Where were you when Adguard won?
>ram usage statistics for browser extensions
>honestly giving a shit
Ram is now cheaper than your mom's 2 for 1 deal. Who cares so long as it works.
just put jlist on the bottom and i am ok with internet ads
>>52142176
>proprietary adware
>>52142176
>ublock
>not ublock origin
>>52142176
>shilling
>>52142176
>closed source
>not comparing to ublock origin
Even so, it uses 2 megabytes less than ublock, fucking amazing
>>>/trash/
>>52142451
> closed source
https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension
The browser extension is open source, what is closed source is their premium clients for Windows, Android and OS X. Their other privacy browser addon is also open source: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/StealthMode
>>52142176
> Not the latest uBlock Origin, I´ll do a test now
>paid software
>not a browser extension
>not open source
>shilling this hard
>>52142176
That's great! Would you mind providing me with the source code so I can try it out myself and verify that these results are accurate?
>>52142176
>Adguard own benchmark
>Showing adguard winning
Holy shit what a shitty comparison.
>>52142651
>premium
>adblocker
Kill urself senpai
>>52142651
>>52142781
>>52142749
Test done right now, the same 2 filter lists on both browsers. Versions:
Adguard 2.0.17
uBlock Origin 1.5.2
EasyList 1.0.49.87
EasyPrivacy 1.0.49.75
>>52142843
2/2
>>52142703
See >>52142651
>>52142176
>proprietary spyware
>>52142843
>>52142859
I see no source code.
>>52142843
>>52142859
>literally nothing between them
Considering every other process is also using a different amount of RAM.
uBlock Origin has the better feature set, even if it doesn't look pretty.
>>52142888
Source code for what?
https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock
>>52142909
There is nearly no difference, thats true. uBO looks pretty, what the fuck are you saying ABP shill?
>hurr
>>52142957
>LGPL
Dropped. Nah jk that's alright with me
>>52143102
d-delete this
>>52142176
>getting hysterical about an adblocker
who the fuck cares?
>>52143102
>running both at once
That's retarded Anon. You're retarded.
>>52143102
> Using both at the same time
omg
>>52143219
>>52143261
>hurr durr
>>52142176
of course something new will use less resources... try adding features and see memory consumption rising
>>52143357
And it even has retarded memory spikes for some reason. I don't think the memory management is as good as Ublock's.
>everyone and their mother has 8-16GB or more RAM
>everyone, look! this extension uses only 25MB!
>>52143431
>>52142303
>optimization is not important
Kill yourselves retards.
>>52142843
>>52142859
You are retarded. You can't test with multiple extensions installed at the same time because one may end up doing 100% of the work and then there's nothing left for the others, leaving them with no resources used.
You need to test each one by itself on a clean install of the browser.
SELL UBLOCK
BUY ADGUARD
QUICK STOCKS ARE TUMBLING DOWN
>>52143573
>A tiny group of nerds who actually care about that tiny bit of ram being used by a browser extension in machines that regularly come with at least 4gb ram now
>Thinking that shit matters to anyone but you and you circle of fellow jerk offs
No one cares. People will continue using what they know or are comfortable with. The world will keep spinning. And you'll still be the only one arguing over this shitm
>>52143405
ADTARD BTFO
D
T
A
R
D
B
T
F
O
>>52143647
Retard, if developers didn't mind optimization you couldn't run half the programs you run at the same time, this applies to everyone.
You're a moron.
>>52143682
I don't care about anything in the battlestation, that room looks so comfy.
>>52142859
your /g/ page sure became heavier all of the sudden.
>>52142176
Meanwhile hosts use zero RAM. It's retarded to talk about plugins with different sets of functions, and ublock(origin) beats everything in either regard. Where's the number of fliters used in each test? Absolute joke of a chart.
>>52143778
>Meanwhile hosts use zero RAM.
Incorrect. Your hosts file is loaded into memory.
>>52143778
I don't think you understand how computers work.
>>52143799
In browser, m8.
>favoring small ram usage over speed
inb4 that guy starts shilling his shitty botnet redmorph addon
>>52143431
>>52142303
This is the reason why some shitty applications take several SECONDS to start
>>52143928
It's dynamic linkers actually.
lol
>>52143928
Allocating all available RAM takes literally milliseconds.
>>52143717
Trying to compare larger programs to a fucking extension
Honestly thinking 25mb ram matters
I know the necessity of optimization but we're talking 25mb here. Not 2.5gb. Shit not even 250mb. Do you think big program devs like CAD software and photo editing programs are actually optimized down to the single mb?
Im not arguing against optimization. Im arguing against the entire point of this thread. 25mb and neckbeards shit their pants. This is a poontless argument in a pointless thread.
>>52143979
>>52143357
>>52142859
>>52142843
It seems they are quite on par
>>52144005
>I know the necessity of optimization
You clearly fucking don't.
>we're talking 25mb
Every bit helps. If one extension has less memory consumption and the same features as another why the fuck wouldn't you use the extension that is more efficient?
ITT:
>LESS MEMORY IS SPEED
I don't care about memory usage, I care about adblock detection.
For example, Forbes no longer works unless you disable ad block (see picrelated)
They claim you get an 'ad-lite' experience, but of course they are fucking lying scum.
You get:
>multiple video ads
>VIDEO ads that LITERALLY APPEAR OUT OF NOWHERE BETWEEN LINES OF TEXT OUT OF AS YOU SCROLL
>pop ads as you try to leave the site
Its like they are a bunch of braindead fucking idiots. They want an adblock arms race
You mother fuckers literally want me to watch a dozen video ads to read some op-ed by some dickbag 'journalist' with a poli sci degree who's probably sucked more dick than most porn stars just to get their job in the first place?
FUCK YOU FORBES
>>52144114
get anti-adblock killer
>>52144114
>Enter Forbes
>See "welcome pls gib money thks" page
>Use Ublock0 element picker
>Select the page
>Never see it again
Adblocking wins again
>>52144175
Doesn't work on all sites
>>52142176
>implying I want to block ads and not just trackers
>>52144292
>implying there are non-tracking ads
>>52144069
>efficient
You're ignoring that there is usually a trade-off between memory usage and speed. Extreme example: what good is an ad-blocker with zero memory usage that needs to re-download its filter lists each time you open a website?
>>52144369
I'm not talking about Adguard. It was more of a comparison between Ublock Origin and Adblock Plus.
>>52144225
yet to find a site where it doesn't work on
I'm talking about the script, not the filter
https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/3qzp6d/why_should_i_use_ublock_origin_instead_of_abp/cwjr0v9
>>52142843
>>52142859
oh my fucking god
a THREE MB difference
T H R E E
I'm switching right now
>>52142176
>About 45MB less RAM than the heaviest one
>45MB
I don't think I could give less of a shit if somebody paid me to.
>>52143928
yeah because you need to get to your pony porn, and you have so many other things to do (that's why you're a bronie)
>>52143102
>https everywhere
>131mb
https everywhere a shit
