a href=/b/thread/695019587#p695019587 class=quotelink>695019587 /a>old thread
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
>>695019587
old thread
Anyone have more awesome loli footjobs?
>>695027711
Will see what I can dig up after this comic
6/10
be daddys little princess loli whore
bloochat.com/dadroom
Hey /b/, so I get you guys think this is ok, what about in movies?
Some anon posted the other day about "scent of a woman" and their being an innappropriate scene - anyhow, yes there is in that movie, of a child damn near fingering herself - Anon went overboard and said it was intentional. But I think he had a point, I went and watched the scene, it was pretty bad, probably a mistake, but what does /b/'s borderline pedo's think?
I have no problem with you guys viewing this stuff, no victim, but real people is off limits IMO.
>>695028859
haven't seen that movie. is that scene in the original from 1974 or the 1992 remake?
also generally i don't mind nudity in movies, but i wouldn't watch pizza
>>695029152
The al pacino one, 92 - 16 minutes in. I have no problem spreading it, because I honesty feel like there should be more outrage.
Kid was doing what kids do when naked, touching herself. It was bad, and I don't know how it got past the director.
pic semi-related, the pose - not quite as graphic
>>695029371
Downloaded it, nothing at 16 minutes, but parents and two kids. Not much to see there-.
>>695030124
I edited out anything risque with black marker - how is that nothing...
>>695029371
found the the scene you were talking about. if i hadn't know about it before i would have probably not have noticed it. looks harmless enough to me, director probably didn't look there at all or didn't think it problematic enough for a retake. but i talk from an european point of view. i can image that it's worse from an us point of view, much more prude.
>>695030613
Oh for sure, different cultures, different takes on it - I am American so to me, that is just WTF?
of course back then, it was before internet, pre-pedo phobia - when you could actually help a child who fell - I know in today's age I will not. If I see a kid fall of a bike, too bad, I may from a distance say, are you ok? But unless they are bleeding profusely, I would not help them. In America, it may be different than say EU, or france or elsewhere though.
in europe just a few decades movies with frontal nudity of kids or kids in undies were no problem. but today with growing pedophobia you see that very rarely, even the bare chest of a flat chest of a girl could be problematic. there are exception, like the movie tomboy (2011), but very few.
when you are interested in the thematic, there is an old movie, i cannot remember the title. there the mother and a female relative take pictures of the two daughters playing on a bed (half?-) naked. the shop where the pics are developed reports them as possible cp and the mother has the has to go to court, where most of the movie plays.
>>695032222
checked
>>695032444
nice. dubs, trips and quads within 5 posts.
btw, some other contributions would be appreciated, just dumping is getting boring.
are there even any lurkers?
>>695032629
ohio
>>695027332
pedophiles
this count as loli?
>>695032831
good enough
>>695033650
i have to take a break for 10-15min. i will continue if the threads still exists when i come back
>>695033751
new thread is up so i will go there:
>>695033423
