Opera is the best browser out there, go ahead, try and prove me wrong
>Pro tip, you can't
explain why there is only 7 users world wide at any given time?
answer "I_'s s_ _t"
find the remaining letters
>>53624050
>Popularity = quality
Go back to apple you shill
it's okay.
>>53624064
extreme unpopularity is not a good thing too
>>53624064
>No one uses it.
>THAT DOESNT MEAN ITS SHIT XDDD
Holy balls you're a retard.
>>53623971
I use it. I like it. It's similar to any other browser. There is no best, but there's a worst.
>>53623971
> Chrome imitation is the best browser out there
It was good before it became Chrome.
>>53623971
What is Microsoft edge?
Once it gets extensions it will rape all the other browsers. No lube.
>>53624430
this desu senpai
>>53624430
Still shit compared to Opera
Whether or not Edge is great or even good, let's keep in mind it requires an operating system downgrade and is therefore inherently shit.
Only browser I don't need 50 extensions for.
That's all I ever wanted.
That's all I ever wanted.
That's all I ever wanted.
>>53624625
>extensions come pre-bundled instead of you having to download them
How is that good?
>>53623971
Mobile? sure. The best.
Desktop? hell no. It's just a chrome port.
>>53623971
>Opera
Chinese adware botnet coming soon.
>>53624633
It does more than Firefox could ever dream of with a stock install, and with all that "bloat" I'm still not even using 450MB with 16 tabs open. For me to be content with Opera I need one extension, to make SeaMonkey comparable I have 10 installed and it's not even close
>>53624655
We're discussing Opera, not Chropera.
>>53624732
*450MB RAM
>>53623971
I agree.
>>53623971
Its great, I hope they bring back many of the features from the old Opera
was the best Presto eras
now it's just a better Chrome which is good i guess but eh
mozilla is making a new engline from scrach apparently
here's hoping.
>>53623971
download.jpg
>>53625491
Oh?
>>53625491
WE'VE BEEN MADE
CODE AF-53
>>53624064
Low popularity = Low quality most of the time
Face it, you are a hipster
>>53625505
>Low popularity = Low quality most of the time
that's so wrong on so many levels i can't even
>>53625505
Nope.
Check out that consistency
>using proprietary garbage when a better free alternative exists.
The only viable excuse to using proprietary software, is when you rhardware won't function without it. It's regrettable but if you can't afford new hardware is the only option.
>>53625549
The only viable excuse to using proprietary software is when it's the best. This is the case with Opera.
Opera is really the best and it's shit
There's literally no browser that's not shit right now.
>it's a bad hack of Chrome now
LOLno
>>53625611
I don't think OP's talking about Chropera.
If he is he used the wrong logo
>>53625630
based Chropera adds native adblocker next version
>>53625648
Opera had it for years before they gutted it, Chropera is anything but based.
>>53625630
What other Opera is there? The old engine? The one that's now out of date and insecure because it's no longer maintained?
>>53625690
Even if it's outdated it's still the best browser
>>53623971
OPERA: THE EXPERIENCE!
>>53624050
IO's shot?
>>53625480
>this
presto times was a golden age.
opera 12 was the best
>>53623971
B A I T
A
I
T
>>53625569
It can't be the best if it's proprietary.
>>53623971
What the fuck happened to them? Just look at their ad blocking video, no music and you can hear some chink in the background giggling or some shit
>>53627301
Can when you're not a delusional freetard
>>53623971
Opera 12? Yup.
Chropera? Nope.
I wish I knew why Opera stopped innovating and instead decided to scrap everything interesting about them and make a chrome-clone.
>>53625539
>so many innovations opera introduced get credited to other browsers years after the fact
>>53629006
they sold out, and anyone still faithful to innovation quit and is making vivaldi now
>>53629006
not enough money cuz low popularity -> can't pay their employees -> ditch presto and fire a lot of employees -> new opera is born.
I miss opera 10-12.
Why did they chrome-it?
Why didn't they bring back the old features?.
Vivaldi and otter seem like a viable alternative but they are taking so god damn long in simply fixing their browsers so they don't crash every 5 seconds.
>>53633354
isn't vivaldi written in javascript or something ?
that's like guaranteed lag
>>53633383
I just want my tab sacking
is so much to ask
>>53633411
*stacking
>>53633354
>Why did they chrome-it?
Webdevs not respecting standards, it was just easier to switch to webkit than patching all the broken websites with the browser.js.
>>53633411
maybe otter will be good
