Am I aesthetic by /fit/s standards yet?

No, but not because you're not aesthetic.

>>35310417
Looks like you have gyno - so no.

>>35310426
Then why not?

>>35310417
Nice bitch forearms.

>>35310417
muh dick says yes, but my mind is telling me no.

What's up with your core?

>>35310417

show legs or youre worthless

>>35310417
/fit/'s standards are irrelevant. The standards basically always say there is something you could improve

>>35310446
literally curlbro tier

for arms like that id expect a bit more chest and a lot more abs

>>35310417
Mirin

Nice job

>>35310417
No one is aesthetic by /fit/ standards.
You have a better physique than 99.9% of people here.

File: shigg.jpg (548KB, 5000x5000px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

548KB, 5000x5000px

>>35312064
>better than 99.9%

Your biceps are tiny, and your delts are pathetic, even from this angle. You're on your way but you're barely into ottermode.

You got nothing but arms going on there bro

>>35312064
proly better than like 45-50 percent