Are they a quality shoe and are they comfortable? Thinking of picking up all white lows
>>10637309
They are quarity shoe.
They are not a quality shoe. The leather is very plastic-y.
They are purely for the looks. They aren't comfortable or functional or well built.
they're fine now fuck off
>>10637309
they are very low quality but extremely durable. they were once very high quality
>1985: af1s are $89
>2015: af1s are $98
naturally $89 in 1985 dollars is a lot more than $98 in 2015. this is why they are low quality. retarded Nike kids can't fathom paying over $100 and getting no "tech" like air bubbles/flywire/stupid crap that costs way less to manufacture than high quality leather
>>10637309
Most comfy shoe I've ever worn
>>10637309
be a real dude and get bapestas instead
Air Max 90s are way better quality, feel like wearing cushions on your feet and give you a cheeky extra 1-.1.5 extra inches of height
get the 90s lad
>>10637715
This
>>10637309
They're not comfortable nor well build. But fuck it got them for 50$ so don't really care that much.
>>10637626
you haven't worn a lot of shoes
>>10637309
They are fucking bricks on your feet. But they look cool I guess...
>>10637618
$89 in 85 is around 190-220+-. Does someone make good quality AF1 mid for that price?
Only way I'm seeing better quality is if you blow $500+, and common person won't know the difference.
Anyone know/have a site that shows the difference between quality over the years?