No watch thread?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
Let's see your watch, /fa/..
Obligatory
current
Casio A159
>>11486120
cop or not
My humble grail
>>11487294
Goddamn it purty, where do i git?
>>11487306
I think this is the only distributor for NA
https://www.junghanswatchesusa.net/Max-Bill-Hand-Winding-Matte-Silver-Dial-by-Junghansbr027370000_p_197.html
k
>>11486120
nice omega c l o c k m a s t e r
I broke it during a fight so I don't wear it anymore but I loved it
>>11487385
daniel wellington of plebistan?
>>11486120
Am i the only one that think the speedmaster looks kind of... cheap? I mean it's a cool design and history and all and i'd love to have one, but the case shape and especially the metal bezel is just not quite right. Can't quite put my finger on it.
What about white dials?
>>11487007
Got the silver one. Should I get that one aswell?
>>11487802
Do you want a gold watch?
If so, yes.
Otherwise, no.
I'm personally not a huge fan, but we can't decide for you. They're pretty cheap so it's not a huge purchase.
>>11487807
Yeah I mean, the silver one has a nice bracelet, looks like steel, but the panel itself looks cheap. Is the gold one the same?
>>11487800
white dials look great but being pasty myself I find them a bit hard to get used to.
then again, black dials never look interesting all that much.
>>11487790
>Can't quite put my finger on it.
the look like swatch irony chronos, basically. that's what it probably is. the domed crystal looks plasticky although it's not.
>>11487790
I can't agree with you. I really like the case shape. It also looks better in person than on pictures.
But maybe this will be more to your liking?
Kinda pointless posting this, since I have a completely different watch face, But the bracelet and shape are nice IMO
8 dorrar off ebay
just bought two orients as my first watches. 1/2
>>11488028
2/2
i like em!
>>11487122
I used to have this as a kid. Nice.
>>11488018
Absolutely disgusting logo + wearing it on the wrong wrist.
>>11488040
This one is great
>>11488028
This one looks like shit
all super cheap, gonna save up till I can afford a nice expensive one ( + $1000,-)
12$
>>11486120
What do you guys think of Audemars piguet watches
I have to say for high end luxury watches they look pretty cheap
>>11488613
Forgot pic
I feel like a faggot looking at all these other watches.
>>11488613
there are nicer royal oaks out there, the jules audemars line is pretty dank
>>11488630
lol @ u buying a fashion brand watch over a swiss . buy a tag huer /rolex / breitling etc not fashion brnads
>>11488630
Is that your watch..? I saw in at the department store as I was walking through the other day, one of the largest watches I've seen.
I've been excited to wear my perpetual calendar Citizen the past couple weeks since winning the bid on eBay. This is by far one of the best watches I've ever had, imo better than a lot of my Swiss watches.
When it stores energy for 6 months, runs perfectly, and only loses half a second per week, I can't help but admire the Perpetual calendars by Citizen, and the Eco-Drive in general.
>>11486981
Is this quartz?
>>11487784
im looking to get identical one unless there are
any other divers very similar but not direct copies of submariner worth looking at?
if the description of a watch says the watch face is 1 3/4", does that include the bezel as well?
>>11489017
>>11489008
No, it's without the bezel
>>11489017
It should say in millimetres but it's the width without crown
Mine right now :^)
>>11489030
>>11489039
so it's just the inside?
thx
>>11489057
my bad, forgot pics.
>>11489058
How much does the bezel overhang even? Have a pic?
>>11489061
How are you liking that Timex?
I never really thought about Timex before, but recently I saw I style I liked, and they range from $40-90. It would probably be my casual, beater, or around the house watch. But they have some attractive styles, and after feeling some Timex's in the store, they seem to be consistent and good quality for the money. But as someone that has one, how are you enjoying that in general? Are the chrono's working correctly? How is the material and durability?
FYI it was the Timex Waterbury orange accent that I am talking about.
>>11488482
w2c
>>11488958
yea
I grabbed one of these during the recent Christopher Ward Sale for $488. They are usually like $900. Are they decent enough watches? Still waiting for it to arrive.
Any one have details on this watch?
>>11489138
aliexpress
anyone with a real one is probably too old for this board
>>11489726
me being a pleb and not realising op put the price in the post and trying to be smug calling them out
>>11487784
>>11487784
nice
>>11489550
I forget the exact name of it, but I thought it was awesome, so I copped a pobeda masonic. Very similar concept and look. If you like the look of that, I strongly suggest checking them out. You can cop them for like 50-100 USD, depending on the exact design you like. I picked mine up for about 54ish
>>11489550
Fake dial.
to lazy to take an actual picture
Just sold this but I did enjoy while I had it
>>11488987
>>11488987
the tudor black bay is a decent watch. Also you get them for a fairly reasonable price
>>11489743
Just take a pic if you have one, no one is gonna believe you otherwise and it's not that much work
Nice patina OP.
my beautiful brass monstrosity
Casio senpai
>>11487800
Love me some white dials. Here's a few of mine with a white dial in there for you.
boccia
not mine though.
>>11489837
>>11489837
Here it is
Tell me how poor I am please
>>11490728
>$250 watch
>poor
>>11489101
cant get a higher resolution pic
>>11486620
Best watch.
No Seikos? Heres a shitty pic of one of mine.
![_6187133[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/GL5CA2C.jpg "_6187133[1].jpg")
>>11486620
I have that and pic related as an alternative. Am I doing alright for a poorfag?
>>11488987
>>11490451
I am right now waiting for mine to be delivered!
Nice one
This thread reminds me that I need to change my strap.
Tired of metal mesh strap. Time to go back to brown leather.
>>11487790
Naww man I love the newer Speedy lugs.
>>11489483
CW are great for the money and you get the old logo which is great and no longer in production IIRC (old logo is horrendous).
But I think you fucked it up with blue dial.
Which one should i buy
>Orient ER2400MW (Automatic)
>Junkers Bauhaus 6070-5 (Quartz)
any other recommendations?
>>11491455
It's not bad, there is better out there though.
If you are going for that price, look on eBay or on some listing sites like Craigslist and you can probably find something better like a lower end Citizen or Seiko if you are lucky
>>11491967
Orient
>>11487407
wellington is pleb tier
>>11490728
I absolutely despise the people that will internally compare their Omega or Breitling to someones Citizen or Seiko. It makes me laugh, but then again, those are the people whose main interest in getting a watch is status. I figure those people know little about watches, or at least the purpose and functionality of watches. I know plenty of watch enthusiasts that will wear their $50 watches around, and leave their $10,000 Constantin at home. There is alot of pseudo-watch experts here, I don't really know many people that would feel 'poor' or embarrassed for wearing a Citizen, or even a $80 Seiko around.
>buy dead Casio databank off ebay in mint condition
>put battery in and it just keeps making a whining noise so I have to return it and am currently going through charge back problems with seller
>find another super rare old Databank on auction
>forgot about it last night and slept through the auction
>sold for way cheaper then I was willing to bid
anyone else having problems trying to cop a watch they really want?
>>11490417
Your's is even better!
How much did it cost?
>>11491967
Bauhaus
>>11492075
Yes me too!
I had this since December and it is the first watch I had that doesn't get caught in my jacket/sweater all the time.
It's amazing
Rate my watch /fa/
any recommendations for a daily/casual watch?
This or terrorist casio
>>11492574
what model is this?
>>11492604
Looks like G-Shock DW5600
>>11490451
just got this 15 minutes ago, the black one behind is a casio mq24 - 1e
sorry about the shitty phone camera with bad lighting.
>88US$
>4 days and only +6 sec in total
>>11492574
casio b640
jk, whatever you like more. the g-shock is functionally the better choice.
>>11492658
Mah man where to cop?!
>>11492570
Price range?
>>11486120
Look at the 12 o'clock penis. You will never unsee it.
>>11492703
/please/ get a better strap holy jesus
>>11492703
>Panerai homage
gaaaaay
>>11492312
I bought from an AD for the better bracelet with the screws. Paid $4200.
>>11492555
>>11492555
>trashtier
i know this is probably awful, but is it at all wearable?
>>11494463
Are you retired? Was that given to you as a retirement gift?
>>11492756
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Casio-A168WEC-1EF-silver-camouflage-blue/dp/B00L236QZ2
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Casio-MQ24-1E-Black-Resin-Quartz/dp/B000GAWSHM/ref=sr_1_1?s=watch&ie=UTF8&qid=1468031623&sr=1-1&keywords=casio+mq24+-+1e
>>11494497
Is that an insult? It felt like an insult. I chose it as a gift when I was younger and stupidly thought it would look "cool". Now it's been lying around for years. I feel like the transparent plastic casing puts it into "beyond salvageable" territory, especially because it clashes with other straps I could otherwise replace the original one with.
But then when I actually wear it, it doesn't look as horrendously offensive as I thought it would, so I dunno. Just wanted to see some reactions.
>>11494567
If you're a woman you could get away with wearing this. If not...
>>11488615
the offshore is nigger tier- vintage royal oaks are by far the best
>>11488771
Ive got the same thing only with the blue and silver dial- its a great watch
>>11494567
It was more of a rhetorical question than an insult. Do you not know what gold watches symbolize?
>>11494585
B- But the description says unisex!
...Yeah, I get it. Maybe I will turn it into a gift for some girl I like or something.
(I actually thought about taking it apart, dyeing the plastic casing white or black and possibly attaching a black strap. At least in my head that looks somewhat interesting.)
>>11494633
Not exactly... I mean, I know they are commonly associated with pompous, not seldomly old, rich folk. But this one looks pretty "hiphop" tacky, or feminine at best.
>>11493266
I'd only get the penis speedy
>>11488987
There are lots of divers out there, the steinhart is ok but too much of a copy of a classic sub..
Maybe a squale? I'm not personally a fan but lots of people like them.
The great thing about the pelagos is that it's essentially a modern remake of the submariner, and since both are part of the rolex brand and family and there are enough differences (snowflake hands, titanium, 3d dial) it works pretty well.
It's still a bit overpriced for what it is (especially the old version pictured with an ETA) but it's a nice watch. Get the new version (the blue is sexy) with the inhouse movement if you can stand the 5 lines of text on the dial.
Recently got this.
>>11495885
congrats. weren't you that UK dude from last thread?
>>11495890
haha yeah I am, surprised anyone actually remembered that. After getting it I have to say i'm quite happy I did, it's a lovely watch for the price.
>>11495895
sounds great. hope you enjoy wearing it, lol.
Pyramid dial is even more gorgeous in person
Meh it's something...
>>11495953
>gold
>roman numerals
mehmet plz
Came with a watch collection i picked up along with some lady omegas and tissot watches. Should i switch to a leather band?
>>11487800
SARB035 masterrace reporting in. Mine is on vacation so the time and date aren't right and it doesn't have even a strap on it.
>>11491967
Orient for me.
>>11492574
Terrorist. So much more value for the money. I'm thinking of ordering one for myself.
>>11496137
not a fan of NATO bands personally, so yes
>>11495885
Why is your escapement masquerading as a tourbillon?
>>11490417
Do you wear it every day? You don't think it's too expensive to do that?
>>11497127
Everday, I don't worry about it too much. After all the Speedmaster is the original tool watch.
I wish to buy this. Will I dun goofed?
Not a single rolex??? Whats wrong with you guys
my Breitling
>>11487076
Cop
>>11498003
crap tried to upload another picture of it but its 4.77mbs
all these pleb watches
>>11498012
6/10 if satire
2/10 if serious (made me reply)
>>11498012
Hublot is flashy overpriced garbage for rappers and basketball players. The majority of their lineup is $15K+ watches with ETA movements. Even after being pressured into making an in-house movement all they did was copy the 7750 at add some shit to it. No technical innovation whatsoever and not even the finishing standards of AP.
y/n?
>>11495953
price?
>>11488466
What are 2 and 4?
acceptable, or no?
>>11498012
This is ugly.
>>11498257
Depends on how it looks in real life. Style is pretty good, I'd say yes.
>>11498859
Maybe. Almost any watch can be acceptable if you manage to pull it off with your outfit.
>>11498257
Christopher Ward is a shit brand, might as well buy a Daniel Wellington. Avoid
I'm gonna piss off all of you using one picture.
Seiko poorfag reporting in
I like it.
>>11499168
Nice GS.
Cop or not?
>>11498972
I'm just offended by the half-ass attempt at replicating the design. If anything, all letters/number should be in the same font as the game has it, that terrible calculator-type font.
weak bait for all the wrong reasons
>>11499168
oof those GS are so fucking nice.texture is lovely too! how does it wear in an outfit? did you get it for a special occasion?
>>11499477
I meant the watch in general, not the theme.
Seems a lot of regular watch collectors don't like the idea of people combining tech with their timepieces
Here, a different face might help
>>11499492
looking at THAT background and ugh
>white typeface on extremely light background
yea now I'm [triggered]
I'm no fan of any smartwatch on the market, yours included.
>don't like the idea of people combining tech with their timepieces
first off if they looked nice enough I would maybe consider one, but I've already stated this viewpoint.
secondly, yes. it is nice knowing the piece around your wrist is an actual manual ticking son of a bitch that uses extremely precise and complicated mechanisms to synchronise spinning gears and whatnot to ensure the face shows spinning hands at the right pace, for the sake of being able to tell the time.
I think if you understood the incredible amount of time it took to design such pieces, you might feel like it is nicer than 'requiring' another piece of tech, which honestly, we don't:
http://qz.com/658010/a-year-after-its-launch-its-now-clear-that-pretty-much-no-one-needs-an-apple-watch/
this is apple watch specific, but I'm sure the difference in functionalities is minimal for the different watches.
>>11499514
I agree with this a bit, but then at the same time I kinda like the idea that this angers you, so I downloaded the most obnoxious face to exist on the store. Just for you anon
>>11488466
>wearing fakes
kys 2bh
Watch was expensive, but I got a discount at Fred Meyer's, because I work at Kroger.
cop or not?
>>11499684
new to the board, what the hell does that mean?
>>11487076
>Buying a watch that says junk on it
>>11487294
>$690
>grail
>>11490491
What do you do for a living?
>>11488466
What's the point of collecting watches that look exactly the same?
>>11498053
This faggot is wearing a soup dish on his wrist.
>>11488482
my $10 one from ali is shit. ink quality is grainy and on some ticks there's white patches. you'd think they'd print it nicely at least.
Am I doing this right?
>eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
>>11499765
>railroad approved
*synth component shivers*
>>11499786
I JUST GOT WORD THAT ANOTHER SETTLEMENT NEEDS OUR HELP
>>11499794
lol fuck the minutemen, institute ftw
>>11489732
very nice anon
>>11499765
fatass ginger
>>11499849
If I was a ginger I'd kill myself.
>>11499728
Gay prostitute in Japan.
>>11499752
Nope start the other way around.
>>11499898
wat
Would love to get a Junker Bauhaus or a Jacob Jensen 600 hereafter
Sarb033
>>11499697
cop = acquire
>>11499752
So you've got 3 fossils, an invicta, a smart watch and a canal street rolex?
You could have gotten a decent watch for all the money you've spent on junk.
>>11499467
Please, help I am still not sure whether should I buy it.
>>11500114
Give us a list of pros and cons.
>>11499752
absolutely terrible
currently this
>>11500082
indeed anon
>>11486120
Should I cop? I've never owned a watch, and need something respectable. Or is it tacky?
>>11488466
2 - aliexpress.com/item/Brand-Top-Best-Selling-Mens-Fashion-Business-Dress-Watch-Elegant-Decent-Design-High-Quality-Brown-Genuine/1537667778.html
4 - aliexpress.com/item/Nomos-Quartz-Watch-For-Men-Women-Lover-Wrist-Watches-Top-Luxury-Brand-Reloj-Hombre-2015-New/32684682863.html
>>11500348
very tacky
>>11500359
Is this a more respectable color scheme? Or is the watch itself the problem?
>>11498012
>wearing a watch made by Tediore
Aren't you afraid it will blow up when you take it off?
>>11499697 he asks if he should buy or not. Cop means to purchase sth
>>11500437
What does sth mean? P. obscure.
>>11500384
Well, if you must go for a daytona, buy a steel one,butin itself it's a fucking huge 'look at me' watch.
If you want a rolex buy an oyster
>>11500478
I figured Daytona was the most popular, so I wouldn't stand out too much. Is something like this fine? Or is gold tacky? Do you have any non-Rolex you'd recommend?
>>11488613
That's probably because they are no where near the high end of the luxury watch spectrum.
>>11500223
+Microsoft logo
+Timex
+A lot of functionalities
+Complete obsolete tech inside
+Big
+Water resistant
+Round
~Digital
-Not popular
-not the best condition
-More expensive than most popular digital watches
>>11500494
Daytona is the most well known, but it's also 20 grand so the one you see very little of in real life.
Personally I think that gold is a bit arab when it comes to watches unless used incredibly sparingly. a Rolex like the one pictured is always a nice piece that goes with everything and doesn't make you look like a flashy asshole (though Rolex, as nice a watch as they make, could make the most understated thing in the world and some asshole will still call you flashy)
Here are some recommendation, of varying price
If you must have a swiss automatic watch:
>Rolex Oyster/oysterdate
>Rolex Cellini
>Omega Seamaster 10XX series
>Breitling Transocean
not swiss but also high end
>IWC Potofino
>IWC Portogieser
If you're primarily focused on design and not brand name then here are some lower end watches. Functionally they are identical (if not better when it comes to quartz) to the higher end models and you will not notice a difference in quality, they're also fairly respectable since most people don't care about watches and if they see you wearing a 1k watch they will be impressed enough. There's a big variance in price in this section (100-2000)
>Anything from Nomos
>Junghans Max Bill Automatic (or quartz if you want something more budget friendly)
>Instrumnt 01C
>Braun have a very nice collection
>Tic15 (very interesting design)
>A variety of Longines
>a variety of Seiko
>>11488613
I think some of the basic royal oaks (both black, white and blue dial) are pretty cool.
Pic related is a rep but still a nice watch.
>>11500689
why no Grand Seiko?
>>11499477
I wear mine almost every day. bought it for myself for getting into med school
>>11500715
check bottom of the post
>>11500706
That's actually fucking disgustingly tacky
>>11499684
Same question here. I actually kind of like it.
>>11500724
Eh, different strokes.
I wouldn't personally buy one, i'm more into tool watches but i don't think it's horrible.
>>11500689
Decent recommendations apart from Longines. A new longines is (with a few exceptions) one of the worst purchases you can make.
>>11500818
Why is that?
functionally, a Longines is identical to any other watch, in terms of impressing those around you, most people know Longines as a luxury maker of pricey watches.
I agree personally that I would never buy a Longines but the design is passable and the other functions are covered.
>>11499765
very nice
>>11499969
very nice
>>11500240
actually quite nice with nato
>>11500733
I think I'm gonna go for it
>>11501021
had a similar Casio before, the bracelet went to shit (didn't clamp very tightly anymore), so I decided to go ahead and flat out replace the next strap on purchase, quite a bitch to get in under the fucking zero clearance springbars, though
>TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK
Should've more lurked watch threads more often
>>11488040
Love me the bambino, looks great.
>>11500082
I only regret the invicta, I love the rest of them
>>11500082
How does one buy fakes in canal st.?
>>11497258
No you're good
>>11490976
How are you liking it? I've been eyeing that model for a couple weeks now.
>>11487331
better pic of right to keep thread alive
>>11501525
do yourself a favor and get a Seiko/Lorus/Pulsar quartz watch.
at least the japanese movements don't tick like assholes.
so basically anything with a Miyota movement is fine but swiss and american movements are hell on earth to sit next to. avoid Swatch as well. at least the plastic models.
>>11488040
I'd like the bambino if it was 38mm and if it had lumed hands.
still looks nice but muh lume is important.
This thread lacks patina.
>>11501993
It's just a way to say low end fake
>>11502890
I know, but I literally want to buy a low end fake in canal st. when I visit NYC
>>11499168
Lol nothing is poorfag about a Grand Seiko.
>>11499765
Accutron's are amazing. Assuming this came from the Tuning Fork era, do you know if the Railroad versions movement had the tuning fork in it? If it does, then you lucky to have one
>>11489743
yeah me too
>>11499954
how the fuck did you obtain?
My Amphibia.
>>11503666
WHERE TO COP??????????
>>11498252
>not admiring a watch made out of fucking carbon fiber
>>11503922
It's flashy garbage that people buy to show off to others
showing off and being flashy is not effay
showing off and being flashy isnt even shit you should do as a normal human
showing off and being flashy is for new money glorified trailer park escapees
>>11500689
>not swiss but also high end
>IWC Potofino
>IWC Portogieser
Umm, IWC is Swiss.
>>11504101
My bad, I had a brainfart and confused with A Lange & Sohne
>>11503922
Hublots are definitely giant pieces of shit in the mechanical watch world.
As the one poster said, the majority of their watches use an ETA or modified ETA 7750. A good ETA watch movement used in ALOT of cheaper watches.
I mean even if the materials used are that good, they have a huge profits margin compared to the type of movement they are using in their ultra 'Luxury' watches. I feel bad for the people that paid over 10K for a Hublot with an ETA 7750. Given you can find a watch with the same movement for around $500, like certain Bulova Accutrons, and some Hamiltons. It's a ridiculous mark up, and Hublot should be ashamed for marketing watches with movements that don't reflect the quality or craftsmanship that you would expect to see on that large of a price tag. I mean hell, Tag Heuers, Breitlings, Hamiltons, and even Bulova all use the same movement and sell for less than 25% of the cost of one of those Hublots.
All of that extra money, thousands of dollars, you are simply paying for the name, and maybe the design if you like it that much. So you can have fun paying your extra 8 grand for a watch that says Hublot on it and is made out of materials that cost them an extra $15 in production. And from my understanding, to some people, they have a nice look, not to me at least, but their movement and quality does not impress many watch collectors or experts at all, there is a particular disdain for them, and quite frankly, understandably so.
But it isn't my place to judge, if anyone likes the name or looks of a Hublot, they should get it if they are willing to fork out all that money.
>>11504179
Ahh, the Lange 1 tourbillon perpetual with a white dial is my grail watch, only 350k though
>>11504198
I can see the appeal of A Lange & Sohne, but personally I just can't seem to find them appealing.
There too WISey and not designey enough, if that makes sense.
>>11486120
>>11498252
>>11504189
a few Hublots look nice
>>11503666
I thought of Archer when I saw this for whatever reason... Cool though. I don't know if I'd rock it, but it's different.
>>11504435
Yeah, Hublot is great.
>>11500448
sth = something, in case you were still wondering
>>11488613
royal oak is nice but if you get the royal oak offshore your a Arab with no taste
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgWJrh3ZiN4&index=10&list=PLOmwjMS-5El3aSOw73TtqKGALlBQnXRLF
First watch, had it for years and it's still going strong. Would be nice to upgrade if I wasn't broke tho
The Quartz has been with me since the 6th grade and has changed bands three times
The Casio was a bachelor's graduation present this year
thinking of making this my next watch
opinions?
I only have small wrists so most bulky watches really don't suit me
>>11504538
What model is that?
>>11492574
>>11492644
Can you actually change the strap for a Nato one on the g shock?
Opinion? Going to cop for daily use.
>>11504671
Fossil Nate
http://www.watchshop.com/mens-fossil-nate-chronograph-watch-jr1475-p99973359.html
>>11503776
It's Seiko W853-4040 rare af, have fun.
Sorry for shit quality pics /fa/m buts it's all I got atm
thoughts? cop or not?
Enjoy pic of blurry timex
