New Loli BreadUnderbaked Edition
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
- Home
- Board: /b/ - Random
- Reading: New Loli BreadUnderbaked Edition
New Loli Bread
Underbaked Edition
Doujin Tiem
Guys just come over here >>691593692
Don't divide the threads please.
-Please
always treat lolis especially tsundere ones with respect
>TFW you will never sex game and chill with a tsundere loli
I dunno. Thread is lacking in space marines. Maybe we should move here?
-fuckeverything
if i was a mod i'd ban you
Goddamn i wish rustle would commision me the image of this loli from this page as a stand alone drawing bottomless being one of my fetishes
http://www.pomfpomf.moe/doujins/280/
>>691595246
Well Clearly you aren't one because you cant read the rules leddit
>>691595442
was not talking to you
>>691595246
>>691595169
i was talking to this fag
>>691595536
oh sorry then carry on im OP so im a faggot after all
loli doujinshis need moar uncensored anal
Y/N?
>>691595586
What for friendpai?
>>691595586
im sorry lolibro please carry on then thats why i made this bread to avoid dramafags and actual quailty loli
>>691595842
meant to say poast quailty loli sorry im a wee bit drunk
>>691593954
The end makes me sad for some reason maybe because we will never have a qt tsundere loli to sex and chill with
needs moar rape/forced methinks
Just a heads up, there's a few... spammers who are probably going to head here soon since they brought the other thread to the image limit. Warhammer 40k and the like.
Is my boner the only one being killed by the forced toddlercon stuff?
Thread needs more Katie.
one more time
>>691596593
okay and i can agree with you to an extent but typically it takes a bigger break from the social norm to allow yourself to get into loli.
many who would make that much of a deviation wouldnt care to take it farther if not for fear of imprisonment.
its the same "gateway" bs as weed. except when people do that theirs more acceptance. and when people choose to do more its not hurting anyone but themselves.
i know you're in here
>>691597263
Guys, this drama is what brought the spammers and trolls here last time, can we cut it out?
>>691597214
>>691597376
i wasnt spamming anything. i was contributing actually. one other anon was agreeing with me. and the other guy was posting some odd shit or other.
im js.
i didnt want to argue at first but.. dammit.
>>691597263
I hate to do this again, but you seem to see the world in black and white. You're leaving out all nuance. You're forgetting about human emotion and basic empathy. You seem to think that one action automatically leads to another. We'll leave out the fact that that's a slippery slope argument. The average person has something called empathy. Wether you believe it's granted by some kind of a "soul" or that it's a basic evolutionary device, 99% of people have it. People tend to not want to hurt other people. Not only because it would be bad for the species as a whole but also because they know what it's like to be hurt and don't want to make other people feel that way. The large majority of lolicons are the same. Once again your argument is the same one used by the thousands of people who have tried to censor television, movies and videogames. "If our children play games that are violent, it will act as a catalyst and make them more violent." But we both know that's not true. You seem to be ignoring what I'm trying to say when I say that only people who are mentally disabled actually end up not being able to draw the line between fantasy and reality. Should we ban cars because they make people more likely to run people over? Should we ban knives because they make it easier to stab people? Should we ban books that talk about war because they make people more violent? We both know the answer to those questions. So you're use of the word many here should be changed to "A few select cases." And those few select cases will hurt people no matter what the catalyst is. They are people with no self control, wether their catalyst is loli, violent movies, or even cartoons. They will not be able to see the difference between said medium and reality. But hey man, like I've been saying, if you honestly have something against loli, that's your prerogative. The evidence proves you wrong. But ignorance is bliss.
Anyone making a new thread? I will if needed.
>>691598865
I made a new thread if anyone is interested. Hopefully the thread doesn't get split again.
>>691598206
>we'll leave out the fact that its a slippery slope argument
why?
thats my point.
its a slippery slope thats slippyer than most. because of what it takes to deviate to the point of thinking thats okay in the first place.
i didnt say it should be banned.
i only stated that for alot of people it is an unhealthy thing because once you're at the point of loli, there really arent many more social norms you can cross. and the lines between reality and fantasy can blur easier than with your "video game, cars, etc" analogy.
because of the sexual satisfaction drive if nothing else.
>>691599054
I think you're misusing the word "A lot". You seem to be taking number out of proportion here. Don't get me wrong, there are people that it is an unhealthy habit for. I know some of them on a personal level. But just as sexual satisfaction drive exists, so does the natural human drive to kill. Yet that doesn't stop most people from never killing anyone in their lives. I honestly don't even know what you're arguing about anymore. You don't think loli should be banned? You don't think loli is immoral? then what's the problem?
>>691599310
KYS
oh btw this thread has been reported to the fbi
STFU
>>691596021
I wonder what the song was.
Damn some of those comics are really hot, just need one where the little girl gets killed after being raped.
