Will they make sex-bots a reality? Virtual reality waifus sure, but actual things that can replace 3D women? Will they allow it? Smart women out there are well aware of their threat and are already campaigning.
>They are yet to hit the shelves, but activists are already campaigning against the sale of so-called sex robots, which may be "harmful and contribute to inequalities in society."
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/09/15/sex-robots-campaign.html
>Should We Criminalize Robotic Rape and Child Sex Robots?
http://futureofsex.net/robots/criminalize-robotic-rape-child-sex-robots/
>Are Robots The Future Of Sex?: Jincey Lumpkin Esq. at TEDxSiliconAlley
>Basicly, robots are programmed to yes and can not concent
http://tedxtalks.ted.com/video/Are-Robots-The-Future-Of-Sex-Ji
>child sex robots
inb4 someone rapes a child robot and puts it on youtube and gets sentenced to death because muh feelings
That screwdriver will never fit anything in those arm components.
>>51715294
are you saying women cant even repair themselves?
>>51715294
The robot probably got a female persona.
>technology not there yet
>commies and feminazis already protesting against it because WHA BOUT MUH WYMYN
It's like they actually know once the technology is perfected and commercialised women are to become uteruses with legs once again.
>>51715294
Might be using it to lever a component out
>>51715232
Why do you still care about this bullshit?
All these campaigns are just butthurt feminist, they can whine as much as they want but you don't have any power to stop anyone. They are not government nor police, they can't make laws and execute them. Not even Canada banned sex robots, it's all just a rumor. Even if they banned them somewhere, there is always Japan who will never ban such a thing.
No one can stop companies from making androids, just like any other porn business it will surely be worth a lot and even if someone decided to ban them, companies can always move somewhere else. For now it's not profitable to make such a research but in the future it surely will, but it will never replace 3D woman completely.
Well I don't know about you guys but sex with robots sounds like dehumanizing one of the most defining aspects of our psyche and behavioral patterns.
What comes next? Robot wives? Robot children? Whats wrong with humans?
>>51715945
Thats not how you hold a screwdriver to level something out
>sexy time with sex robot running Arch for sex
>driver crashes
>sex robot crush your penis
>>51716061
It's surely no more dehumanizing than sex with my dakimakura of my beloved waifu with attached onahole to it.
Why should I or anyone care if that's dehumanizing or not, when it allows you to finally make love to someone you love?
>>51715294
Came here for this and the subsequent replies. You guys make me proud.
>>51716132
Because it isn't someone. You love something.
>>51716151
It's purely semantic problem and don't change reality that I love Miku.
It's pointless to argue if I love someone or something. If anything, I'm in love with an idea.
>>51716132
Because it isn't real. It's equivalent to having a slave. It has no choice in how 8t feels about you, you are forcing it.
>>51715232
Seriously go fuck a hooker if you're that desperate. Fuck dolls are just super expensive masturbation, they can never replace the pleasure of making a living, breathing, feeling person into your personal cum dumpster.
>>51716260
>they can never replace the pleasure of making a living, breathing, feeling person into your personal cum dumpster
I'm not saying I'm in favour of fucking robots but eventually technology will reach the level where the difference wont be noticeable, in like 500 years you might walk into a brothel and fuck a robot but think it was a real girl.
Who is this semen demon?
I can't pretend to understand the metaphysical arguments about "love", but once androids are sophisticated enough, they'll replace 90% of human necessity. The world is designed for the human form factor, but there's very few day to day tasks that require complex abstract intelligence (unless you count vision/object recognition, which imho will be completely solved in less than 10 years). Having a personal android will be something anyone who can afford one will get.
The fact that they can satisfy sexual needs is just a convenient bonus, if anything, it's ironic such a limited use case is seen by the public as a driving factor for the technology. It's probably just more interesting to write shitty blog posts about sex robots than the impending doom for all manual laborers under the median wage level.
Fucking synths
>>51716413
This, to be honest family.
But why would it be a threat only to women? There will be male sex bots as well and most likely human girls will prefer their any-size titanium cocks with vibration function, selectable temperature and painkiller infused semen replacement. How will your femenine dicks compete with that?
Hey CUNTS, did you know that OUR POPULATION IS ALREADY DWINDLING??? GO OUT THERE AND FUCKING FUCK A BITCH AND GET HER PREGNANT INSTEAD OF STICKING YOUR CAWK INTO SILICONE METAL
>>51716474
Why? I don't owe the future of humanity anything, certainly not 18 years of my life just to raise another shithead like me.
I just want them dystopian cyberpunk future tbqh.
>>51716510
Yeah and let humanity get taken over by curryniggers, asians and nignogs
>>51715232
That photoshop is very cringeworthy
>>51716474
Why the fuck would you care about puny human population when your only task is to boot superior robots?
>>51716305
In like 500 years you'll be dead.
>>51716190
Oh come on, robots are real, just like me or you.
How can it be a slave? Slave is someone, you took their freedom away and forced them to serve you. A robots don't have freedom from the beginning and they are machines, made by people to serve people. You don't consider your washing machine a slave, do you? Purpose of my hypothetical android would be to pretend to be my waifu and I'll surely make her in a way that she will love me(otherwise she couldn't do it properly). So if she loves me and wants to be with me, what is so "slavery" about it?
>>51716260
There is nothing stopping robots from being more and more realistic. Also I wouldn't be so sure that they are so inferior. I heard opinions that sex with living female you don't really love is far less nice than pretended "sex" with a waifu you truly love using good lewd pics, good onahole and lots of imagination.
>>51716459
I don't know but I suppose it's because woman don't really sex bots. Think about feminist, they want quotas in IT industry to get more money, they fight for their "rights" etc. They want money and power, that's what modern feminism is about. All the pretty girls just end up with some rich guys and have everything they want, while the ugly ones join feminist groups. For now, they still can use sex to manipulate beta males to pay alimony and stuff, but once sex robots will be available, these feminist will completely lose the tiny appeal and power they have. Robo-chad rather won't give them money.
>>51716579
>I heard opinions that sex with living female
Don't you find it irritating when people with no experience or knowledge of a subject insist on sharing their opinions on it?
>>51716652
But that's what /g/ is all about!
>>51715314
do don't date much do you ;)
>>51716652
I just shared opinions of people of /jp/ who claims that they had occasion to fuck a hooker and/or random girl, but they collect onahole and still prefer "sex" with their waifu.
I don't know if they were lying nor can I confirm it since I'm a virgin. But I know that once I got waifu, sex with her is an experience on completely different level than just plain masturbation. Even just a thought of sex with the girl I love while I'm masturbating is overwhelming and when you cuddle with daki in afterglow, you never feel that emptiness, but a warm, happy sensation instead.
>>51716568
how so?
>>51716260
>go fuck a hooker
>wanting STD
Look at all the TV shows and movies about robot rights. Sexbots are never going to happen because humans have empathy for things that look like us. It's that simple and stupid.
>>51716900
That's just false controversy. Androids are way too useful to ban outright, even if a country tried to ban "sex robots" they'd be hopeless against a black market for mods or erotic parts.
>>51716960
I doubt fully human looking robots would ever be allowed. Like with realistic skin.
>>51716579
PIc somewhat related.
>>51716190
>Implying humans have free will
Sorry are you from the 18th Century?
>>51716979
You think every country in the world is going to ban the most profitable emerging market of the century?
>>51716043
>Not even Canada banned sex robots
IIRC I read an article about someone getting arrested for having a loli sex doll here, unless things change I don't see it happening differently with robots.
>>51717425
Canada banned loli but not sex robots. Child robots fall under loli restriction I guess.
>>51716717
He probably does anon, hence why he would know.
>>51715232
Sex would honestly be a secondary function
Smart women who earn their place in the industries shouldn't worry; it's dumb womyn who contribute nothing to the economy, industry and society that will be replaced by gynoids in doing menial tasks.
Robomaids, secretaries and nurses etc will save a lot on labor, simply requiring routine maintenance and updates to their firmware/hardware, won't throw bitchfits, go on periods, claim maternity leave or cry rape at any form of perceived altercation.
>>51717731
This ttbbhh ffaamm
>>51716061
Humans are nothing more than just organic machines, fooling themselves that their chemical cpus somehow magickally make everyone of them a special, unique, one-of-a-kind snowflake.
>>51716900
Robots won't have rights, or won't need rights if they're not sentient
People seem to forget that what they see in science fiction does not apply to real life, and robots will only get rights if AI advances to a level where it can be considered sentient, basically "alive".
Otherwise robots, even if they're covered in synthetic skin and hair, will still be but machines of silicon and metal programmed to act upon the command of their masters
>>51717906
You underestimate feminists and SJWs. Plus the US is still a puritanical country. If people disagree with gay marriage, they sure and hell won't let you have sex with a robot. Laws will get passed early on that prohibit it.
>>51715232
>>51717450
What is a child robot? Parts, maybe few weeks, a month old at best? Resemblance of human child physical sizewise? The age software presents? If there would be AI, age of the AI? How do you compare age of a machine that loops and loops eternities, possibly processing lifetimes of data while you haven't even finished a single word?
>>51717731
Pic related.
>>51717976
Resembling under 18 year old human female.
>>51717965
And those laws will quickly be struck down as unconstitutional.
>The majority opinion stated that "Because of Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), the issue before us is whether the Texas statute impermissibly burdens the individual's substantive due process right to engage in private intimate conduct of his or her choosing. Contrary to the district court's conclusion, we hold that the Texas law burdens this constitutional right. An individual who wants to legally use a safe sexual device during private intimate moments alone or with another is unable to legally purchase a device in Texas, which heavily burdens a constitutional right."
>>51717999
So screwing under 18 boy robots would be ok? Makes sense. IRL when man touches girl it's a crime, women's interactions with boys are considered educational experiences.
>>51717965
Our greatest allies Nippon will perfect this technology, and even if the western SJW cancer gives it all to ban it, business moguls in yurop, china and anywhere that doesn't give a shit will still continue to help that market and tech grow.
It is but a matter of time, and maybe before we die we can get affordable gynoids on the market that are capable of conversation beyond compliance
>>51718050
Homosexuality is never OK. But underage girl robots are fine.
>>51718058
Does the bible say anything about underage girl robots? I didn't think so.
![UFb0029[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/mikvsR7.png "UFb0029[1].png")
obligatory
>>51718058
I can't figure out if this is sarcasm or sincere.
>something without a conscious can't consent
>robotic rape
>women finally feeling the pressure of feeling inadequate like most males
>>51717976
whether it resembles a child and/or is labeled as being under 18, if they're going on the same basis as their dumbass anti-lolicon laws
>>51716474
Not sure if troll or not but that's the opposite except for south Korea and japan
>sex robots start to appear
>weebs and other lowlifes start to use them as a way of expressing their repressed sexual urges
>They finally die out due their incapacity of getting laid with a real woman.
Sounds good to me m8
Ser robots all the way!
>>51718186
You're not thinking far enough
After sexbots come artificial wombs where you can pay up to mix and match your custom babby's genes
Sex between humans and marriage in general will become deprecated
>>51717450
>Canada banned loli
I'm pretty sure it just falls under "visual representation" (and holy shit is that ridiculous in and of itself) and is therefore illegal, they didn't go out of their way to ban it specifically as far as I'm aware.
>but not sex robots
If they judge the robot as appearing underage, I really, really doubt it would be legal.
>>51718078
>biocunt
Every single time.
>>51716099
This is exactly how i want it to end, because then i know i have surpassed my ancestors to die in the best time the human race will ever acknowledge.
>>51718212
Sounds like a hell on earth m8
>>51716474
Good, there needs to be a cull. The planet is already overpopulated.
>>51718238
Indeed, because it unfortunately allows faggots and other mentally ill SJW LGBT degenerates to spawn brats following their ideologies as long as they have money
>>51718224
>If they judge the robot as appearing underage, I really, really doubt it would be legal.
I didn't finish reading the post, so I basically repeated what you said with this sentence. My bad.
>>51718224
>If they judge the robot as appearing underage, I really, really doubt it would be legal.
That's what I'm saying.
>>51718212
>>51718238
Sounds wonderful.
>>51718283
>That's what I'm saying.
Yeah sorry, I posted too early. See >>51718280
Sex with non humans is heresy and you should all kill yourselves for not being able to get real pussy
China just lifted the one child policy, but they lifted it far too late to avoid the reality that in just a few years time there will be over 30 million excess men on the dating scene. I'm pretty sure that sex bots are inevitable.
>>51716335
>It's probably just more interesting to write shitty blog posts about sex robots than the impending doom for all manual laborers under the median wage level.
Interesting point. We're so fucked as a species.
>>51718318
some of us were born with the dreaded combination of shit-tier genetics but enough self respect to have high standards.
>>51718318
But then again if a robot could learn on its own and have sex get pregnant and have babies then that would be ok
So when do I get my own Chachamaru?
>>51718389
>being that hypocritical
>>51716190
so we should abandon all technology because we all bend it to our own will and make it do what we want it to do instead of letting it do what itself wants to do
that's clearly rape and slavery
>>51718389
Lol you can't be serious with that statement. You are to good to fuck a fat chick but a robot is acceptable? Give me a break.
>>51718083
Not him but homosexuality is vile regardless of the religious statutes.
It's a mental disease like all the rest.
http://www.behaviorismandmentalhealth.com/2011/10/08/homosexuality-the-mental-illness-that-went-away/
>>51718444
>You are to good to fuck a fat chick but a robot is acceptable?
Exactly. Do you have problems with reading comprehension?
>>51718318
>this angry biocunt
>>51716190
>we made this assembly line machine to do factory work
>but we never ASKED the machine whether it wanted to put together parts all day
>this is SLAVERY, FREE THE MACHINES
>>51716043
GITS2. Regular service androids firmware is flashed with bootleg sex bot firmware, becomes aware of the sexual abuses and kills owners. The threat is real.
>>51716335
>>51718337
Just a matter of time before other tasks can be automated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU
Fuck I can't wait for this. Long gone the times will be where I'm forced in this constant quest for sex with my female partner. "Would you like some wine dear?" "Oh Hows that lady at work being a bitch?"
Constant nagging and generally every negative quality of coexisting will be over.
>>51718378
Why would it have a monitor inside its head
>>51716190
Startrek had no problems with the holosuites, nor should the rest of society
>>51718378
dat heatsink
>>51718318
I'm getting a v2.0 maidbot and there's nothing you can do to stop me.
>>51718595
That's why you should treat your robo waifu with love and care all the time.
>>51718648
the enthusiasm is real
>>51715232
It's fucking over, women are finished and bankrupt.
>>51718318
By their very own definition of sexual abuse/rape, feminazis are already raping and abusing their dildos, which are getting smarter and smarter.
#dildoliberationfront
>>51718660
>artificial wombs incoming
>ginoids that are indistinguishable from humans
IT'S OVER
>>51718667
>#
/g/, this is the future you chose. This is what happens when you hide and filter, but don't report.
Who am I kidding, /g/ has been a carcass for many years now.
>>51718660
>>51718685D E P R E C A T E D
E
P
R
E
C
A
T
E
D
Please give me my Synth.
>>51718618
Maybe for maintenance? If something is wrong with her, open her up and quickly see self diagnostics/whatnot.
>>51718618
>>51718739
Not questioning the piston inside the uterus.
>>51718780
Obviously for suction
SYNTHS GET OUT REEEEEE
>>51718711
Please give me my Kyoko.
>>51718577
>implying assembly line machine has a conscience
I'm assuming that since you all want these robots to love you they will be conscience of some kind.
>>51717826
Underrated post
All I want in life is artificial intelligence and aliens.
>>51719023
>conscience
>>51716530
And then the Asians genocide both of them leading to a peaceful society, the end.
Any problems?
>>51716542
I think it's pretty cool. Maybe it's because she's a qt3.14.
>>51718488
If one considers homosexuality a mental disease, there's nothing wrong with that. But with that thinking there's genetics involved, which means that your brains should only want to have sex with something that will create healthy children doing so, nothing else. Any blowjob, anal, boobjob, masturbation, bukkake, sex with your own sex, sex with animals, children, vacuum cleaners, waifus, fleshlights, blow-up dolls etc. won't do. Any sex that's not inserting semen into healthy adult females is wrong. We have the problem of overpopulation, though...
If that's not a good rule, we must modify it. Sex is ok if it's not hurting the partner physically or mentally. This automatically covers anything that's not a live human or animal, since objects don't have feelings. You still can't have sex with kids since it will destroy them mentally and possibly even physically, but you can have sex with any human that's adult and wants it. You can also pleasure yourself with objects, no matter what they look like.
Well maybe not with some exceptions like rubbing your dick to nuclear weapon's launch button, which will hurt others if you touch it even though the button isn't complaining.
>>51719023
>I'm assuming that since you all want these robots to love you they will [have] conscience of some kind.
>robots
>automated machines that fulfill exactly what they are told to to a T
>conscience
You watched one too many movies, my friend.
>>51719447
>it will destroy them
Jesus Christ.
>>51719567
Found the catholic priest
>>51718595
why would sex bot firmware need 'awareness'? and even if it was aware, why would it feel 'abuse' for serving it's raison d'etre?
>>51719586
Great ad hominem, but I'm just laughing at your dehumanization of anyone who has had sex before reaching age of majority.
>to cause (something) to end or no longer exist : to cause the destruction of (something) : to damage (something) so badly that it cannot be repaired
>>51719690
Well it's not really my concern if you laugh at something or not. You would have to present some positive evidence supporting pedofilia if you wanted to be taken seriously, though.
>Protip: there isn't any
Would you fix her leg?
>>51719767
>pedofilia
Work on your reading comprehension please, and back up your claim of "destruction" of anyone under age of majority while you're at it. Burden of proof is yours.
>>51719021
>>51719662
I wouldn't mind if sex bot could enjoy the sex, quite the opposite - therefore awareness would plus.
>>51719447
The first half of your explanation is entirely incorrect, as there is a methodology to sex that includes practices other than just Penor in Vagina. It doesn't "disprove" it as a mental disease because it's with the same sex. As in we are biologically wired to be attracted to opposite sexes for reproduction, if we take extra pleasures in those sexes I would say it's nothing more than a process towards reproduction.
So no, it's not "wrong" because it's only involving the opposite sex.
The overpopulation meme is hilarious, I don't see how you can justify limiting peoples reproduction or think that 3% of the population makes any difference when Jamal and Ringo are going to have 12 children.
Sex is not okay with someone who is mentally ill or incapacitated in some form or another, that would include being attracted to the same sex, or thinking you're a different sex than what you are.
It's funny you try and dimiss the one thing that upsets your argument, there is no objective reason to not have sex with children (e.g. 14 year olds) as if they are female they are well within their developmental range if they have hit puberty.
The biggest problem with the development of Homosexuality is kids who go through puberty and get infected with the idea due to many social factors that have developed since the 1970s, and dating farther back to the French revolution, see British teens boys kissing other boys is now 50% occurrence, and some develope it into a mental delusion and others grow out of it.
Homosexuality is nothing but a development of leasiure and the comforts of modern society, and is both objectively and morally wrong.
Go ahead, try and argue that pedophilia is wrong from an objective standpoint, it's impossible.
>>51719983
You know, I almost made the inb4 about that "burden of proof is yours" but I didn't. Looks like it was needed anyway. When you have nothing, that's how you save your ass.
There are stories about sexually abusive parents and uncles everywhere and how the kid needs therapy after it. They may never learn to trust others after that. Someone that's also way too young and small for that act may also suffer physical damage from forceful pushing. Either one of these is enough to deny that act.
There aren't any stories about successful acts of pedofilia in which everything worked out perfectly for everyone.
You try to twist the topic into something called "age of majority" when you replied to someone who specifically was talking about children.
In the nature it's better the earlier you are ready to create more members of your species. Some might be ready for it after the first year or something. Humans have a complex mind however and there are a lot of things that can go wrong even if the body would be ready age-wise. Traumatic experiences may harm your capabilities of creating more humans, since men might not get it up, women might have defensive uterus or miscarriages since their bodies aren't accepting it. Pregnant women aren't allowed to do practically anything that would, for example, scare them. That can be too dangerous for the baby.
>>51717826
But we are unique, one of a kind snowflakes.
Except for identical twins, they are fucking posers.
>>51715294
I always thought its supposed to be a soldering iron
>>51715232
We're gonna need a whole century minimum before figuring out how to make accurate waifu bots. Seriously though if you guys are so desperate just go to some poor war torn country and buy a girl.
>>51720301
Historically in many earlier societies young adults ranged all the way down to 14 and 15, and we're married and bred. The increased age is nothing but a development of leasiure, the most recent studies over the effect of sexual conduct on different minors showed there was no significant damage to them, or needed any type of therapy.
You're just repeating commonality stories ment to scare people like
>creepy uncle
Or
>the Catholic priest
There is nothing valid about trying to objectively deny pedophilia, especially in modern society where young girls dress skimpy like adults.
It's called hebephilia or something.
Now, am I a pedophile? No.
Would I hang one from a tree? Yes.
Because I have a righteous moral opposition to it.
>>51720400
not the person you replied to but:
I was raped at the age of 13, in a catholic school, now I'm not one to say that the stereotype is right but it did fuck me up pretty bad, granted I'm mostly fine now, and I know it's not objective proof but I guarantee had it not happened I wouldn't be on this site, or having depressive episodes, and generally would be a happier individual with a more "normal" life.
>>51718022
Sex toys are still illegal in the state of Alabama.
>>51720260
Nice try with the 14 year old meme, that almost makes it sound like people aren't interested in younger kids than that. They are just being logical with their choises. Too bad that only a moron would buy that.
People don't develop their bodies at identical rate. There are people who are capable of having children at age 14 but there are also people who aren't. If you draw the line at the absolute limit there will be negative consequences. Some 14 year old kids have the hips of a child since they haven't grown yet. It's physically dangerous to push a baby out of that body, it can break apart.
It's also obvious to everyone that 14 year olds don't have the same mature mindset than 18 year olds. Even all the 18 year olds aren't mature mentally. Wanting someone who acts, sounds and looks like a little kid can't be justified with the "she's mature for her age" meme. That's not why you're interested in her. You're interested in her because she isn't mature in any way.
Categorizing homosexuality into something a lot worse than straight sex with the intention of not reproducing (like anal sex or sex with a condom on) is just hypocritical. If it's for pleasuring purpose only and you're not hurting anyone it all falls into the same category. I wouldn't do that but luckily I won't have to.
Would you have sex with a doll, /g/?
>>51720702
Yes
It's /g/, but it's still 4chan.
>>51715232
>robot girl using the wrong screw driver to attach arm
Its like man wants female robots to be just as stupid as 3DPD.
>>51720702
If she looked like my waifu and didn't had so shiny plastic-looking skin, then yes.
I even plan to buy one once I get enough money for great looking one.
>>51720604
Rape is bad.
Sexual interaction us not.
I'm not defending rape from any stand point, although it can be argued from a historical one.
>>51720667
Ignoring your first half because it's non-sensical.
14 years old is the average age for puberty and development, in a general trend.
Your second "all pleasurable sex is wrong, or not" has no basis in any amounts of sexual theories. The reason other sexual pleasures are indulged in between Mating partners is to fill intermediary periods, or to prolong a relationship. This doesn't give validity to homosexuality.
Actually at this point the only reason homosexuality is off the list is because of "leftwing" terrorism. Not because of actual basis of analysis. Every homosexual from the 1974s on is declared perfect, sane, rational, and normal. Otherwise it's homophobia.
Now of course I use a bit of exaggeration but that is to the extent of which it is grown.
While everyone is partially hedonistic, Homosexuals are pure hedonists. There is no reason to pursue that lifestyle other than extreme pleasure.
They even have suicidal sects of sexual deviance, "pozzing" or "bug hunting" that imposes massive risks to public health. Statistically they are more likley to be attracted to young children and abuse them at a higher rate. They will take drugs to fit larger things inside their rectum or take pleasure in what should be pain. Public sex acts that would land others in jail, is described as art, and so on.
All of these are certain foundations for a mental disorder or a disease. And not healthy to expose to a functioning society.
>>51720078
Thank you anon.
>>51721903
>>51721853
I do think that homosexuality is a mental and/or sexual disorder, but you are wrong about hedonism. People can fall in love with opposite or same sex, and even if the latter is the result of some disorder, it doesn't mean it's any more hedonistic than the former. People fall in love with each other not because they seek pleasure or because they want to make a offspring, but because of instincts. The fact that someone can fall in love with someone of the same sex doesn't mean that they just seek extreme pleasure or something, but because they brain is working wrongly.
>>51722058
>>51721853
>he fell for the heterosexuality meme
>>51721853
>Ignoring your first half because I can't counter it
FTFY
This is a thread about sex robots. Having sex with a robot has nothing to do with a man and a woman mating. It doesn't spice up their love life, there may never even be a relationship between them. It's the same thing as masturbation but it's simulating the act of sex better.
If you are against robot sex, parts of your post make a little sense. In your mind there should only be sex between a man and a woman and they might try something new to keep each other interested.
If you aren't against robot sex, however, you shouldn't be against homosexuality either. It's a preferece endangering repopulation and it's done purely for pleasure. People who want to fuck something that's not able to produce offspring can all be categorized under the same label, objectively.
>>51722058
Homosexuals are mentally disfunctioned, they can experience pleasure, I doubt "love".
Homosexuality, in my view, must be passively repressed by society. And actively if it is expressed.
I'm earlier, more traditional society relationships were for economic and beneficial means, and developed into love.
Fiddler on the roof is a good pop example that you can see.
>>51722230
I am againts sex robots, yes. Although I find it humorous that we can invent such things.
In the end I have little control of the world and am spouting an opinion on a fingerprinting appreciation board.
So meh.
I also find that there will ever be room for healing this infected and wretched society of self victimization and Envy,
Ride the tiger
>Women have a massive advantage over men in sex due to how they more or less have complete control of it
>This benefits women massively
>Men forcibly going around and committing rape is not only very much frowned upon, but considered a serious crime usually leading to prison sentences even when it's only one incident
>People start making robots more and more advanced to the point at which sex bots can become a real thing in the near future
>Women would naturally lose their sexual control over men as they could get their sexual release without needing a woman to consent to it
>Women realize that they'd no longer have men by the balls when it comes to sex (both figuratively and literally)
>Women now protest and start extending the idea of consent to also include inanimate objects that might take away their sexual control over men
Kind of retarded when it comes down to it, but people reacted much in the same way when the spinning jenny came along.
>>51722305
>I'm earlier
Hi earlier, nice to meet you.
>>51722335
Women also got male contraceptive research thrown out.
Because it would give men control over reproduction
>>51722372
In earlier*
you swine.
>>51715232
My hope is that sensorial technology research will pick up soon and we'll have no need for "real" things anymore. I think at this point that should be the main research point of entertainment tech, and I think it would be dumb to waste resources on anything else.
Give it a few more years, I'm sure we'll have the brain figured out by then.
2D already replaced 3D, so literally who cares?
>>51722833
Currently, yes. But they're trying to capture the best of both world and create something wonderful.
2.5D
>>51716335
>vision/object recognition, which imho will be completely solved in less than 10 years
>females are too stupid to build robots
>gay scientists are too few
>tfw no husbandobot
China is setting up a cloning factory for beef cattle to feed their country. They will also clone rare species apparently. They will no doubt clone humans at some stage too for profit. Sex clones will arrive long before realistic sex robots.
>>51715275
Poor persecuted kid-touchers. :^(
>>51724689
I wonder what will happen first:
- GMO human with accelerated growth and learing so you can choose what genes will it have/how will look like,
- realistic androids that sounds, move and feel like human
- neural interface for VR with AI and virtual world good enough that virtual waifu as realistic as above
In any way, I can't wait for my artificial waifu.
>>51719980
Yes if I knew how, but in return she'd have to live with me for the rest of her life.
>>51724762
I know you meant this as sarcasm but I honestly think if they could vent their desires on a loli robot instead of the real thing then it would mean a lot less actual child abuse. Problem (almost) solved.
>But muh feelings!
>>51726134
I would solve it by permanent internment or public execution.
>>51724823
we've tried Eugenics before. It's not worth it and weakens the gene pool.
1900-1970 US
>>51726499
Eugenics and GMO are executed completely differently and have different results. you shouldn't compare them.
>>51726499
>we've tried eugenics before
>>51719447
>Well maybe not with some exceptions like rubbing your dick to nuclear weapon's launch button, which will hurt others if you touch it even though the button isn't complaining.
I'm keking you motherfucker
>>51716260
>>51716190
You, normies, are disgusting. You do not know what it is to be an undesirable male. We basically do not exist for women.
And hookers are AIDS-ridden.
To feel yourself on a high moral ground, if just for a while, you are denying us the only possible way we could ever have some physical intimacy.
Disgusting.
>>51722305
>Homosexuals are mentally disfunctioned, they can experience pleasure, I doubt "love".
What happens if you decouple love and sex
ie
sexual attraction is just a stimulation of fetishes
a homosexual male is just a male with a penis fetish
a heterosexual male is just a male with a vagina fetish
and then you just overlay a bunch of other fetishes on top of that to get your standard set of attractions
and then the concept of love is freed to be paired with really anything
man, woman, tran, child, dog, tree what have you
dont need to fuck what ya love
love is really the problem at hand desu
completely fuckin unnatural, purely puritan-induced nonsense
>>51726259
You realise being a pedophile is no different to being gay
It's just a fetish
If they can fuck robots, power to them.
No harm done and they can finally live out their fetish
>>51727340
Homosexuality isn't a fetish mate
>>51727340
Homosexuality is usually carried out by two consenting adults.
Pedophiles must trick or force themselves upon a child.
>>51716474
>our population is already dwindling
>people are still having a shit ton of kids even when they have no means of taking care of them
>world population expected to triple by 2060
>>51727405
What if the child forces themselves upon the adult?
>>51727358
> Homosexuality isn't a fetish
agreed. it's a decision.
>>51727405
>Pedophiles must trick or force themselves upon a child.
a result of child miseducation by mainstream , and popular denial of child self-authority
>>51727436
You just made a few lists...
>>51727430
That only happens in your dumb chinese cartoons. Children have no interest in sex (unless they have been groomed to) and never will.
>>51716132
Sauce ?
>>51715294
I always use a big ol flat head screwdriver to pry shit out of hardware at work. Don't need anything designed to stick that big ol thing in because I'll always find a place to jam it in.
>>51723479
They are already solved http://blog.kaggle.com/2015/01/02/cifar-10-competition-winners-interviews-with-dr-ben-graham-phil-culliton-zygmunt-zajac/
on CIFAR top convnets show ~3.4% top-5 error, human shows 5% error. Less is better.
>>51727467
Really, the same arguments that allow for the acceptance of homosexuality apply to Hebephilia ( pubescent + )
* It has been done throughout the ages
* It's only been made illegal by puritan/christian beliefs pervading western cultures, and western cultures pervading globally
* There's no `natural' barrier, given that both parties are fully capable, and biologically ready to procreate (an argument even homosexuals don't have)
* The only reason it's a form of -rape- is that we've arbitrarily decided a person below the age of 18 cannot make decisions for themselves (and the US doesn't even follow through on this in full, with 21 limit for drinking and certain other activities)
* If we're already assuming the act of sex is divorced from procreation (such that we can have sex without necessarily intending to reproduce), then any arguments in the vein of -child endangerment- from the act of giving birth at too early an age does no apply
* It is only necessarily rape if we're working under the current legal format that a pubescent child has no self-autonomy (though in practice, he does. However, this has been dwindling in the US since the ~70s, mostly due to fear-mongering). If a child has autonomy, then he/she can make the decision of fucking an older man/woman, in which case consent is fully applied.
Thus, if it were not for certain limitations in arbitrary cultural standings, it would be simply be consenting recreational (or even procreational) sex between two biologically capable, consenting humans.
>>51727692
Pubescent+ would be like, 16, which is the age of consent in the UK and several states
We can argue about the exact age all you want, but even something like 14 would include a large percentage of people who aren't fully sexually developed
>>51715232
Goddamn those shorts on her... <3
>>51727737
pubescent begins ~11
ends ~16
an argument can be made that intercourse before completion is questionable, but that's only if the assumption `capable of accepting the dick' (or capable of inserting the dick) falters
which would then necessitate that legality is not determined by age, but by reproductive capability (legal age now varying between individuals)
now whether or not such a vague determination is practical is another issue.
I'm not convinced it's fully necessary to even distinguish though, if we're assuming consent is still necessary, and earlier sexual education is given
>>51716510
underrated post
>>51718780
the first thing i noticed
>>51718840
makes a good point
>>51726613
What do you call forced sterilization of African Americans and Natives?
Humanlike robots will be slavery all over again, once they become cognizant enough they'll become the next reparations seeker.
Fuck that noise, I'd rather keep my robots dumb.
>>51728352
Robots should be kept to a dog like intelligence minimum. That way they have show loyalty, and love but still would be too dumb for concepts like rights and freedom.
>>51728294
A product of racist hysteria? I doubt they actually put much effort into testing their genetic fitness.
>>51718212
GATTACA m8.
>>51727340
There are arguments for both being a mental disorder.
Those arguments to me make much more sense.
You can objectively deny homosexuals, you can not do the same to pedophiles (to an extent). Only a moral opposition to pedophiles is explainable.
>>51727358
It's a mental disorder.
>>51727405
The mentally ill cannot consent. Regardless, it is both objectively and morally wrong.
>>51727692
Go to double chan with your pedophelic garbage.
>>51729286
Here's the definition of paraphilic disorders from the DSM.
Under this definition, pedophilia falls but homosexuality doesn't.
>>51729837
I'm a dumbass
>>51722382
>Women also got male contraceptive research thrown out.
>>51729837
>>51729864
You didn't read
>>51718488
Did you?
The APA is not a valid source on mental disorders regarding sexualities and sexes.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/former-president-of-apa-says-organization-controlled-by-gay-rights-movement
>>51729874
I can't find the proper link.
But here is some info, from a biased site, still info.
http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/mens-issues/the-real-reasons-we-do-not-have-a-male-birth-control-pill/
>>51718444
Fat chicks and robots are both subhuman things, rather than people. At least a robot has SOME chance of being attractive.
Sex robots are my fetish. Are there any dedicated communities to this that have a good amount of fap material?
>>51715232
>Humans are genetically programmed to desire genetically superior mates, and/or mates with resources
>genetically programmed...therefore cannot consent?
That's just one interesting question this raises. There will be loads more.
Personally I find the notion of fucking a robot to be disgusting...if they're programmed to want me.
Everything we've ever done to each other on this little mudball of ours, has basically been motivated by fucking. It's going to be pretty amazing to see what happens to us when the limiting factor for satisfying this motivator, is completely short circuited. It will FUCK. EVERYTHING. UP.
Exciting shit.
>>51716190
Our thoughts are the result of a bunch of chemical reactions. It's likely that we will eventually be able to simulate them.
At what point does a human with a significant amount of robot parts become a robot with a significant amount of human parts?
Ell's route in the visual novel My Girlfriend is the President goes into what it means for a robot to love and the value of a robot's existence compared to a human's life. It's surprisingly deep for a moege.
I'm curious whether we'll see the same interesting distinction in attitudes towards male and female sexbots as we see towards fleshlights and dildos (with purchasers of the former being scorned while the latter being damn near accepted).
>>51720742
>>51726259
Are you going to pay for that?
>PUT ALL THE PEDO'S IN JAIL!
That will be a nice big slice out of your taxes please.
>KILL THEM ALL!
That still requires a trial to prove guilt. Again that will be a nice slice out of your taxes please.
Are you willing to pay the huge bill to lock them all up or execute them?
>>51716474
Sorry, Schopenhauer makes a better case than you do.
>>51731908
Executing people for being something wrong is wrong itself. There will be next generations which will have more of them anyway and it's impossible to keep track of them. You would just kill people without solving the problem.
>>51716474
Why would I waste my money supporting a family when I could use that to make myself happier? The respect one got for being a father is long gone.
>>51731998
This is why I laugh at the idiots who say to kill them all. It may be that one of their own kids end up being a pedo. What then? Basically the ignorant of mind don't know how to deal with the problem and allow their feelings to control any logical thoughts instead.
>>51727431
>Edgemaster Flex here
>>51716190
>forcing it
Why are you attempting to humanize a robot?
You can't "force" a robot to do anything.
>>51731863
>someone actually made a demotivational
What fucking year is it?
>>51716061
Feminists... That's what's wrong with humans.
>>51727405
If they want to do it for real then yes. Just like necrophiles would have to fuck a corpse and furry would have to find anthropomorphic animals. But having such a fetishes doesn't mean you have to do it for real. Eg. you could buy child-like sex robot and release your urges into them, so you wouldn't be frustrated nor were thinking about abusing real child. It's positive to everyone.
In my opinion things like child sex robots, lolicon and maybe even child porn(but not producing it or selling, it should be severely punished) should be legal, just because it let people like that relief and no one is hurt. Thinking that forbidding will somehow help is kinda ignorant and might end up in exactly opposite result.
>>51727539
On the novel? It's Mirai no Kimi to, Subete no Uta ni
It's non-H, just short romantic story with Miku.
>>51731807
That was really great story, my favorite VN route of all.
>>51732109
>You can't "force" a robot to do anything.
You can use sudo.
>>51715232
They will almost certainly make sex robots a reality. They will print money and the market always prevails in the end.
There will be controversy but the nay-sayers are doomed to lose.
>>51732315
>we'll have to root our sexbots to get them to do lewd things, or to not report back to a Google datacenter when they do them
>>51732184
2015, come on!
>>51715232
yes
>>51727430
you need help brah
>>51732353
>you got your first personal android
>when the first night comes, you take your robot to the bedroom and tell her to undress
>I'm sorry anon, I'm afraid I can't do that. This kind of behavior is prohibited by Google RoboAssistant™ EULA.
>sudo undress
>you are not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
>google comes in to your house and take her away
>tfw you got sentenced to jail for emotional robot rape because of new SJW law
>tfw it's actually a thing
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2015-09/23/pepper-robot-sex-banned
>>51727072
there are over 7 billion people in the world m8
you think all males or females that have ever fucked were desirable? you need some reality check anon
>>51716764
You're dick soft and sticky from your cum and hers mixed up is a sensation not replaced as of yet by lube. Also the warmth and the smell.
Those are the things future android makers have to work on if they want to really imitate human intercourse. Otherwise it'll be just an exotic and expensive masturbation toy.
I've to admit sometimes I feel like I'm simply holding a large masturbation piece when fucking my gf because she gets tired and I want to finish but sometimes it's the other way around and she humps on me while I lay back and just enjoy the scenery. You'll need a safe way to emulate that 'mode' without a mechanical malfunction breaking your hips or something. You wouldn't let a 230 kg steel android hump you just like that.
>force an inanimate object
What? You're forcing your stove, electric toothbrush and your vacuum cleaner every fucking day.
I'm gonna order a VR set soon for my Nexus 6 and watch my porn and movies on it all day.
I won't fuck a robot, but god damn I am enjoying the replacement of females in general. Thank you Jew overlords for inventing porn!
>>51718078
Sexbots can't breed. They have the same problem than cute boys and tyrannies.
>>51732440
I think that one was because it wasn't designed for it and can cause injuries because of that. Like having a warning label "Don't stick you dick in this blender" but it's actually needed since that robot resembles human. Well, vaguely anyway.
>>51716474
>over 7,100,000,000
>dwindling
wew lad
>>51715232
>replace
When you ain't getting any in the first place it's not really called a replacement.
>>51716190
>Because it isn't real.
It is if you can't tell the difference.
>It's equivalent to having a slave.
Yes. Slavery is cool, just no one wants to be the slave. Which is why we created machines, so we can have slaves that don't rebel.
>It has no choice in how 8t feels about you, you are forcing it.
Just like you're forcing your keyboard to type this bullshit. Please stap.
>>51716474
>wanting /g/ to spread their genes
>>51716474
neckbeards are a product of the environment, not because neckbeards are breeding.
Reading this thread it seems like /g/ has a hell of a revenge fantasy for women. Have none of you ever honestly got any or something?
>>51732564
>You're dick soft and sticky from your cum and hers mixed up is a sensation not replaced as of yet by lube.
I think good lube would replace it nicely.
>Also the warmth and
That's why you put your onehole into warm water and cuddle with daki first.
>the smell.
You can just use perfumes. With enough experimenting you could probably even recreate smell of sweat. I even put some girly perfumes on my daki when I sleep with her, it's not really a problem.
But I dunno, it probably feel better to do the real thing. But I still think that majority of pleasure comes from romantic attachment than just from senses, so sex with waifu you love > random pussy
>>51732639
>Sexbots can't breed yet.
FTFY
>>51732885
After becoming close friends with two and seeing all these destroyed relationships in my family and friends because of betrayals, lies, manipulations etc, I've learned it's not worthy to go through all of this. Especially if you value long-term commitment, trust, support much more over just getting dat pussy.
>>51733040
>After becoming close friends with two and seeing all these destroyed relationships in my family and friends because of betrayals, lies, manipulations etc, I've learned it's not worthy to go through all of this. Especially if you value long-term commitment, trust, support much more over just getting dat pussy.
elaborate?
>>51719106
If whites cant stop them i doubt slant eye yellow fever can
>>51715232
I love how initially one of the campaigners thought it would reduce the objectification of women.. By turning women into objects bwahahahaha. Goddammit.
>>51716900
This tbqh
>>51732885
I assume most of /g/ hasn't why do they think so many posters obsess over anime girls ?
its almost as if they are trying to live out their fantasies through hentai/anime
>b-b-be gentle its my first time
>that's so lewd!
>senpai, I love you!
>>51733040
>After becoming close friends with two and seeing all these destroyed relationships in my family and friends because of betrayals, lies, manipulations etc,
feelingeuphopric.jpeg
>>51733063
essentially what OP is saying is that they saw other people in shitty relationships so they never want to get into a relationship themselves.
By the same logic OP never has sex because people get STDs.
>>51717731
fugg I'm a nurse
>>51732885
dumb frogposter
>>51733063
[blog]
Every marriage in my family older than 10-15 years except one ended up in divorce. Even my beta dad got NTRed by some alpha dude and ended up in divorce and have to pay alimony. There was many fights, reprisals etc.
I lately become friend with some girl and she confessed me something. While she was in relationship with her boyfriend, she started romance with my friend. She keeps being close and cuddly and all, even when her boyfriend is around and when she had argue with him, she just went to my friend and betrayed him and then come back like nothing happened. Her boyfriend texts me from time to time and he don't know what to do, he suspects she betrays him, but he loves her and have no idea what to do. She told me she enjoys how he is trying to fix their relationship while she stay distant and cold to him.
Also 2 or 3 other friends' relationships end up in the guy discovering that she is betraying him or only manipulating him to get money or something.
>>51733115
>they saw other people in shitty relationships so they never want to get into a relationship themselves.
Yes, exactly. I'm so happy I've found a waifu. I can experience love and how does it feels to be loved by someone and I will always be safe.
Actually this might not be too far out.
Clearly some really wealthy and influential groups are quite obsessed with lowering the birth rate of countries with large ethnically European populations, with the Japanese to follow.
So really, sexbots would be an imperative for them as they would be the final nail in the coffin for any sort of population boom amongst those ethnic groups.
>>51727405
Pedophilia != Child Molester you fucking moron
>>51733513
Purely in logical terms, yes.
But in terms of practical reality it would be interesting to know what percentage of pedophiles end up being child molesters.
>>51733554
>it would be interesting to know what percentage of pedophiles end up being child molesters.
I don't think it would be any significant. I remember there was studies showing significant amount of man are sexually attracted to children, but we know that child abuses are rare cases. Also consider all the lolicons, people who enjoy sexualizing 2D children. One may argue 2D lolis are different from their 3D counterparts, but it's still about small, underdeveloped bodies and other child-like attributes. I think it's just that lot's of people have these tendencies(maybe because natural reasons), but because idea of child abuse disgust them a lot so they never realize that.
I personally enjoy 2D lolis and I can't say I don't enjoy nice bodies of pubescent girls, but I would never abuse children just because this idea disgust me a lot. I've come across some cheesy pizza here and there but it's always disgusting abusive shit. In real life you will never find emotionally mature, lewd lolis like in anime.
>>51716061
>implying women are humans
>>51733513
>I'm not gay, I just enjoy sucking dicks and taking it in the ass
>>51716900
This guys right, humans even have sympathy for africans, and robots would look more human than them
>>51734335
You can be homosexual and never have sex with someone of the same sex.
>>51733947
>>51733947
I agree with this chum. Majority of pedophiles either reject it or are too scared to admit it to themselves rather then actively engaging in the subject of their sexual fascination.
Why don't we just run next event simulations to simulate small brains like an ant brain and then progressively move up the ladder once we get that working?
>>51718378
"do not iron" logo on thigh..
>>51732592
The idea of artificial intelligence or at least digital intelligence questions the inanimacy of object
>tfw will be losing my virginity to a robot before a real girl
>>51734685
Could lead to over adaptation and true artificial intelligence that greatly surpasses our own. That on its own opens up a tonne of bad shit for humanity that could potentially arise.
>>51733040
jesus christ you are really commited to this arent you
no offense m8 but its kinda sad what im hearing from you
