bump for interest

most butan does not evaporate 100% so...

Alternatively, you could ask 420chan

File: theoden.jpg (20 KB, 238x193) Image search: [Google]

20 KB, 238x193

>>693801968
What are dabs?

File: 20160627_232656-1.jpg (896 KB, 1718x2911) Image search: [Google]

896 KB, 1718x2911

>>693801968
I don't know how it affects you, but I like them. I smoke flower 99% of the time but I smoke dabs when offered and they are actually pretty good.

Same with me. I don't smoke, but i've became tolerant from smoking whenever my friends have them available. I also get the burning sensation in my throat, and after I do I occasionally get a sore throat the next day.

Well, it all depends on the quality of the wax you're dabbing on. I prefer to dab on rosin, which is completely solvent less. Straight THC.. You're probably dabbing on some BHO which stands for Butane Hash Oil. That burning is from you coughing up a lung after taking a hot ass dab lol.. Man up.

>>693801968
Smoking ANYTHING is not good for your health. The human lung is not designed to take in large quantities of any kind of smoke.

>>693802815
I have that same marbled pipe, just not with the long mouth piece.

>>693802815
disgusting.

>>693801968
There's a way to make it yourself through a coffee filter so it's 100% pure. Dabs are quite difficult to come across in Holland believe it or not.

File: marijuana injection.webm (2 MB, 500x282) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 500x282

the problem is because it's hot smoke. try injections, they're pretty easy on the veins.

>>693803074
That's hash you're referring to. To make wax, you can simply get a nug... Put it in some parchment paper, and squeeze with a flat iron on about 300 degrees Fahrenheit.

>>693801968
I can not speak for how "healthy" dabs are because smoking it's self is not healthy. I would not worry about the butane because if it still is in the dabs by the time you take the dab it will be combusted on the nail much. Also there shouldn't be any butane in the dab because it should sublime out of them over time if it wasn't fully purged in the first place because of its low vapor pressure. it can be any worse than any residual butane you inhale while smoking flowers with a lighter.

>>693803105
Actually, it's not smoke at all. It's vapor. It's hot ass vapor... I explained that in my post above, just forgot to mention to you all that it's vapor.. Not smoke. I dab daily, and work for a medical dispensary.

>>693803195
That's rosin. And a nigger way to make it as well.

>>693803195
ok Vice

>>693803335
I know it's rosin you nigger. That's the best you can get ;) also, I own a 15x15 press lmao.. Just letting the newbs know how to do it.

File: Message_1467759917941.jpg (3 MB, 4160x3120) Image search: [Google]

3 MB, 4160x3120

Just picked up my new recycler, and yeah man Im a medical consultant in the state of WA and dabs have a certain PPM of residual solvents & whats left over pretty much so miniscule to ever effect your body, but the hospital over here gets 2 people a day from dabbing, point is dont make the shit in your backyard and buy it from a rec store ore if you have asthma stick too solventless like rosin or supercrititical co2 works just as well.

>>693803301
Vapor and smoke are literally the same thing

Pro tip I'm a chemist

hated it when my friends became dab fiends. I'm pretty sure it's pretty fucked up for you, there is such thing as a dab face. Face gets super thin from just dabing all day every day

>>693803105
look how red that niggers face gets lmao

>>693803602
a dumb one, then

>>693803301
i doubt that. surely people heat up nails way past the flash point of whatever extract they have all the time.

>>693802782
Fancy hipster names for hash and hash oil.

Yes OP there has. I'm mobile so I can't link it or I'll lose this thread but if you google high potency marijuana nerve damage it will pull up a reputable source which links to the study. Smoking dabs or other high potency mj causes damage to the nerve endings in the brain which has different physiological and psychological effects. It's not good. It's much much worse if the person smoking is under 22 or so because their brain is not near finished forming. This last point has been known for a long time now.

>>693803750
Explian how smoke is different than vapor? Notice I'm not saying smoking and vaping.

File: dallas 054.jpg (418 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]

418 KB, 1024x768

SO MUCH IGNORANCE AND FLAT OUT WRONG-INFO IN THIS THREAD IT MAKES ME SAD.

>>693803602
Pro tip no one gives a fuck

>>693803912
>provides zero correct info of his own

And you're helping the problem how?

>>693803890
smoke is a mixture of dust sized particles suspended in air, vapor is individual molecules dissolved in air

>>693803844
You can't dab hash faggot

>>693801968
But weed cures cancer, anon! So you're really just curing yourself of any disease as you're introducing the carcinogen!!

After all, nobody ever died before marijuana was illegalized, right?

>>693801968
Ever heard of co2 OP. Fucking n00b

>>693801968
gr8 b8 r8 it 8/8

Butane is not toxic so why should dabs be more poisonous than regular high-grade hash?

>>693802815
How can you take a picture like this? Or even have all this shit on display. I would feel fucking ashamed of myself if I had all that stuff. Just look at it.

>>693803912
Damn that looks good

dab is burnt off then sure some chemical residue but thats about it!

>>693804073
Atomization is individual molecules suspended in air not vapor

>>693801968
stop trying to rationalize your vice. no amount of recreational pot is really good for anyone. acknowledge smoking anything is NEVER going to be anything but bad for you. acknowledge it for what it is and just deal with it.
that said i smoke most days, that said i'm not gonna pretend it's this miracle drug thats gonna save the world and change medicine forever. I just have problems and like to get high. thats all.

File: dummy.jpg (23 KB, 480x539) Image search: [Google]

23 KB, 480x539

>>693803912
Whine like a bitch, and don't contribute? .....Kids today.

>>693803105
I remember I injected marijuana once. It was pretty great.

>>693804337
No, atomization is - as the name implies - the cleaving of molecules into single atoms.

>>693804337
atomization is a process not a state of matter, and yes a vapor is made of individual molecules dissolved in air, if you think about it air itself it's a vapor of nitrogen oxygen and all other gases

I love how you little snapback faggots took smoking weed and turned it into crack. At least you get to be the Nigger you've always wanted to be lol

>>693804210
lol the way i rationalize it is by looking at my life and career. (software dev, i prolly make more than you) I do shit all day a lot of people spend their entire lives thinking is magic. If i want to go home and smoke a fucking bowl damn right i'm gonna.

>>693804087
It's the same shit we made in the early 80's with ether. You little faggots make a far less clean product with butane and rename it "dabs" because ???

>>693804730
I giggled. Thank you.

Dude just look up dab brain for your answer lmfao. Dabs have turned half my friend group into literal fucking tards. I chose not to partake after doing the research. I'm now on my way to a bachelors degree.

>>693803602
OK I'll bite

Vapor and smoke are two different things
Smoke comes from burning
Vapor is something that you get when you heat something up to its boiling point. That's when you get gas/Vapor
You probably think that steam(water Vapor)
And smoke from burning wood are the same
If you are a chemist then you are a shitty one
I'm a Chemfag
Don't want to write too much so I butchered
The explanation quite a bit

>>693804612
In mass spectrometry, a tool used for fragmenting molecules to indentify its composition, first your liquid sample is atomized (made into a fine vapor of single molecules) then it is fragmented by another source like electrons into fragments and individual atoms of the parent molecule

Do you even mass spec or chemistry?
>>693804717
I never said it was a state of matter, if anything it's a gas

>>693803844
Hipsters urk me. The english language already has more words than it needs. But these cunts keep making new words and labels to sound edgy and cool. Fucking faggot cunt faggot mother fucker and tits

File: Dabney1.jpg (42 KB, 600x402) Image search: [Google]

42 KB, 600x402

>>693804823
Because they love Dabney Coleman. The same way the hippies made up the term Bogart, for people that hold on to the j too long.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4XhDpSgHrs

>>693805099
lol, i dabbed every day during undergrad. BS of CS . i'm just smarter thn u

>>693805117
There is a difference between steam and water vapor though.
Steam are small water droplets (visible), dispersed in a gas (air).
Water vapor are single molecules of water (invisible) dispersed in a gas.

I'm NOT a chemist btw. I'm just right.

File: 89%.jpg (17 KB, 620x400) Image search: [Google]

17 KB, 620x400

You're smoking what's called Butane soup. If you smoked the shit I make for a living you wouldn't get that amount of impurities. Look up clear dab, its more expensive because of the machinery and time it makes to actually pull all the harmful things out (Trust me that shit literally takes about a week or two for one batch). Dabs actually are a really good way to save money and still get your CBD and THC fix. Just gotta get the good shit and not butane soup my mang.

>>693805117
Both of your examples are taking solids/liquids and turning to gases. Smoke and vapor are the same thing just different compositions since you are heating different materials

File: 05d.jpg (30 KB, 600x451) Image search: [Google]

30 KB, 600x451

>>693805099
>dab brain
all this brings up is fake articles and articles refuting this

Oh wait, this was bait. Well shit now I look foolish

>>693805277
>first your liquid sample is atomized (made into a fine VAPOR of single molecules)

dude, i can't even

>>693805277
> first your liquid sample is atomized (made into a fine vapor of single molecules)
Nope. Electrospray ionisation (by which single molecules are released, charged and sometimes fragmented) is not "atomization".

>>693805569
can't even what, understand? lol

>>693805629
>implying mechanical atomization is the only kind

>>693804146
>>693804194
Samefag

>>693802706
oh yeah? then why doesnt it ignite when you light it?

>>693805629
Did I say ESI? No, I said EI. There is more than on type of ionization

>>693805768
i know what mass spectroscopy is, i studied chemistry, you just said vapor is not made of single molecules, and then you said an atomized sample is a vapor

>>693801968
Butane comes out so cold it burns off at low temps. Only a minute amount is left. You just got a bit of bitch in you.

>>693805780
lol no. and why?

>>693805629
>implying mechanical atomization is the only kind
Well of course you can call anything atomization. Some people call old perfume sprays "atomizers". People are stupid.
>>693806002
> Durr I said EI.
The mode of fragmentation does not matter. MALDI, EI, ESI, who cares. Atomization is the fragmentation of molecules into single atoms. It's that easy.

It's in the name ffs.

>>693806028
An extremely fine vapor because that is the closet description it can be given. But it is not a vapor, sorry for not writing more. I'm lazy

>>693806230
>>implying mechanical atomization is the only kind
>Well of course you can call anything atomization. Some people call old perfume sprays "atomizers". People are stupid.
That was directed to >>693805768

>>693806064
Butane is actually a shit solvent because it's so poorly QCed since it's not meant to be an extraction solvent. Butane has lots of contaminants in it. Butane is like what homeless people would use.

We live in an age of supercritical CO2 extraction, butane is for mongrels.

i had a friend in high school who would smoke dabs every day since freshman year, and he was obsessed with it. dabs were all he talked about for a long time

he would be totally fried all the time and smoking was pretty much all he did. now apparently he can't even smoke bud anymore because his body is rejecting thc or something. said he was 'allergic to bud' because he had smoked too much dabs

>>693802706
byproducts of a butane torch are oxygen and water, professor.

>>693806230
It does faggot, Maldi doesn't atomized like how ESI, EI, or CI does. that why they use it for large MW structures like proteins

File: girls-laughing.jpg (55 KB, 553x496) Image search: [Google]

55 KB, 553x496

>>693804823
>ether
>cleaner than butane

>>693806002
>Wikipedia->electron ionisation
>Strg+f atomiz
>0 results

>>693806474
Your friend sounds retarted.

>>693804823
I agree it's not new, it's just more popular now and people use butane for their extracts instead of ether becuase butane is cheap

>>693806602
>Wikipedia
(Not original person you're arguing with just pointing out you're using Wikipedia, many keks)

>>693806311
yeah that's not what i'm saying, you said that a vapor is not made of individual molecules dissolved in air (or another gas), correct? so what's a vapor to you?

>>693806530
>completed missing the point
>trying to divert by spamming his notes from his 3rd-semester college lecture on bioanalytics
Fuck off.

>>693806796
>same old gay genetic fallacy
As opposed to this printed encyclopedia here....

>>693806602
Hur dur if it's not on wiki it's not true

>be in grad school
>take a course on MS
>taught by a prof who builds MS instruments
>learn the parts and how the instrument works
>have used MS for class and research

I know what I am saying

>>693806530
Which is completely irrelevant to the topic at hand.

>>693806919
LMFAO must of hurt your feelings, sorry SummerFag, go back to your hardcore 420 life now.

>>693807085
lulz

>>693807109
I just joined into post that one reply to you lol

>>693806798
A fine smoke, if not the same thing a smoke but with less carbon because typically vapor comes from heating none carbon based compounds

>>693806918
Wrong, see >>693807085

File: i have a different opinion.jpg (43 KB, 639x640) Image search: [Google]

43 KB, 639x640

>>693806544
ether is an extremely clean solvent. plus it gets you nicely fucked up, so i say leave a little in...

>>693807085
And you professor calls the process by which EI ionizes molecules "atomization"? What a retard.

Or - more probable - you got something wrong there.

>>693805878
Why doesn't asbestos light on fire when you ignite it?

Retard.

>>693801968
i rather smoke my herb like a normal human being. dabs are too much and it doesn't appeal to me.

File: hqdefault.jpg (6 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]

6 KB, 480x360

>>693807366
>come on richard, we've got some smoking to do

>>693803602
Im a biofag
Even I know you are retarded

>>693807382
Don't put words in to my mouth
Its the process of taking your liquid sample and spraying it at your ionization source. You must atomize your sample prior to ionizing

>>693804783
i agree. fuck the haters. toke up fam.

File: consider.jpg (35 KB, 500x377) Image search: [Google]

35 KB, 500x377

People who drink alcohol have a concept of alcoholism. It's hard to define but you know it when you see it. If you get up in the morning and have a glass of bourbon to start your day, you're probably an alcohol and even other drinkers would recommend you get help.

Why do marijuana smokers not have the same concept?

There are clearly people who are the mj equivalent of alcoholics. It has taken over their life and become an actual problem. Last thing before bed, first in the morning and twice more during the day if they have a chance. But other mj smokers don't call them out on this.

Shouldn't mj be treated similar to alcohol?

>>693807345
>Wrong, see >>693807085
Yawn.

One more time: Like any ionisation method, EI can fragment molecules. If this happens, it acts as an atomizing process. This however is not the main function (the ionisation is, what's important) and even if the molecule is fragmented into two smaller molecules, this molecule was not "atomized".
Calling EI an atomizer is colloquial language at best and highly unscientific at worst.

I'm a postgraduate biochemical engineer, btw.

>>693807699
>only smoking 4 times a day

are you even trying?

>>693801968
Any "study" is bunk anyway.

This stuff hasn't been around long enough in a controlled (FDA regulation style) form to know what the long term effects would be vs something else.

Anything kind of "well mass spectroscopy tells us X" or "analysis of the product does this" is just a theory.

1) Every person is different.
2) 60-80% of gut bacteria in humans is unknown.
3) Heisenberg.

>>693807844
I never said the ionization was the atomization. I said you must atomize, then ionize for MS

>>693802815
Nice colection I really like that gandalf pipe

>>693807655
>You must atomize your sample prior to ionizing
No, you must vaporise it. In EI this is achieved by vacuum vaporisation.

>>693807428
Lol you think that you're being smart, but you've actually terminally autistic

>>693808020
Dude no, you spray a fine atomized mist, through you ionization source. The vacuum Is required to keep your fragments from colliding with other stuff and fragments before getting to the mass analyzer

>>693803844
they're slightly different things, but you also have to remember that different places have different names for things.

>>693807993
Ok, then you are not stupid, that's good. You definetly are using common speech, though. Letting single molecules escape from your sample is not "atomization".
Plasma atomization in inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry however (in which the sample indeed is broken down into single atoms) is real atomization.

>>693808172
I'm not even sure what you just said.

File: 1467755214198.jpg (109 KB, 296x431) Image search: [Google]

109 KB, 296x431

>>693801968
This is it: https://youtu.be/44ZDLMIcREc

>>693808269
>Dude no, you spray a fine atomized mist, through you ionization source.
Leave out the "atomized" and your statement is absolutely correct.
>Dude no, you spray a fine mist, through you ionization source.
There you go.

>>693804783
This.

>>693808289
Sorry for using terms that a nonchemist would understand. It's /b/ not my research lab

>>693807345
>A fine smoke, if not the same thing a smoke but with less carbon because typically vapor comes from heating none carbon based compounds

dude, are you chemistry courses going well? lol
a vapor it's the gas phase of any material, even iron can be a vapor, and also carbon based compounds like ethanol or acetone for example, how could you even smell then otherwise?
what you are referring to is an aerosol, like when water vapor (which is invisible and made from single molecules of water dissolved in air) condenses and forms a fine mist which you can see
smoke is a totally different thing

>>693806796
Wikipedia is reliable and the shit

File: 20160709_093657.jpg (1 MB, 2560x1536) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 2560x1536

smoking on this here white gold.

>>693808420
>>693808936
I guess I'm wrong but I still swear my prof said atomization and not vaporization. Saying the droplets formed were smaller than vapor. Maybe I just remember it wrong

>>693804210
The fuck is wrong with you? It's a decent little collection. And it's weed you cave dweller. It's not like he's doing meth.

>>693801968
Try rosin

>>693809999
>quads

But also, I think his argument is that there's a difference between atomization and misting. Technically that's true but most people don't distinguish the two. Atomization has come to just mean "a fine mist".

>>693803602
>Vapor and smoke are literally the same thing

Wrong, fake, and from a non-OP faggot.

Vapor = gaseous phase of a compound

Smoke = suspended solid particulates

The only similarity is that they're both suspended in air.

>>693809999
well if by atomization you're referring to breaking some substance to it's very atoms to do some kind of chemical analysis you're correct, i was just arguing about the definition of vapor

>>693811540
And when comes to vapor, what is suspended inn the air?

>>693811786
when it comes to vapor it's not a suspension anymore, it's a solution

>>693811893
Aren't we all?

>>693803602
Smoke is the byproduct of a chemical reaction called oxidation (burning with oxygen, fuel, and heat) whereas vapor is simply evaporation due to bioling. Chemist these nuts you faggot.

>>693801968
I feel like with how hard it hits you, and how many people just pass out after doing it, its gotta kill brain cells are something

Any dabbed concentrate also contains concentrated impurities, also butane. If you want the healthiest way, vape flower at about 350

I'm the opposite. Weed flower is wayyyy too harsh. I can't take big tokes like I can dabs.

That being said combusting sucks and I'm not a fan of flower

>>693811786
>>693811893

The concept of vapor pressure is the equilibrium between gas phase and other phase, usually liquid, sometimes solid. Vapor can exist in isolation or commingled with air.

Calling vapor in air a solution isn't technically right, because solution/solvent refer to liquid phase. All gas phases are infinitely miscible with each other; a better term is a mixture.

>>693812466
chem major here, this guy knows whats up

>>693812098

Vapors can also be products of combustion. Methanol is a common one.

Smoke can also be a result of boiling, for certain chemical mixtures that will codistill the solute and then deposit it in the air as smoke.

You did list the more common ways, these are produced, but the means of production does not define the substance.

>>693812466
Danke.

>>693812219
or* ...

>>693812466
isn't "mixture" a more general term to also include suspensions colloids and heterogeneous mixtures?
a solution has characteristics that apply also to gas and gas mixtures, although it's strange to think about them in that way
ethanol in water it's a solution, and they too are infinitely miscible

>>693813947

Mixtures is indeed more general than just gas mixtures. Anybody who knows this stuff doesn't bother calling mixed gases anything special, in my experience, because it's common knowledge (at least in people that deal with this as part of their lives) that gases infinitely mingle.

Infinite miscibility applies to *all* gas mixtures but only *certain* solvent combinations.

Remember that both gases and liquids are fluids, and from a physics perspective they do share much in common, particularly their simplified equations of motions. The main physical difference is that liquids have surface tension and gases do not. The underlying quantum effects at the atomic level that generate surface tension also generate solvent effects.

>>693814809
And atoms are all solid

>>693815232
>And atoms are all solid

You don't know much about atoms, do you?

>>693815787
Quarks

>>693814809
so are infinite miscibility and the absence of surface tension the reasons why you shouldn't consider gas mixtures as solutions? aren't they solution just because they met the criteria?

>>693808365
he said that you are terminally autistic. it is something you might want to look into. also if you had any contact with asbestos you might want to check up on that too

>>693803885
And been disproven time and again.

>>693816392

Not infinite miscibility, because that occurs in both gases and liquids.

But yes absence of surface tension, because it's the solvent effects that actually hold something in solution. See van der Waals forces for more information; it a quantum effect that happens at the atomic level. It's not as strong as a chemical bond, but it is an attractive force between molecules.

All this said, I'm sure there's someone out there who calls gas mixtures solutions. I don't find that helpful, but I also don't consider it horribly wrong, just a bit misguided.

>>693803885
I started smoking oils when I was 17 and am 24 now and I feel great
fuck yourself and your studies faggot. you can't link them because they don't exist

>>693801968
Why do u smoke every day, isn't that a bit much

how do i smoke hash with my pipe ?

>>693817258
no

>>693804783
It bothers people, though. The thought of you doing something that's none of their business.

>>693801968
Cities in my area have posters and other stuff like that saying it can perma kill brain cells

>>693816997
so the absence of strong enough interactions is the reason? so it has the characteristics of a solution but it's not entirely a solution
so a certain degree of interaction is a condition for calling something a solution?

>>693818364
>a certain degree of interaction is a condition for calling something a solution

Yes, in my book, if it means liquid interactions. But it's not all interactions.

This is actually more complicated than I've been summarizing. There are also intermolecular interactions in all actual gases; these cause deviations from the ideal gas law. But these interactions are not strong enough to overcome kinetic energy of the gas molecules and the don't lead to anything like a persistent store of energy. Surface tension, however, *does* reflect an interaction that stores energy over time. This is closer to the actual distinction.

>>693819035
this is interesting, i'll read more about it

>>693819760

It's fascinating, I agree. (Was a physics/math major back in college.)

What's particularly interesting to me is that we have a model of an "ideal gas" but we don't have one for an "ideal liquid". Liquids are just fundamentally more difficult to understand, and to my eye humanity is still missing some basic concepts about them that will clarify much.

>>693803105
looks like a speedball injection

>>693804210

wtf, was your dad a catholic priest?

>>693820198
how would an ideal liquid be characterized? an ideal gas model it's much more intuitive and comprehensible

OP is a pleb, prob hits dabs on a glowing hot red nail and burning his throat. weed is harsh to me after i smoke dabs. your doing it wrong

>>693821071
>how would an ideal liquid be characterized?

I don't know. That's actually one of the problems. What characteristics can be considered "ideal" and which should be considered deviations from it?

Density is a good candidate to be one of the ideal values, but even that one could be a derived quantity. Viscosity is a general feature of liquids, so there's another candidate. Surface tension is another one.

Are these sufficient? I don't know. Like I said, it's an open problem.

I neglected to mention that there is an ideal solid model, namely crystal structures. An interesting fact there is that the heat capacity derived from this model matches many real materials, but not metals, since electron mobility is not part of the ideal model.

>>693821559
legitimately 100% this
OPs idea of dabs is probably some janky Ti set up that I was using back in high school

>>693803912
Dabs are for faggots. That's the only relevant info in this thread.

>>693801968
Mouth Fedora plus

>>693803912
in-n-out is fucking gross
i say this with an in-n-out less than 1 mile from my home

fuck that disgusting shit

>>693803912
ANIMAL STYLE FTW

>>693821890
wouldn't just the forces between molecules be the main issue? like strength and range of effectiveness

>>693822662
diabetes ftw more like it

>>693804210
OH GOD IT'S THE DEVIL'S LETTUCE

WHERES JESUS AT THO HAS HE LEFT US

>>693801968
any tips on how to hide a bong from family? I really hate rolling joints, takes me like 20 minutes. And I can take a bond hit a lot better.

I'd be more worried about the questionable low grade Chinese metal you're taking a propane torch to and inhaling thru.

>>693822894
That might do it, but I'm doubtful that's all of it. The problem is that there's no real correlation between surface tension and viscosity. A single kind of intermolecular force can't account for both. This isn't too surprising, since viscosity is a kind of friction that results in kinetic energy converting to heat, whereas surface tension stores energy.

Like I said, I think this is a problem that will break to conceptual advances. I suspect the underlying mathematics may not be all that hard in its own way, but it may well involve some unfamiliar math.

>>693823781
>chinese metal
if you aren't getting direct from highly educated or another american source you deserve whatever brain damage comes to you

>>693824074
so unifying surface tension and viscosity would be a step forward?
could it be that there can't be something as a ideal liquid?

>>693824935
>so unifying surface tension and viscosity would be a step forward?

Absolutely. If you're looking for a research project, that's a good one.

> could it be that there can't be something as a ideal liquid?

Conceivable, but ideals are about the mind, how humans perceive nature. It's likely there is an idealization that's useful.

Has anyone ever bought any thing from someone they found on Whisper?

>>693802938
QFT

>>693825153
what the fuck is a whisper and when the fuck will you kids just pick one social media and stick with it?

>>693825144
well i'll look into these things

Why can't all fucking junkies just die?

>>693825339

Social media needs people to make money off of, so they will never go away.

The people that frequently use them just don't really understand information unless it's in meme-form or top-10-list-form.

>>693804210
It's gay as fuck.

>>693804783
So, you're a fucking neckbeard nerd who smokes weed from gay ass pipes after work. Congrats.

>>693826101
>>693826298

Samefag

Keep dancing

>>693802782
a little dab will do ya!

>>693803105
So it's official. Injecting marijuana isn't just a mey mey.

>>693812461
Then smoke hash, faggot. 'Dabs' pfff.

>>693826496
Your pipes are gay and you're a fucking nerd.

File: lol.gif (3 MB, 500x282) Image search: [Google]

3 MB, 500x282

>>693827467

I'm not OP, bro.

Keep dancing though you're making me hard.

Say more words.

>>693801968
I don't like dabs. As Snoop once said: If you're gonna smoke weed, smoke weed.

>>693801968
Using concentrates tend to overload cannabinoid receptors causing them to deactivate temporarily. That's why the high lasts less time when you take a lot of dabs

>>693824312
I have a vape but all my friends dab and buy their rigs from the local Persian headshop who sells nothing but counterfeit glass and metal threaded pipes

not a fan of dabs personally, I use a vape+bong w/ ice combo whenever I get stoned. Dabs just don't get me to a place where I feel like I can actually do things well, I just feel slow after dabs.

>>693827096
>doesnt like kief
>suggests to smoke hash

what?

dumb noobs, unless you live in Colorado or maybe some parts of west coast dont smoke dabs, even most of the dabs here are contaminated when I put some of the nice stuff from dispensary in the vac oven it still boils up... be careful

Your all intolerant week little fags
I smoke a gram of oil a day and function

>>693807428
As somebody with a chemistry education I am here to tell you that you are a fucking retard.

Asbestos doesn't burn because it is a mineral and made up of silicon crystals. Butane evaporates.

>>693807699
Marijuana isn't addictive. You could take the biggest stoner, somebody who smokes all day every day, and stick them in a jail cell and not give them any and they will be perfectly fine. Sure they will "want" to smoke, but other than that they will not have any problems.

Take a true alcoholic or opiate abuser and do the same thing and the person will by physically ill without their addiction. Cold sweats, shaking, lying on the floor etc.

File: cool.gif (2 MB, 312x250) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 312x250

>>693829106

>>693802714
Kek

>>693803602
Chase get the fuck out of here