>>693768688
The mother jones data literally suggest that minorities are more likely to commit mass shootings according to MODERN demographic makeup alone. When you consider that the US was much, much whiter in decades past, it looks even worse.
Dismissing an argument according to the source without addressing it is intellectually bankrupt.
>>693768952
It literally doesn't. Do the math, idiot. Dismissing an argument according to the source is exactly an okay thing to do and is by no means intellectually bankrupt.
What the data ACTUALLY SHOWS is that, according to the demographics, minorities are AS LIKELY AS WHITES to commit these types of crimes. Which is what I have already stated.
>>693769163
>>693769169
It is very clearly the act of a crazy and pissed off individual. I'm not saying it's right, or justified, but that's most likely what it is, a black man killing cops because cops are the perceived enemy at this point.
SHUT THE FUCK UP SF
>>693769368
moar actual gfur
less avatarfag pls
>>693769585
>Wildcritters, e621, Furafinitty, Yaoi.in, Yiffy.cz, U18-Chan, Inkbunny, Pixiv, Sofurry, Weasyl, Ychan
>>693769763
gross
>>693769113
Alright, here you fucking go.
81 incidents classified by race. 48 of those were perpetrated by white people. Hell, let's say 49, to be generous. 49/81 = .61, rounded up to two significant figures for convenience. White people are 63% of the population - the MODERN population, and again, this data goes back to the 80s.
Blacks committed 12 of the 81 crimes. 12/81 = .15, while blacks are 13.2% of the population.
Asians committed 6 of the 81 crimes. 6/81 = .07, while Asians are 5.6% of the population.
Native Americans committed 3 of the crimes. 3/81 = .04 (.037, this one should probably be more precise) while Native Americans are 2% of the population.
Hispanics, apparently, are underrepresented in mass shooting crimes.
Happy?
>>693769763
>>693769585
Ok
>>693769950
You're not worth a response outside of this prewritten macro response.
hue
And yes, dismissing an argument you haven't even processed because of the source is intellectually bankrupt. I disagree with almost everything salon has ever done but I'll give them a chance because they, like any other publication, have a point once in awhile.
>>693770278
Not to play the Devil's Advocate but motherjones is a pretty terrible source of info
Going on that website is a communist torture technique
>>69376995
That is literally incorrect. You are not by any means adjusting for change in demographic breakdown, basing 30+ years of mass shootings on the demographics of the United States today. What you are doing is intentionally misrepresenting data.
javascript:quote('693768882')
Watch the videos carefully. These guys knew what they were doing
And you're all playing into their hands by getting your jimmies rustled over what color these people are. Melatonin is irrelevant when it comes to the government, they're out to make waves and they don't care who dies to split the population. they can either start another civil war (which weakens us as a society), or use this as an excuse for further gun control (unlikely, this happened in T E X a s), take further steps toward a unified world government, or all of them.
Point is, don't be a dick, stop killing each other, we need each other more than we know. when ww3 breaks out (soon) we have a shot at standing together as a strong and capable society who can share common goals. We just have to hope it's not too late by then
>>693770438
Facts are facts.
>>693770482
Wait, what?
>>693770482
>>693769953
>>693770438
He cited it, not me.
>>693770482
Wait, you think the US was LESS white in the 80s and 90s? Because historical demographic data doesn't help your point at all.
>>693770823
My bad
I didn't meant to imply you were red
>>693770278
And no, it's literally not at all intellectually bankrupt. What is intellectually bankrupt is misrepresenting data, not dismissing an article because it the source is notorious for doing exactly that and worse.
>>693770823
Population demographics change, you have to break the data down per census, meaning you calculate based on the ten year periods, then calculate based upon that, dip shit.
Uh, yeah. How about this rare piece?
>>693771074
>>693771074
Did you draw this?
>>693771275
>Fiilename
It's from Jacob, from two years ago.
>>693771061
You have literally no argument. You didn't read or address the article I linked you, your own data source doesn't present the data the way you WANT me to analyze it, and you are grasping at straws to find a way this fits your narrative. I have given you more than enough in the way of analysis and you've done nothing except sit here telling me that I still haven't done enough. How about instead of being a useless cocksucker you present your own position with something remotely resembling substance? That'd be novel, wouldn't it? I mean, you HAVE an opinion about this that disagrees with mine. Try proving it.
>>693771056
I am arguing on his terms and he's still got fucking nothing. This is an exercise in absurdity.
Jesus christ, both of you SHUT THE FUCK UP
Friendly reminder: Jews are responsible for this
>>693771549
Absolutely not.
>>693771812
Israel is our greatest ally.
And the world keeps spinning
>>693771350
Oh I see. Have you been drawing lately?
>>693771857
No, shut the fuck up right now.
Your self righteous attitude and big fake words (to make you look smarter) is fucking pissing me off. Go shove your head up your ass you piece of shit
Fool too, fuck you bitch you're the same.
>>693771373
I didn't address the article because I refuse to wade through garbage. It doesn't present the data analyzed in any way, that RAW data, nothing but the facts, not broken down, or anything. Your analysis is taking 30+ years of data and applying it incorrectly.
>>693772257
All words are made up, Nibi.
>>693772257
I am not making up words, it's not my fault your vocabulary is tiny.
>>693772299
You're close-minded in the most literal sense of the word.
If I am applying it incorrectly, then correct me. Make your own fucking argument you vacuous jackass.
>>693772161
A time to reap
A time to kill
A time to heal
A time to laugh
A time to weep
>>693771373
Julian, do you mind completing this?
>>693772409
This coming from a cunt who believes it is entirely okay to kill people and anything that doesn't agree with his narrow view of the world is inherently evil.
I'm breaking it down right now, shit for brains.
>>693772653
I never said anything other than my view of the world was evil.
>>693772635
Yeah sure gimme a sec.
>>693772719
You make the claim that anything that doesn't agree with you is inherently flawed, stupid, corrupt, etc.
>>693772357
Fake like your philosophys
>>693772409
Kiss my ass you stupid fuck.
>>693772953
I don't think the going outside thing should count since I was asleep and then it was way too early in the morning to go out in Philly.
>>693772928
Well, yeah, I assume beliefs I disagree with are incorrect, like everyone else. I give them a chance though.
>>693772969
Sure.
>>693772447
A time for peace
I swear it's not too late
>>693772249
Did this for Soup recently.
>>693772719
Might be interesting since I found your results from three years ago.
>>693773030
I wish my internet husband, cousin jeff, and uncle terry would stop fighting. It makes me sad
>>693773081
Ooo, lemme see.
>>693773081
That's cute and well done, I like it. Do you post your art online anywhere?
>>693773154
which one am I
>>693773068
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrIPxlFzDi0
>>693773051
Shut the fuck up you incoherent kunt
>>693773051
Well, you still avoided bingo back then, but I think there's been an improvement.
>>693773168
Not really, though most of what Herbie uploads is colored by me.
> "own fewer than 10 articles of formal clothing"
10?! It's normal to have 10 or more?
>>693773251
cousin jeff, the trump supporter. Fool is uncle terry aka the weird quiet one who does obscure art in his studio, and nibi is my husband because ilh
>>693773316
Cool! I like the colors and shading you use, I saw his FA gallery
>>693773316
Nope, that's bingo. Diagonally down.
I have a hard time believing my room wasn't a disaster 3 years ago. That sounds wrong, I must've missed it.
>>693773393
You have an unbelievably bizarre mental representation of the world.
>>693773359
I mean, maybe. I went to a school with a coat and tie uniform through high school so I was inevitably going to have more formal clothes.
>>693773154
Can't we all just... get along? ;_;
>>693769953
Is this the data and "interpretation" that you idiots are arguing about? Because if it is that's really sad
>>693773393
Wait barry you forgot me
>>693773532
It's from mother jones. I'm sure you've got something better to bring up though.
>>693773493
it's the only way I cope with how shitty everything is
>>693773559
you're Ned, the neighbor kid who keeps getting caught looking in windows and eating tree bark
I have never been this fucking tilted in my entire life a team of five fuckign awpers beat us when we were leading fucking 14-8 cause my team doesn't know how to use smokes
>>693773483
Thanks!
>>693773493
I knew there was a reason for that filename.
Also, apparently you cut back on masturbating, now you've learned to do your laundry and you no longer believe video games are literature.
>>693773652
Well gee tthanks
>>693773658
Smoke if you got em or just use it to put out fires
>>693773652
Everything is wonderful though.
>>693773717
My sex drive is dead, I knew how to do my laundry back then too but usually someone did it for me, and I think video games could be on par with literature, they're just not because game devs are really awful writers.
>>693773806
>everything is wonderful
>>693773806
Seems like an objective improvement.
>>693773717
Hey there's no way that's me.
It doesn't have my name on it. Although I like that picture, wish I had it.
>>693773262
Rolling Stones suk
>I'm not sorry
>>693773804
do you even know what you're fucking saying
>>693773651
Don't care too. Just how the fuck do you get into that level of fight with data like that? That shit's in a complete vacuum, it doesn't even begin to address anything as simple as obvious confounding factors from what you guys have posted. How the fuck is that worth arguing over?
>>693773886
MINE is pretty good.
>>693773913
The only things relevant in my mind are the employment/university bits. And when I filled that out previously I'd just graduated high school.
>>693773913
OH BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOY
that's a blast from the past
one I didn't necessarily need
>>693774049
The only argument we were having was whether minorities are overrepresented in mass shootings. I claimed they were, he claimed they were not. Mother jones is the source HE cited.
Confounding factors are not relevant, those would constitute moving the goalposts since we weren't talking about those.
>>693772969
Sure, why not?
>>693773051
You don't give them a chance. I don't assume that a belief I disagree with is incorrect. I assume that the belief is incorrect for myself alone but will not make the argument that it is wrong for others.
Clint is a sensible man and rightly appreciates the objectively greatest video character.
>>693774012
>attention
>>693774022
Yes, I bet you don't even try to get chicken pets you cunt. Hell I bet you're the type to UNDERHAND nades
>>693774244
I'm a fucking pro at underhand pop flashe peaks
>>693774191
There's a difference between being openminded and being a relativist.
>>693774052
Sometimes I forget you're closer to me in age than I think.
Damnit boys go to fuck to sleep
>>693774352
I'm wise beyond my years, I know. Aren't you like 18/19?
>>693774481
You're a piece of shit beyond your years.
>>693774588
The wisest pos you've ever met, yes.
>>693774181
I just assumed it was a minorities are violent argument after stumbling in late. Question still stands on why the fuck that's even worth debating though. It's a boring stat on it's own so why bother headbutting a brick wall over it?
>>693774660
I like arguing.
>>693774627
You have HIV?
>>693774767
No, thank god, and that's spelled poz.
>>693774352
I mean even 3 years later I can still attest to this, grizzly really is top husbando bear
>>693774627
Fuck you faggot, id stab you in your fucking eyes if you tried your fake intellectual superiority shit with me in person.
>>693774833
I don't think you would, I carry, and it's not fake. You don't LIKE it, but it's not fake.
>>693774312
There's a difference between being open minded and assuming everyone that doesn't agree with you is automatically wrong.
>>693774979
I assume they're wrong until they prove themselves right. I have been proven wrong before. You haven't done it yourself which is probably why that's incomprehensible to you, though.
>>693774980
man that cat is satisfied with himself
>>693774942
Ill shoot you like the fucking deer I shoot, faggot. I dont want any lip from you. You already give that out enough.
>>693775266
Why are you so grumpy right now anyway
does anyone know if theres a bracket somewhere to see the cologne standings right now it seems like they make this fucking info so godamn obscure
>>693775469
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/counterstrike/ESL/One/2016/Cologne#Results
>>693775311
Shove it up your ass and have it break, fuck you.
>>693775577
hopefully not, but rip liquid
https://youtu.be/AAvB-t71lys?t=3m55s
I won!
>>693774979
>>693774942
>>693774833
He was honestly dignifying that response more than he needed too. Unless you're arguing something that's relative to the individual, in which case everyone involved is an idiot, there's a set of right and a set of wrong answers; saying otherwise is just retarded.
It is a was a tad affected at points though; you were using vocabulary that didn't add much to dunk the guy
If you stab someone to prove they're not intellectually superior you're missing the point
>>693775681
ok dude
>>693775748
OH GOD THAT GAME
FUCKING FLASHBACKS
>>693775784
That's so fucking funny
>>693775852
First off, Nibi is not who I was arguing with originally. Secondly, I've been dealing with this vocabulary shit for literally 8 years on the internet. Nothing I say is an affectation unless I'm doing faux-Ebonics. That is just how I talk.
>>693775875
not once not twice but 3 games they do the same thing I have ptsd
>>693776050
I still believe in them. They can beat fnatic, I just know it.
>>693776129
they have to beat virtous first, I think everyone wants to believe but it's a stretch, it would be pretty cool for an NA team to actually win a major
>>693775875
Apparently having a hobby makes you a loser these days
>>693776218
You're looking at the bracket wrong, it's fnatic first.
VP is my favorite EU team so a liquid/vp finals would be amazing for me.
>>693776239
I mean it makes you a huge fucking dweeb but you're married with two children like that just doesn't apply.
>>693776415
oh im dumb i didnt even see the actual bracket i was looking at the group stage things
>>693775093
What, been proven wrong? I don't hold any beliefs that can be "proven wrong" as it were. Basically what I believe is neither provable nor improvable. I don't know why, but it is getting increasingly more difficult to type. To let you know, I did a numbers breakdown, but I don't trust myself right now because I feel the fog rolling in, so I'll have to do it again some other time. It's not that I'm tired, my perceptual distortions are just ramping up.
>>693776415
Dweeb shit is cool now though. There's like a popular series where people just sit in and listen to people play DnD
All the popular movies right now are comic book films
It's like it's cool to like dweeb shit but you can't actually like it, you must be casual as fuck.
And also I have super nerdy hobbies they're just not on the chart.
>>693776633
Opinions you can't argue about are pretty boring if you ask me but you do you.
That's fine.
>>693776564
I just desperately want fnatic to get fucked.
>>693776737
Right see the actual dweeb CONTENT is cool, but you can't get invested in it or you're a nerd loser.
>>693776862
That is a load of cocks, man
>>693776862
I can freely discuss my opinions all day long. I hold them to be true, but that doesn't mean they are or aren't.
>>693776999
it's worse when your hobbies are politically charged
>>693777067
If you can't demonstrate the validity of your opinion why would you hold it?
>>693777181
guns can be 'cool' though
I don't get to be 'cool'
I'll never be the cool-dad
>>693777333
Guns are cool, but if you're into guns you're a gun nut, which is like being called a nerd but also an evil babykilling nerd.
Which I guess is still cooler than the more banal nerd.
I did the thing.
>>693777181
I can demonstrate the validity of my opinion to myself. I am not concerned with others because most people can't understand how I think because I developed psychologically different from most other people due to things already discussed previously.
I have a problem with the "fewer than five times per week" bit. It should be fewer than seven times per week.
Man you guys are low-tier losers.
>>693777415
There is a difference between being a gun nut and being interested in guns. I think guns are fine, I like to target shoot, it's fun. Obsessing over guns makes you a gun nut.
Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii'm a winner.
>>693778024
It's the difference between a hobbyist and a dedicated hobbyist. Gun nut is just a uniquely deprecating word for the latter.
>>693778039
You WERE a winner
Now you're just a not-loser.
>>693778145
I guess winning at loser bingo makes you a winner at losing.
>>693778196
exactly.
You're not a winner.
>>693778094
Not necessarily. I would say someone that likes guns as a hobby enough for them to make a career out of it isn't a gun nut. It's the fucking weirdos that obsess over them, hoard them, and ammunition while also spouting a certain type of ideology that are gun nuts.
::
>>693778270
I lost at losing, that makes me a winner. Multiply negatives together, etc.
>>693778291
according to my facebook friends, who I realize are not representative, anyone who thinks guns are good things is a gun nut.
And I think you're describing preppers.
https://youtu.be/7eNtbOp-1U0
I wonder what would happen if blm monkeys tried to stop a car with someone who had an ar with them
>>693778393
No, you did not lose at losing
You lost at being a loser. It's not a fucking verb you fucking fuck.
You failed at achieving a status. That does not automatically grant you the opposite status.
You get NOTHING! You lose! Good DAY, sir!
>>693778560
Irrelevant. The car is a deadly enough weapon. There's already a webm of blm idiots getting btfo by someone hitting the gas.
>>693778618
Honestly nef I think we're ALL winners.
Also, what's wrong with collecting comics? What about people who are bed ridden? What about monks who have taken a vow of chastity? What about people who are learning a foreign language, but have basically just started? What about people who are in crippling poverty and so can't afford to travel? What about the mentally handicapped who can't live on their own? What about people who follow a religion that forbids the cutting of hair? What about people who haven't read Shakespeare because they never had the time?
This game is stupid.
>>693778393
Yeah, some of them. Guns aren't inherently evil, they're tools intended to kill, but that doesn't mean they have to be used for that purpose.
>>693778663
No but most likely you could get off with defense if you needed to shoot someone to protect yourself
>>693778663
The fuck is this participation award bullshit?
>>693778684
Man you are getting WAY too triggered by a dumb bingo game.
Killing isn't inherently evil but I realize we're not going to agree on that.
>>693778765
Easily. The guy who ran the fucks down isn't getting prosecuted either.
>>693778780
I'm just being nice, loser.
>>693778859
To yourself? Giving yourself winner status just because you failed to become a loser.
Just sad.
>>693778859
I guess you could also blast your horn for easy hearing damage
Surprisingly, Subjectivefag, guns are perhaps the one thing we can agree upon. I don't believe in such strict gun control. Basically keep them out of the hands of criminals and those with mental disorders that makes them potentially dangerous. Other than that, fuck it, guns for everybody.
>>693778859
I'm not getting mad at it, I'm just questioning the validity of it. There are too many potential exceptions.
>>693779002
But I endeavored to not be a loser, so I succeeded and won.
>>693779006
How loud is a car horn up close?
>>693779013
I'm not even totally sure we agree on guns. I think felons should be allowed to own them under the logic that if someone is not trusted to own a weapon they shouldn't be free in our society anyway.
Obviously there are exceptions, it's not meant to be taken seriously. Some shitposter on krautchan made it to trigger bernd.
>>693778684
This was a bingo game designed to make people on 4chan buthurt. You're expecting too much from it
>>693779156
like 150DB-170 which wouldnt be pleasant
>>693779237
Oh I'm pretty sure I scream at that volume, it can't be THAT bad.
Or I might have hearing damage I don't know about.
>>693779191
I expect a lot from most things.
>>693779156
Violent criminals, that is.
There are too many exceptions is what I am saying.
>>693779156
Oh, you say that now after the fact
"Good, you can have it", the pouting child cries. "I never wanted it anyway"
>>693779327
I know music concerts have 150DB warnings at the front fence so it is fairly loud
>>693779339
Again, if a prisoner is too violent to be trusted with a gun, I don't want them exposed to society at all. Life in prison or capital punishment.
Naturally.
>>693779345
I think it seems self-evident that I didn't want to be a loser.
>>693779408
My volume judgments might be weird. Normal speech is 50db, opera singers are supposed to make it to 100...
>>693779013
Those are almost mutually exclusive goals; otherwise you're assuming we as a society are capable of selectively denying people access to some publicly available good. This is not a reasonable assumption
>>693779156
Relativity in it's proper place
>>693779519
http://www.industrialnoisecontrol.com/comparative-noise-examples.htm
according to this a horn is 110 but thats still fairly loud
>>693779519
Being a loser is cool though
It's like being a dickhead, and being a dickhead is most certainly cool.
>>693779408
Given that the scale is logarithmic that seems very hard to believe
>>693779646
Yeah I might have no idea what I'm talking about here. How do decibels work?
>>693779773
That would explain the problem.
>>693779741
No it's not like that at all.
>>693779823
Sure it is. There is a massive overlap between dickheads and losers.
>>693779891
So? They don't mean the same thing. Steve Jobs was a winner and a dickhead. Being a dickhead is only cool when you are also a winner.
>>693779823
higher the louder
That scale kid seems fairly good at what shit is
>>693779947
>Being a dickhead is only cool when you are also a winner.
rebuttal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVmmYMwFj1I
>>693779956
it's not linear is why I was confused
>>693779823
From what I remember every 10 points is an order of magnitude instead of a linear scale.
>>693779947
I feel like dickhead is a tad to affectionate for that guy, I like plenty of dickheads; Jobs was actually kind of a cunt.
>>693780011
I didn't realize the hipster thing is as old as 2010.
>say I work in media I'm really on the dole
I'm dying.
>>693780058
Got it.
>>693780154
It's just an issue of degree innit
>>693780304
>note: The Beegees are in no way dickheads
>>693780445
Goes without saying really.
Y'all fuck cats and draw minecraft comics on deviantart.
>>693780716
jesus christ the samefaggotry is strong in this one
>>693780838
You got me
I swapped pcs and >>693780032
is the latest message before >>693780716
wtf
>>693781011
you biffed it
>>693780907
We are all one and equal in the eyes of God~
good morning
>typical australian matchmaking
welp
>>693782505
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZbKHDPPrrc
>>693782505
I am nearly finished my cancer
>>693782582
oh
>>693782630
are you dead yet
any recommendations for comics/etc of straight guys turning gay? cant find anything on e621 and I dont want to look through 3000+ pages of tags
>>693783234
Litle Buddy by meesh
>>693783370
*Little
>>693783219
Nah Im less death which is pretty good
>>693783472
dont worry you'll get your time now
>>693784017
thats pretty rude
>>693784780
do something about it nerd
>>693784961
1v1 me irl manlet
>>693785428
He probably doesn't want cooties.
its true i do avoid cooties like the plague
also i aint no manlet
>>693785618
I can send you some if you give me your address
Bullshit, you're like 5'4
I'M not.
I'm 5'8"
>whats the difference
4 inches
about 12 cms
so like a dicklength
> like a dick length
do you not measure length in dicks or
Ye your dick probs
>>693787611
Not really, but that's not what I'm mocking.
no not mine
just an average dick