors can actually do IPS, 144hz, and 1440p at the same time
>One only does freesync up to 90hz, the other is a shitty chink Acer, and the last is 1000 dollarydoos
>Meanwhile theres tons of Gsync monitors that offer the same features and actually pull them off
Remember AMDfags, this is what you get for buying your shitty bargain bin technology
>>54971312
Except that's actually what happens
Calling them buzzwords doesn't suddenly make you right
Stop arguing like a middle schooler
>>54971430
>The Gsync can TALK to the gpu, freesync only listens!
You sound like some poo in loo repeating marketing buzzwords.
It helps that you don't even explain what that shit is supposed to mean.
>>54971448
How am I supposed to explain more plainly than I already did
I'm not going to write you a fucking thesis on it
>>54964400
It has a shit freesync range, the Acer XF270HU is the same thing but with a better freesync range.
>>54971414
back to /v/ summerfag
>>>/v/
>>54971977
kinda hesitatant because Acer already has an updated line for Gysnc and they might make one for Freesync
>>54971414
ASUS and Acer are from the same country dipshit
>>54972029
They updated the G-sync ones because the old ones had terrible QC, the freesync one had good QC so no need to refresh it.
>>54972048
>The Freesync model wasn't selling so they didn't make a new one.
>>54964400
Best monitor I got so far.
Freesync is quite limited sadly. With CRU it's possible to switch the range on the fly.
I use mine with 25hz-60hz. (30fps locks dip sometimes below 30fps and the switch to frame double might become noticeble)
Normal range is 35hz-90hz but you can also use 60hz-144hz or something entirely else.
Keep in mind that dwm doesn't allow variable refresh rates in window mode. Nvidias GSync uses some hack to achieve that, AMD doesn't. First games which support freesync in window mode are UWP apps.
Quality control is bad. Had two monitors here and both had dust behind the panel. Less annoying than a dead pixel subpixel though. There's often halation on the side. My first one was bad, the second one better.
>>54972080
im so glad you have a trip so i can filter you
>>54972146
You can turn the range up and down?
Sounds pretty gr8
Now the problem is playing the asus panel lottery
>>54972146
Not sure what I want to do, thinking about getting an Acer XF270HU. But don't feel like playing lottery so if that one sucks go straight to a BenQ XL2730Z.
Or skip all that and wait for the Viewsonic XG2703.
I have an ASUS PB258 that I'm quite happy with. Want to get 2 more and I'll be more than happy. Just wish it had freesync.
>>54972217
the Acer XF270HU is on woot right now for like $100 off it that helps
Anybody own a monitor that has like 0 backlight bleed?
>>54972260
It's impossible
>g-sync
>freesync
Just get a better gpu, faggots, no need to hide dropping fps with meme tech.
>>54972272
well I meant "minimalest" close to 0
>>54972251
>Shipping Note: Shipping to Alaska and Hawaii is not available for this item.
If I did want to, I can't.
>>54972260
Amoled :^)
>>54972314
Do I look like tony stark?
>>54972297
>living in Alaska or Hawaii
why
>>54972281
Found the 1080p guy
>>54972340
Well you got your answer, did you? Bleeding is always a lottery, IPS tends to be worse in that regard.
>>54972398
>IPS tends to be worse in that regard.
That's what I needed to know. Thanks Pepper
>>54964400
im running the gsync version of that monitor and its pretty nice. the backlight bleed is there tho. but it only appears on completely black screens. its not really an issue imo. but yeah for 800$ it shouldnt have that. but even with the bleed still blows away 1080p 60hz non gsync
Has AMD even put up freesync support for Linux?
>>54972281
poorfag 60hz fag detected.
>>54972352
>>54973221
Obvious poorfags.
>>54967918
why the fuck is tax so fucking low? Its at least 10% in california.
>>54971223
Lol, good luck gaming on 4K dumb faggot
new to the monitor game. whats a 27 inch monitor < $500 boys? The Dell ones seem nice.
>>54973221
Explain to me what's the point in purchasing 144hz monitors if you're not gonna use it at that frequency due to freesync? And if you ARE gonna use it, then freesync simply won't kick in. G-sync is even bigger meme - uses tech that's built-in to HDMI and then slaps in a dud chip.
>>54964400
free sync is irrelevant at 120hz+
ranges when i can tell fps difference at 144hz
work something like this
45-90
90-100
100-144
I don't know why 90-100 is such a turning point though
>>54964753
Its also free. The same can not be said for buying a Gsync monitor with an AMD card.
>>54966841
Its closer to:
>Fury X is 45% worse with gameworks
>980Ti is only 35% worse with gaywerks suck shit AyyMD losers now my hair looks good but pisses on my fps when there's a breeze.
>>54973268
dell usually is solid all rounder
when in doubt use this
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews.htm
>not buying a tv at 4k at half the price
>>54973945
42''
>>54973969
4k 42" for only 320 bucks is hard to pass by, sit further back
>>54973987
>sit farther back
Holy shit you're a retard. Might as well get 1440p
>>54974023
forgive me father
>>54964826
1440p is the sweet spot. All monitors should be this resolution.
>>54964400
>IPS with 100% colors
100% what? sRGB? AdobeRGB? NTSC?
Also you can't just look at color gamut and automatically assume it's a good monitor. Color accuracy, white & black level, greyscale accuracy and contrast ratio could all be garbage.
>>54974059
all of them fgt
>>54974077
>144hz "gaming" monitor
>ever even approaching 100% AdobeRGB
Give me a break.
>>54964400
>1440p
shit res
>100% colors
the only way you could possibly interpret this statement, it would be false
>This monitor seems too good to be true
That's because you're a fucking idiot consumer swallowing up meaningless numbers without a care in the world for actually important display metrics
>What's the panel technology? TN, IPS, PVA? Who made the panel?
>What's the panel's native resolution?
>What's the diagonal size, and what DPI does this work out to?
>What viewing distance will you be using it at?
>What's the native refresh rate, and does it accept other refresh rates? If so, which range? Can you overclock it?
>What's the advertised native color gamut?
>What's the static contrast ratio?
>Does it have “dynamic contrast” antifeatures, and can you turn them off?
>What's the brightness range, and how stable is the contrast ratio as you adjust the brightness?
>Does it use a flicker-free brightness adjustment? (Be especially wary of PWM cycles)
>Does it use any pixel overdrive, and if so can you adjust the strength or turn it off?
>What's the viewing ratio gamma stability like?
>What bit depth does the display advertise? 6+FRC? 8? 8+FRC?
>Does it support FreeSync / Adaptive Sync? (What about G-SYNC?)
>What display coating does it use?
>In the case of LCD displays, what polarizer technology does it use?
>In the case of LCD displays, what backlighting technology does it use? CCFL? WLED? GB-r LED? RGB LED?
>What's the display's input signal latency?
>What's the display's VESA response times? What about G2G?
>Does the display support VESA mounts? What height/adjustments does the mount support? Can you use it in portrait mode?
>What's the power consumption like?
>What's the panel uniformity like? Does the backlight leak?
>Wait an entire year for the the PG279Q because muh IPS
>Price is £750 on release
>£750 for a single fucking monitor
>I can buy 2 27" QHD panels for that price
>Price isn't dropping
>It's still selling well
Why is it so fucking expensive? I could quite easily afford one but it's the principal that bothers me, one 144hz monitor is not worth more than two quality QHD monitors like the BL2710's I'm using right now.
>>54974125
You seem pretty damn knowledgeable about monitors. Could you lend a moment to my question here?
>>54974187
>>54974187
>>54974187
>>54974162
Your monitor is the most important part of your system, since you're staring at it all day long. More important than your CPU which you're only using at like 1% load on average
>>54974231
I understand the importance as I do a lot of colour work, but 144hz + GSYNC is not worth double the retail of 60hz panels.
>>54974265
For me that answer depends on whether or not you can overclock your 60 Hz monitor to 72 Hz or not.
72 Hz is pretty important for anime desu
>tfw I was going to buy a new gaming monitor with "full HD" and looking at like ~150€ monitors
>"Oh great, so cheap and nice! But maybe I should check /g/ first if there is something I should know before I buy"
Now I apparently need to find a 1440p / 4K 144hz IPS that need to be Freesync or G-sync, enabled and anti-flicker and certain type of RGB settings etc. etc.
Fucking hell /g/, I would have probably been perfectly happy with that shitty budget monitor, and now I need to get something in the 500€ rage or I feel I'm missing out.
>>54974327
>72 Hz is pretty important for anime desu
>72Hz is pretty important for a source that's been produced at a maximum of 12fps
Damn, you're stupid.
>>54974412
72 / 24 = 3
60 / 24 = 2.5
>>54974436
>being an animefag
>2016
>>54974478
Most film and television content is 24fps too.
>>54964400
Advertising is against the rules
>>54974496
And that's what you need, 24fps.
>>54967918
Grab the calibrated settings and ICC profile from tftcentral and you are golden.
>>54974721
>Grab the calibrated settings and ICC profile from tftcentral and you are golden.
Using somebody else's ICC profiles is like using somebody else's correction glasses.
Can someone explain the "backlight bleeding" problem etc.
What does it mean, and why does it matter?
>>54974747
Displays don't vary that much from each other assuming that the panel is the same and it is in the case of PG279Q. Using a properly calibrated ICC profile + hardware settings is a lot better than out of the box colors.
>>54974757
Glowing of the backlight, visible as an uneven/gray blacks in darker scenes around the monitor edges. I have a feeling that many people here mix up backlight bleed with IPS glow.
>>54974799
>I have a feeling that many people here mix up backlight bleed with IPS glow.
this
The difference is easy to see: IPS glow goes away / changes if you move your head around. Backlight bleed stays the same
>>54967918
I got a very good panel. There is minor bleed on all black but I'm amazed by the color and clarity.
Replaced a 10 year old Samsung TN that actually had a few physical rips in the screen. It's amazing what people will get used to.
Gaming was very smooth with gsync, 1440p & 144hz isn't a meme.
>>54974747
>Using somebody else's ICC profiles is like using somebody else's correction glasses.
Yea nah. The production always yields some deviation between different units but the magnitude is nowhere near the level that calibrated settings and an ICC profile wouldn't help compared to the stock.
>>54969160
detail/quality IS resolution you stupid cunt
>>54975024
>resolution = quality
I guess you're one of those idiots upscaling 240p content to 4K to make it look better, right?
>>54975024
I think he meant graphical quality as in running a game at ultra settings at 1080p/144fps is better than running the same game at high settings at 1440p and getting ~60fps
>>54975024
No PPI is detail/quality.
I'm a poorfag but if I were looking for an expensive monitor, I'd get this probably.
>>54975262
I would agree with this
IMO: framerate > graphical settings > resolution in that order
In other words, pick the highest graphical settings (within reason) and then lower the resolution until you can play it at 60 fps.
I have two monitors here: a TN 1680x1050 120hz monitor and a 21:9 IPS 2560x1080 60hz monitor.
I can definitely enjoy 120hz on games that support it. But I cannot go back to the image "quality" or low resolution.
>>54975526
Depending on the game, some can even be playable at 30fps.
The issue is, unless there's a limiter ingame, by limiting it with some tools you will introduce input lag as well.
Lol, not even mentioning the BenQ XL2730Z in this thread
>>54964702
>27"
Dropped
Anything below 32" is just too small for me. I seriously hope they stop making monitors for children and move to 32-40" 144hz 4k with low ghosting.
>>54975781
Because it's TN.
>>54965117
>>54965187
It's cheaper Chinese fake IPS ?
>>54976276
Hitachi/LG pioneered the IPS technology and named it that. Other manufacturers made their own version of it and refer to it with a different name. There are some minor differences in these technologies and none of them are strictly better or worse than the other. IPS-type panels come in different qualities that can be measured which is the part that actually matters, not the underlining technology.
>>54969092
Lacking interest because large manufacturers priced their better offerings lower. And although they still cost more than Korean Gloss -memes, there's value in not having to worry about panel quality/warranty problems, build quality and image quality. For most Korean stuff you are buying shit blind unlike with these known brands which often get measured and tested by various of sites.
>>54974352
you don't need 1080p+ unless you have a decent card, 144 means shit only for esport, freesync\gsync is nice but overrated - most of the time triple buffering is enough, im looking to buy LG 27MP68 with RX480\490 when they arrive, and will be happy as a clam.
I dont get it /g/, if TN panels and cheapo Asus IPS monitors have the same color range, why do things look shitty and washed out on the TN but colorful on the IPS?
>>54964400
Does cause eyestrain anon?
>>54976629
>GTX 480 in sli
>>54976160
>40"
Enjoy your neck strain faggot
>>54976629
>you don't need 1080p+ unless you have a decent card, 144 means shit only for esport
you must be literally retarded, the difference between 60 and 144hz is night and day, even on the fucking desktop
>>54977357
human eye can only see 30 pixels
>>54977305
I've been using a 32" for 4 years and never had any neck pain or discomfort. It actually help me since I'm not hunching over a 23-27" monitor to have a comfort view.
mfw i got a benq g2411hd for 40 euro used
120 Hz > 144 Hz
120 is divisible by 24, 30, and 60.
144 is only divisible by 24
>>54964400
1 ms > 4 ms
Come back when IPS can actually be used for games.
>>54977563
>144 is only divisible by 24
aren't you forgetting about watching native 48 fps films such as The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug, The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies, amongst many others?
>>54977580
average human response time is 100 ms so fuck off
>>54977580
120 Hz is 8.33 ms/frame, so there's nothing stopping IPS displays from using G-sync style time-compressed writeout with strobing other than not wanting to not wanting to make a custom T-con/scaler with an extra screen's worth of buffer.
TN transition times will still obviously be better and allow for narrower strobe widths, but the issue is solvable with IPS in principle.
240+ Hz with IPS will probably happen no time soon if ever though, while we stand a good chance of getting that soon with DP 1.3/1.4 TN displays.
>>54977762
I assume he's talking about pixel transition times, which limit how many frames per second a display can generate before ghosting starts happening.
IPS is inherently slower than TN and VA because it needs to generate sideways electric fields across pixels from just bottom electrodes instead of front-to-back with large transparent front electrodes.
>>54977762
While anon's comparison(read: bait) of practically irrelevant g2g pixel response times is dumb, human reaction time is not a factor here. The latency caused by your hardware and software adds up on top of your own reaction times. It's an overhead.
>>54975024
Well guess you won retard of the day there.
>>54977905
Says the person who will gladly spend 10 hours optimizing the 1ms function call that's added on to the 10,000ms function call because “it's overhead, right?”
>>54978080
>right?
Not right. You can't think human reaction like that as our reference point is anything after the rough 100ms reaction time and we can be quite good at discerning timing differences of small value after it, especially with a reference.
Also I don't know shit about coding so wrong there, too.
>>54973267
Dual 1080's, have nothing to fear.
I have one, it's awesome but you'll have to play the lottery. I went through 6 different screens before having one with no dead pixels et very minimal bleeding.
How doyou check for backlight bleed, when you take a picture you can clearly see it but in reality it's barely noticeable,
>>54966829
>Waiting for 4k IPS HDR 144hz panel from Dell as they make the best monitors and best no dead pixel policy.
Same
>>54966829
>IPS HDR
have fun waiting
>>54966829
>>54980677
I'll settle for 120Hz
But yeah... That
