worst animated movie sequels?
Imo The Resucuers Down Under and both Aladdin sequels
>>82840773
>Rescuers Down Under
But then we wouldn't have thatsexy kangaroo
>>82839280
Pretty much any Disney movie that isn't Toy Story.
>>82839280
>Not the Cinerella movies
>not the beauty and the beast movies
>not the hunchback of notre dame 2
Watch some more movies
>>82840773
>both Aladdin sequels
Those aren't too bad if you think of them as the pilot and finale of the TV series.
>>82839280
but then we wouldn't have sexy Reba Macenterrier.
>>82840895
Those sound like poop
>>82840880
Delete your image
>>82839280
The Land before time sequels gets credit quantity over shit-quality. One mediocre film would be ignorable, except they just keep coming
![Ataln1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/yd1qN1b.jpg "Ataln1[1].jpg")
>>82839280
This is literally just 3 short cartoons condensed into a movie. All Vinnie does in this movie is saying stuff about explosives, and all Moleman does is saying stuff about rocks and dirt.
>>82840773
I thought Rescuers Down Under was pretty good, the Australian Outback was pretty cool, and the villain poacher was a good villain.
Return of Jafar was kind of meh, but it was really awesome watching it as a kid, seeing Jafar come back to life and Iago coming back. Return of Jafar was really just an intro into the cartoon series- and the Aladdin cartoon series was my favorite of all the Disney after school cartoons.
Aladdin and the King of Thieves was pretty good, it served as the ending to the cartoon series. Saluk was a good villain, and it wrapped up the cartoon series nicely.
Stuff like Lady & The Tramp 2 are why I refuse to watch sequels to movies that came out 20+ years ago
>>82840895
Cinderella 2 was surprisingly watchable. Not great, in no way necessary, but it wasn't garbage.
>>82841075
> Atlantis
Well, it's not much of an excuse, but Milo's Return was released like this because, initially, Disney had ordered an Atlantis series, but for whatever reason, funding got cut after the first three episodes were finished. So they sent them straight to video and called it a movie.
>>82840846
rose please
>>82842183
You seem to be missing the entire point of the rescuers
They rescue people
>>82840880
It was pretty gud
>>82842574
They show both.
>>82841821
I think you mean Cinderella 3.
Cinderella 3 is fine, Cinderella 2 is boring
Mulan 2 was pretty bad. The voice acting was way weaker than the original. It's like they didn't care
this was the only animated sequel I ever watched. So I have nothing to compare it to
>>82843255
(you)
>>82842025
I would have watched that series.
>>82843584
Also, this one is the exact same thing. Three episodes stitched together and released as a movie.
>>82843255
Lucky bastard.....
That right there is the best animated sequel that Disney has ever produced.....damn its giving me memories again.
>>82841000
They aren't that bad, though. Most of them, anyway. There are one or two that are legitimately horrendous.
>>82843632
Except Tarzan had been a series for the better part of two years before Disney released Tarzan and Jane. The tv show wasn't half bad. Tarzan 2 (The interquel or whatever you wanna call it) was pretty good.
And how do we feel about prequels? I thought pic related was surprisingly good.
>>82844081
It was released in America as Little Mermaid 3
>>82839280
all the disney ones
>>82843705
>Evil as plain as the scar on his face
Deception... An outrage!
>>82844081
Ariel's Beginning was a missed opportunity. Ursula should be the villain.
>>82843255
>I want to fuck that lion
To this day I blame Lion King 2 for my racoon eyes fetish.
>>82845997
Vitani was pure sex.
>>82841075
>All Vinnie does in this movie is saying stuff about explosives, and all Moleman does is saying stuff about rocks and dirt.
so just like the first Atlantis, then.
>>82839280
This Turd.
EVERYTHING ABOUT THIS TURD.
>>82840880
>>82840969
>>82842525
Mulan 2 has a major problem: Mushu as the antagonist. The way he acts in that movie is just awful.
>>82843255
But that was better than The Lion King.
>>82840880
This was an abortion
>>82847801
Came here to post this
>Made without Bluth
>added musical numbers
>Timmy is an insufferable little shit and he knows it
>all that stupid fuckery with NIMH
>animation and backgrounds arnt even in the same ball park as Secret of NIMH
>a couple bandages fix years of self inflicted crazy electroshock therapy
>the cats
>the musical numbers
>in general an almost offensively mediocre kids movie, but an abysmal bastard child sequel to one of Don Bluth's best movies
WHAT THE FUCK!!!
>>82845997
Did she fit the tsundere/childhood bully role?
>>82840926
>Macenterrier
Surely it would be easier to list the ones that are good
So, like
>Lion King 2
>Alladin 3
And that's kinda it
>>82843705
It was a bad sequel wtf. The whole romance plot was terrible
>>82848263
>Made without Bluth
Fivel Goes West was made without Bluth but, was made without being complete and utter trash.
Then these came along
An American Tail: The Treasure of Manhattan Island
An American Tail: The Mystery of the Night Monster
>>82842025
>but for whatever reason, funding got cut after the first three episodes were finished
The movie bombing may have something to do with it
I'm noticing a strong Disney trend in this thread
This steaming sack of shit. The other sequel, The Brave Little Toaster tk the Rescue, was actually really good, but this one sucked ass.
>>82841000
I think that, up to the 7th film(The Stone of Cold Fire), they're good. After that, the quality begins to drop. After film 10, it drops HARD.
>>82848272
But that was pretty good? Had great music too
>>82848663
>tk
to*
As a kid I remember liking a lot of the Disney sequels I saw. Mulan 2, Little Mermaid 2, Forty Thieves etc. Maybe it's time I rewatch them to see how bad they really are.
>>82840969
Delete your "life"
>>82848419
And to top it all off, the movies passed off Fievel Goes West as a dream! What about the series? I suppose those were just "recurring dreams" then.
>>82848272
fuck you this was a good movie
I've seen maybe ten Disney sequels and I didn't really dislike any of them. Most of them are just mediocre or okay.
>>82839280
What's wrong with this one?
>>82850869
>And to top it all off, the movies passed off Fievel Goes West as a dream!
FUCK YOU I didn't even know they'd done that. Christ, who the fuck greenlights this shit?
>>82840880
Lilo and Stitch sequels are surprisingly good
>>82851208
Don Bluth didn't even like Fievel Goes West, either.
>>82848663
>The Brave Little Toaster tk the Rescue, was actually really good
it was pretty shitty senpai
>>82843255
Not as good as the first but ok
>>82839280
The quality drop in animation didn't do it any favors
>>82848663
The Mars one actually based on a book.
>>82853153
I'm not saying it was as good as the first, but it was still a decent sequel.
>>82853953
The film wasn't good. Never read the book tho.
>>82840773
>>82839280
>>82840880
>>82847801
>>82847913
Those are truly bad.
>>82849575
Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuurn
>>82840880
I need to sabotage Mulan and Shang's relationship or else I might lose my job!
Rescuers Down Under was pretty good for a sequel.
>fucking based villain, McLeach with his sick Mad Max half-track and shotgun
>the lizard, Joanna, and that whole sequence of her stealing the eggs out of McLeach's lunch box
>the crazy salvation army mice
>>82854003
>groct boct moct
>>82851435
I thought the things related to the spin-off series was pretty forgettable. But Stitch has a Glitch was surprisingly decent.
>>82852964
Probably because it has a totally different tone to the first film. But fuck him, it's still a good movie regardless in my opinion.
>>82848263
don't forget that this movie has the stupidest plot twist ever
>>82847913
this was the first movie that made me realise that if there was a sequal with an animation quality drop its most likely shit
>>82841075
I really liked Rescuers Down Under as a kid, the sequence with the pea from the human's table blew my mind when I was younger.
>>82850975
It kind of betrays the idea of the first film that the animals are all emotionless and unfeeling animals just like real ones by giving them emotions and feelings.
For some reason as a kid I remember liking a lot of direct to video Disney sequels more than the originals. Maybe the simplicity of the plots appealed to me? I have no fucking idea.
>>82839280
Most pretentious film I've ever seen.
>>82843255
All I know is many girls ended up having a crush on Kovu because of it...
>all these replies
>still none for pic related
>>82858248
I though the first film had to be good to count
>>82857707
>pretentious
Just because you aren't smart enough to understand it, that doesn't make it pretentious.
"Pretentious" has become a meme word, it seems.
>>82858675
Agreed, this is awful
>>82858675
>see trailer
>literally fall out of chair laughing
>see film
>realize all the jokes were in trailer-- rest of film is shit
>>82848419
Because Spielberg was still involved. Had he, or Lucas been involved with the Land before time sequels, those probably wouldn't have such an infamous history.
>>82858542
It's literally been a meme for ages.
>>82858675
That and the fourth film were complete shit.
>Entire plot is just Shrek not being fit for royal duties, oh and he's about to become a daddy!
>Arthur and the medieval school just feel very uninspired compared to the other jokes of the series.
>Villain is literally a leftover from the previous film, only now somehow as devious as his dead mother.
Then the fourth film, entire thing is just a "Character has a 'It's a wonderful Life!' kind of experience" with Shrek seeing a world where he didn't exist. Nothing about matters beyond him not being a cunt to his wife and children.
It makes me wonder why they even said they were going to do a five-part series if they clearly didn't have any forethought put into any of the films.
>>82853915
Are you kidding /co/? Balto 2 was better than the original. It's a flawed film yes, but the original Balto? Very boring. And no having good animation does not mean squat. Balto himself is a very passive dull character who gets shat on and wants to save a town that HATES him. Terrible film, it's basically Zootopia's prototype story where Nick wants to save a city who HATES him making him look like a tool.
Aleu is a better character than Balto as she has some bloody dignity to fight back when harassed. Plus she gets the best deal ever, she lives freely in the wild without answering to a human master who would likely discriminate against her for being a wolf-dog. Especially since Balto himself said in Balto 2 that dogs in town still insulted him for being a wolf-dog. Why would Aleu want to live there then?
>>82860004
>Implying Balto didn't do it so he can bury the bone inside Jenna
>>82858675
I loved all the Shrek films.
Maybe I'm just easily amused.
>>82853915
Pretty sure this movie 30% responsible for me being a furry
>>82843255 this and the first one are the other 80%
Rewatched Simbas pride a couple years ago and it was still pretty good desu
>>82860570
>Pretty sure this movie 30% responsible for me being a furry
How? Aleu, Balto, Jenna, etc are just Talking Animals.
>>82860637
Do you think it will stop people?
>>82860637
You realize furfags want to fuck animals right?
>>82839280
>Fox and the Hound 2
You don't say.......
>>82860843
I thought that FatH was the best Disney movie as a kid and thought like that until I rewatched it few years ago and realised it was pretty shit. The pacing is just way too fast for the friendship to develop into something meaningful.
So in comparison, 2 is not that bad.
>>82845997
oh god, not the only one.
>>82848371
>The whole romance plot was terrible
So was Romeo and Julietts
Still one of Disneys better sequels.
>This
Completely ruined the first movie
>>82861116
Still better than the sequel and Lion Guard.
>>82861116
No see, the Lion King was an adaptation of Hamlet, the second one was Romeo and Juliet, and this is Rosencrantz and Guildenstern and Dead.
>>82861418
Clever... but ¿What is Lion Guard?
I fucking hate it
>>82855776
That was the book. The in the movie the animals were pretty anthropomorphized.
Come to think of it, The Fox and the Hound were pretty much the same way.
>>82861503
Why?
Worse animation aside it was pretty good in my opinion. The series on the other hand was unnecessary. Granted I've yet to actually watch through it.
>>82861480
Haven't seen it, but based on what I've read? A soulless cash grab.
>>82861480
what's with the spanish question marks?
>>82861961
I interpret that question as what Shakespearean story it's based on.
>>82861116
Agreed
>>82847801
Thread ended here.
>>82843255
Even as a kid I knew this was complete and utter shit.
>>82845997 was the only good thing to come out of it. I liked the idea of her character, there just weren't enough bratty little villain girls in my childhood.
>>82858849
Same, except I was lucky enough to hear the disappointed reviews before seeing the movie itself.
>>82861539
There was a series? Was Charlie the voice of Charlie for that too?
>>82843255
I really liked this movie for some reason as a kid. I don't know why and desu I haven't seen it almost a decade if I had to bet. Man I feel old as shit.
>>82858675
This is probably the most correct answer by just how much they hyped it up and just fell flat on its face.
>>82859233
It's so bizarre as a film, mostly because it's so sedate and boring. What struck me, even as a kid, was how little plot the movie seemed to have - even though it has, like, eight different plots happening.
I watched this recently after watching the original Lady and The Tramp. I thought it was pretty meh but one thing confused me.
>Scamp is clearly a puppy. This is clear because he's a smaller version of Tramp.
>Angel, Scamps love interest, may or may not be a puppy. Same size as Scamp but voiced by an adult. Clearly different breed.
>Buster, evil leader of the Junkyard dogs, is clearly an adult.
>Buster constantly refers to Angel as "his girl" implying he wants to giver' the ol' knot knot joke
So basically either Buster is a pedophile or Angel is a pedophile. Maybe I'm just overthinking it.
>>82860936
They were like the only true friend the other had dude.
>>82848663
But ten was the best, anon. 8 and 9 weren't that good though, you're right.
>>82867238
Shrek 3? Seemed like it was just the three; Shrek needing to find Arthur so Fiona and he could fuck off back to the swamp, Prince Charming seeking revenge and the throne, and Shrek being all edgy about becoming a daddy.
Problem was how little any of them tied into each other, and how the lattermost felt just out of place with Shrek.
>>82848272
I take it this wasn't "Bambi's Children"...?
>>82875883
Midquel that takes place in between the original movie's time skip. Literally the only other thing I remember about it is that the father is voiced by Patrick Stewart.
>>82858248
Will never understand the hate for these movies. Sure, they're not as good as Pixar's best, but they are perfectly fine movies. Pixar has done worse, like Brave and The Good Dinosaur.
