>980ti performance for $199
>AMD drivers have been only getting better
>Nvidia drivers breaking cards and hampering performance
You'd have to be a cuck to be an Nvidiot at this point
>>54847048
that hand looks really dry. should use some lotion or some shit. maybe change soaps.
>>54847117
because I want a sweaty hand on my technological technologies
>>54847048
>1070 has only 7GB of "fast" vram
>Nvidia shills won't mind this massive lie
>>54847048
When is this coming out?
>>54847241
June 29th
>>54847117
amd cant afford lotions
>that garbage cooler
Fuck off pajeet. That shit is gonna be screaming at 90 degrees on the slightest load
>>54847163
7GB? That's a lot
>>54847341
lol that cooler,is it like 2cm? I nearly did not notice that shit
It's over nvidtards
You could of prevented this
>>54847048
/g
not linking any related source
much sad meme
>>54847645
WATCH THE STREAM FAGGOT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Icm9B1nkGJ0
>>54847048
>980ti performance
Fuck off
>>54847379
No like remember the 970? "4"GB of ram was actually 3.75
Hell look at the thermals? Nvdia CAN'T rebase one fucking product without some massive lie
>>54848100
beats the gtx 1080 so isn't that the same?
>>54847702
link offline steam
call other anon faggot
>full retarded
>>54848490
Opens link 40 mins later, calls anon retard cause can't even open link on time
REKT
>>54848486
>this level of bait or idiocy
As expected of a MAD.
It's not more powerful than the 980ti, but is basically a Fury. So, it's better than the original 980. That's very impressive.
>>54848462
3.5*
>>54847048
kms i got cucked when i bought my 970 for like 300 2 weeks ago can i get some insults hurled at me? :/
I'd consider AMD if I didn't use Linux
>>54848963
HAHA you made a mistake that negatively affected your material value!
>>54849011
AMDGPU is shaping really well anon
>>54849011
Why not just dual boot? What's the point of gaming exclusively on linux?
>>54847048
im not buying one now because i dont wanna get the one that pajeet touched. i bet he got poo on it
>>54849041
I do, but I use Linux for more than just vidya
>>54847341
That blower should be fine for a 150 watt gpu without being spun fast n' loud. The only reason the blowers sucked ass with the 290x is because it was a power hungry card.
I would like to see one with an R9 Nano type cooler. With a tdp that low they should be able to cool it without the overhang past the pcb.
>>54848100
they took the previous best card on the market and made it under $200 in 2011, so it's not unheard of.
but they had the best gpu for a couple years back then before releasing it, so idk.
>>54848814
When they decide to unlock the gpu it will most likely match or beat a 980 ti, since that is the LOCKED gpu matching a fury.
>>54850268
>CF ISN'T CROSSFIRE REEEEEEEEE
>IT'S NOT UNLOCKED REEEEEEEEEE
sasage AMDumbs
When's this thing coming out? I need a GPU right away and if it's not within a few weeks I'm getting an R9 280 and waiting for Vega.
>>54850322
June 29th, sorry bub.
Will the price of past generation cards drop significantly on June 29th? (or now?)
What's the best card I could plop in a computer with an fx6300 before bottlenecking? I have a 270x atm, and get the feeling I'm about there already.
>>54847117
can just use some poo
>>54850303
You don't seethe card down without CF? Ironic calling others dumb.
>We promise shit that isn't out yet will have vague performance figures based on no evidence and references!
Typical fanboi thread, move along people.
P O O I N T H E L O O
>>54850357
You're fucked boy, even my fx8350 was bottlenecking my gtx 970.
>>54850445
Hm. Maybe I'll look into replacing the cpu too... See what my motherboard is capable of. Don't want to build a whole new computer... AH WELL.
>>54847048
>980ti performance for $199
[citation needed]
I was under the impression it was between a 970 and 980. Still a good deal, though.
IF you've been paying attention, AMD's R&D has gone into making the 200 series cheaper, not better. They make it cheaper to build, then stick a higher number on it.
>>54850510
It'll end up at 980Ti levels.
Just look where the 7970 ended up at. head to head with the 780Ti, in spite of starting at less than half the performance.
>>54847341
>buying w/ reference coolers
l m a o
>980 tier performance for $199
It's finally time to upgrade from my old GTX 570. Thank god I didn't buy the meme 3.5GB card.
>GTX 1070 150W TDP, MUCH HIGHER PERFORMANCE
>RX 480 150W TDP, MUCH SLOWER PERFORMANCE
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2016/05/27/from_ati_to_amd_back_journey_in_futility/
>In the simplest terms AMD has created a product that runs hotter and slower than its competition's new architecture by a potentially significant margin.
Kyle was right all along
We don't have many concrete numbers besides AMD's benchmarks, which they obviously cherrypick to favor themselves. AMD's whole thing was performance/watt this generation (even naming it Polaris because stars are the efficient things at producing light), and the 1070 appears to be better than the RX 480 in that regard.
I'm happy AMD is catching up, but this is just more bait for the waitfags who think the next revision of Polaris will destroy AMD at the high end.
>>54851484
When you post the same comment in multiple threads, it makes people think you're a shill and not an enthusiastic fanboy.
>>54847341
Yeah... I seriously hope there's some decent coolers that don't look gaymer, or like refference ass.
You know AMD lost hard when shills trying to praise their shit tier gpu for 199$ as the next 980 Ti
Hahahahahaha
Nvidia won in every single possible aspect
>>54851576
I'm posting FACTS backed by AMD's own slide which says 150W TDP
Not my problem if AMDPOORFAGS can't accept the bitter truth that Kyle was right
>>54851484
>Let’s start with the tension. Koduri was able to wrestle control of the graphics division away during AMD’s last leadership transition after threatening to leave the ship and take a role at Intel, something he's not shy about telling his AMD colleagues. Lisa Su caved and Koduri got the job.
Does this mean Intel is interested in breaking out of shitty integrated graphics and competing with Nvidia in the GPU market? Man, that'd be crazy, if Intel buys the GPU division from AMD and the "green team" is now Nvidia + AMD and the "blue team" (?) is now Intel + what's become of ATI.
>>54851675
Fuck off, Kyle. Your site is irrelevant.
>>54851742
ATI has been dead since GCN
I don't get why everyone is buttblasted that it's not beating the 1070, it was going to be a mid range mainstream card all along, every leak said that. Yet half of /g/ is pissed off they can't beat a $400 card with a $200 one.
>>54851845
Honestly I'm amazed that they're giving 390x performance for $199 with a 150w tdp.
Personally I'm waiting for something more budget tier though, like the 460x.
>>54851845
It's buyers remorse. These cards are fine for most games out there including VR and are cheap as dirt but Nvida convinced them to pay twice as much for little real gain.
NVIDIA WON IN PERFORMANCE & POWER EFFICIENCY
AMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATCH
>focusing on the poverty segment
>>54851845
It's not that, it's that the 1070 is a tier above the RX 480 yet they have the same power draw. This means that the 1060 and 1050 will likely be more power efficient and run cooler than the RX 480 and siblings (if you can call the other Polaris cards that). So it's basically confirmed AMD isn't actually ahead on their main marketing point, and pricing will likely be more competitive from Nvidia on the 1060 and 1050 now that AMD is more competitive in that price point.
>>54847048
It's sweet, but I already got a $250 R9 290X. I need something faster to upgrade.
You only get 4GB for $199, good luck playing games with 4GB when modern games are easily exceeding 4GB
>>54847117
it's dry feces
>>54851933
Fair point, a lot of people were expecting polaris to top out at 100w, and maybe even be 75w
>>54851940
Even if it was $299 (and it won't be) for 8gb it would still be a better deal than the 1080 or 70.
>>54851940
398$ for 8gb(dx12) and same perf as gtx 1080p
>>54851954
>SLOWER THAN GTX 1070 150W
>better deal
AMDPOORFAGS, everyone
$229 for 8gb rx-480
>>54851878
nigga 200$ is budget tier, anything lower is poverty
>>54847048
>980Ti performance
Did I miss something? They are referring to the 980.
>>54847163
Incorrect, the 1070 has full uncut 2 MB of L2 cache, which now doesn't cause problems like the 970 had.
>>54850268
The 490X could be on par with the 1070/80.
Being a massive faggot i was mostly waiting on Polaris for the next iteration of the iMac.
Guess it's likely to be something very similar to the polaris 10 460 or based on the future P10 470.
>>54851963
>slower than card costing almost twice as much
>better deal
Well yes...
>>54851933
This is entirely speculation on my end but I think this is going to be another 7970.
The 7970 and 7950 launched and ate Nvidia's lunch for about 3 months... then the 670 and 680 launched with very close performance (slowly widened over time) but both blew the 7970 out of the water. Prices dropped for AMD until they released drivers that made the 7970 directly compete with the 680.
Nowadays, the 7970 rebrand (380X) matches up with the 780Ti, when it launched at half the relative performance.
As time goes on, AMD's performance goes up and Nvidia's performance stagnates. It's a proven fact over 4 years of driver updates and rebrands.
Who THE FUCK actually cares about power draw though ?
>>54852032
380X isn't Tahiti, it's Tonga, it has newer architecture than the original 7970. Are you thinking of the 280X?
Nvidia has won in performance & power efficiency
AMD knew they were fucked back on May 6th once the GTX 1080 launched
>>54852048
Well isn't it slightly related, correlated with how much heat these things generate
>no gddr5x
dead on arrival. i won't buy subpar indian-made products.
>>54852048
I do.
I run my PC 24/7 when I'm not using it I'm watching something on it even at night which uses my GPU to render so I rather use something with less power usage and heat output.
>>54852048
People who pre-ordered a 1070 FE yesterday.
>>54852054
For example
>>54852048
Literally only Nvidia zealots.
It matters more on laptops and phones, but unless it's ridiculously high, it has pretty much zero effect on desktops aside from requiring a bit better psu
>not knowing nvidia tdp is usually higher than the rated value while amd is usually lower
It's actually a 130w card vs the 200w fermi card
>>54852048
AMD is, considering it was one of the main points they used to hype up Polaris. They themselves said they named it after a star because stars are the most efficient at producing light, like they want to be the most efficient with GPUs.
>>54852051
Yeah, sorry. It's been a long day.
THANK YOU BASED KURWADIRI
$199 for a VR capable 980/390X tier card with <150TDP. LITERALLY what I've been waiting for EXACTLY.
Goddamn.
>nvidia expects people to pay 3x for a 1080 even though a cf polaris setup is cheaper by 33% that will only gain performance (51% gpu utilization because of muh alpha drivers)!!!!!
LEL BTFO
At worst you can get 2 for $400 and closely trail a 700-1000 card and only have to wait for it to outperform an 1080.
So
Much
Win
So fucking relieved I waited.
>>54852032
>7970 beats 780ti
the 290x can't even beat the 780ti, what makes you think a 7970 would?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJ3KlJB5IY
>>54847048
It is a gorgeous GPU. I'll pick up the $229 one with the 8GB v-ram. I can put the extra dough towards getting a Vive.
>>54852065
>which uses my GPU to render
Yeah but the UVD is gonna be a couple of watts at most, the maximum power draw under full 3D load is hardly relevant.
>>54851484
Holy shit those hard ocd guys are mad lmao
>>54852088
>nearly 2 year old video
k bud
If the 480 pulls 150w at load? huge deal for me, my 270 currently pulls about 275w at load.
>>54852089
>>54851967
Where is this $229 number coming from for the 8GB version?
>>54852090
idk about you but my videoplayer settings can hrat up my gpu more than some games.
>>54852110
http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-480-polaris-10-launch/
Got an extra $30 for 2x the v-ram? It's worth it, I'm sure.
>>54849041
>gayming
grow up, kid.
serious question, is amd bad for a linux distro? I've heard bad things about their drivers
>>54852128
Oh that sounds fine to me I just wanted some confirmation. Thanks.
>>54851991
Not really. I seriously don't need that level of performance, but an upgrade from my HD5870 would be nice
>>54852135
> the entire thread is about videocards for playing games, not FirePro or other serious stuff
Just fuck off.
>>54852143
Amd open source is better than nvidia open source.
Nvidia proprietary is better than amd proprietary.
>>54852168
I see, thanks.
You are a bunch of curry niggers
>199$
>cheaper than 390
>performance better than Fury X/nano
Do you want to tell me that AMD will put out a card that will make most of their mid/high range cards obsolete?
Something is not right here.
>>54852168
Pretty much this.
>simple rectangular brick case design
>it's just 1 color and a rectangular shell
Thank god I don't have to deal with those cringe "for gamers" cases with fangled shapes I don't need.
>>54852211
Performance isn't better than fury X, and it's about on par with Nano.
Nano is a small FF niche card, anyway, so it makes sense, and Fury X is being followed up with Vega
>>54852225
Literally perfect.
For all the non-believers:
http://www.ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/b0db0294-8cab-4399-8815-f956a670b68f/match-details/ac88258f-4541-408e-8234-f9e96febe303
http://www.ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/b0db0294-8cab-4399-8815-f956a670b68f/match-details/a957db0f-59b3-4394-84cc-2ba0170ab699
NVTARDS BTFO
>>54851484
Kyle is a butthurt idiot who shouldn't be allowed to post.
>>54852229
So essentially they barely got the fury out there and now they're gonna supplant it with the Vega?
Gaming is literally curry nigger tier business. Cards don't even last 1 fucking year.
>>54852241
>300W
>2FPS faster
Good going there, AYYMD
I'm not really super wealthy but im trying to upgrade my PC from 2009. I was considering getting a 750 Ti cause I have a GT 220 now. Should I go through with it or will there be another card within the 200$ or under range that would work better? I have a cozy little laptop I use for work and id like to build a pc that could run some modern games. ive missed so many titles cause i cant run anything
>>54852275
And 200$ cheaper.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKkFqG77-x4
Nvidia async compute just work
AMD FUD again BTFO
>>54852252
Considering 980ti is in the same boat with 1070/1080, does this surprise you? Graphics cards advance fairly rapidly. That's not to say Fury X/ 980ti aren't still viable, they're just moving down a tier.
>>54852275
No matter how many times you say this, you're still comparing a $199 card to a $699 one
>>54852291
Lurk more fucking christ
>>54852308
im legitimately asking for help, you dont have to be a fucking dick about it
>>54852291
go with the 480, there's no other card going to be released at that price, we know both companies lineups
>>54852291
I have a 750 Ti in my computer now, it's a solid little thing for around $100, it'll definitely carry you through light games like League of Legends and anything on Source. I'm probably gonna get this new $200 AMD card to replace mine since I can't run Overwatch on the thing right now, though.
It could also be my processor slowing games down, but I guess I'll find out
>>54852315
Wait for those Polaris cards or try to get a cheap ri 380. It will be slightly better than the meme 750ti, though it's a good card as well.
Falling for AMD memes guys. The TPD on the 480 matches the 1070, so we can extrapolate and the 1060 or 1050 will have VASTLY lower TDP in the 75-100w range, and probably offer around 110% of the 480’s performance.
If you want a cheaper card why not wait a few months rather than selling out to the red devil?
>>54852307
It's $400 vs $599, do you even math?
Most people already tried multi-GPU and know how much it sucks and most modern games don't even bother supporting multi GPU
You'll pretty much have a worse experience with 4GB framebuffer on each card
>>54852318
alright, ill look it up, thanks. ill have to order it from amazon and pay, like, 60$ for shipping. but its better than paying 3 times what the card is worth from the jew retailers i got here
Wait for the GP106, it will be much more power efficient than AYYMD's 150W TDP HOUSEFIRE for same performance
>>54847048
Yeah thing is my 1080 kills the shitty gpu you own so I dont give a fuck
>>54852324
>so we can extrapolate and the 1060 or 1050 will have VASTLY lower TDP i
If the 1060 is the same gpu as the 1080 and 1070 but even more cut down like the rumors say then it wont.
Am I understanding this correctly that buying a 970 or 980 now would be retarded?
AYYMDKEKS, PAYING HIGH PRICES FOR SAME PERFORMANCE EVERYONE HAD BACK IN 2013
>>54847163
*6.75 GB
>>54852349
>someone on /g/ actually bought a 1080
>>54852356
It's Nvidia we're talking about, buying ANYTHING maxwell right now would be questionable at best, given that it's practically guaranteed to perform like shit in games released next year.
>>54852303
That's not async compute, just software-wise bullshit that gives no performance, a couple fps at most in some titles, in some others it even has worse fps (-2 or -3) with "async" turned on, also read the comment to the video you posted, nvidiot.
the r9 390 has a 275 tdp
How the fuck is 480 supposed to be housefire if it's 150?
>>54852356
Yes, you're better off buying GTX 1070 with greater than GTX 980 performance or waiting for GTX 1060 with about the same performance with GTX 980 or slightly slower
>>54852356
Yes, 960,970, 980, r9-380,380x,390, practically everything is irrelevant.
>>54852373
GTX 1070 is 150W and has significantly higher performance
AYYMD created an inefficient GPU with much less performance but still 150W
>>54847390
>using reference coolers
good goyim, spend 100 more on the worthle...I mean prestigious Founders Edition(tm) for the ultimate goyim experience.
WE DID IT
Do I understand correctly that if I don't want to be associated with poor people, it's better for me to go Nvidia?
>>54852364
I did and no regrets at all. Amazing its quieter than my old cards.
>>54852356
Here are the smart options:
AMD RX 480 (8GB)
GTX 1070
GTX 1080 (If you have more money than brains)
Everything else is irrelevant.
>>54852407
You are a nigger
>>54850341
They'll only go up from here. Chances are whatever's left is remaining stock, with no further production
>>54847048
AMD + WIN10 The Ultimate Poo experience©
Is this accurate
>Nvidia
>lots of misleading marketing that technically makes accurate claims (pic related)
>but they still deliver about what they promise once you look at what their marketing says in detail
>AMD
>barely any marketing to speak of
>by they over promise and under deliver
>>54852331
>$599
please, find me a 1080 for sale at $599.
>>54847048
Damn.
480X could be my next one. But i wonder how the 490/490X performs and costs
>>54852419
Incorrect as I paid for my card. Enjoy that shit card anon one day you might get a half decent one
>>54852389
>150W at base clock
>225W at boost clock
Nvidia jews it again! :^)
>>54852431
Nvidia
>Jews
AMD
>Pooinloos
Pick your poison. Nvidia's overpriced, and AMD has shit support and overhypes. Either way you're fucked.
does it have displayport?
Indians won once again.
>>54852471
Duh. Doesn't have dvi though.
>mfw I bought a 280x 1 year ago
>mfw there is already a 380 AND a 480
>mfw at this rate I will never buy a GPU again because they will release a new one every 6 months
Still happy with my purchase, max outs everything I throw at it and it was 230 bucks, pretty hot and loud but whatever, I would buy it again.
>>54852530
>mfw at this rate I will never buy a GPU again because they will release a new one every 6 months
That's bit retarded logic innit? You buy one if you need one.
>>54852128
such a beautiful time to be alive
is the 8g card gonna be 6pin as well do we know?
>>54852530
Some of us just have to live with our good mistakes until Vega makes an appearance.
>>54852032
>but both blew the 7970 out of the water.
680 outperformed 7970 by roughly 7% at 1080p at launch. 670 had similar performance to 7970 at launch. Is this what "blew out of the water" means to you, or are you trying to exaggerate the performance gains of 7970?
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_670/28.html
>until they released drivers
What they did was up the core and memory clocks by 125 MHz. Simply calling it a driver update is extremely misleading. This overclock brought 7970 slightly above 680 at 1080p (at higher resolutions the gap is a lot wider).
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_7970_GHz_Edition/28.html
>when it launched at half the relative performance.
At 780 Ti launch, 7970 was 72% of the performance of 780 Ti, which is pretty far from half.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_780_Ti/27.html
>Nowadays, the 7970 rebrand (380X) matches up with the 780Ti
In the most recent TPU benchmarks, 780 Ti is still 32% ahead of 280X at 1080p. While this is a bit lower than the difference was at 780 Ti release (39%), it's far from the values you're claiming.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_1080/26.html
Classic AMD shilling. Think my job is done here.
>inb4 someone posts a random cherrypicked benchmark where 280X matches 780 Ti and claims that it's a better representative of performance rather than an average of 16-18 games
>inb4 someone starts posting benchmarks at a resolution different than 1080p making the chain of comparisons worthless because a different resolution is being used at a single point
AMD has only one gpu? No RX 470?
>>54852593
In the world of FPS, even 1% can make a huge difference. 7% is certainly blowing it out of the water.
>>54852624
470 will likely be a Polaris 11 part like the 460.
>>54852648
7% is the difference between 56 fps and 60 fps.
Not sure who would call that huge.
And 1% most certainly doesn't make a huge difference. It's most likely not even a statistically significant difference.
The wait was worth it. Thank you based AMD!
what is the difference between RX vs R9?
>>54852693
It's just the brand name. I guess they felt "rx" was more attention grabbing than "r9".
199$ for GTX 980 level performance is amazing.
AMD will ruin nvidia at this rate, if thats the price of AMD's reference cards, just imagine how cheap the after market ones are.
MUH DICK
>>54852698
I never liked R7/R9 to be honest. RX sounds much better to me.
nvidiots on suicide watch.
Sorry I'm retarded but... how does this stack up against the HD7970?
>>54852706
>aftermarket cards cheaper than reference ones
you must be retarded or just got fooled by "founder's edition" horseshit
So wait
Am I gonna be able to get this in different colors?
Not that it matters much, I just think it'd be neat to get this in blue.
>>54852719
Not really
>>54852742
I don't think so anon. Just add more LED strips to your gayman rig.
THIS CARD, THIS CARD, IS BEAUTIFULLY BUILT PREMIUM CARD.
pajeet, never change.
OVER 5 TERRAFLOPS OF COMPUTING.
>>54852698
>>54852709
Really?
I like the R7/R9 branding
How do you think they're gonna differentiate between P11/10 and Vega? Or are they just all gonna be RX?
>>54852722
At least twice the performance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNiqZzl-_G0
Post yfw you finally get your RX 480.
its really power efficiant, so the overclocking overhead is huge.
>>54852759
>yfw no drivers
>yfw it overheats
>yfw nvidia 1070 gives better performance for same TDP
>>54852781
just stop.
>>54852758
Holy shit. thanks anon, guess I'll be getting one for sure.
>doubting Raja
>anytime
Based. Vega confirmed to be 9800 come again
>>54852369
>>54852357
>>54852376
>>54852387
>>54852417
Okay, thanks for answering!
And price drops in those now non-viable cards making them worth it again aren't liekely to happen, right?
>>54852759
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTIIMJ9tUc8
People do realise this card comes 4gb & 8gb and its the 4gb one that $200.
http://arstechnica.co.uk/gadgets/2016/06/amd-rx-480-polaris-release-date-price-specs/
It seems to be more on about VR than anything else so dont hold your breath for much
2x RX 480, cheaper and better then a 1080
its more power efficient, looks nicer, better overclocking, cooler, better crossfire drivers and most of all its fucking cheaper, why would you even bother buying a 1080 now?
nvidiots commit sudoku.
>>54852753
>OVER 5 TERRAFLOPS OF COMPUTING.
by 2020?
>>54851484
lol he 150W tdp only means it will be using a single 6 pin connector
this doesnt mean that the card is using all 150w of that power, it means its limited to that 150w of that 6 pin connector
and guess what, the card can use less, and they never said what or how many Watts the card was using or even uses at full load
AND GUESS WHAT the gtx1070 will most likely being using almost all of those 150W at release non overclocked just like the 1080, meaning very little overhead for overclocking
Im patiently awaiting vendors OC cards and see what they bring
>>54852088
A 280X now matches the 780Ti. You're a little off champ.
>But for the mainstream crowd that couldn't give a monkeys about TDP and process improvements, a £160 graphics card that plays high-end games at 1440p on the desktop, and spits out VR visuals without fuss is a very attractive proposition—one that Nvidia simply doesn't have a response to right now. Here's hoping that RX 480 can deliver when it's released on June 29.
>>54852048
I used to run a 400w machine in my bedroom, and constantly woke up with dry mouth, nose, sore throat. Swapped it for a 90w amd apu setup... And no issues anymore. For what it's worth
>>54852853
You really think that? bahahahahaha
>>54852875
Too bad we get britcucked by VAT. £199 isn't so bad though.
>>54852781
>>yfw nvidia 1070 gives better performance for same TDP
I'll believe this when I see the actual power consumption.
>>54852853
because having 1 good card is better than crossfiring 2 weak ones
>>54852853
>looks nicer
what are you, fucking retarded?
>>54852895
£400 for 2x 1440p mainstream cards is really fucking good.
>>54852906
thats used to be true, but not now.
>>54852915
4gb cards though. They havent given us the price of the 8gb ones yet
>>54852902
I blame the amount of power it was using...absorbing the moisture in the air or something. I have no clue. Just saying the lower power draw machine helped my sleeping in a bedroom
>>54850268
I'm wondering why they wouldn't just use Fire Strike instead of 3DMark 11, as that's currently the biggest crowdfunded database of competing Nvidia shit that'd really showcase what a 480 can do
>>54852455
Using other peoples money doesn't count, you stupid nigger
>endless hypothetical shitposting from both sides until these cards come out
It's going to be a wild fucking ride lads
>>54852389
Again, how is 150w tdp housefire?
>>54852994
Red Team V Green Team
You ready anon?
>>54852723
This, aftermarket cards will cost the same or more.
>>54852925
Not the same anon but I assume you are functioning under some misconception that games written for DX12 don't have to be written with support for multiple cards just like it always has?
>>54852959
source?
>>54853011
What happened to blue team?
>>54853032
Intel are cucks.
>>54853027
Uhh, the AMD announcement at computex today?
>>54853011
my anguses are peppered
>>54853032
They never left the stable let alone got to the arena.
>>54852853
>looks nicer
Reminder that your GPU is not a fucking handbag to carry under your arm wherever you go.
>>54847048
>Dat dirty nigger hand
Ewww, Nvidia wins again.
>>54853048
Theres nothing wrong with aesthetics however in terms of GPU it should be right on the bottom of the list.
>>54852837
In my experience, price drops during a generation switch are usually very small or non-existent. They are a lot more noticeable on the used market. If you still want a 970, get a used one. People will probably be selling theirs once the 1070 is released.
>>54853027
http://www.gamersnexus.net/news-pc/2458-amd-rx480-specs-5tflops-for-200-dollars-and-release-date
>>54852853
>looks nicer
WHAT? That's like saying a Lada looks nicer than a Lamborghini.
Friendly reminder that there are people on this board who fight for "their company", for free.
>>54849145
I'm not sure that a nano style setup would be capable of dissipating the heat from a chip that small when you consider the fact that they're still trying to eke higher clocks out of it before the official launch.
>>54852759
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUhVCoTsBaM
>>54853098
>not getting what's best for your money
>mfw fanboyism is a thing
I'm going to build a pc this month and I'll spend about 200€ on a graphics card. Should I wait for RX480?
>>54852062
But you'd use a 980Ti if you found it in the garbage right?
>>54853124
If you need something to heat the room then sure.
>>54853070
The 5TFs were leaked weeks ago.
It's still a good 20% slower than a 1070.
It still doesn't' have CUDA.
The 200$ card has 4GB of ram.
I could go on and on why the card is priced fairly.
Look. If you're a poor ass kid in Russia, Arabistan or India and you just want to play a shitty video game at 1080p at 60 fps (ever more doubtful considering Denuvo pretty much killed video game piracy), feel free to buy a 480.
The AMD market share will grow a bit. Good for them. Hey if it makes the Nvidia card prices drop it's only good for the rest of us.
>>54850303
If that's crossfired, that's some pajeet level shit scaling.
>>54853056
Nvidiots, everyone.
>>54853146
It's a mainstream product aimed at allowing people to buy a GPU (or two) for VR without selling a kidney.
It's not meant to compete with the 1070/1080 directly unless you get 2.
>>54853203
Only AMDrones are buying the "cheap for VR" line. The rest of us realize you don't buy a four cyclinder engine for your F1 racer.
>I can afford to spend $600+ on VR but not more than $200 on my GPU
>>54853144
Yeah, GTX1070 will be available soon, he should get that.
>>54853146
>and?
>$30 more for 8gb version
>what is a stream processor/ opencl
>implying/ also over 50% more expensive
>im-fucking-plying that $200 to max out the most used resolution in all of PC gaymen isn't the most based shit, this side of Jim Keller
>>54851933
What you and everyone else in this board haven't noticed is that the 1080 is also rated at 150 TDP even though it's being built with an 8 pin where as the 480 only has a 6 pin. What I'm saying is that the official TDP should be taken with a grain of salt. Just look back at how AMD rated the 7850 and 7870 as 150 TDP even though neither of them drew more than ~110.
Any idea when the 1060 coming out?
I want to buy the RX or 1070 but don't want to bite the bait. Something in between like 1060 (or so I assume) would be perfect.
>>54853232
>hurdurr youre not saving much so dont bother saving at all
pleb
Will AMD fix Crossfire stuttering by the end of the month?
Probably not.
>>54852965
>heat absorbing moisture
How would that even work ?
Convince me to not buy this card
Seriously, I want to know everything that's wrong with it.
>>54853248
>hurdurr youre not saving much so dont bother saving at all
>saving
Let me guess. You have an BMW M3 and you put some no name Chinese tires on it because you can "save more."
>>54853264
>BMWs
kekd
So a 1080 can max all games at 1440p?
>>54853273
Not an argument.
>>54853264
>le car analogy
when will this shit end
>>54853255
Not much wrong desu. My main concern is it'll probably be closer to $300 once OEMs get their paws on it. But otherwise, if the 8gb version is $230 as they say, good purchase
This card is going to be a hit here in Russia.
>GTX 980 cost here roughly 570$
>RX 480 with around the same performance for lets say 250$ is RIDICULOUS! Mind blown.
>>54853146
Someone asked me for the link as I was saying the $200 was 4gb.
I actually had my 1080 delivered on saturday
>>54852135
Kill yourself, gramps
GUYS, GUYS, i need help. Do i buy 4GB version or 8GB? I will mostly play on 1080p screen.
>>54853305
>tfw you realize AMD is singlehandedly responsible for the Russians/Brazilians shitting up online and especially f2p games
>>54853322
For $30 more?
8gb, no fucking contest.
>>54853327
>playing f2p games
It's your own fault
>>54851484
fuk off crybabby
>>54853327
>t2p
Topkek kys
>>54853343
desu the only one I actually play is tf2.
>>54852048
Environmentalists.
>>54852048
Yes, goy, don't care about that power draw, it's obsolete, that't not the way it's meant to be played
>>54853322
Both are too much for 4GB
Anything will be right unless you want better monitor
>>54851742
They have shown interest in that a few times already, even made some announcements like a year or two ago, but it seems like they forgot about it again.
>>54853327
More players is a good thing, though.
The main problem with those two groups is that they largely lack respect for gamers from other regions, and generally refuse to assimilate into the community, sticking to their own languages instead, which makes them stand out.
I'm German, but in a international game you will never see me reply to anyone in German, even if they asked the question in German.
>>54852048
nvidiots cared about it until now apparently
>>54853450
I really wish they had their own seperate network.
>>54851878
Same here
This would look like the perfect substitute for my 7950 but 2 things have me worried:
1. They didn't talk about UVD at all
2. 150W is the same TDP as stock 1070, so they probably are already pushing the clocks as it is, leaving little margin for OC and subject the card to unfavorable performance/watt comparisons
>>54853481
I don't. I wish they'd just talk English like everyone else and no one would be the wiser.
>>54851742
>Does this mean Intel is interested in breaking out of shitty integrated graphics and competing with Nvidia in the GPU market?
Intel is going out of the cheap ass desktop product market you idiot. Why would they buy a dead-weight division that pretty much only does desktop products?
If AMD had something significant to offer in server GPUs maybe Intel would've had interest. Maybe. Still considering they have a million engineers I severely doubt they couldn't make their own graphics processors from scratch if they had to.
>>54853501
Rumours say that P10 consumes much less that 150W, somewhere around 110-130W.
Intel does this - they say 95W TDP but the chips only use 75-80W max.
It's very strange that they advertise the max power that the card can get. I guess they are going to promote 150W because there will be many AIBs that will show up with factory overclocked 8pin conectors cards and then the average of RX 480 will be 150W.
>>54853501
>150W is the same TDP as stock 1070
I think this is why they have an NDA all the way up to release. This is the crucial time they should be instilling uncertainty in purchasing a 1070/1080 with previews.
>>54853511
>no one would be the wiser.
You can always tell mang
>>54853511
>no one would be the wiser.
Yeah right.
I play a certain f2p in a region filled with snownigs, arabs and slavs. All of them are instantly detectable even when they communicate in English.
>>54847048
Please tell me this is real. I'll just sell my r9 380 for 150$ and get the rx 480 for 200$ if I get the same performanace as 980ti
So, i don't get this.
Is the RX 480 the R10 480X or the R10 480?
>>54847048
>980ti performance
Oh cool look its an AMD shill thread.
>making multiple SKUs for price pointing memory
Good goyim
>>54853511
Russians fucking ruined Planetside 2. They are shit people with shit internet who should stick to their own shit servers and stop ruining things for the superior Central European master race.
>>54853552
It's AMD's (failed) attempt at matching Nvidia's new cards, so it's the R10 490.
>>54853549
I'm glad I'm not the only one who fell for the 380 meme. I might do the same famalam.
>>54853587
Theyre not the highend models anon.
Poorfag here, how stupid would it be to use this in an old Q6600 box?
I doubt that it has 980ti performance.
>>54853605
Not stupid at all. Just start saving up for a new cpu after.
Still wait until the benchmarks are out though.
>>54853611
What are the chances it will have 980ti performance in AotS only.
>>54853549
>>54853596
I wanted to get the 380 but tdp was too high for me still. This card is <150 tdp bit it's not 980ti performance. More like 390X/980. Still a great deal since it's a low power low heat high performance vr ready card that's at an incredible $199 or more realistically like 220. This is a paradigm shift right here boys.
daily reminder when they say "VR" ready it doesnt mean you are going to be playing games on max settings, more like on medium low just passing by.
>>54853552
r5 r7 r9 now a new series rx presumably equating it to the performance of fury x line
>>54853596
Atleast it was a great budget card for 1080p
>>54853255
go buy 650$ nvidia shit faggot. you don't deserve AMD
>>54853630
Nevermind actually. It's probably much better than both cards since gpu utilizatiom was at 51%. Paradigm shift indeed.
>>54853620
You think I'll get severe bottlenecking?
I'll have to see if my PSU can even handle it.
how much °C should we expect idle and on load ?
>>54853255
It's a budget card with budget performance.
0 longevity.
Typically it's not a good idea to buy a card which is already being overtaken by a good 30-35% by cards already out on the market.
>>54853670
Likely going to have to wait a month until the NDA lifts.
>>54853642
>650
More like 700-1000.
This is set to become the most sold card of 2016
>>54853587
>$200
>meant to match $500 and $700 cards
>380 successor, not 390 or fury successor
Okey anon. Whatever helps you cope
>>54847048
>980ti performance
>the 1080 just game out
get with the times bruh
>>54853670
25 idle and 50's under load.
>>54853697
I wonder when AMD announced Polaris was not going to be performance but budget cards? Before or after specs on the 1070/80 leaked?
>>54853697
>fury successor
>confirmed lower throughput than fury
Are you being retarded on purpose?
>>54853712
Source?
>we want the teenager/welfare recipient audience
think I'll stick with nvidia
>>54853715
Around the time the specs were beginning to leak.
I know what you're thinking and you're probably right.
Vega is DoA. Unless they sell that for 200 Rupees as well.
>>54853676
You're very wrong. AMD's strategy has been repeatedly stated as being once that provides ample performance for cheap so to penetrate a large untapped market while also undercutting competitors. It's a budget card with the performance of a 980/390X for less than half the price. Regarding longevity, you don't have a clue. It should last a good while given its temps will be very low. Lower than what nvidia lied the 1080 would operate at at least since it's a <150td card on 14nm finfet and much lower clocks than the 1080.
>>54853717
I'm saying 480 is the successor to 380, not Fury. That's Vega.
Learn to reading comprehension
>>54853723
I'm under NDA.
>>54853630
I'm running mine off a 600w psu that's about 5 years old and it's fine, even when OCd.
Still you did well waiting, the 380 was a nice upgrade for me from a 560ti but I should have waited just a bit more too.
>>54853661
Shouldnt be too bad. What GPU have you got now? You should still notice a decent bump in performance coming from an older GPU.
>>54853640
I'm not too upset since it only cost me £175 which isn't too bad. It plays GTA, Doom and a few other taxing titles pretty well but I don't think it'll keep up too well in the future. Unless everyone suddenly starts deveoping for vulkan.
>>54853748
You're pulling numbers from your ass, huh?
>>54852572
https://youtu.be/rVlsdwEDRI8
>completely ignoring the fact that the game looks like shit on AMD
what the fuck
this is a type of jewery that only us indians can accomplish
>>54853729
>>54853715
Nigga, AMD have been targeting mainstream ever since last year.
Back in January they demoed a low power Polaris vs GTX 950.
>>54853707
30% less performance for 1/3 of the price.
Sounds fair.
>>54853732
Yes and that strategy is what landed them in the shithole they are in right now.
They're not selling cheapass "just good enough" gpus for the first time. This is what caused them to have a laughable 20% of the market in the first place.
People with PCs regardless of what you want to think do not like upgrading. It's very rare for someone to buy a piece of hardware with a perspective to upgrade in 2 years.
So when they're given the choice of buying a "just good enough" gpu for 300$ and a powerful gpu for 400$ most choose 400$ without batting an eye.
>>54853715
An event at the of the year before anything was known about 10xx, Vega was introduced as the big chip set for 2017. After 10xx leaked Vega rumored to be repositioned for Q4 2016.
>>54853723
My dad works at Nintendo and therefore got to see Polaris while working with AMD on a custom chip for the NX.
I'm gonna wait for AdoredTV to tell me what to think.
>>54853757
Yes. Let us say for the record I am.
>>54853770
>I've never seen Ashes benchmark before
Ashes have procedure terrain that randomly add a certain effect so that people couldn't cheat for the benchmark.
The left side, the Polaris side, just happen to have a deeper snow in that run that makes the terrain look less detailed than on the right.
Both used same resource and processing power regardless.
>>54853779
Yeah? Well my dad works at Sony and the 911 chips for the NEO need a special cooling system alone to keep it under 90c.
Nvidia Founders on suicide watch.
>>54853642
I haven't actually ever used an nvidia card, and I'm running AMD at the moment
I just wanted a critical review
>>54853812
1 card is alwys better than 2 cards tho
>>54853798
Oh okay, fair enough. I thought the LOD was turned way the fuck down. But didn't it seem like there were fewer objects on screen?
>>54853779
Nintendo confirmed for using Tegra in NX, update your shitposting templates.
>>54853753
Integrated from the C2Q lmao
It was a 6800GS or something many years ago
>>54853825
Nintendo received bids from Nvidia and AMD, it was my dad's job to evaluate them both.
t. shitposter pro
>>54853778
Vega initially were set to launch Q4 this year in the older roadmap.
Then the set back happened regarding the HBM2 manufacture, and the revised the roadmap and pushed it back to 2017.
Some shit happen again regarding HBM2 development, which is where the rumour stating that Vega will be dragged back to its original plan.
>>54853822
better how, because it takes less space in case?
>>54853842
>le my dad works for Nintendo meme
This is a vintage meme, don't go around showing it off to everyone.
>>54853823
You can't have less object on Ashes DX12 test preset.
Here is Ashes 1440p Extreme CF score for C7, which has been confirmed to be RX 480
>http://ashesofthesingularity.com/metaverse#/personas/b0db0294-8cab-4399-8815-f956a670b68f/match-details/0561a980-78ce-4e24-a7c3-2749a8e33aac
This score pretty much the same as the score they showcased in the conference.
>>54853852
Because you don't have to wait for new drivers to be released when a game comes out, it's not even close to 100% efficiency, and you get microstutter.
>>54853880
Cool, thanks for the info.
>>54853833
m8 theres no comparison between the two. Pretty much anything would be better than what you have right now.
I hope the after market coolers don't look like all the hideous gtx1080 ones.
>>54853957
I wish somebody would make Nano style cooler.
Small, slick and simple.
>>54853957
I know it's reference and whatnot but why do they still use those shitty blower fans? Wouldn't one decent 80mm fan be better?
>>54852065
>>54853390
My system draws like 130~150w idle with just browser open (and like 40 tabs including one with a stream). It's kind of high, but I'm not overly concerned about it.
How much of an upgrade over my old 760 would this be?
I'm assuming it would start out decent and then get much more competitive once drivers improve and Dx12//vulkan start to really take off right?
I just want to max out all the important settings in Doom and witcher 3.
>>54853992
I think they do it just to avoid competing with their own board partners.
>>54848712
Top kek
>>54854038
It will more than likely completely blow your 760 away. Shouldn't be a problem maxing out Doom, should be able to get mostly high/ultra in Witcher 3.
>>54848963
the NVidia gods' punishment for poorfags
>>54854024
>idle
>with browser open and playing a video
I don't think you quite grasp what "idle" means.
>>54854077
I do. My idle includes the browser being open. I never close them. Who the fuck closes their browser before locking/walking away from the PC?
I just checked without browser. It's like 110~120 without the browser open. Wooo.
>>54852572
>290x for that price
>mistake
>>54847379
3.5 * 2
>MFW /g/ literally argues about GPU manufcaturer companies like 12 year old kids argue about game companies and console manufacturers.
I'll just be over here with my unbias purchases that haven't led me wrong yet.
>>54854530
10000000000000x this
>>54854530
>>54854553
>attempting to take a moral high ground in 4chan
top jej fags
>>54854530
>posting leinternethahafatman
>Unbiased view
You're so cool. Do you have a twitter I can subscribe to?
>>54854610
https://twitter.com/reddit
Also follow me on MyFace.
>>54852853
>Be AMDrone
>Buy 2x rx 480
>Haha stupid nvidiots I have the best price for performence
>Try to play any game, no crossfire profile exists
REEEEE PAJEET HOW COULD YOU DO THIS TO ME
>>54854739
On Dx12 games you don't need any profiles I think
>>54854770
On DX12 the dev is supposed to handle SLI/CF and none of them will bother with trying to get good support for features a tiny fraction of people actually use. Dual GPU is going to be completely dead in a few years due to complete lack of support.
>>54854889
Same guy from just above.
Speculating here but this is a game engine thing yea? A feature that popular engines could add in kind of like how devs add gameworks into the codebase?
Also anyone who has an ok card could just leave it in the computer and grab a more recent one to boost fps etc...
>>54854968
Dual GPU scaling is more complicated than copy and paste. If it was that easy AMD/Nvidia would have it enabled all games. Devs barely give enough of a shit to get their console port half fuctioning on PC, they're not going to go out of their way to add crossfire support.
>>54850985
What the fuck are you talking about?
I can't post the site this is for since benchmarks are still off limits, but it should give you a better idea of actual performance.
>>54855485
I'll take 20.
