[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Home server for database.
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 1
File: mysql-mariadb.png (14 KB, 500x285) Image search: [Google]
mysql-mariadb.png
14 KB, 500x285
So i've been looking for a cheap (price and electricity cost) small server for home use of MariaDB (MySQL's better sister).
By cheap i mean somewhere in the ballpark of $300.
At first i thought about
HP ProLiant MicroServer G7 N54L
It is small, very power efficient, has ECC memory but pretty crappy processor.
And it made me think, although in enterprise solutions processor usually isn't a bottleneck in DB applications, however all those microsevers (which IMO are more suited for NAS) have crappy CPUs. I cannot find any realiabale data or benchmarks of those low power CPUs, taking into account DB workloads.
So i searched for aftermarket servers and found HP DL365 and HP DL80. They cost pretty much the same as N54L, have more RAM and better CPU. With those i wouln't be concerned about CPU bottlenecking it, but they crave power and require SAS drives (which are expensive, especially SSDs).
So, even that N54L is a bit more expensive than those used servers and have nicer form factor for a home use (i'd put it in my closet) i'm stil afraid that CPU woud become bottleneck.
Important thing, it's not some idle DB, it is set of 40 InnoDB tables, totalling 180GiB. On average 200 inserts/s, 40 updates/s, 5 deletes/s, everything transactional, averaging 5 operations per transaction, taking no more than 3 seconds each trx. Currently i run this DB on Pentium D 2.66GHz (two cores), 16GiB of RAM, RAID0 (speed) HDDs with daily backups. Pretty old stuff and DB servers aint going past 25% of CPU, but dont know how it would scale to that lower power one from N54L.
Also i don't want to top this servers CPU resources with DB, as this machine does other things too.

Tl;DR:
I need good, reliable, low cost, low power server for heavy MariaDB workloads.
>>
>>52111764
Just a lil bump.
>>
Just rent a server in the cloud dude this is a total waste of time.
>>
>>52112829
I considered it and asked couple companies for quotes.
It would cost my at least twice as much monthly (including server amortization period of 2 years).
I would still need to run a second machine at home (which needs this DB) - more extra costs.
If i get a new small server i can have DB and application server on the same machine.
And no, i cannot put application server on the cloud with DB - it requires too much traffic and dedicated port costs a lot of money.
>>
>>52111764
Just get an Intel Nuc or tiny box barebone.

Cheap as first and good for small applications.

I've got a 6x NUC cluster running Hadoop for some personal projects
>>
>>52113043
I stumbled upon NUC's in my searches, they are prety good value for money and very power efficient. I considered them for the application server at some point but i got 2yo DELL990 (i7 with 16Gb of ram) for $80. And NUCs seem to be a bit too powerfull for DB only and lack SATA/SAS conectivity - i'd like to run DB on two RAID1 SSDs.
>>
I ran some numbers.
- Cloud 4 vCores 16 GB 1TB - $225/mo
- Dedicated Xeon E5 4cores 32 GB, 2TB - $87,5/mo
[not including transfer (1TB costs $18)]

And if i buy used server i pay:
- $200 max for the server (two quad cores usually) and 16GB, without storage disks
- $18/mo for electricity

So unfortunatelly cloud or dedicated solution won't work for me, because it's not some thing that i could monetize, just a little project of mine.
>>
One last shameless boomp before work.
>>
>>52113801
>just a little project of mine

two quad cores and 16GB

>a little

Are you kidding us m8? If you optimize it a bit you can run the front page of Yahoo on this fucker.
>>
Loathed to help a tripfag, filtered.
>>
>>52111764
>Important thing, it's not some idle DB, it is set of 40 InnoDB tables, totalling 180GiB. On average 200 inserts/s, 40 updates/s, 5 deletes/s, everything transactional, averaging 5 operations per transaction, taking no more than 3 seconds each trx.

What the shitting fuck are you running on here? Details, please.
Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 1

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.