Rajeet better fucking deliver, the wait is going to kill me. Who iGPU since Xmas here?
http://videocardz.com/58894/amd-radeon-r9-490x-and-r9-490-launches-in-june
>>53913957
>ywn snort a line of curry from his tiny brown dick
why even live?
Decent iGPU's will never come because it might hurt their video card sales
My Fury X will still be better :^]
>inb4 it's just a rebranded 390X
>>53913957
currently cruising on a 380x but once polaris hits I might upgrade to a 490x or a used fury x.
whatever has better performance.
>>53914054
Have you tried the Vive benchmark on the 380x? How satisfied are you with it?
>>53914031
>Fury X is slower than Polaris 10 and it may be used for Radeon R9 480 series instead
>Release June
This is the best case scenario that anyone could have hoped for. Thank you, based Raja.
I'm still gonna wait for 14nm + HBM2. There is no way in hell I'd ruin being a waitfag without going all out.
>GDDR5
>256bit
TOPPEST LELKEK, AMDPOORFAGS
>>53913957
>the wait is going to kill me.
Even if they deliver the shitty drivers will probably kill you anyway.
Lol been using an igpu since Christmas up until 2 weeks ago. Sister was nice enough to buy me a 780. I think I'll wait till later this year to make any purchases. Was waiting for Pascal but honestly I'll get whatever card is best for the money or a good deal.
>>53914156
Just curious, did you have any driver issues with either of the two Nvidia updates in March? Saw a bunch of articles saying it could mess up your card and or Windows installation. My windows 10 kept boot looping and I assume it was because of this.
Didn't see any threads about this on /g/ unfortunately.
>>53914086
i go for value, so its not likely i would ever touch the higher then 490x card unless i come into alot of money, but seeing as im sticking with 1080p i may get alot out of a card, at least maxing out 60fps on everything.
still going to wait on zen before i make the call on a new gpu but shits looking nice.
>>53914083
didn't try the benchmark since I already know it's too weak for VR.
for new games it does a great job on 1080p but anything beyond that gets laggy.
it could handle dark souls 2 and some other older games on 4k though so I'm quite happy with the performance for that price.
>>53914191
I've owned 20 Nvidia cards not counitng the mobile ones and I have never ONCE had a driver issue.
Owned 2 AMD cards and each had bluescreens after a week, never again
>>53914291
That's the general quality of AMD products, you get what you pay for.
Man I hope the 490 will be better than the Fury X. Don't want to wait for Vega, and want to get the best they offer for a decent price.
>>53914359
AMD's 'best' the 'least' of Nvidia
>>53914291
Hmm, I had 3 gtx 770s bust on me which is why I was gpu less since Christmas. Dunno what happened, what went wrong.... I just don't know anymore. Since then, Ive scrapped the system, sold the parts and got a new motherboard/cpu and psu. While I only ever had driver crashes on Windows 10, I won't blame Nvidia for that. 8.1 and 7 worked without any problems.
>>53914010
depends. if aaa game publishers would take advantage of HSA, they would already hurt the video card sales.. but they would also boost dedicated gpu's just as much
>>53914372
>Fury X is as good as a 960
Assuming that's even the least of Nvivia, which I don't think it is.
>>53914291
it's strange how experiences differ that much.
i had problems with both, but more on the nvidia site once the gpu got outdated
>>53914291
Things that never happened: The Post
Meh. I want a 1080 Ti but they won't be available until next year because every GP100 chip goes into those 129000$ supercomputer thingies. I absolutely need an Nvidia GPU because I use Shadowplay to make Planetside 2 webms :^)
>>53915695
Fuck off lalu
Fuck Polaris, can't wait till Zen comes out.
Is this going to be with HBM2 or at least HBM?
I can't stand being a waitfag anymore. My HD5850 is already begging to be replaced.
>>53913957
If Polaris 10 is 490, what will the pricing be?
>250USD 'affordable VR spec'
>200USD 'priced like the 380 tier'
>300USD 'priced like 390 tier'
If Polaris 10 is priced like 390, I'll be fucking disappointed.
>>53914492
Are you retarded? The Fury X trades blows with the 980. Async shaders, HBM, it has a longer lifeline than any current gen nvidia card.
It only says 490 and 490X
So 480 and below is just gonna be a rebrand?
oh my god guys i'm so happy right now
just came up with a mindblowing idea how to overclock my LG 29UM67-P freesync monitor
>>53918382
Fuck off Nazi
how do I trick my mom into buying me a 490x?
she just got me a 380 for my birthday but it can't even max FO4 at 1440p.
I'm thinking about switching from law to video game design next semester, could I say it's for study?
>>53918403
but this is the last website i'm allowed to post :'(
>>53918411
buy some bitcoin miners
>>53918334
Point your post towards >>53914372, I was implying he was retarded for implying the Fury X is as good as a 960. I know the Fury X is AMD's "titan", somewhere around the 980.
>>53918828
More like 980ti in neutral games
>>53919068
Fair enough, I haven't looked at recent graphics cards enough to now specifics, aside from the that Fury X is better than Nvidia's worst by a lot.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gpu-hierarchy,4388.html
So where do the new cards fall into?
Sub $300 card would be nice but Im not holding my breath,last June I got my card and can run everything except ARK at ultra running at 15-20FPS...If their new cards cant running that POS smoothly then I'll be on my way.
>>53913957
>490x
>Polaris 10 will replace the 380x DURRR It`s just a low-end gpu
/g/ BTFO again.
>>53920592
When was a 380X a low end GPU you fucking fuck fuck
>>53914146
>bigger number = better!!!
>>>/v/
>>53921255
LOL 1080Ti watch the Ntards get the same old fucking garbage with a bigger number
>>53918370
If Polaris 10 is the successor to the 390, I imagine Polaris 11 will be that to the 370. Then Vegas 10 will be Fury, and Vegas 11 will be 480.
>>53914291
So much fucking bullshit.
>>53921420
Anecdotal evidence of a user's history of GPU ownership doesn't mean those issues in your image aren't true.
I've been using nVidia GPUs (I think I've gone through 3 different sets of them, with 4 of 5 being in SLI) and I've never personally encountered any catastrophic driver issues that caused crashes, burned out GPUs or slow downs.
The 970 however isn't a driver issue, obviously. But even in those articles if you read them, they'll not that although the number of people that were experiencing those issues were enough to cause nVidia to recall the drivers, they were still an objectively small percentage of the owners.
>>53921517
I been using 1million billion trillionnnnn AMD cards and I never had 1 issue. but I used 2 nvidia cards and they both house fire and I had to move into a shelter.
>>53921545
That's what I get for trying to have a reasonable discussion.
>>53921573
>trying to have a reasonable discussion.
>Saying something is shit and then doing the exact same thing you said is shit
>>53918411
>You MUST be 18+ to browse this website
>>>/out/
>>53921622
What did I say was shit you retard?
All of those drivers issues of nVidia's can be true, and people can still have owned multiple GPUs without having been affected by them. Learn to read you dumbass.
>>53921517
>Anecdotal evidence of a user's history of GPU ownership doesn't mean those issues in your image aren't true.
Did you reverse what I wrote in your head when you read it? Read slowly and carefully this time. I said just because someone with a (even long) history of ownership of a specific brand, doesn't negate anything in that picture that is posted of all of nVidia's driver issues.
Similarly I stated that 3.5GB memory flaw in the 970 isn't a driver issue so that doesn't even need to be addressed as it's a hardware fault.
tl;dr lrn2 english you faggot
>>53921573
If you want to have an honest conversation, I worked as a cctv installer about 5 years back and I been doing it for about 8 years. I had to use both AMD and Nvidia. Both gives problem AMD way more than Nvidia. But when a fuck comes on here and say he's had 20 Nvid cards with no problems...it's pure BS
>>53921827
>it's pure BS
Statistically speaking he probably trolling with meaningless bullshit, given this thread and typical discourse, I'll agree with you there. There's still a chance that someone could get lucky enough to have been hit by those driver issues. They always seem to affect specific configurations and not across an entire model lineup.
>>53914403
>tfw bought a Gigabyte 280x in 2013
>still runs quiet and cold as fuck
>>53921792
>What did I say was shit you retard?
>>53921517
>Anecdotal evidence of a user's history of GPU ownership doesn't mean those issues in your image aren't true.
>>53914403
Probably the PSU.
>>53921792
>built two gaymur PCs for bros with 390s (payment: PS4, and promise to get me For Honour and Dark Souls 3)
>no probs
>got my girl a 380X for her birthday to compensate for the fukchueg amount of stuff she got me for christmas
>bitches love 380Xs
>no probs
>sexy times were had
I have also owned: HD7870, HD5870, HD5850, Radeon 9800, Ti 4200, Geforce 2MX, Geforce 256
Ti4200 blew up when I overclocked it too far, same with HD5850. Aside from that, I have not experienced grave issues with drivers or cards. Or maybe I'm just lucky.
I have always refused to beta-test new drivers and only install them a month or so after release.
>>53922119
>Ti4200 blew up when I overclocked it too far, same with HD5850.
>blew up
By how much did you OC it, exactly?
>>53922119
>I have always refused to beta-test new drivers and only install them a month or so after release.
Best tip for all the kids on here.
BETA NEVER!
>>53921952
>tfw bought a MSI 280 in early 2012. Dropped tea on it
> Still runs quiet and cold as fuck
>>53921399
P11 has always been the new 7870/7850
The shrink characteristics along with the die size point to similar core counts. It's going to clock higher along with it's considerably more advanced hardware, and 4GB will be the norm instead of 2.
I'd wager per-clock performance of GCN rev.4 is roughly 20-30% better than GCN rev.1, and the new cards will ship ~1.2Ghz out of the box, able to hit at least 1450Mhz, and at similar power levels will offer about 70% better performance comparatively.
If I can buy large P11 for ~$150-175, and if it is a decent upgrade not a sidegrade, I'd rather have that and buy refined 14/16nm the year after instead of "big" polaris or pascal.
>>53922201
I got it to 300/580 core/mem and was quite happy for 2 months. Then came summer. I was a stupid kid back then, expensive mistake.
Actually found my Ti 4200. It's the AGP 8X version, sadly I got the 64MB version.
Also 9800.
>>53914086
Lol next time include the full thing
>>53913957
as long as PS4.5 isn't here I have no reason to upgrade.
Consoles still majorly influence PC gaming fidelity presets.
Gonna be fun to see if AMD can save itself though. I for one DO NOT welcome our Nvidia/Intel monopoly overlords.
>>53914086
tfw became a waitfag for zen and scrapped a skylake upgrade
Am I doing the right thing?
>>53924342
>>>53914086
>tfw became a waitfag
I don't know why this is so funny
I am a #AMDmissile now
Never Nvidicucks
>>53922823
like some great tech lead in Ubisoft Kiev said:
>If game runs poorly on PC, user just buys new system
Truer words never been spoken by man.
AMD is already dead, they just don't know it. nVidia already got working HBM2 16nm card, while AMD can't afford HBM2 and waiting for Hynix to start making it. nVidia just made a deal with Samsung and for this year they have 100% of HBM2 shipments.
They have fuckton of money, they can throw it around.
>>53924518
>completely made up posts with no sources
AMD will release their HBM2 cards first and Nvidicuck architecture is a total disaster in dx12.
>>53921952
>mfw bought 290X TriX for 200$ a year ago, because the seller decided to upgrade to 980
Needless to say I'm satisfied with my purchase.
>>53924632
>no sources
AMD shitskin director already told they can't afford HBM2
http://www.pcper.com/news/Graphics-Cards/AMDs-Raja-Koduri-talks-moving-past-CrossFire-smaller-GPU-dies-HBM2-and-more
nVidia already announced HBM2 card
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/NVIDIA-Pascal-Architecture-Details-Tesla-P100-GP100-GPU
But I know you just want sources to spread the word yourself.
>>53924700
>cant afford HBM2
>roadmap
nvidicucks cant read?
>>53924754
>Vega
Yeah, maybe next year or the year after, when Hynix starts producing.
Have you even read the post, faggot? nVidia is getting HBM2 from Samsung this year, while AMD is waiting for sloppy seconds.
>>53924781
Nvidia is not releasing anything with HBM2 in 2016 you stupid nigger.
>>53924796
>>53924518
They showed a Vega 10 engineering sample off to journos in a closed room a few weeks back. And no I don't mean the Polaris 10 demo, that was separate. Polaris 11 was already fully shown to public.
Nvidia GP200 didn't tape out until March, the pictures being shown out are very likely the first A0 steppings to come out of the fab. It's not silicon that would Ever be put onto market or even for partners to test.
>>53924865
>all but two are missing HBM pads
WOODSCREWS
OODSCREWS
ODSCREWS
DSCREWS
SCREWS
CREWS
REWS
EWS
WS
S
>>53914291
>>53921420
>>53921517
I own Nvidia GTX 630 and Im getting BSOD since December's driver at least once a day. It's annoying
>>53913957
Would the Polaris 10/11 cards be able to handle Dota 2 at 4K60? With maxed out details?
>>53913957
So how much is Polaris 10 gonna cost?
>>53924968
?
>>53924796
Samsung
>>53913957
Why do they even let Rajeet out of the designated cage?
Everytime he talks, I get less excited about Polaris.
>>53925316
>doubting based raja
Poolaris will btfo nvidia of ever and give amd 100% market share
>>53925282
look at the bigger picture
8 PCB's, only two, the ones in yours, have HBM pads
>>53921297
>LOL 1080Ti watch the Ntards get the same old fucking garbage with a bigger number
>every amd card in the last 5+ years has reen a rebrand with a higher number
oh the irony
>>53924796
they actually are. their enterprise render cards have 16gb HBM2. theyre coming out in like 2 months. google it
>>53921297
exactly
I am a #AMDmissile now
Pascal is a total disaster
>>53925556
>he implies 1080 ti will be a rebranded 980 ti
>980 ti is by far the best card on the market
>he thinks it's 'fucking garbage'
Why even reply to such brain dead people? Why even reply to ayymdrones at all, they're all fucking spasticated and deluded.
>>53925689
>I am a #AMDmissile now
cringe
Just realized today that this exact time last year I was in the exact same position, waiting for the new EPIC (gonna be so great bro, it's gonna be a GAME CHANGER!) GPU's from AMD to come out in June. Why is the GPU market so shitty?
>>53914291
Had a gtx 295, was a housefire pos. 1 GPU crapped out and had to run everything in single GPU mode
>>53926014
>dat gyno
>>53925556
>>>5 years
Here are the unique chips AMD has launched in the last five years, in order by date:
Barts
Cayman
Caicos
Turks
Tahiti
Cape Verde
Pitcairn
Bonaire
Oland
Hawaii
Tonga
Fiji
Now here are Nvidias:
GF119
GK104
GK107
GK106
GK208
GK110
GM107
GM204
GM206
GM200
12 vs 10
Who rebrands more, exactly?
>>53925902
So you're it is a rebrand!
>>53926584
How does this show rebrands? This just shows names of each die family. GM are all maxwell and GK is kepler. This doesn't show which cards from which gen are rebrands eg 2xx being rebranded to 3xx. They term 'unique chips' is misleading when a chip can be 'unique' but have 0 difference compared to the last chip except for a more mature chip leading to slightly better temps and clocks, which is what the 3xx series is.
Are you actively trying to deny that each amd card since the HD 7xxx series to the 3xx series has been a rebrand in one way or another?
>>53926735
They're unique chips as in they aren't rebrands
Notice I didn't include GF110, a rework of the prior GF100 chip from 2010, known internally as GF100B?
Notice I didn't include Grenada, the Hawaii rebrand? or Trinidad the Pitcairn rebrand?
>>53926735
are you retarded? This clearly shows names of architectures, he even excluded rebrands you mention (Hawaii - Grenada) and cut chips (cut - XT)
>>53924342
Since Skylake is literally a meme you did the only reasonable thing
>>53926773
So you've pointed out unique architectures within a 5 year space. Now show me now many rebrands each company have done within that space and how many cards these rebrands correspond to. I'm legitimately interested from an educational viewpoint and not a fanboy viewpoint. I own both nvidia and amd cards currently.
Don't be biased. If you don't want to explain it then link me the wiki.
>>53927014
>>53926773
Never mind I found something
http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/anton-shilov/rebadging-of-graphics-adapters-past-present-and-future/
Interesting shit if you're not a deluded fanboy. Gives you a nice insight on the progress of graphical technology from both sides.
>>53921194
low end of what matters for gaming, any lower then that and you are just getting it for video/old games.
>>53925078
My 270x can do cs go at 4k high setting no mssa 80fps do the math
