Let's get one of these going.
>>37676684
>>37676690
>>37676708
>>37676721
MOAR
I dont need my sides
>>37676729
>>37676708
Fucking Christ my sides
>>37676738
>>37676746
Oh, I'm all out BTW. I know there are more, or someone should make some OC.
I'm terrible at drawing with a mouse, otherwise I'd make a few
>>37676746
Kek best one yet
>>37676741
meta functional strength: work on your obliques to prevent strain from laughing at Internet méemées
>>37676746
I know there's a law of physic or something but why wouldn't you be able to deadlift yourself? If you step on the bar and lift it, why can't the bar move upwards?
>>37676784
try it and report back.
>there are people that ACTUALLY think these are funny
>>37676746
Kek
>>37676784
You can, physicists are just pussies who believe in math.
>>37676811
Functional strengthcuck spotted
>>37676746
>office sign
kek's hard
>>37676807
>>37676818
I mean the equal and opposite force is the same, right. That's how it works in physics. That's why the gun has rebound when you fire it. But since an 80kg guy can deadlift over three times his own bodyweight, shouldn't that mean that the force being exerted is greater than the force exerting it? It doesn't make sense.
>>37676784
gravity
>>37676861
you need to push on something different to make the bar move upwards, the floor in this case
>>37676861
>gun has rebound when you fire it
>rebound
>>37676729
this one doesn't make sense
>>37676861
In all seriousness it doesn't work because the harder you pull on the bar, the heavier your body is on the bar.
>>37676861
Since he's on the bar not the ground the force he's exerting upward is equal to the force his feet are pressing to the bar.
>>37676874
>>37676885
>>37676888
>>37676899
>>37676901
Thanks guys. I know it doesn't work. It's why we don't literally see flying powerfats all over the place, but I really didn't know how to explain it. Like if someone asked me why, I wouldn't be able to provide an answer. Damn I think I'm losing my mind.
>>37676947
it's because when you lift 200kg, your feet are exerting 200kg (or more during liftoff) of force into the ground. so if you stood on the barbell, the forces pulling up and pushing down would even out. this is all due to newton's 3rd
>>37677003
So why can't I just tie a balloon on the bar so it's like 200kg vs 199.999kg and then SLOWLY start to fly?
>>37677054
FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUCK
I have to fucking try this mane
>>37676899
>>37676901
So if i was just to row the bar it would work
>>37676708
Dat fucking bird
>>37677054
>i cant explain why this wouldnt work
education has failed me
>>37677054
>>37677079
>>37677101
the balloon is also helping you lift the bar. you're exerting 199.999 into the floor and the bar is being pulled with 199.999
I haven't seen a new one of these in a while, and I've been here all summer
so this is the famous amerilard education itt ive heard so much about
>>37676784
Each action has an equal and opposite reaction, you would press the bar to the ground with your feet just as hard as you would pull it upwards
>>37676784
Because your feet aren't pushing you away from the ground, they are pushing away from the bar they are standing on.
>>37677133
What about TWO balloons instead??
>>37677133
You added your own weight to the bar.
You are still pushing down with your legs as much as you are pulling up on it.
Now you are gonna need a giant balloon or hundreds of regular balloons to pull your weight + the bar combined for you to lift off.
>>37677054
You would need enough balloons to carry your weight plus bb+weights. No matter what your pushing down and pulling up is gonna cancel out
>ITT
>>37677268
Okay, what about this?
What if you are deadlifting yourself with a balloon, BUT someone is also deadlifting you as well. That way you get a little boost so when you finally go into the air then the weight difference won't matter anymore and you start to fly, but only slightly.
>>37677085
Theoretically yeah. As long as their is a net force upward.
>>37677085
I think it depends on what kind of exercise you do.
What if you benched the bar instead, but you held your feet off the ground and instead of pushing you are actually pulling the bar towards you?
>>37677293
If the balloon can support all of it then yes anon you could fly slightly
>>37676721
>planks for the skanks
kek
>>37677293
You don't do anything diddling yourself on the bar. Might as well just stand on it.
The guy dLing you has to pull your bw + bar - balloon upward force. You still are exerting force downwards thanks to gravity. And the guy dl you has his acceleration stop when he reaches lockout. So no.
This thread.
>>37677343
>And the guy dl you has his acceleration stop when he reaches lockout. So no.
Okay, what about this?
What if the guy doesn't dead lift but instead does a clean and press and at the apex of the exercise he lets go so there is a little more momentum with the guy who is deadlifting with the balloon?
>>37677365
In space this would work with some caveats. Try it anon and post vid
>>37677394
>in space
Well yeah, but we're talking about Earth. Come on, at least be a little bit realistic.
>>37676784
Imagine a strap wrapped snug around a box. Tighten the strap and you crush the box, correct? The box will not move.
Same concept - you cannot lift the ground because you're standing on it, regardless of how heavy it is. In this case, the bar is part of the ground because you're standing on it. All you will do is compress yourself, not lift the bar.
To lift something, you add it's mass to your own, for example picking up a 20kg box will make you exert 20kg more force to the ground. By trying to pick yourself up, force on the ground is unchanged, as your mass has not changed and gravity is a constant. In fewer words, you'd be standing on your own shoulders, not the ground. The more you pull, the more force you exert on yourself.
>>37676784
Newton's third law pham, you learn that shit in high school
>>37677293
>>37677319
>>37677365
don't stop anon, I want to hear more of your ideas
this is how innovation happens
>>37677411
Also if he imagines he's floating in space not moving with a barbell and tries to do the same thing. He won't move anywhere. Now apply this to down on earth with the added gravitational force, he definitely will not move anywhere
>>37677423
>implying /fit/ graduated high school
>>37677423
Newton was a DYEL, apple eating faggot.
>>37677458
What about this?
Okay, so imagine you're benching like 135lb right? So when you get back to the resting phase of the exercise, you throw your back up and pull yourself towards the bar?
THEN, before you start to fall, you push the bar away from your chest while you're still in the air. Then the bar goes higher in the air. Then you pull your chest up to the bar, and then push the bar out again. If you do this over and over again, you'd constantly keep going higher and higher until you're finally in the clouds. The only tricky part would be that you have to do this very quickly.
Pic related. It's science.
>>37677411
this is a nice pepe mind if i keep it?
>>37677529
Oh, I failed to mention that you'd also have to weigh slightly less than how much you're lifting, so it will be able to pull you upward. So maybe not 135 lb
>>37677485
Newton literally invented gravity faggot, if it wasn't for him, you wouldn't get gains from lifting heavy things off the floor, so shut up
>>37677559
You are wat is holding the bar up in the bench position. so no.
But you mention if you did the process really fast.
>intredeasting.
If some how you froze time,
Gravity = 9.8m/s^2
You can pull yourself up to the bar assuming you are not frozen in time.
You still cannot push up the bar because you have nothing to push against. And you can't displace air because your not a helium-filled balloon, your density is too high
>>37677650
>You are wat is holding the bar up in the bench position. so no.
So what if I had someone deadlift me for a boost? I'm fairly certain that'd work.
>>37677678
Same thing with the a guy diddling you while you stand on bar.
You made think of something intresting.
What if you are in space with a loaded bar equivalent to your bw to your chest. And neither have motion in any direction. What would happen if you press it?
This thread pretty much explains why everyone in my physics course is a fat dyel.
>>37677731
Depends if somebody is deadlifting you for a boost.
>>37677054
To distance yourself from the ground you have to push the ground away from you. Pulling the bar can only move the bar closer to you and you closer to the bar. You have to understand that earth is just like any other object with a mass. Consider that in the given situation it's just as true to say the ground is lying on the barbell. If you stand on the ground and pull on the ground, could you lift yourself and the earth off the barbell?
When you ask that question it becomes more obvious why the barbell is not part of the equation. How would you lift the earth off the barbell, and what would you do differently to lift it off your mom instead? The barbell and your mom won't move in relation to the earth because you pull on it, they're attached by gravity. Likewise the earth won't move in relation to the barbell because you pull on it. The earth is attached to the barbell and you've done nothing to change that. You can move it of the ground by standing inbetween the barbell and the ground and pushing them in opposite directions, which is exactly what you do in a conventional lift. If you stand on the barbell you'd be pushing and pulling the same thing and nothing would move.
Alright anons, what if we just got extremely muscular arms and shoulders, with wide lats, and hear me out on this, flapped our arms with 45lb plates, and glided on air currents with our lats?
>>37677529
Holy fuck I'm dying
>>37677900
You aren't aerodynamic. Gogle bernoulli's principle
>>37677900
Personally I like spreading my arms out and spinning around really quickly for take off. Makes it easier and you don't need lats
>>37677900
What about this?
What if you took a barbell and held it over your head. THEN you started to spin very, very quickly. Would you take off? What if you had killer abs? Could you keep yourself flying by constantly flexing your abs and twisting your torso?
>>37677054
>>37676947
>>37677079
>>37677101
>this is the board you trust to give you fitness advice
>>37678015
Ok, but what if you grab yourself by your quads/pants and shrug yourself into the air?
>>37677804
Kek, most of my fellow physics undergrads lift heavy regularly.
>>37677900
Bros, I think I understand why Rich Pianoman is getting so big to leave humanity behind. It's to contort gravity with his here mass. Think about it, every object has an influence of gravity, so maybe, he's getting big enough to break the laws of physics and truly leave humanity behind. We're going about this all wrong bros, he's getting swole so he can bend gravity and fly. We won't need to fly like a bird or helicopter, or lift ourselves to fly, we can simply will it and we'll fly from being that swole. We will essentially cuck gravity. We will truly become gods and leave humanity behind.
>>37676729
i dont get this one, why does granny have a barebell on her back?
>>37678063
What if, and just hear me out, what if you did weighted dips a lot. So much so in fact that you're so strong that you can dip the weight of Earth.
What if you went to a cliff and you did your weighted dips? Would you push the world down, or would you be pushing yourself up?
>>37678063
>>37677678
>>37677529
>>37677365
>>37677293
yu are my hero
>>37678215
Huh, that's pretty solid. But how about, and I'm just spitballin' here, you stand on your hands and OHP the earth away from you
>>37676746
t. mercenary Tao
>>37677900
There is a planet that has such a thick atmosphere that one of those old style flying machines where you just flap your arms would actually function.
>>37678273
Okay, get this. Listen. Are you listening? Okay, check this out.
What if you got like, 100 2.5lb dumbbells and taped them together to be like a wing and you made 2 of them.
Then, THEN, you became really good at lateral dumbbell raises.
Would it be possible, if you did the raises fast enough, with enough reps and sets, to be able to start flying?
>>37678063
>"This is Houston speaking, come in."
>"Your sides have just left orbit and are now on course heading toward Jupiter."
>>37676746
>>37676784
>>37677054
>>37678047
someone screencap this shit
>>37677900
You could just get huge lats and jump from a mountain and if your lats are big enough you'd glide
Literally just made this.
>>37679104
Hi there!
You seem to have made a bit of a mistake in your post. Luckily, the users of 4chan are always willing to help you clear this problem right up! You appear to have used a tripcode when posting, but your identity has nothing at all to do with the conversation! Whoops! You should always remember to stop using your tripcode when the thread it was used for is gone, unless another one is started! Posting with a tripcode when it isn't necessary is poor form. You should always try to post anonymously, unless your identity is absolutely vital to the post that you're making!
Now, there's no need to thank me - I'm just doing my bit to help you get used to the anonymous image-board culture!
>>37679104
>lifting girls
Gonna make it
>>37679141
Ahh, thanks mate! Didn't even notice!
>>37676909
ur the person that turns a 4chan meme into a reddit meme
>>37679104
>right pec noticeably larger than left
Something I can relate to
>>37678973
>>37679183
>>37679196
>>37679209
>>37679222
this is the best bread I've ever seen on 4chan
>>37679237
last one, gotta finish my presentation for tomorrow
>>37676784
Newton's third law. The upward force on the bar from your hands is necessarily equal to the downward force from your feet, so the bar remains stationary.
>>37679173
I don't understand this feel because my left pec is actually bigger.
>>37679104
>Having a trip
>Not violently overreacting and resorting to ad hom attacks when someone mentions your trip
You got a lot of learning to do famalam
>>37677054
My fucking sides.
>>37678085
they better, since manual minimum wage hard labor is all you can do with a physics degree
>>37676784
Your not lifting hard enough retarded idiot it is posible
Okay, I think I got it
What if you squatted down really deep and then jumped so you pushed the earth away from you. Then earth pulls you back down and when you hit it again the momentum makes it move a little more in the same direction. Is there a reason as to why you couldn't destabilize the earths orbit if you did this enough times? What if multiple people were doing this at the same time?
Pic related, tried to draw out the plan
>>37676861
It's because there's no external force exerted upon the man and bar. He pulls the bar up, but the bar is pulling him down (3rd law), and he's standing on the bar, so that force is then applied onto the bar, preventing it from moving.
>>37677411
>kg
>force
Get the fuck out
>>37677331
PLANKS 4 THE SKANKS
CURLS 4 THE GRULZ
SQUATZ 4 THE THOTZ
BENCHES 4 THE WENCHES
>>37677919
Will Bernoulli mechanics replace Aesthetics as the next generation's lifting goals?
>>37676746
>>37676784
please tell me someone's capping everything that happened as a result of this
>>37680200
no external force on you+earth two body system. You exert equal gravitational force on the earth
>>37676947
Put it this way. You are both deadlifting the bar and leg raising it (towards the ground) at the same time. The harder you deadlift the harder you have to push down with your legs to stop the bar from going up your ass.
>>37677365
Then he throws you... though that's a lot of weight so more realistically he lifts you up and drops you.
>>37680322
>I'm actually just an Americuck who enjoys physics and puzzles
>yfw
This is the funniest Thread I've seen in forever someone screencap this entire thing please
>>37676721
Before height 5'11"
After height from train stretching 6'1"
What the fuck is going on here?
> invited to this guys party
> don't really like him but he's one of the few ppl I know from university so go anyway
> he's a head taller than me but pretty much DYEL
> starts getting physical with me until I pin him down and people get between us and telll me to stop
> kek while being a manlet with strength
Witnessed
>>37677293
someone illustrate this for me, I'm having trouble visualizing it
>>37680850
In case any amerianon is actually curious:
In metric, we use different units to measure mass and force, thus we wouldn't say "500kg of force" like you'd say "1100lb of force". We'd use Neutons and say "5000N of force".
The difference is because although earth's gravity applies (almost) 10N of force on a 1kg object, the moon's gravity would apply a significantly lower force, though the mass of the object hasn't changed from 1kg.
>>37681409
Newtons*
>>37680200
earthquakes destabilize the earths orbit so if you got enough people this might work
for the love of all that is holy, don't let this thread die before it can be screengrabbed
>>37676738
The true dank meme. I miss those days.
>>37676784
Jesus Christ...
>>37677529
No No No, You have it all wrong. You have to add in potential and kinetic energy to the equation or it would never work. Basically when you have hold something up high, it's potential energy is being focused on you and it transfers to kinetic energy which means more weight so you're not going anywhere, even if you are slightly lighter. See the right part of my picture.
But I have corrected this foresight, First you have to grab your bf (no homo). Have him lift the bar like in right example. Then go and with extended arms grab the bar from on top facing downward. This is critical because now facing downward you are not holding anything up, the bar is holding you up, completely flipping the PE( potential energy) and KE (kinetic energy) in your favor. Now just retract your arms and the bar will push against you and propel you higher. Easy flight, it's just harder to see where you're going. Remember to use a heavier weight for more propulsion.
>>37676784
you could if you jumped at the same time
you see there is something called gravity which is pulling down to the earth
>>37679209
love it
>>37676784
>americans
>>37682387
no anon, you're almost there.
one person has to be able to do a front planche. that dude holds on to the bar on top, and the other guy has to be able to bench the bar and the top guy's weight.
starting from the bench, the top guy goes into planche, and the bottom guy presses the bar and the top guy. the top guy then rows the bar towards him, and the bottom guy does a pull up while the top guy does a pushup back into the starting position.
I'm really high right now
This thread is not helping
My fucking sides.
>>37679164
kek
his meme was shit
I love you all
This entire thread, never change /fit/
>>37681409
Not metric. It's the Standardised Unit. Newtons are the unit of force. Pounds are a measure of mass, kilograms also measure mass. Newtons are universal because our scientific formulae are based around Standardised Units. F = ma, for example. Mass is kilograms (standard unit) acceleration is metres per second squared (standard) force is Newtons. This does not work with pounds. It isn't metric vs imperial. It's science's standard units vs retards that don't understand physics
>>37677133
pls gravity
>>37676746
Surely if you can deadlift 400lbs and weigh 200lbs this would work?
This has been the best good work
nsfw this is why I deadlift
gfycat DefinitivePinkDragonfly
>>37684658
First of all, they're called SI units. Second, there are pound-force and pound-weight measurements; you may be shocked to learn that mechanics was studied in the UK, US and Commonwealth before the adoption of SI. Don't go calling others retards when you know some high school physics and fuck all history.
>>37676861
When you deadlift normally, there is a force pulling up the bar, and one pushing down on the earth. When you stand on the bar, it's feeling the force pushing down on the earth.
>>37685378
I didn't use SI when describing them because anybody using kilograms as a measure of force is unaware of the meaning of "SI units"
>pound force
>pound weight
>weight isn't force
Same thing ya idjit
I'm saying today's formulas, this conversation isn't set in the fucking dark ages. (10kg)(9.8m/s^2) = 98N
In pounds?
(22lbs)(9.8m/s^2) = 215.6 (some other unit)
The SI units move into other formulas nicer. Stop getting worked up over shit that doesn't matter
>>37685332
lmao
>>37684658
Pounds measure force dickhead. Weight is a result of downward force, measured in pounds if you're an American. Your weight in pounds is gravity dependent, unlike mass in kg.
>>37679058
>>37682172
>>37680911
screencapped it and made a le reddit meme of it
>>37685907
10/10 reading comprehension there pal.
11/10 if bait.
>>37676721
>You can hold my caboose anytime
10/10
>>37685332
Real life example of functional strength.
>>37679222
That's cardio faggot
>>37679196
I appreciate that the first and third panels are different instead of just copied over.
>>37680341
ROWS 4 THE HOES
CHINUPS 4 THE PINUPS
>>37678213
Because it's the only scenario in which dling a barbell would be useful
>>37686863
GLUTES 4 THE SLOOTS
>>37686270
No he reaches that right.
Imperial measurement of mass is slugs.
Force is pounds.
You just didn't know.
You can convert Newton into pound.
And ever heard of horsepower? It's expressed in pound*feet.
You can use imperial for physics. SI is just easier.
>>37676784
How fucking high are you man.
>>37676784
Christ
>>37680200
If we wanted to dodge a meteor on a collision course with earth, we could send everyone to Australia and make them jump up and down and it could shift the planet out of the way.
>>37686100
post it pls
>>37687188
>>37686863
LIFTING STICKS FOR THE CHICKS
>this thread is still up
Can we get some sort of cap for this?
these are fucking autistic reddit tier
>>37680033
Prob says the guy who could never do physics. Kek get mad pleb
>>37676777
>posting the non-gif version
>mfw
>>37677531
All yours famalam, Pepes are meant to be shared, not hoarded
>>37685449
What? In Imperial units, you measure force as pounds * feet / second^2. And the SI units ARE metric units.
>>37677521
thanks for this
can someone cap this shit? please? ill love you long time
>>37679173
Same problem with me. But my whole right side is larger than my left. Im afraid im going to look like that one monster from left for dead that half huge half dyel
>>37677259
Jesus christ that file name.
>>37686100
>>37688405
http://imgur.com/gallery/ZOv4u/ I found it
>>37677259
You got him there
>>37677293
>but only slightly
are you flying or not?
>>37677900
I crunched some numbers.
Say you're 200lbs and with the plates it's 270 total. To stay airborne, with the plates at a 10° angle of attack, assuming combined surface area of 3.5 cubic ft (guestimating) and the lift equation being
L=Cl*0.5*ρ*V^2*S
With lift needing to be minimum 270 lbs
Where Cl =2π*α (angle of attack in radians)
ρ is density in slugs/ft^3
V is airspeed in ft/sec
S is surface area in ft^2
Solving for airspeed is 243 ft/sec which is ~357 mph=574 km/h for our euro friends.
Meaning you need a jetpack or rocket or someshit to keep that speed up otherwise you start to fall. 45 Plates aren't the best shape for gliders.
This does not include drag btw, so you'd have to go faster anyway... or the fact that your arms would fall off.
>>37697004
>Fixed
>Meant you're 180, not 200
I crunched some numbers.
Say you're 180lbs and with the plates it's 270 total. To stay airborne, with the plates at a 10° angle of attack, assuming combined surface area of 3.5 cubic ft (guestimating) and the lift equation being
L=Cl*0.5*ρ*V^2*S
With lift needing to be minimum 270 lbs
Where Cl =2π*α (angle of attack in radians)
ρ is density in slugs/ft^3
V is airspeed in ft/sec
S is surface area in ft^2
Solving for airspeed is 243 ft/sec which is ~357 mph=574 km/h for our euro friends.
Meaning you need a jetpack or rocket or someshit to keep that speed up otherwise you start to fall. 45 Plates aren't the best shape for gliders.
This does not include drag btw, so you'd have to go faster anyway... or the fact that your arms would fall off.
>>37681409
US customary uses Lbs force exclusively for force
We actually use slugs for mass. Lbs mass is just an easier unit to use sometimes.
Don't ask me why it's called slug, but it does take some ambiguity out of the pound which is used as mass and force
>>37689858
how new are you?
