Last thread is on the verge of death. Post it all.
Why? Why can't we have an OP that waits until after the thread falls off of the catalog? Why must all of the recent OPs suck dicks?
>>6891030
My bad on the thumbnail
>>6891032
Figured I was being the lesser of two evils. Last time they posted while it was on page 5 and started with two images. Page 8 is fine and I'm starting off with a lot of images from all three sunsets in the title (I even included all three). At least this way the thread starts off right.
>>6891035
Subsets*
![large[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/kQFARt0.jpg "large[1].jpg")
>>6891032
Depending on how slow the board is going, it can take up to 3 days for that to happen. Once the thread passes page 5, there isn't much point left in replying, since it's well on its way out the door. No one is gonna care too much about it from that point, especially since the threads are popular enough to even reach the bump limit in the first place.
>>6891068
Yeah that was my thought. Nobody's gonna post in that once it hits 9 anyway, cause who's gonna see it?
>>6891029
>someone posted something I drew
Oh gosh~
The only actual flattening art I did last thread, hah.
May be my last offering for a while, art or writing wise.
>>6891410
I'm glad that we get to see Elsie and Ko in Lemon's style.
>>6891410
This looks delicious in so many ways
>>6891423
Not as happy as I am, I'm sure! He never fails to impress and when it's your OCs, man. Also, why don't we ever call elastic women "noodle girls". I love that.
>>6891430
What I love is how he made their bodies like a chocolate/vanilla twist ice cream cone. I didn't even ask for that. He's great.
>>6891430
Also, I followed your tumblr. Very exciting!
Would detachable body parts count as shape change? If it was cute anyway.
>>6891512
Definitely falls somewhere between there and amputee
>>6891042
Well shit, the tumblr updated.
>>6891690
I wouldn't call it great, but I did finish this.
Slimes are meant for melted snuggling.
>>6891624
Holy shit
>>6891740
Where's Jez. Think this is right up her alley.
>>6891740
I got the weirdest boner right now
>>6891786
lilitheslounge.tumblr.com
She answers questions and takes pose suggestions.
A bunch of squiddies
>>6892050
my bby squiddy. I luv u.
Finished up Nero's cute assistant (and wife) Bianco.
She's made of gesso.
>>6891024
>>6892050
I really should have mentioned how cute this character is. she's great.
>>6892620
H-How old is she?
>>6892187
Unf. Best girl.
>>6892620
Sunny so cute!
Will we see more goodness of her? Though I wonder, what would happen to her if she melted due to spicy food
>>6892620
Scoop her up, toss 'er in the freezer and bam Sunny freezy pop
Probably tastes like orange
>>6893005
Forgot pic
>>6893003
Any loli material is too much loli material. You wanna fuck little girls go to the other Chan. Keep that disgusting shit out of here.
>>6893007
Don't get so triggered, it's not like we haven't got touhou or other loli TFs posted here before, I don't remember you bitching about them before.
Maan, usa's stuff is pretty good. Always fun to see it happen.
>>6893128
>>6893145
>>6893147
>>6893148
>>6893149
>>6892187
omg so cute, thanks a lot!
>>6893168
No problem! Glad you like it.
>>6893057
Always been gross. Always gonna be gross. Saying that the people who don't get off on little girls doing things are weird is what sick people do.
Hey, I made a pixiv account to post my tf drawings, I'm not sure how to post the link without being considered spam but try at pixiv dot me slash silentako
>>6893414
cute stuff
>>6893198
They're right! Think of the pretend, fictional. non-existent children anon!
>>6893198
I'm sorry Canada hates children.
>>6893538
nice
source?
>>6893547
バカ作者
From his pixiv, there is a link to BOOTH, which has three pay comics. That picture is from the second one (the one starring the brown haired girl).
God, is this community so alright with drawing little girls getting manipulated like this? What the fuck.
>>6893574
I'm not entirely sure you know where you are. Just to be clear, these are fictional characters, and while the legality of such content varies from country to country, such stuff is legally distributed in Japan. This website, and especially this board, has a hard focus on Japanese culture, and since this is the board designated for bizarre hentai, it should come as even less of a surprise to come across this stuff. I mean, Touhou gets more hentai than just about any other franchise, and a wide variety of the characters are designed to look like children. At least with this fetish, the subject of an image doesn't necessarily have to be engaging in any sexual activity, nor are they required to be nude.
I can understand how you may find this morally reprehensible, but you sound just as annoying as the people who mourn the loss of their erections when a transformation is depicted as permanent or non-consensual. Different strokes for different folks. Whining that something doesn't appeal to you adds nothing to these threads so either suck it up, or head back to wherever it is you came from.
>>6893601
Personally, I just got tired of drawing sexual and lewd stuff, and wanted to do something cute and lanky for a change.
>>6893618
I couldn't draw lewd even if I tried...
>>6893625
>>6893601
Alternatively, he/they could be complaining just to troll. On this site that's always a possibility.
>>6893630
That being said, I'm not really a fan of involving loli- or young-looking characters in this thread either. I don't like drawing kids unless their my OCs, so sorry to say but don't expect anything Sunny-related from me.
>>6893618
And that's totally fine. The fetish isn't limited to lewd. Hell, if most people who have the fetish trace back to the source, it was probably because they saw it happen to a girl or boy in either a cartoon, live action television show or movie, or a commercial. Look at the similar, though somewhat separate (due to extreme popularity in comparison) fetish of inflation. There's an enormous camp of people who got that fetish from watching a little girl turn blue and blow up like a balloon.
>>6893618
Was going to make a mention of that myself. I don't mind it as much because my preference is projecting onto the role of the character undergoing changes. So on that end it ends up being more 'would I want to be this char in this situation' than anything else.
Course that also means that most of my art centers around my own sona and characters whom I would want to have the aesthetics of (and by extension a bit of self indulgence in design and conceptual direction). S'also why I won't work with chars who are not at least mature in looks in most tf commissions unless it can be construed in a non-sexual way.
>>6893574
Nah man I wouldn't fuck a kid
I would just draw them as adults and then fuck em
Its been a while.
Glad to see Gun Ho and Co are at work.
Maybe I can finally relinquish my weird ideas at long last and make a request to our /d/ shape change overlords!
i want more food tf !
>>6893601
>I'm not entirely sure you know where you are
Not that guy, I know exactly where I am, on /d/, where loli is banned.
>>6894219
Good thing loli doesn't mean clothed little girls, the very thing our original complainer was making such a big fuss about.
>>6893574
Next there will be people alright with dead babies being joked about. They're basically baby murderers!
>>6894250
Did somebody say "Harlequin Babies?"
>>6894252
Somebody sure thinks so! Because dead baby jokes are basically horrifying real life baby deaths.
>>6891751
Yes it is~~~
I've been dealing with drawing block and depression lately, I'll try to begin drawing again.
>>6894538
Hope everything is okay, friend.
On the topic of all this loli stuff, I know it happens and I know people jerk to it. Not that my opinion matters, but I don't really care as long as we don't start explicitly talking about them being kids/talking about their age in the pictures. That's where it gets weird. I think we can all agree drawing ambiguously aged characters rides a certain line that creates discomfort, but falls in the "don't ask don't tell" category.
>>6893958
Although I am blushing here, I don't think my drawing ability is nearly adequate enough to give my name top billing over the other drawfags of the flattening/elastic/etc. threads.
(but thx anyways~)
>>6891410
Who are they
>>6894593
Honestly, I'd also argue the age isn't an issue if they're not being presented in a sexual manner. Like every sunny pic that's popped up has been distinctly non-sexual, so the only reason to feel icky about that is by assuming that someone's fapping to it (unless someone says they're fapping to it). And at that point it's pretty much on same lines of "getting squicked because you know someone faps to an innocent pic".
Though that opinion is probably colored by the idea that while this is /d/, not everyone here is intending to fap, but rather that this is the only place an odd general interest such as this could be discussed without being side-eyed as 'overly obsessive'.
>>6893646
So what are the characters in this from/does anyone know what the dialogue says here?
>>6894937
See I can't separate the /d/ thing from the pictures of kids thing. I don't believe for a second that any kids getting shape changed or flattened are seen and purposed as anything other than sexual, either by the viewer that enjoys it or the artist that draws it. Obviously, once more, whatever gets you off gets you off. But to get pissy when it makes other people uncomfortable... I mean yeah, this is a board for weird porn. But I think most people would say that "little girls" falls outside of weird and more inside disgusting. I'm not giving my own personal opinions here. Just giving the facts.
>>6894947
Also we've been talking a lot and posting few pictures. Let's not let this go the way of the other shitfit threads. Pics with posts!
>>6894939
http://kenitiro.web.fc2.com/
If you can stumble through the website, you'll find plenty of material. Kenitiro was kind of one of the Japanese "pioneers" of this stuff, along with Timesignalman back in the day. All the characters are his own, and his art style is very cutesy. There use to be a website with translations of his really old comics, along with Timesignalman's, but it's long gone now. Though I don't read Japanese, from what I understand in that particular picture, the blonde girl is a henchman to the grey-haired one (who is the big bad of the comic). After failing in whatever her mission was, that's her punishment.
>>6894947
>See I can't separate the /d/ thing from the pictures of kids thing. I don't believe for a second that any kids getting shape changed or flattened are seen and purposed as anything other than sexual
That's kind of a closed-minded view, though, and it's really just projecting your view of things on everyone else, as I'm sure the originally offended poster did. I don't know about anyone else personally, but for me and this fetish, it's limited to fiction. I don't look at real people and be like "I wish they were flattened", nor do I have any sort of fantasies about this stuff happening to people I know or myself. The more I think about it, the more esoteric it seems, but it's simply the idea of it happening that does it for me, and only in a fictional context with fictional characters. They can be completely clothed, they can be male or female, they can be anywhere from completely distressed to entirely indifferent to their situation and it still works for me.
>But to get pissy when it makes other people uncomfortable
It was more getting annoyed that some guy keeps posting about how much he doesn't like something while contributing absolutely nothing but a wasted post. Also, I can only assume he reported the pictures and posts that were deleted from the thread.
>>6894986
>http://kenitiro.web.fc2.com/
Thanks for the link. I love that general concept as you described, doubly so with bowling; so it hits all the right points for me.
>>6894992
Yeah, sports in general are a personal favorite of mine as far as uses of the fetish go, and bowling is probably the top for me among them. I don't think there's anymore quite like that on the website, but for someone who hasn't seen his work before, it's a gold mine of shape change material, with a particular focus on food. Enjoy!
>>6894997
Aww, that's a shame. I'll have to do more sportsball stuff after the convention this weekend, then. (Still working on updated refs for self and friends' chars so I have them to order commissions at the con)
>>6895027
Not quite the same, but she does remain a ball for the chapter that the prior image leads into, where her partner uses her as a 'weapon'.
>>6895046
>>6895047
>>6894986
Don't they have a DA
>>6895078
Nvm I mistyped it first time I tried
Curious here, why does this arouse you?
>>6895078
Just realized this now. He doesn't appear to use it, but it seems to have reposts of all the comics that were translated from the old website. Shame though, since he's made heaps of stuff since the latest of the translated stuff, and now he primarily does stories with supplemental images.
>it's a 'guy can't understand the difference between fictional and real' episode
You'd think people would have learnt to not reply by now.
>>6895120
I'm almost positive that squid is under the age of 21. I'd ask if you would please refrain from posting such immoral content.
>>6895047
yeah more of that ball tf please
>>6895177
>>6895120
You can't ignore such an important issue. Sure, the globalized fetish thread faps to planet wide enslavement and the apocalypse. While the amputee thread is made of mutilation and tragedy. But what's really disturbing is when an imaginary number is too low.
Watch out, one of these 50 non-existent girls trapped in a terrible circumstance might be 17. That's the bad part.
>>6895267
It's crazy how offended the obviously same guys in here are by one person (not me) saying it's weird to think about that stuff.
>>6895270
I wouldn't quite say "offended" so much as "perplexed" or "bewildered."
>>6895267
Globalized enslavement fetish is weird
Amputee fetish is weird
Shape change is weird
Loli is weird
And let's not try and use the wide parameters of "underage" to try and paint away that the characters in focus are so obviously not even close to 17. If they were, nobody would give a fuck. Nobody even said loli was worse than any of the other fetishes on this board. That's your desperate need to justify it coming through.
Everything on this board is weird. Best not to let people telling you your fetish is weird get to your head, or you'll have a bad time. Your fetish is weird. Your fetish is weird. This whole thread is weird. The fact that little girls are involved makes it weirder. Your fetish is weird. Your fetish is weird.
Get over it. Move on.
>>6895270
>nuh-uh YOU'RE offended by moral crusaders
kay
>>6895284
Cute. Does this artist keep posting stuff? his DA has been inactive for a while and I don't remember his pixiv ID.
>>6895270
>>6895276
But it's not just that he's calling it weird. He's also gone the extra mile to report posts. Kind of annoying when someone pulls that shit.
>>6895284
This might just open the shitstorm floodgates.
>>6895276
Learn to read.
>But I think most people would say that "little girls" falls outside of weird and more inside disgusting. I'm not giving my own personal opinions here. Just giving the facts.
Nobody is hung up that they're on a weird fetish board for their weird fetishes. But we will make fun of reality-challenged autists who decry the fetish equivalent of fart rape. You don't have to be a public fart enthusiast for that.
Maybe post a picture some time instead of aiming to be the world's most ironic retard.
>>6895291
That may be, but it is against the rules. I'm not a rulefag but you can't expect to post it and not have it deleted. It's no more accepted than furry. the mods here aren't slouches anyway, he may not have even reported it.
>>6895290
As far as I understand, he's pretty much completely gone. His last pixiv post was in 2014, and he never really took to Twitter like many other Japanese artists. He's truly one of the best to have ever done this stuff though.
>>6895298
Well, the character in the picture that was deleted, like every other one in the thread that could be considered depicting a character of questionable age, was fully clothed. And I'm not sure how many other threads you frequent on this board, or this website as a whole, but its not something they crack down on often, especially compared to furry. Just scanning through the catalogue, I see two threads where the original post pictures are depicting nude characters of comparable age to that of the deleted picture.
I'm not gonna deny I'm being overly defensive, but I've been with these threads since they started here, whether it's been posting or just silently observing, and I like to see them flourish. I don't mind when some guy comes in the thread and laughs or questions the fetish since he doesn't understand it. That's fair enough, it's a totally bizarre fetish by many standards. But when someone who actually has the fetish is here, and all they contribute is telling people that they hate a certain kind of content, it bothers me. This should be one of the least limited places for posting content, and here some guy is trying to restrict it just because it doesn't please his own dick.
If I may say, I think the trouble is dependent on the content being posted HERE.
Like, on DA if you post a pic of a young character who can do shape-change-ey stuff, but isn't using it for anything inappropriate, that's fine because both the content and context are sfw, and both the poster and those viewing it know that with a certain degree of certainty.
Whereas HERE on /d/, it can be safely assumed that for 99.9...% of posted images are intended to be sexual. So if someone posted art of the same or similar SFW nature, most would assume that it was posted on /d/ because the poster found it sexually arousing.
TL;DR
What I'm saying is that when we're talking about involving young characters in this sort of thing, CONTEXT matters just as much as CONTENT. If you post pics that are in-and-of-themselves SFW on a primarily NSFW site, people are well within their rights to be suspicious.
I'm defensive because it's already a rare fetish. Watching the short bus cousins of SJWs descend on it and cut content is a travesty.
Sadly, a fetish centered on distortion is autism-bait. It attracts all the broken-brained psychoses from the deepest hells of deviantart where most /d/eviants fear to fap. Where the pretense of cleanliness makes it even more psychotic.
That leaks over here, and we get weirdos who think cartoons are the real world and broken-brained illiterates going on spiels. It's gonna be a fun summer!
>>6895276
>Nobody even said loli was worse than any of the other fetishes on this board. That's your desperate need to justify it coming through.
Clearly.
>>6893574
>God, is this community so alright with drawing little girls getting manipulated like this? What the fuck.
>>6893198
>Always been gross. Always gonna be gross. Saying that the people who don't get off on little girls doing things are weird is what sick people do.
>>6893007
>Any loli material is too much loli material. You wanna fuck little girls go to the other Chan. Keep that disgusting shit out of here.
I mean, the exact words don't include the direct statement that loli is worse than anything else, so maybe it's just me, but that sure looks like they're saying it's more than just "weird"
For the record, I'm not a fan of loli, but I also feel like there's some leeway between "underaged" and "you're a fucking pedo"
Like, obviously, there's no magic wand you get when you turn 18 that instantly turns you into an adult, but on the other hand, that doesn't mean there's nothing creepy about really young characters being sexualized. it depends on exactly how young the character is, how mature they are emotionally, and the nature and context of the material. It's a fine line to walk and I have chosen to avoid that line because I am a moral coward who just wants to be liked...
But honestly, the thing I feel most strongly about is how civil this whole conversation went down. I'm just really happy with the level of discourse that's happening.
>>6893198
And we're just like them,not everyone likes our fetish but we are still in it and we shouldn't judge others either
I really regret asking her age now.
>>6895382
I used to think the whole "kids on #chan during Summer" was a lie. Then I browsed the other boards.
>>6895918
C'mon, now.
>>6893597
wooled
>>6895382
>Sadly, a fetish centered on distortion is autism-bait
Is there science behind this?
>>6895382
>STILL trying to pull the Just Cartoons card to justify your lust
And here you call everyone else autistic?
>>6895967
>STILL trying to give a lecture on cartoon morals while posting one crushed and crying
Given your ability to miss every point, I guess I shouldn't have to. Nice schoolgirl in a PE tracksuit, by the way. I'm sure she and every student who sits on her face is of age.
At this point, having a severe mental condition is the only thing that could justify you.
>>6896040
He's not attempting to justify tho
>>6896068
Well, yeah. He's too dumb to realize he's also into something abusive, illegal, and utterly immoral in real life. Where the only excuse is that it's a cartoon. I was making a point about his complete lack of self awareness.
You guys should smoke salvia. It makes you feel exactly as if you are flattening and transforming.
>>6895941
No. There's no science behind the Sonic OC community being kind of off, either. But that doesn't make it unnoticeable. Both communities have a penchant for concepts that really should not be combined, while discovering new ways to fall out of touch with the ingredients.
Out of all my fetishes including the guro ones, cartoon transformations are where I've seen some Sonichu shit.
>>6896126
So you just don't know what autism is? Or you were trying to meme?
Oh boy, I sure love white knights and pedophiles fighting on my shape change threads and discouraging drawfags.
>>6896130
Given autism includes having trouble with communication and abstract concepts? I might be using it correctly in this case. Is there a more accurate term for the local Chris-chans who stumbled into this thread?
>>6896132
Are you the drawfag who made that pic?
>>6896137
So like not understanding the abstract concept that there's an age of a person where it becomes weird and then progressively grosser to fap to them? Guess that's fair.
>>6896137
Ye, just thought it would fit
Granted you guys are posting content while arguing so it ain't that bad.
I'd kill for more male flattening.
Just MURDER.
>>6894231
Ah yeah you're right, it's okay to jerk off to little girls and suggest that other people do the same as long as they're clothed. Good point.
>>6896140
No, like failing so badly at a comeback. You're legitimately dumb at the basic act of talking.
I'm sure everybody finds something that disgusts them in this thread. But there's only one prick going on a crusade and getting things deleted. That's being a much bigger asshole with less understanding for others. Trying to chastise them for not tolerating intolerance just makes you a bigger hypocrite shithead.
>>6896141
Alright, I'll stop. I was going to say your art isn't as good as the pictures raising complaints, so we could afford to lose another condescending dispshit. But that's actually not bad.
>>6896189
I-I didn't draw that, I'm just another condescending dispshit.
>>6896189
I truly don't understand how you think the asshole is the person reporting pictures of kids that are posted for jerk off material. This is a board for jerking off. This is a board for porn. By posting little girls on it, you are 100% saying "jerk off to this, I find this acceptable jerk off material." How is the guy that's saying that jerking off to little girls is wrong the asshole? How?
>>6896199
Then I'm stopping out of sheer disappointment. >:(
Don't let it stop you from contributing.
I wonder if the age regression/progression threads gets this kind of shit since it involves youth?
Status update on those requests from a few days ago. I'll work on commissions instead 'till this blows over, so later.
>>6896210
Regression threads often do, progression threads often don't. Depends on the mod monitoring it and the content posted, amongst other things.
>>6896202
I drew >>6896132 but not >>6896141 which the guy thought was mine, I think.
>>6896206
Oh jeez, I'll get better for you anon.
>>6896215
Can't wait to see the commissions! Assuming the commissioners will allow it to be posted here.
>>6896225
It'll be up to the commissioners to post them. I don't like fast moving threads or ones filled with really stupid arguments.
>>6896225
Nope. It's mine, all MIIIIIIIIIIINE
Nah, I'm totally fine with having my commish posted here.
I wish the person behind this picture would be still drawing.
Anybody knows any story with similar content - suits that transform their wearers or make fusing possible?
>>6896287
Now, count up your sins!
>>6896152
I feel like there isn't enough content like this lol.More guys being flattened and used by women for their own enjoyment would be great.
It is only drawings, why you all hev to be mad?
But for real, complaining about the morality of underaged stuff (Not loli, just girls under 18 in general) is really silly when we share a board that fetishizes amputees and global slavery. Just about everyone in those threads can separate fantasy from reality and probably would be grossed out pretty badly if they saw any "real" videos of their fetish in action. Hell a lot of people in the fat threads are grossed out by actual fat people.
For people who have a fetish that can only work in fantasy, it baffles me that they assume that others can't separate fantasy from reality.
>>6896614
Haha nice another person saying "but other fetishes are bad too guys"
We know. But this one is legit more troubling than either of those. For sure.
>>6896642
It's not that they're "bad too", it's that "It's just drawings and cannot be compared to the sexualisation of actual children".
I'm into loli but I absolutely refuse to browse that other chan since they have an actual jailbait board, it legitimately sickens me. Mentally I don't even link loli to actual children, they're two completely different concepts to me.
I'm not advocating that we post Loli here, it IS against the rules after all (though so is western content, that goes to /aco/. But I'm not going to go on a crusade against it either).
I just wanted to throw my own two cents into the conversation.
Honestly anyone who says there's a barrier between fantasy vs reality is just lying. We all act out our kinks in real life don't we? Why just the other day I tricked a girl into becoming my kettle. In fact I'm drinking tea I made with her while browsing this thread.
Feels good man.
>>6896663
I don't hate non-con art. As a result every time the news reports a rape I masturbate furiously. When a rape victim tells me their story I get so turned I give them another rape.
Oh no some of these pictures are non-con. I must take to the streets and rape again.
>>6896650
I feel that. Decent response. At least you're trying to have a discussion.
>>6896663
Love the same dude being overly sarcastic with every single reply so as to flex his mental superiority and prove its totally cool to jerk it to little girls.
Keep going. It's working. You're winning and everything.
>>6896180
can you please do a picture of her squished like a ball?
>>6896663
>>6896716
I get what you're saying, but it's mostly irrelevant.
Hell, I even agree with your reasoning! If it were up to me I wouldn't have restrictions on what one can draw or post.
But depending on the laws of the country some people could get in trouble if you post loli/underage content on this board. On top of that, it's simply not allowed on 4chan. Don't do it. Simple as that.
It sucks, but your reasoning doesn't matter here. The rules are what are being infringed. If you don't like it, go and take it up with the mods and then complain to your local politician.
>>6896730
>I feel that. Decent response. At least you're trying to have a discussion.
Honestly I just don't like the notion of "You're into loli, you MUST be an actual pedophile who thinks it's okay to fuck kids". I guess I'm a bit defensive but I don't want this to become a common mindset for what I believe is a harmless fetish. It's just a little frustrating I guess since here of all places I thought I'd see the mindset what we do with these silly drawings of girls of girls being squished, stretched out and transformed doesn't represent what we want to do with a real person, you know?
Yes I understand that Loli is extremely taboo, but so are a lot of fetishes and many of them are on this board. And I'm not trying to say "C'mon guys loli is super sexy and normal to jack it too!", just that most of the people into loli don't even have to separate the "reality" from fantasy as it just straight up sickens them.
>>6896743
I get that, not saying that loli SHOULD be posted here but I just think going "WHAT AGE IS THIS ANIME GIRL???" is pretty dumb. Just ignore the post and let a mod deal with it if they come across it. The thread isn't going to get canned for one or two rulebreaking images and you're not going to get arrested for accidentally scrolling past a 15 year old anime girl.
Also I mentioned this before but western content isn't technically allowed here either, but I feel a good chunk of the people who are complaining about Loli being against the rules also overlap with those posting western stuff.
[spoiler]Not that i'm saying we should get rid of western content, most of the stuff I jack it to here is western. Just wanted to point out the slight hypocrisy[/spoiler]
>>6896743
I've no intention of posting loli here and never have. You brought up an actual fact, that there are rules here, which I have always followed.
I'm sure most of us are just making fun of the person on an ego trip who apparently does not understand what a fact is and thinks their morals are magically objective. While also being a sanctimonious cunt and pretending to want civil discussion. People like that are prone to being made fun of by a lot of people regardless of the topic or even a person's stance. Even SJWs will make fun of a Sarkeesian.
>>6896205
Well, the board IS technically for porn, but these threads have kind of become a hub for the community, since there really isn't a lot of other places online (and those that are available have their own little drawbacks). Like several other fetishes on this board, the content for it does not have to be pornographic, or even sexual in nature, in order to cover the fetish. For instance, with the giantess fetish, someone could post a picture of a giant, fully clothed woman doing something funny, like posing and trying to blend in with Mount Rushmore. I doubt the people in the thread would be lining up to wank to it, yet it would still fit in the thread. And if someone is adventurous enough to use it as jerk off material, it would be a harmless act. No person other than him (or her) would be affected by this action.
The Sunny pictures, which were what got the original complainer going, are just that. They're cute pictures of a character unwittingly finding herself getting in predicaments that result in her getting molded into a different shape. I doubt many people in the thread look at them and find themselves aroused. If someone does though, I'm not gonna condemn them for a thoughtcrime, since last time I was outside, the world was not a dystopia.
>How is the guy that's saying that jerking off to little girls is wrong the asshole?
Because he came in the thread to complain and push his own views and opinions on other people, while shaming those who don't adhere to them. He could have at least had the decency to post some pictures while he was at it, but it was obviously too much for him.
>>6896743
Being fair, 4chan (and many countries) ban underage pornography. Legal dictionary define pornography as "Pornography is the depiction of sexual behavior that is intended to arouse sexual excitement in its audience."
While contextually, loli on this board is pretty skeevy due to context of the board; posting any picture that lacks sexual conduct or nudity on this board does not result in it becoming pornography. No loli porn is a legal protection as to prevent the site from getting taken down for distribution of said content less than on a moral judgement, in a similar capacity to certain forms of guro being unallowed due to rules on snuff.
If we're going to make an assessment based on the rules of the site themselves, it's important to remember the letter and intent of them.
>>6896766
I get what you're saying totally. But the thing is these threads are all purpose built. They all deal with specific fetishes or subgroups where when you go into the thread, you pretty much know what you're gonna get. Therefore, if you wanna avoid rape and slavery, it's as easy as not going into those threads. If you want to avoid loli, you should be able to avoid loli, especially here, seeing as how it's against the rules. And for me, I personally DO want to stretch a girl out (or really have them do it for me). Obviously I know it's impossible but I do very, very much want that. It's nothing I believe will happen, but that's never stopped me yet.
As for the separate rules, the western art thing was only a hard and fast rule in the beginning of /d/, and even if it was, there's no legal grey area or moral outrage going along with the posting of western originated art. Just two different rules with two different reasons, not really relevant to compare those two.
You should jerk it to whatever makes you cum the hardest, that's a luxury we should all be awarded. But I don't think you're ever gonna live in a world where loli is seen as acceptable by anybody but a vocal minority.
So if I find depictions/drawings of women melting sexy, does that mean I automatically am aroused by real women melting?
If I find depictions/drawings of guro sexy, that means I must automatically enjoy real women dying?
If I find violent video games entertaining, I am entertained by real violence?
The answer must unequivocally be no if you have any sense. This isn't an argument. All studies have pointed to this. This isn't open to discussion. Either you can differentiate fantasy from reality, or you cannot.
>>6896840
Version with less penis.
>>6896829
Honestly I don't think you can separate an image on /d/ from the glaringly obvious reason it was posted on /d/. That sexually arouses somebody, and they're posting it to say "this sexually arouses me, does it sexually arouse anybody else?" Even if it's just a cute lil freckly kid waving to the viewer. Even if it's just a baby in a stroller. We all know why that person is choosing to put that image here, barring some truly uninspired meme-ing.
* To the death
* But nobody Came...
>>6896840
Yeah but women melting in this way is never going to be possible. You can't fuck a melting/melted woman in real life. What's the closest thing you can fuck? A regular woman.
You'll never be able to see, or dare I say, do whatever it is you think about when you see a shape changed child in real life. What's the closest you can get? Real life kid.
You, as somebody who has this fetish, as somebody who's reconciled in in their head (don't tell me you never once thought maybe it wasn't a good fetish to have), know that you can divorce the two things and the above thought process is a straw man overreaction. All anybody else is gonna be able to think is the above thought process. You need to start accepting that. The idea of a child being manipulated, abused, or anything against their will in their discomfort, creates a visceral reaction in most of mankind. As an aside, Wouldn't you say that's actually a good thing?
>>6896858
You're ignoring the part where I like violent video games.
Aren't you worried I'm going to go out and kill people for my entertainment, anon?
I mean.
Nothing's stopping me.
>>6896838
That's reasonable enough I suppose. It's true that Loli shouldn't be forced into peoples faces, but at the same time I don't think it's exactly fair to point at a picture that just happened to be of a loli and go "REEEEEEE PEDOSHIT, DELETE THIS AND REPORT THE POSTER TO THE COPS!". Unless if it's super explicit (which I would advocate reporting mind you) it should be easy enough to ignore.
But really the point of this discussion was that I felt like it was weird for posters of /d/ to assume that people who enjoy [x] MUST 100% want to do it to another actual human being. I mean, it's fair enough that you personally would like to try the stretching thing in real life if possible, but I think it's a pretty safe assumption that for most people this is something that can only work in fantasy. Like I said in a previous post, I like loli a lot but the idea of an actual child being sexualized is absolutely sickening, and I don't browse 8ch because it's filled with jailbait and those who defend it.
You've been pretty civil about this anon, I'd honestly continue a little more but i'm running out of images to post for the thread! I'd rather not continue the conversation without contributing to the thread in some way, so how about we call it quits here? I think we've said all we wanted to say and we'd just repeat ourselves if we continued anyway.
>>6896875
>I'd honestly continue
*I'd like TO continue
Well fuck, how embarrassing.
May as well use this opportunity to post the last of my relevant content to this thread. And also clarify that I don't expect Loli to ever be considered normal, it's understandable that people are grossed out by it, and if that's how anyone feels then so be it. I'm just against the notion of "Liking loli = actual pedophile".
>>6896846
Of course, but that's why I specifically said it was skeevy to do. The argument here, at the end of the day should be 'you shouldn't post any loli to /d/ regardless of if its pornography or not as to not encourage people who get off to it' and not 'you cannot post any loli here, because it is /d/ and against the rules', when it is not against the rules as intended (a protection against the site hosting what is deemed illegal); as it muddies the waters with unnecessary and incorrect assertions given the first argument's like is sufficient.
>>6896838
>>6896846
Those are some creepy assumptions.
"I want my fetish in real life, so everybody must be the same and they can never help it."
"People could only possibly post what arouses them. Or they're something else I hate."
Non-sexual art books get posted on porn sites because it's a convenient place to spread them. Humor threads happen on fetish boards that don't revolve around memes. Even porn doujins have had pages dedicated to something non-sexual like a sci-fi spacecraft the artist loves the design of.
All you do is demonize everything you don't like and insist it can only operate on the skeeziest level or is "uninspired meme-ing." Maybe your mind works that way, but don't project that on others. Cartoons transformations have always had other appeals besides fetishism, including humor, unique art styles, fun depictions of motion, and cuteness. There have always been more reasons to like and share them. People who fetishize it can also appreciate its other aspects, even if you are incapable of it. The world isn't narrow just because you have tunnel vision.
>>6896918
Thank you for saying this. Like I had mentioned in my own previous post, the shape change threads have become a bit of a hub for anyone in the community who wants to use it. As such, it is (as it has been for the past several months) a place that people are posting or creating any kind of related content, whether its for sexual or non-sexual purposes.
Of course, it's none of anyones business whether someone chooses to use a picture as fap material. And literally EVERYTHING in the world has the potential to arouse at least one person on the planet (like the guy with the tile pattern fetish). Doesn't mean everyone will be aroused, though. For example, today I used some Space Jam fanfiction as material. This wasn't some elaborate, erotic tale featuring the characters from that true cinematic masterpiece. No, this was some 1:1, exact retelling of the entire movie in text, with Michael Jordan being replaced by the self-insert character of the writer. But it did it for me. Just because I got my rocks off to it, doesn't mean Space Jam is now rated R.
Made a sequel to >>6891729
Slimes are meant for bizarre paizuri.
>>6896959
That is some top tier bizzare paizuri.
>>6896858
>know that you can divorce the two things and the above thought process is a straw man overreaction.
No, that's science. Proven and accepted in a court of law science. Ignoring it and refuting a thing that does not exist is a strawman argument. Guess what you've been doing.
If somebody automatically goes to the next closest thing, someday the police are going to catch you screwing a poor girl's corpse stretched out over a rack. It's the next closest thing, after all, and morals and the fear of harm to others cannot curtail fetishes, apparently.
Don't tell me you never thought of doing that. Because you have been explaining that's how your brain works. Most people would have visceral disgust or fear at seeing the human figure stretching in unnatural ways, which is why it was largely relegated to monster horror imagery for centuries. You somehow lack that, therefor you will pursue it. You've reconciled it in your head. You need to start accepting that.
>>6896959
The world needs more guys being transformed by girls (or cute slime girls).
>>6896981
Preach it, brother!
>>6896981
>>6896985
my people
>>6896989
B-but that's a girl!
>>6896991
>>6896974
Also this classic Hokusai woodcut was posted solely for me to masturbate to and find others who also masturbate to it. Not to make a point on logic or to look at one of the classic roots of this fetish as a phobia. That was its only purpose, I guess, because this is /d/.
Do you prefer your orbs with breasts, or no breasts?
>>6896996
I'm in the camp of no breasts. I prefer a perfectly spherical subject, where their breasts are either smushed like the rest of their features, or stretched out to the point of becoming flat.
>>6896996
with.
>>6896996
no breasts. of course I also like the implication that a character has been so thoroughly pressed and molded that they are an actual sphere and their features are just details on the surface of the orb, akin to decals.
>>6897003
To each their own, though.
>>6896991
>>6896992
huh. I actually never noticed.
The only other boys I have are alone, but this one implies another person is involved.
>>6897015
Yeah, the first time I saw it, I looked at it for a bit before I realized it was a girl. Of course, I have a soft spot for girl-on-girl where there is a submissive but masculine/androgynous girl, while her partner is dominant, but also playful and feminine.
>>6897098
Flatko!
>>6896996
>>6897003
>>6897006
Throwing in here! If you're doing an orb, you have to try to attain perfect roundness.
>>6896392
I dont get your joke.
>>6897445
The catch phrase for Kamen Rider W, who are a pair of detectives who fuse together to transform.
>>6897520
Aaah, thanks.
So, no stories related?
>>6897676
>>6897683
Art trade with m23
Biscuit girls are best!
>>6897683
I want that pop-tart girl filled to the brim with milk until she's three dimensional
>>6897758
>>6897758
>>6897744
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_OlQBNUsU4
>>6898068
Sauce. Please.
>>6898078
http://lilysbakeryshop.tumblr.com/
>>6898077
Cute
lolwut
>>6900065
Not sure why this is appearing sideways, I'm pretty baffled right now as to what happened...
