File: jfmsu.jpg (26 KB, 689x539) Image search: [Google]

26 KB, 689x539

mfw cut tight

Mfw I'm cut
it didn't heal correctly
I have to get surgery

File: 5.png (375 KB, 415x750) Image search: [Google]

375 KB, 415x750

>>690234911
but there has to be a difference between the two procedures

I'm so glad I live in a first world country.
Completely uncut.

I've never used lube to masturbate.
It's like having a self-lubricating fleshlight built into the end of your cock.

>>690236201
im cut and ive never used lube to jack off either

I saved this from an old /r9k/ thread:

One problem is that a lot of people are operating under the mistaken impression that the glans is the most sensitive part of the penis, so they see the removal of the foreskin as no big deal.

It's actually the foreskin--particularly its ridged band and the immediate surrounding area-- which is the most sensitive part of the penis with respect to gentle touch sensitivity. The frenulum and frenular delta are also quite sensitive. (1)

The male glans is primarily a protopathic structure. Protopathic areas of the body are those with the ability to sense coarser stimuli, like heavy pressure or painful scraping. The preponderance of nerves in the glans are free nerve endings (FNEs), which are pain sensors. The predominant corpuscular nerve ending in the glans appears upon close inspection to be of a similar nature to the free nerve endings. (2)

Male circumcision irreversibly destroys the most sensual parts of the penis.

References

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3697758

>>690236508
you saved this shit onto your computer? what the fuck? why do you care about this so much?

>>690236583
How would you feel if it was commonplace for your countrymen to remove the fingernails of children?
It's like that, but on your penis.

Once it has stopped, we will look back on the practice like we look at Witch Burning or some shit.

>>690236769
but they aren't doing it just to be mean

im cut and i dont have any problems with any of the things you've listed

Having your foreskin should be a right, not a privilege.

>>690236976
i dont think its that serious man, you're making a mountain out of a molehill

>>690234911

I'm circumcised...no issues, sex is great.

>>690236923
It's done because it's always been done.
It was originally done to prevent masturbation and "to be mean".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Harvey_Kellogg#Masturbation_prevention

>>690237053
Which is why my penis is as sensitive as my thumb.

>>690237096

But it can be even better. You're literally being forced to miss out.

>>690237053
http://notjustskin.org/node/7

>>690237117
dude you're not cut

you're uncut and you're just trying to troll us and make us feel bad

even if you are cut and your dick is fucked up, that doesnt mean everyone who is cut has a fucked up dick

>>690234911
Men were the ones who decided it was a good idea to chop off bits of their penises.

I didnt lose sexual satisfaction. Its just all in the glans right under the tip. The entire shaft is basically numb. Helps me last longer sometimes

>>690237245
>dude you're not cut
I fucking wish I wasn't.

>that doesnt mean everyone who is cut has a fucked up dick
Why would we do it though? It's like rolling a dice twice and then cutting off your son's penis if you roll doubles. It provides literally nothing but negatives.

>trying to troll us and make us feel bad
I don't want you to feel bad.
Unless you circumcise your children.
Then I want you to fucking get brain cancer.

To think the only reason Amerifags get cut is because the Kelloggs breakfast cereal guy had a huge hateboner against masturbation in the 20's.

And it didn't even work.

>>690237454
Amen

>>690237454
dude there is no point in talking to you, you are way too emotinally invested in all this and you probably have some deep psychological issues going on

circumcision for most men is not a big deal, im sorry if they fucked your dick up but its not the norm

have a nice day

>>690237626
I hope you don't roll the dice if you ever have children.

I hate America so fucking much. This shit is sickening, also I love those fags that are cut and say I'm glad I was mutilated or I don't care that I was mutilated. You don't have any foreskin so how can you say that it's ok to be cut if you have nothing to go on.

>>690236201
This.

Circumcised looks better aesthetically. Beauty is pain.

>>690237777
Quads speaks the truth

>>690237213
Underrated post.

>>690237921
Who better to speak on the matter than people who are cut? It's not like reading some half-assed article online makes someone who isn't cut any more informed.

>making a decision for your kids that they can make themselves at any time anyway
jej

>>690238246
This

>>690237921
settle down you whiny little girl

>>690238246
well under that logic, why make any decisions for your kid at all? just let them do whatever they want

>>690238246
Of course they have to do it when your young. Who the fuck in the right mind will get that done when there an adult.

>>690238367
Don't reproduce.

itt: butthurt uncut fags jacking each other off in an echo chamber

>>690238507
Why would you get it done at all?

>>690238559
This

>>690238559
good one bro

id say the same to you, but, honestly, i'm not worried

>>690238598
Exactly

>>690236201
Im fuckin jealous, growing up as a Muslim I had my dick cut and I can barely feel penile stimulation

>>690238246
This tbdesu.
It's not like the penis becomes uncutable after you turn 4.

>>690238468
It's not like a bad haircut though which is temporary.
You can't un-mutilate a dick.

>>690238586
>butthurt uncut fags
An uncutfag could become a cutfag in less than a week if they wanted. It's not like it's some kind of unachievable goal.

>>690238750
Actually the Italians are working on foreskin restoration surgery.

>>690238586
>butthurt uncut fags jacking each other off

at least i'd feel it ;)

>>690238741
im jealous of dirty unwashed eastern european's smegma

>>690238741
Hello Ahmed

>>690238922
do you really think that i cant feel it when someone jacks off my dick?

are you a fucking idiot?

>>690238918
Foreskin restoration does not restore the destroyed nerve connections or restore the same special kind of skin, nor is it accessible to people who have botched circumcisions.
It's like saying a wooden leg is a substitute for a real one.

>>690239047
Yes it will, they take a bulls foreskin which is similar to a humans and decellularize it and make it yours. It restores 100% of your dick. Yw

>>690239239
whoa

thats crazy, i wouldnt do it, but thats really cool

>>690239010
your perception will not be nearly as good. like not feeling it at all

>>690239239
Do you know a more effective treatment than foreskin restoration? NOT GETTING CIRCUMCISED

>>690239316
trust me, i felt it when i was fucking your mom

>>690239362
I agree, I'm very anti mutilation.

>>690239477
i bet you are you stupid gay little retard faggot

jk man, you're alright

>>690239316
You couldn't possible know this. Unless you're cut.

>>690239239
Basically what this guy said >>690239362
"restores 100% of your dick" is quite optimistic too, and very unlikely to be done in decades.
Even if it is worked out, it's gonna cost a fucking fortune to get done.
You'll probably have better luck getting a fake vagina.

>>690239658
careful anon

i wanted to say that to him as well, but if perception is determined by our skin then he may have a point

but it doesnt make a difference in the long run, whether he's right or not

>>690239658
Medical science and peer reviewed articles are a reasonable substitute in this situation.
Neither someone who was uncut, nor someone who was cut early in life will have any experience of how the other feels.
This is the point of such medical studies.

>>690239812
i agree with you, but i dont think thats the point of the study

the point of the study is to get a quantity, all perception has to do with qualities and not quantities

File: Sorrells-et.-al_Sensitivity_Study.jpg (88 KB, 960x496) Image search: [Google]

88 KB, 960x496

>>690239942
The study I posted earlier said that the circumcised penis had reduced sensitivity.

This is also a graphic thrown about online (from said study) which demonstrates the same point.

>>690240276
jesus christ man lmao why do you like this subject so much?

im willing to concede and agree with you, if perception is determined by our skin then the removal of skin would affect perception

BUT

all perception relies on previous perception as a reference, if i never experienced the "pure perception" of having foreskin in the first place, its not possible for me to make a comparison, and so its a moot point