Arch is getting to buggy for me, I can't decide between ubango and opensuse, what should I use /g/
Gentoo
>>54905594
Debian
>>54905594
Ubuntu is a joke. If you liked arch why not opensuse tumbleweed?
opensuse is best for posting memes from imo.
![ab173014ae70275ae3c255fbdf4bda6d1aef488183fd62f6add879451773be41[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/huiniSX.jpg "ab173014ae70275ae3c255fbdf4bda6d1aef488183fd62f6add879451773be41[1].jpg")
>tumbleweed
>>54905655
Fedora is the meme distro
>>54905670
I like it though
>>54905594
If you like having access to the AUR and just want more stability, Manjaro is perfect. Between Ubuntu and openSUSE, I'd recommend openSUSE tumbleweed. It's more stable than arch, but you get to keep the benefits of having a rolling release.
>>54905670
Fedora isn't meme, it's just neckbeard/autist/reddit tier.
>>54905645
What do you think is shit about ubuntu
![f8e[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/kfoFIpQ.jpg "f8e[1].jpg")
>>54905726
Fedora is a brilliant jewish ploy to get neckbeards to betatest RHEL packages for free.
>>54905768
- Release model is shit. Why would I want old version of filezilla? How is this improving stability if new version has bugfixes?
- It is suppsed to be stable but it isn't. 16.04 was garbage on release.
- The only valuable versions of ubuntu are spins like Ubuntu Mate or Xubuntu, main edition is literaly cancer of computing
- They are wasting time with things they shouldn't waste time with (Mir, phone, snaps)
- They don't spend time where it's needed. 16.04 has new software center that is blown the fuck out by what deepin has. Ubuntu mate glued better software center in one release with their software butique.
- do-release-upgrade brakes 9/10 times
The only reason to use ubuntu these days is the wide support from everybody (if they support linux, they support ubuntu)
>>54905846
Thanks, I will reconsider
>>54905807
>for free.
Kek.
RH pays for all the architecture Fedora users get without paying.
Buildsystem.
Personal hosting space with SSH access.
Personal repositories.
Same situation applies to Novell's openSUSE.
It's just users of poorfaggot distros like Arch and Debian which can't afford none of them, that are perpetrating the Fox&Grapes scheme.
>>54905922
The neckbeards do it for free.
Obviously it still costs redhat money, but that's not the point.
>>54905594
Can someone explain what was going on that scene?
Suse is really nice if you are using KDE, it's the best experience I've had so far. Only thing that sucks is that you have to download codecs from this packman repository.
>>54906516
They got into an argument probably about grades and studying. Brat holds loli as hostage. Loli gives speech saying don't blame brat since society/education system is wack. Brat lets loli go.
>>54905594
Debian or Gentoo
>>54905709
>If you like having access to the AUR and just want more stability, Manjaro is perfect
Iisn't manjaro Arch with pre-installed stuff ? How's that different than Arch concerning stability ?
>>54906581
No, they also have their own repositories instead of the arch repositories. They're still very up-to-date, but the packages are tested a bit more so they don't break. The one that's the same just with things pre-installed is Antergos.
Debian
e
b
i
a
n
>>54905594
>Arch is getting to buggy for me
every distroy will be buggy if pebcac.
>>54905594
>Arch
>buggy
wat
I know people who have been using the same Arch installation for 10+ years now, just copying it to the next pc
>>54906936
Is that Maki?
>>54906936
i-if I install debian, will I become a cute little girl ?
>>54907515
No, those are the sluts from sakura trick.
>>54905594
Too bugy in what sense? Maybe you have a couple of packages yoll need to downgrade.
If you want stability go with Debian, you'll be stucked with old as fuck packages, but it'll be stable.
>>54905594
Install FreeBSD.
>>54908280
Debian testing is a really good compromise between stability and newer packages. It's a nice balance.
>>54907001
I've been doing that for years too, it literally just werks
>>54906516
I came to this thread to post that image
>>54905890
from my experience, 16.04 was a complete mess. I'm using 15.10 though and it's very decent. It doesn't have the Arch Linux fast boot time sadly...
>>54910232
>testing
No it isn't, because you're having to wait the 2 week migration cycle for bug and security fixes compared to unstable
Get unstable
>>54905846
Snappy is a good though. It's a great way to fix compatibility between software releases in a consistent manner. It's the same strategy guix and nixos use.
>>54910561
In my expeeience, there's very little difference between unstable and arch, though I'd say that updating after a long period of not on Debian is more likely to go well since they always have to be ready for anyone to move from stable up to testing and then to unstable.
>>54910244
>JUST WERKS™
>U
>S
>T
>W
>E
>R
>K
>S
>™
>>54911113
found the guy who's never used arch
Fedora for sure. Debian is shit where you have to chose between, a year out of date, frozen, or broken.
>>54911139
fuck you I'm >>54907001 and I've been using Arch for a year and never had an issue
you're just too fucking dumb
> arch is buggy
what did you do you fucking retard. sudo ./somescript.sh? You deserve everything you got.
>>54911227
I'm
>>54910244
work on your reading comprehension
>>54905594
I was in the same place and went with Opensuse, it ended up being more buggy and specially hard to get anything done because of the lack of a good wiki. I am now back on Arch
>>54911306
I'm >>54911227
don't talk to me or my Arch rig ever again
How can arch be buggy? There's a detailed wiki page for literally everything. I even got it working nicely on a macbook pro recently despite all their proprietary crap.
You should use the most stylish operating system currently available.
http://hannahmontana.sourceforge.net/
>>54911303
Why so aggressive? Is it frustrating to have sunk hours and hours into an OS for netcred only to find that not everyone was dumb enough to do the same?
>>54912155
I'm sick of the retarded arch memes and sick of the retarded people on this board. I just wish people like you were killed in some genocide, but alas I got unlucky.
>>54912169
>I just wish people like you were killed in some genocide,
>but alas
>Arch user
*tips pacman*
m'AUR.
>>54905594
gentoo
>>54907933
one can only hope fampai.
>>54905594
If you want to attempt to actually veer away from the defaults somewhat, every other distro will be buggier than Arch.
>>54905645
>>54905666
>tumbleweed
Nope. That shit's basically a trashier Arch without AUR and pacman.
>>54907933
No, but you will get sodomized by a flashlight by a negro policewoman.
