Would this be allowed on Windows or OSX?
>>52181497
If I open up Nautilus right now (Ubuntu) I have thumbnails
Image is wrong
:^)
>2016
>loonix still has this problem
>90% of loonix freetard distros still have gnome shit installed by default
>even attempting to offer this as a "better alternative" to windows/osx
>>52182151
>Username is "X"
Edgelord detected
>>52181497
yes
>>52181739
>(like Nautilus)
post yfw the FSF killed Linux
>>52181497
>>52182151
>>52182151
>90% of loonix freetard distros still have gnome shit installed by default
Source?
>inb4 picture of your ass, where that statistic was pulled from
I keep seeing complaints about this. I just navigate down the list via keyboard till I find the image I want. Is that so difficult? Organize your reaction folder to where you don't need to stare down thumbnails like a fucking caveman.
>>52182308
>I just navigate down the list via keyboard till I find the image I want
Not all of us have 10 minutes to find an image.
>>52182315
>2006
>>52182151
KDE on CentOS doesn't solve this problem either. CentOS, OpenSUSE, RHEL are also the only usable well supported linux distros with an actual company backing them with proper timely security patches and the only ones anyone should ever bother using.
Sadly loonix is just stuck in 1995 usability where it will stay for the rest of this decade and probably the next decade as well.
>>52182327
>10 minutes to find an image
Do you just dump your shit into one folder with out tags and names?
>>52182387
Yes because I don't have hours to spend tagging images. People who have been here for a long time have thousands of images.
>>52182387
> tags and names
Nobody does this
>>52182392
Yeah and I figured out back in 2006 that it would be a good idea to actually sort those thousands of images.
>>52182387
Windows hasn't had this problem for TWO DECADES now.
OSX hasn't had it for A WHOLE DECADE.
>>52182422
This place didn't exist in 2006. Nice try though.
>>52182443
>This place didn't exist in 2006
26/11/09 how it that possible?:
what is the system clock format set as may i ask?
>>52182381
>his distro can't even afford to patch Firefox
>>52182468
26th of November 2009
I think that's how Brits do it or something
>>52182151
Gnome has this problem, specifically that failed abortion of a GUI toolkit known as GTK+. AKA "Hurr durr let's implement OO in a procedural language." KDE master race.
>>52182443
I don't even know why I'm bothering to respond to someone who can't even google, and to think I got made fun of in 2005 for being a new fag.
>>52182486
>all that white space for a file name
>freetard level gui design
>>52182468
DD/MM/YYYY
You know, just what most of the world uses.
>>52182478
>his distro will die when the project leader chokes on a hot pocket in his mom's basement
>>52182515
You mean a multinational corporation whose stocks jumped £300 in the last month?
>>52182498
>weebtard logic everyone
>mfw this whole thread
>>52182478
Is that 13.2?
>>52182515
>Not recognizing SUSE
>>52182612
>I have to use a work around therefore the problem doesn't exist!
>>52182645
That it is, and that it will be until this time next year.
IT manager here.
We use all three OSs, because each has its use.
Windows on desktop - Proper well supported desktop OS for all employees to get shit done. Full suite and backend tools for managing the entire fleet from IT dept.
Windows on servers - Excellent as domain controllers for management purposes, linux DCs also serve as good backup DCs. Exchange is tolerable. It's annoying when it breaks but frankly no one has ever come up with a better solution with all the functionality it offers, so there's no real alternative.
Linux on servers - Lean stable single purpose servers that are easy to troubleshoot as they can be reduced down to minimal services.
Linux on desktop - A complete joke and completely unsuitable for anything besides software development. If someone even suggests putting it on a machine that's used by marketing/accounting/engineering/etc, that someone is going to be looking forward to a performance review and a new job.
OSX on desktop - Flashy brightly colored rounded buttons GUI and fancy animations. Lets the CEO think he's hip and trendy despite the fact he's a 300lb landwhale.
OSX on servers - Good joke.
>>52182687
The thumbnails are a shortcut to not having to open every file.
A workaround if you ask me.
>>52182612
>firefox
>>52182478
>3rd patch hacks
see >>52182381
>>52182689
What's your reason for not moving to Leap?
>>52182705
>IT manager here.
And you think your opinion matters because? I'm a CEO, our entire office use macs because it's NIX and not shit like linux, and don't even get me started on wincuck.
>>52182687
>I would rather use an inferior workflow because I'm used to it.
>>52182724
2 rupees have been deposited in your designated applel account pajeet
>>52182724
>our entire office use macs because our staff are retards
>>52181497
>>52182151
What exactly is the problem here?
>>52182724
>CEO here
and you think your opinion matters? I'm President Obama and blah blah blah cuckolds porn, blah blah blah tell lies on the internet, blah blah blah tendies
>>52182721
And why is firefox bad?
Hopefully there is someone on /g/ that can explain that to me instead of spouting memes.
>>52182275
you're so mean anon
>>52182772
Did I get enough GBP yet mommy?
>>52182724
>our entire office use macs
And managed from a Windows/Linux DC if your 2-bit operation is big enough to even have a DC. Or do you just have one switch and a modem for dialing into AOL and string all your macs together with spaghetti cabling like your code? Stay cucked lmao.
>>52182328
and in 10 fucking years, it still isnt resolved to an acceptable degree
>>52182772
Obama uses a mac.
>>52182819
You mean the man who ruined America ?
>>52182819
Obama uses his mac to update his facebook and tweet, literally.
>>52182723
As it is now my computer runs and runs well and works for weeks on end. If I wanted shiny bells and whistles it'd be less hassle to upgrade to Tumbleweed than it would to install Leap. Only thing I care is fresh and updated is mpv and Packman does a nice job of keeping up with that (and time before last I checked didn't even support Leap).
>>52182852
It's not Obama running those accounts mate, just a PR team
>>52182859
Packman supports Leap now, but codec support is a little dodgy as always. I love SUSE, but they need to focus on refining the experience more if they ever want to catch up to Fedora.
>>52182908
>catch up to Fedora.
>GNOME installed by default and the only supported GUI in the documentation
>file picker that hasn't even reached windows 98 level functionality
>>52182956
weeb blabber disregarded
>>52182705
>Linux on servers - Lean stable single purpose servers that are easy to troubleshoot as they can be reduced down to minimal services.
This is literally THE ONLY REASON to ever use linux besides development, and even that's starting to lose traction now that windows server core has come out and integrates better with other windows servers.
>>52182956
I drag and drop to pick files on KDE too. GNOME is fun to use and Fedora would be great if it let me at least compile rlvm so I can play my Keyshit. Or go more than a week without rebooting.
>>52182593
How can you honestly look at his/her post and think that they're talking about the text input boxes and not the huge amount of space (seemingly an entire line) reserved for image filenames.
Do you have aspergers?
>>52183065
>>52182381
>server distribution
>should be bloated with useless crap by stock
yeah, no
>it's 2016
>osx still can't install software from networked drives
>>52183242
How is that relevant to this thread?
>>52183281
How is that not relevant to this thread?
>>52182425
>OSX hasn't had it for A WHOLE DECADE
Cheetah had thumbnail view. It's 14 or so years old.
>>52183218
>basic image thumbnails
>useless crap
LINKEKS
I
N
C
U
C
K
S
>>52184209
I, an openSUSE user, frequently drag and drop images into the choose file button.
Thumbnail view in a file picker definitely is a useless feature.
>>52183629
The thread is about a Linux problem
>>52184580
>being this much of a cuck
>>52184709
I unlike you have an OS that doesn't spy on me, so you might want to choose a better schoolyard insult.
>>52184760
>My OS doesn't spy on me
>*opens up Gmail, Facebook*
>>52184988
you mean cockmail and manjaro forums :^)
>>52185044
>That one kid who installed antergos last week
>>52182493
/g/ wasn't a tech board in 2005 though
>/g/ is literally packed with freetards saying how great it is to be able to see the source code and fix the bugs yourself
>not a single one of them is busy with fixing the upload dialog
heh
>>52188583
kek
Linux noob here
Where exactly do you find that "non-thumbnail" file managers/distros? Because i tried few distros and all of them had thumbnails so i wonder what's the problem here?
>>52188650
Maybe you should be reading more carefully. The thread is about thumbnails in browser dialog box when you click "choose file" to upload an image.
>>52188715
Which browser? Because i guess that's browser's fault, not Linux as as a OS
>>52188583
>>52188613
https://gist.github.com/ahodesuka/01213036b58e510dc074
you just need to change 2 numbers for thumbnail resolution
>>52188739
Post your upload screen.
>>52188739
No it's GTKs fault. GTK is very much a core OS component in most loonix distros. This is a problem for all programs using the gtk file picker, not just browsers.
>>52182705
>Exchange is tolerable.
Immediately stopped reading.
>>52188779
Just tried it in ubuntu 15.10 firefox, i have thumbnail
>>52188850
Well, you see, you have to click every individual file to see the preview.
This >>52181763 is what it's supposed to be like.
>>52188850
>this thread
>this retard
>every time
>>52181763
>windows 98 works fine
>linux didn't get the bug report until 2004 and still can't fix it
pepe'd
>>52188859
Oh, i get it now
I always thought people don't see ANY thumbnail whatsoever
Yeah, it's amazing that they didn't implement that, imho that's a trivial thing
>>52188583
1. /g/ is packed with worthless Windows plebs
2. said Windows plebs create these threads
3. I couldn't care less if ShitTK shows you thumbnails of your Pepe collection
>>52188832
what font is that? it's pretty!
also if you have color list that'd be radical! ;^)
>>52188893
>being this jelly of my extensive pepe collection and big, high-res, colorful thumbnails
>>52188893
>I couldn't care less if ShitTK shows you thumbnails of your Pepe collection
Step 1 of the Linux user handbook: If something doesn't work for you, tell yourself that you don't really need it anyway.
>>52188955
Exactly.
Linux, as a desktop client, always feels half-baked. There's always some minor thing not working correctly or missing.
There are also regressions every few months after installing updates with things breaking which worked fine before.
>>52188893
I installed Arch and when I realized that I wouldn't have easy access to my hundred steam games, I went back to Windows. might dual boot at some point though. I don't see the point in only using a riced up os that can't run my casul programs.
>>52182163
>what is a placeholder convention
>>52188955
People release and maintain free software. If this doesn't make you happy and you feel entitled to get people do whatever you deem important for free, go fuck yourself.
>>52182773
It's a google chrome knockout that ditched all of it't unique features(search from address bar independent from the search bar), uses stupid mobile ui even for desktop, removed half of the under-the-hood customizations.
If you like the new FF then switch to crhome, because chrome does chrome better than FF. If you like FF then switch to Palemoon because ot does Firefox better then the new Firefox.
>>52189118
palemoon is just ff trying to rename itself after fucking up.
>>52188989
>muh servers
>muh embedded
>>52189148
Palemoon is firefox *before* you it fucked up. It's a forked previous version of firefox. If you don't know shit then just shut up next time ok.
>>52189086
>le its free and just a hobby meme
Why do freetards only take a break from lying and making out their desktop software is the best invention since sliced bread and admit it's inferior hobbyist garbage when backed in to a corner?
Such a dishonest group of people.
>>52182381
>KDE on CentOS doesn't solve this problem either.
>GTK file picker
Hmm, I wonder why this is still happening.
>>52181497
HURR DURR I WILL POST THIS EVERY DAY ON /g/ UNTIL GNOME FINALLY FIXED IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>implying
just flood the gnome irc if you want to get shit done, how would they know if you people loose your shit at an chinese imageboard about the topic?
>>52189295
How long did it take you to find that image using such a shitty file picker?
Have you learnt to give up yet and just double click random files?
>>52189318
2 seconds
>CTRL + F + wojak
>>52182468
Amerifat confirmed.
> using mm/dd/yyyy
>2016
>>52189875
Or should I write it 6102?
bump, debian babby here, how do I do thumbnails without AUR
>>52190234
u don't.
>>52190641
ok :(
>>52182493
He may be talking about /g/
>>52181497
yes
>>52182781
God damnit
This is a crude low-effort overly-glossy digital drawing of a terribly generic and tame fictional subject
I don't even like anime apart from some rare really high quality stuff
It should not be arousing me in any way
What the fuck is wrong with me
>>52188955
>>52182387
Yes, because I can see thumbnails in my file browser so it takes me about 2 seconds or less to find the right one.
