Small (ITX) home servers

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 3

Anonymous
Small (ITX) home servers 2016-05-10 15:24:14Post No. 54478365
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

File: asrock-n3700-itx.jpg (474KB, 1920x1272px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

474KB, 1920x1272px

Small (ITX) home servers Anonymous 2016-05-10 15:24:14 Post No. 54478365 [Report]

Ok /g/ show me your smallest price/performance balanced servers.something like https://pcpartpicker.com/guide/42TwrH/priceperformance-balanced-mini-itx-home-servernas

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 15:25:09 Post No.54478376
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 15:25:09 Post No.54478376 [Report]

>>>/adv/

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 15:26:22 Post No.54478388
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 15:26:22 Post No.54478388 [Report]

>>54478376
That board is for relationship advice, not general advice. It's basically /r9k/ with questions.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 15:33:13 Post No.54478469
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 15:33:13 Post No.54478469 [Report]

File: P6120366.jpg (276KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

276KB, 1500x1000px

>>54478365
>price/performance balanced
There is no answer to that. CPU performance is largely irrelevant for a home server as long as you're not running an ancient single core atom, and memory is cheap. What matters is the number of SATA and Ethernet ports, as well as other ports you may need, but all that heavily depends on your individual uses.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 15:57:08 Post No.54478761
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 15:57:08 Post No.54478761 [Report]

File: 5350_cablebox.png (141KB, 676x1621px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

141KB, 676x1621px

my last mini build

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 16:00:52 Post No.54478799
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 16:00:52 Post No.54478799 [Report]

>>54478469
all servers are not file servers.