Hypothetical question: let's say you gain insight into the future and become almost certain, that the at least moderately wealthy people from your generation will live at average 200+ years (some possibly much longer), if they dole out cash for various procedures later in life.
How does that change your outlook on investment and your business? Which financial tools become more and which less attractive for the long, looong haul?
Land, Logging and Mineral Rights, farmland, and other raw resources.
Modern Structures reach full depreciation, and are less good. population demand might outstrip this though
Technology will advance highly with high level experts needing to work harder longer.
As such corporate equity is more volatile over the long term.
Multigenerational family run companies are now able to run by a sole member, the enlightened head of the family. So gifted individuals are more highly prized.
Water rights
consistent gambles in biotech.
Still depends if societies accept this and the physical and mental state of the old farts.
>>1015816
Won't basic stuff like raw resources devalue in the future?
>>1015822
If you want specifying let us assume it will be via extension of regular medicine. There won't be any flashing lasers or miracle elixirs to rally against in some kind of pseudo-philosophical luddite/lumpenprole rage. Just a bunch of different therapies treating various age-related problems and frailty. Lets assume the optimistic scenario, where younger generations don't go full retard, ban access to excellent health and slash their own life expectancy, because muh fee fees.
>>1015868
its two rates
more people less stuff.
or everyone needs less stuff because we use everything way better.
first relies on incompetence
second on wide scale competence
my bet is on the first out matching the second.
I don't see a post consumption world happening.
Doesn't change a thing. I want ROI right now.
