Is this a bad joke?
you weren't joking..
>MUH THIN
Practicality and usefulness isn't Apple's strong suit
>macs
Why even get a laptop that just limits your max potential of customizing?
>>46937477
>trying to shoot the next spielberg flick on a webcam
i know budgets are tight in tinseltown, but steven, pls no
>>46937477
Don't you tinfoil faggots usually rip the webcams out of your laptops anyway?
>>46937477
Its seriously their retina screen, in a $199 Netbook, for $1299
Intel M 1.1Ghz in their new Macbook? Fucking bullshit, for a little while they were slowly increasing their hardware specs, now they're going back on their hardware specs to see far they can go, while increasing profits!
i already order 2 . i don't even care. i just want my apple products, and be the first of my friends having one
>>46938857
baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
baaaaaaaaa
baaaaaaaaaaaaa
>>46938914
>the sound of the samsung users as they shitpost about apple
>>46937477
>using the built-in camera on your computer anyway
This is literally only ever meant to be used by grandmas, and they won't know the difference anyway.
If this shaved off even 0.1 millimeters and/or 1 cent on the final pricing, I say good riddance.
I'm having a hard time figuring out who the audience for this machine is. Shitposting aside it's a slower, smaller, less featured macbook air.
>>46939153
>Apple reducing prices
LOL no.
ahahahahahahahahahaha
>w-we didn't use the camera anyway
>tfw this is essentially an apple netbook
>>46938806
Tinfoil faggots aren't buying macbooks.
>>46938935
hows it feel that cell phones are as powerful as the All™ New™ Apple™ MacBook™ including higher resolutions then Apple™ Retina™
>>46937477
>last gen hardware
>charge next gen price for it
apple customers, everyone.
oh, hope you enjoy that blazing 1.1ghz processor.
>>46939206
its the Apple Sheeple callsign
Apple doing their thing, as always.
Very overpriced crap on the low end of their lineup, very overpriced crap on the high end of their lineup.
Very rarely, anything actually significant is different from other products.
i only use my macbook for browsing facebook and play candy crush saga. but i will buy the next macbook, because i like apple.i dont even know that much about computers, but for apple its worth the effort
>>46939257
me too, i love those 800Mhz Processors
thinkfags BTFO
>>46937477
What does it matter? It was already established years ago that Appleltards were unironically stupid, so let them continue to be stupid.
>put apple logo on 10 year old hardware
>market it as REVOLUTIONARY
apple customers are so fucking stupid
the only useful device they have is the ipad
>muh broadwell architecture doe
>>46939584
>the only useful device they have
>is the ipad
I died.
>>46939652
RIP in peace
>>46939584
The MBP is a solid machine.
iPhone is a pretty good phone as well.
Apple Watch will most likely utterly annihilate Android Wear.
>>46937501
>>46939754
>utterly annihilate Android Wear
It will mimic laptops, and phones, and tablets.
i.e. 80% Microsoft and/or Android marketshare, and 20% Apple marketshare.
>>46937477
How do they expect me to fap to homemade porn?
>>46937477
I don't know. /g/ is trashing it all around, but from what I'm reading Intel is claiming this new Core M is a few times better compared to a few years old i5. So, they imply this fanless CPU is somehow competitive for the portable market.
Waiting to see some benchmarks before joining the crowd.
>>46939816
This isn't the first computer with a Core M. Reviewers who've gotten their hands on computers with this CPU all agree that it's shit.
>>46939816
Core M is less-powerful than Core i5, which the MBAs already have.
So with this pushing more pixels than the MBA with less power, it's simply going to stutter doing intensive shit.
>>46939863
Plus no fan at all.
Year of the OS X desktop when?
That keyboard looks as if theyre trying to train us for touchscreen typing only.
>>46939226
The Core M are the current gen, 14nm based line
Pixel density doesn't determine quality. I've got a 720p sensor in my laptop that's shit. I can see a 480p camera possibly producing better images, but I doubt that's the case here.
>>46939250
I don't know what you're talking about, my late '13 MBP is great.
>>46938838
>Intel M 1.1Ghz in their new Macbook?
How does that compare to the Core series line? Are there any benchmarks out there?
>>46939925
It's a little below the i5-2410M
http://cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+M-5Y70+%40+1.10GHz&id=2382
>>46939945
So are these multicore scores?
>>46938669
Customizing is what teenage girls do with their phone. Are you a teenage girl?
>>46939973
Single core is 1337, Multicore is 3096
>>46939919
Yea, and so is my late '08 i7 920 desktop computer. It cost quite a bit, but not as much as an Apple. Same for muh late '07 laptop.
It's not that Intel and related computer parts are bad. But the deal that Apple offers on them is quite silly.
>>46940013
I looked at a lot of windows options, but they didn't have what the MBP offered. They were all high res touchscreen laptops, which isn't what I was looking for
>>46937501
>let's add extra words so the goyim will attracted
>add "FaceTime"
PROFIT
R
O
F
I
T
So does it really only have one usb-c port? I know it does every thing but what if you want to connect two devices?
>>46940317
a hub
>>46940085
Alright ill take the bait, what exactly does MBP offer that a different manufacturer doesn't? No, saying it slays $300 pc's doesn't count, same price point only. Genuinely interested in why.
>>46939910
That's true, to a point.
480 kind of universally looks terrible, especially as screens get nicer. I mean, imagine using this laptop for both ends of a video chat, 480p stretched across a screen like that would be wretched.
>>46939949
Sell your soul to Satan for an extra USB slot.
>>46939863
You do realize you can just generalize and compare core i5s to core Ms right? There are different generations in these lineups of processors. You can't compare them as a whole.
>>46940400
1.) the construction was nicer
2.) the display was better and not touch screen
3.) can't beat applecare honestly.
4.) An operating system with good HiDPI that isn't linux
5.) A BSD environment that isn't linux
>>46939861
>>46939863
Well, this is a tablet/notebook CPU. Is Intel bulshitting when they say they expect it to perform better than some older i5s?
It's clearly not made for doing heavy shit on it, if it has a tablet/notebook CPU. I suppose it's an expesive email/web browsing machine. Anything graphically intensive on high resolution will freeze and stutter like shit.
