Probably going to be the best one

Definitely going to be the worst one

You're a funny pickle anon

>>687953996
I'd rather chew tinfoil and have my fingernails drag across a backboard and then snap in half

i would be better to place a toothpick under your toenail a kick a wall than to watch this movie

I would rather take nail clippers to my scrotum

All these MGTOW angry cause women are in their movies. Pathetic.

>>687953996
the same non existent people that are hyped for hillary clinton as president.

its hilarious how noone can recall ever meeting a single other human being thats voting for hillary, yet somehow shes supposedly winning.

>>687955043
gr8 b8 m8 8/8

>>687955155

Ok smartass, then you tell me why people refuse to see it when it isn't even out yet

>>687955308
Because, Face It, Hollywood is so drunk with power that they'll pump out remakes worse than your mum.

File: TheWiz.jpg (236 KB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]

236 KB, 1280x720

>>687955308
Did you see this?
No?
Oh, tell me.. why the fuck not?

File: Packer-truck.jpg (866 KB, 2304x1536) Image search: [Google]

866 KB, 2304x1536

>>687955308
Because, from the trailers, everything about it looks like garbage. The cgi looks like garbage. The writing sounds like garbage. The jokes are garbage. A large majority of the acting in the trailer looks like garbage. It's being marketed like garbage. It just looks exactly like all the other shit remake movies that hollywood has been shitting out in recent years. Garbage.

>>687955656
I'm being honest here, it didn't look that much different from the originals.

>>687955855
$1 has been deposited in your account from Sony.

File: 1446149325754.jpg (16 KB, 365x385) Image search: [Google]

16 KB, 365x385

>>687953996
I'm more hyped about taking a shit.

File: awgraervre.jpg (19 KB, 220x220) Image search: [Google]

19 KB, 220x220

>>687955436
This.
>>687955308
Because people don't like it when their favourite old movies get unnecessary big-budget remakes with SJW casting decisions in a cynical attempt to draw in masses of soccer mums who don't know any better.

>>687955308
Mostly because there was nothing wrong with the first one and it's basically a cinematic and comedic masterpiece and this just looks like a steaming pile of shit.

>>687956120
Here we go again with the SJW bullshit. Let me guess, the "feminazis" are in on it too?

File: fuckyouimdead.jpg (20 KB, 336x446) Image search: [Google]

20 KB, 336x446

Three mediocre cunt comedians and a nigger tranny take over a once great franchise. Can you hear my opinion from the grave?

>>687956120

Yup.

And the same feminists who have already decided to LOVE this movie no matter how terrible it is would absolutely lose their collective shit if some beloved old film that featured a female character were to be remade with a male one.

Imagine Alien getting remade/rebooted wih a male lead. Imagine ten thousand Moon Cups popping out in RAEG.

>>687956651
It's clearly a "sign of the times", affirmative action type deal, yeah.

"I would assume there's a very large crossover of people who are doubtful 'Ghostbusters' will be great and people excited about the Donald Trump candidacy," said Apatow, who is a producer on "Ghostbusters." "I would assume they are the exact same people."

Ironic what Jew Apatow said, because it's the exact opposite: it's the "I'm voting for Hillary because she's a woman" kind of thinking that likes the new GB. They are literally only watching the movie because it has an all woman cast and they think that somehow that's an important thing in itself, and the fact that it's just a loud, boring special effects movie doesn't even register with them.

>>687957530
Name one movie with an all male cast where the majority opinion was, "oh great, its an all male cast, this will be terrible." Pro tip, you can't.

>>687957043
>>687957530
These two things. All of these two things.

>>687957835
Because men are better.

File: 226.jpg (6 KB, 200x166) Image search: [Google]

6 KB, 200x166

>>687957835
That's a false comparison and you've missed the point entirely.

I'm pretty hyped for the film to get good reviews and watch the Internet have a stroke

>>687958333
So what you're saying is you can't name one and now you're trying to dismiss my point. Gotcha.

>>687958577
Same

>>687958577
Good reviews don't necessarily mean a good movie. Shitty movies get great reviews all the time. Look at Avatar. Visually stunning, sure. But the movie itself was a boring, tired mess. Still got good reviews.

The fat girl looks kind of annoying but the main problem is the black lady. Not because she's black but because they make her a typical black character drawing attention to the fact that she's black and the odd one out. Winston in the originals was obviously black but not once did anyone mention anything about race, he was just a regular guy. It's typical shit hollywood characterizing and writing.

>>687959088
Well that's a completely subjective opinion. There's a reason Avatar is the highest grossing movie of all time, people liked it.

>>687959336
Bullshit. It was all hype and 3D surcharges. Look at the IMDB forums for the sequel they're dead because nobody gives a fuck anymore.

It's the same reason that Alice in Wonderland made over a billion dollars and the sequel is bombing hard.

>>687959336
It's funny you mention that. You know all these people that are being judged because they don't like the new GB trailer? Guess what. That's their subjective opinion as well. The comment that I was responding to only mentioned reviews. Reviews are also subjective opinions and don't always reflect the quality of the movie or the most prevailing opinions of that movie. That was my point. A lot of people liked Avatar, sure, but a lot of people also, rightly, had a lot to complain about. Just like this trailer. So to assume that everyone who can't stand this trailer are all trump loving misogynists is a completely ignorant opinion to tout.

>>687957835
>>687958796
You're misrepresenting people's issues with the film and you know it.

This entire thread is full of varied explanations of what is wrong with the film and why people hate it so much. Yet you keep reverting back to "people only hate it cuz there's women in it!!"

This is why there's no point in talking to faggots lie you about it.

>>687959656
Pretty sure it's around a 7.8 on IMDB. Good user score for a movie people hated. And most forums outside of TV shows and superhero movies on IMDB are dead.

>>687958857
As if the reviews mean shit. Critics will praise it purely for the feminist agenda.

Bad Neighbors 2 got good reviews blindly championing it because of the "feminism yeah!!!" Message despite the film being fucking terrible.

>>687960171
There's undeniably sexism involved. People had a fit when they seem that the main character from the new Star Wars is a chick. Insecure teenage boys exaggerating some 'forced feminism agenda'

>>687960416
>IMDB scores meaning anything

The movie has a high RT score too. But my point stands that nobody gives a fuck about it anymore.

>>687960579
I hope the new GB movie does well. Women could really use positive messages towards women.

>>687960579
>people on the internet complained about something
>must be sexist

I bet you think the billboard of Apocalypse holding Mystique by the throat was misogyny also don't you?

>>687960863
Yes if there's one thing women need it's having society blow even MORE smoke up their asses.

>>687960873
It definitely wasn't planned very well. Couldn't they have promoted their movie any other way?

>>687960579
Not really, actually. Maybe some dumbass trolls got all uppity, but most people didn't care because the trailer looked pretty good and then the movie came out and it wasn't terrible. Wasn't the best movie ever, but it didn't tear down the source material, like the new GB looks to be doing.

>>687960984
Do you have an issue with women?

>>687960985
DING DING DING DING

Fucking knew it.

>"Treat women equal to men!"
*treat women equal to men*
>"THATS SEXIST!!!"

>>687961007
Taking about Rogue not Episode 7.

>>687961075
I have an issue with retards like you who think women are children who need to be protected from the real world.

>>687961211
Man it must really suck being an oppressed male

File: 1458646501222.jpg (364 KB, 1280x1184) Image search: [Google]

364 KB, 1280x1184

>>687955155
>>687955855
>>687958333
>>687958577
>>687959088
>>687959211
>>687961133
>>687961211
I just want to take a second and check all these dubs and trip in this thread. Savage.