>>685652510
5.

5

5

>>685652510
5

8

Thats clearly 20 watermelons

9

5

File: Albert.jpg (110 KB, 1200x1200) Image search: [Google]

110 KB, 1200x1200

>>685652510
Not enough information.

Seeds or seedless?

6

8 you never said full melons

File: 3F7JDYd.png (18 KB, 735x555) Image search: [Google]

18 KB, 735x555

5 melons

>>685652510
if you add up the amount of watermelon, you have 5 watermelons

if you count the number of unique watermelons it took to make the image, 8

>>685652510
OP is a nigger

File: 1378864146399.jpg (21 KB, 398x500) Image search: [Google]

21 KB, 398x500

>>685652510
2((2^2+1)/(2^2-1))((3^2+1)/(3^2-1))((5^2+1)/(5^2-1))((7^2+1)/(7^2-1))((11^2+1)/(11^2-1))...

>>685652510
6 no?

723048957209834759827349574.66

>>685652510
4x0.75+4x0.5
=5

bunch of retarded, the question was how many watermelons are there, the answer is 6. if you cut them all up you could combine them into the shape of 5 watermelons but theres 6 different watermelons in the picture.

8

There is the equivalent of 5 whole watermelons

there are parts from no fewer than 6 and no more than 8 watermelons

>>685652510
watermelons are a social construct

funf

>>685652993

>if you count the number of unique watermelons it took to make the image, 8

it can be 6 melons as well

it's 6. the 4 halves in the center clearly came from 2 melons, the 4 on the outside are 4.
6.

4, it's jsut a picture balanced on top of them

>>685652510
4*(3/4) + 4*(1/2)
= 3 + 2
= 5 watermelons

File: 000 how many wa wa melons.jpg (251 KB, 996x996) Image search: [Google]

251 KB, 996x996

>>685652510

>>685653114
this nig gets it

>>685653076
How do you know that the halfs are the same watermelom?

5

>>685652510

there are actually only three watermelons, the rest of them identify as pumpkins

>>68565299
wrong, its 6. the 4 pieces in the middle was made from 2 different melons. 2+4 of the outside = 6

File: 1396208606814.jpg (79 KB, 427x323) Image search: [Google]

79 KB, 427x323

>>685653161
Yeah, and it keeps triggering me.

>>685652510
0, I consider a watermelon being one when it isn't cut.
So there is only watermelon slices

>>685652510
Assuming 360 degrees of 'visible melon' equals 1 melon, then there are:

(3/4 x 4) + (1/2 x 4) = 5

Assuming only whole, uncut watermelons count:

0

Arguments that suggest the visible melons are missing their bottom half are either blind or (far more likely) trolling, as the shadows confirm their presence.

/thread btw

>>685652510
5

>>685652993
Unless in the center there is 2 halfs, then correct answer would be 6

File: 1459234731705.gif (442 KB, 441x270) Image search: [Google]

442 KB, 441x270

>>685652510
It's obviously 8, if anyone says anything else they are fucking retarded

>>685653114
>>685653076
these get full marks for completeness

File: 1461984381343.jpg (51 KB, 552x805) Image search: [Google]

51 KB, 552x805

>>685653421

>>685652510
6
Technically (.75 x 3) + (.5 x 2)

There are many watermelons, probably like millions or something?

4*(3/4) + 4*(1/2) = 5

>>685653377
my nigga

>>685653421
It could be 6 with your logic, or even 7, because you don't know where the halves came from. 2 watermelons? Or 4?

>>685653264
because i'm black. trust me, i know.

>>685653377
/thread
also checked

>>685653114
This is the simplest, most complete and accurate answer. The rest of you fail at math, life, and all of existence.

Approximately five collective watermelons worth of volume, however either six or eight individual watermelons, depending on whether the middle halves are halves of two melons or halves of four independent melons.

File: 1463867946845.jpg (67 KB, 292x243) Image search: [Google]

67 KB, 292x243

>>685653421

>>685653264
they aren't, the ones in the middle aren't quartered

>>685653114
Winner

File: 1463694982610.jpg (61 KB, 499x391) Image search: [Google]

61 KB, 499x391

>>685652937

>>685652510

(0.75 * 4) + (0.5 * 4) = 5
/thread

>>685652510
None. None of those pieces is a melon, only parts of melons.

>>685653773
could be halves from 3 melons for some reason

File: tyrone.jpg (93 KB, 620x670) Image search: [Google]

93 KB, 620x670

I bet OP is laughing his fucking ass off rn

File: 1463947709452.jpg (308 KB, 2006x994) Image search: [Google]

308 KB, 2006x994

>>685652510

>>685654053
You're right, since two halves could be from one and the other two could be from separate individual melons. Therefore >>685653114
covers it accurately.

>>685652510
TFW you try to make people argue but a vast majority of the responses you get can't be proven wrong

>>685653591
Nigger mathematicians get nigger grades in school

>>685653184
or even 7 (discard two halves)

>>685653076
This is what common core is responsible for, this level of "intellect"? It's a shame the people who push common core are degenerate, anti-Christian, Jews because using their own method you would have no problem explaining how Jesus fed 5,000 people with 2 fish and 5 loaves.

>>685653354
>>685652510
/Thread

5

>>685653114
winrar

>>685652510
There are actually 6 present.

4 have quarter sections cut out of them, 2 are cut in half.

However: You could cut the remaining amount to fill in the volume of 5.

>>685652510
3/4 + 3/4 + 3/4 + 3/4 + 2/4 + 2/4 + 2/4 + 2/4 = 20/4 = 5

File: 1459234246450.jpg (171 KB, 1058x727) Image search: [Google]

171 KB, 1058x727

>>685653421

>>685652510
There's either 6, 7, or 8 if we're talking how many watermelons were required to make this
If we're talking about adding fractions then there's 5
These are the only two answers and are both right depending on what we're looking for

>>685652510
6
4 sliced 3/4
2 sliced 1/2

9 (the remaining watermelons are stuck up my arse)

>>685652510
2, 3 or 4, depending on the central image

>>685654739
There could be 8 present, or even 7.

sum(x) = 5
6 ≤ x ≤ 8

>>685652510
I think I know how niggers feel now.

>>685654984
User with an IQ that is two standard deviations below average detected

>>685652510

All of them.

>/thread

>>685652510


...6.

>>685655138
Correct. 6-8*

Upon further inspection I am leaning more toward 8 now due to discrepancies in the watermelon strip patterns.

>>685655170
Want to buy a troll detector, you pleb

File: 1415913765608.jpg (82 KB, 953x960) Image search: [Google]

82 KB, 953x960

>>685654919

File: ay.gif (403 KB, 245x118) Image search: [Google]

403 KB, 245x118

OP HQ leaked footage

>>685652510
5

0 whole watermelons
8 sliced watermelons
5 imaginary whole watermelons

>>685655533
We're on /b/
It's just as likely that this faggot is retarded and not actually a troll

4 Melone.

4x0,75 + 4x0,25 = 4

5

if you answer in any number you are retarded... its a watermelon , you eat it... unless youre a farmer u just eat what you can and not worry about the rest.

File: 13239182_544709829034260_2543159993460019068_n.jpg (19 KB, 400x398) Image search: [Google]

19 KB, 400x398

>>685655461

>>685652974
>>685652993

But what is the halfes are from only 2 melons? Or 3?

Its either 5 or "go fuck yourself with this lacking info"

>>685652510
6, you can't magically fuse 1/4 slices

6

xD

Its 6

The 4 halves are in a box on top

Trick questions. Correct answer: None, those are nigger-pickles.

>>685652921
i disagree

>>685652510
4 melons around the outside, each of which has had a quarter removed and discarded.
4 half melons in the centre, produced from 2 whole melons.

6 melons in total used to create the image. 5 melon's worth of fruit remaining.

8. End of.
You can't put two fucking halves of a melon together and claim it's a whole one.

>>685656083
I can't eat shit but I won't

>>685652510
9

there are none!! a watermelon is consider a watermelon when its whole. what you see there are simply watermelon pieces, even the big ones

>>685658663
Fuck off.

>>685658776
Theres more than one answer fuckface.

6. the ones in the box are halves 2 watermelon

>>685655461
You can't know for sure, because any number of the 4 halves in the middle could be rotated on the z-axis 180 degrees, so that you are seeing the 'bottom' instead of the 'top.' That would mean you are not able to visually align the stripes to determine whether they are from the same melon. The answer maintains its ambiguity. 6 - 8.

Since the halves are clearly not cut, it cannot be 5 unique melons, and since there are clearly no extra pieces, it cannot be 9 or more unique melons. But two of the halves could be from unique melons, while the other two are from the same melon, therefore it could be 7.

6 - 8.

>>685652510
4

>>685658776
whats the matter bro? cant take the truth?

>>685658991
apostrophe, not even once you cunt

7

200

>>685658663
Do you traditionally call a 3/4 watermelon a 'piece,' though? That's not correct in connotation. Anything more than a "half" is a whole watermelon with pieces cut from it.

>>685652510
6, and 4 quarters discarded.

>>685652510
there are only 4, what is everyone saying?

>>685652510
holy fucking shit all of guy guys are retarded... there are quarter pieces taken out of the outer pumpkins not halves.

>>685659518
nah awhole watermelon is a watermelon nothing els

>>685653114
Can't argue.

>>685653691
kek

6
>4 for the ¾ sizes
>2 for the ½ sizes

You need to buy 6 watermelons to take this picture. You see the mass of 5 watermelons depicted.

>>685652510
4 halves = 2
4 3/4 melons = 3
2+3 = 5
There is no discussion

>>685657760
i disagree

0

There are only fractions of watermelons and not a singlr whole one.

>>685660208
agree

>>685660208
Finally someone who's aren't completly retardet.

>>685652510
6, it's a box on top of 4 melons containing 2 melons.

5

>>685660208
>4x3/4=4

retard detected.

4x3/4=3
4x1/2=2

The answer is 5.

File: ch001.jpg (859 KB, 2140x1446) Image search: [Google]

859 KB, 2140x1446

>>685652510
While we're asking stupid fucking questions are the characters on this piece muslim or chinee?

>>685652510
(3 x 3/4) + (4 x 1/2) = 4.25

Four watermelons and a quarter.

>>685660788
arabic

>>685660765
l2math faggot

>>685660847
there's four outside. not 3

>>685660847
>>685652510
My bad, it's (4 x 3/4), which gives us 5 full watermelons.

>>685660788
Sandnigger, made in china

>>685660847
>3x3/4

can you not count? there's 4 3/4 melons. the answer is 5, you stupid cunt.

>>685660453
i disagree

>>685661227
i agree

>>685661107
>>685661084

>>685658155
I think that math might argue with you on that one

If you're counting how many original watermelons, then 6 since the middle ones make up two (Left and bottom are the same watermelon, same goes for top and right) and the corners make up for more.

If you wanna count the amount of watermelon, then 5.

>>685661272
I'm undecided

>>685652510
9000

>>685660765
The middle ones are two watermelons, each cut in half. The outer ones are 4 watermelons with a quarter less in each.

>>685652510
6

>>685661272
Same

>>685661308
It's not exactly maths we're dealing with. We're dealing with fruit, you can't call half a melon a whole when it is shipped with another half. It would be labeled as 2 halves.

>>685660910
thank you.

>>685661094
thank you. I think.

Took me a minute but 5.

>>685652510
Trick question. There are no watermelons there, unless you're a nigger.

>>685662442
Am I Nigger^5 then?

>>685652510

>72
/thread

>>685652510
4 halves = 2 and then we have 12 quarters which is 3 so we have a total of 5 watermelons.

>>685662578
Yes, you're a nigger. Now stay away from my bike.

>>685654303
Still got a lot of responses

8 pieces of melon.
4 pieces outside the box.
4 pieces inside the box.
Total value of melon: 5

>>685652993
Not 8, 6 in that case, the half watermelons are clearly two watermelons, just look at the patterns of them. But there is 5 melons worth of melon there

>>685652510
5

>>685660471
If you pick a flower then take out one petal it's still a flower dumb ass, just because you removed some doesn't suddenly mean it can't be counted as a watermelon

5

5 Watermelons worth of volume,
6 Watermelons assuming the halves match up,
8 Watermelons maximum assuming halves are unique.

File: IMG-20151213-WA0016.jpg (137 KB, 640x480) Image search: [Google]

137 KB, 640x480

>>685652510

Actually you only need 2 and a half watermelons to make that figure...

Stupid cunts...

Minimum of 5 and a maximum of 8 (if we assume they are ½ and ¾ watermelons.

Shit! A nigger can't count at a time like this!

In theory, there is 5 melons there. But see, the thing is, you cant actually match up some of the melons with eachother, without having the split one of the halves. so there is 4 "half" melons. they could be matched together and have a total of 2 whole melons. then there is 4 3/4 melons. You can not physically put them together. So that means that there is 4 separate melons there. So there is 4, and then an additional 2. so there is technically 6 total melons there.

but im not a niggerfag

>>685652510
5

>>685663920
Uh... 1... Fuck! I can't count that high!

>>685652510
Technically 8 partial watermelons since you didn't say whole, but if you meant whole then its 5.

>>685653076
>bunch of retarded

what if every watermelon is sliced in half, but we can only observe the upper view

>>685663360
Yup, exactly this.

>>685664428
shut the fuck up

There are 6 unique watermelons in the picture.

There are 2 whole watermelons, and 4 partial watermelons.

>>685652510
4.5 you fucking retards

>>685653207

If you cut the leg off of four babies, and cut two other babies in half and put them on the table (without the removed legs), how many babies are on the table?

The answer is 6 you fucking retard. You can't mix and match babies.

5

>>685652510
5

>>685664800
>You can't mix and match babies.
Yes you can. You just don't have the audacity to make a frankenbaby.

>>685652510
6 these idiots dont use their eyes

>>685652510
6.....duh

> 8
> 8
> 8
> 8
> 8

>>685653114
ah, but you can only see the top half of each of the sections of melon... therefore it could add up to only 2.5 watermelons if the bottom hemispheres are missing.

File: 9000.jpg (61 KB, 496x370) Image search: [Google]

61 KB, 496x370

>>685652510

File: Dp7U0p3.png (79 KB, 235x188) Image search: [Google]

79 KB, 235x188

>>685653114
he dunnit

There are 5 whole water melons
But there are 6 to 8 individual watermelons there.

>>685652510
Depends on where you cut them. If you cut them in Detroit, there are gonna be 0 watermelons.

>>685655862
This. Thank you anon for not being a retarded idiot.

>>685652510
4 melons with a quarter cut out and 2 melons cut in half.
at minimum 6 melons were involved but could be as many as 8 melons were involved.

>>685652510
Four because cutting a watermelon doesn't make it a new one. Same as a car. Cutting a car in half leaves you 1 car.

File: bitchholdon.jpg (72 KB, 419x610) Image search: [Google]

72 KB, 419x610

>>685652510
It's impossible to know as it's ambiguous whether the halves come from the same watermelon or not. Level up your PHIL plebs.

>>685666554
>>685666554
if you take two ford fusions and cut them in half and take the front end of one and the ass end of another and bind them together it's 1 car stupid this is how they do it in the factory. common knowledge dude, you must be a trump supporter because you are so stupid.

0,75 x 4
+
0,5 x 4
=
5


:)
:)

5 or 8

all of these shitposts have multiple answers you fucking retards

File: Answer.jpg (147 KB, 761x460) Image search: [Google]

147 KB, 761x460

Took the time off my life to make this shit for all the idiots.

>>685662948
>the half watermelons are clearly two watermelons, just look at the patterns of them

are you a fucking watermelon forensic scientist or something? that's not at all clear

>>685668520
>/thread

>>685668520
ok kudos to you anon thats fucking smart

5.5

>>685668520
good to see someone fucking understands this simple ass bullshit

>>685668520
you took all that time and didn't even consider the four halves could be from two watermelons making it 6 total watermelons used, it also could be 7 or 8. fail bro

>>685668520
>THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS

>>685652510
Zero.

I'm certain it is 3

>>685669132
except for
this
>>685669082

>>685652510
5

>>685669082
are you fucking blind you retard?
why did I mark them as 0.5 for?
0.5x4=2 you dumb blind fuck
argue with me when you major math

>>685652510
5, сука

>>685652510

6

/thread

>>685668520
The 6 actually comes from the train of though of the center picture, but using 2 watermelons cut in half instead of 1 half of 4 different watermelons.

>>685652510
(4 x 0.75) + (4 x 0.5) = 5

>>685653007
Good job conor. A+
>>685653012
A.J. take a note from this guy.

File: Screenshot_2016-05-22-23-02-17.png (44 KB, 720x1280) Image search: [Google]

44 KB, 720x1280

5

>>685665359
not true: you can see the 3/4 melons are top to bottom.
technically the 1/2 melons could be 1/4 melons, but since they are the same height they most likely are not.

>>685669082
NO IT CAN NOT YOU FUCKING MORON!

THERE ARE ONLY 3 ANSWERS, BUT ONLY 2 OF THEM ARE CORRECT YOU FUCKING IDIOTS AND THOSE ARE 5 AND 8!!!

>>685652510
Impossible to say. With only the top down view you can't be sure those watermelons aren't bisected in half

>>685669396
you forgot 7 though stupid bitch

>>685652510
6, but four are missing a slice.

0. Watermelons aren't real

>>685669754
This nigga knows.

File: 12479330_999149976813645_1644578725_n.jpg (44 KB, 640x640) Image search: [Google]

44 KB, 640x640

2

>>685669415
yeah but its not logical...
you cant treat 4 watermelons on the outside as whole watermelons, but when counting 4 on the inside, treat them as half parts.
you see what wrong with that king of logic? (you cant even call it logic, because its not logical in any way)

>>685669754
you can idiot, look at the light and shadows

>>685652510
6

>>685669713
Dude, imma bite the bait here.

The middle watermelons might be Two watermelons cut in half and arranged accordingly.

I'd rather waste 6 watermelons for a picture than 8. And it can be done with 6.

So the answers are:

In terms of volume: 5
In terms of watermelons used for the picture: {6,7,8}

6 melons were used to create this image, regardless of cuts

>>685668520
you're wrong about the one one the right ,though

>>685669754
>It says: "in the picture"
>it doesent say: genetically and mathematically examine watermelons in person to gather evidence if those watermelons are or aren't bisected in half
you are supposed to act as if watermelons are bisected in half and give answer based on that

>>685670377
Actually you absolutely cannot tell based on shadows. There is no indication for how deep they go. How would you accommodate your calculation if they were only 75% of their normal depth?

>>685669396
o you know...

0.5+0.5=1 and that 1 can be a whole fucking watermelon that got cut in half.

so you still get your .5*4 to be 2 but the .5s might come from the same watermelon.

>>685670946
Where does it say "in the picture" you fucking cunt? Learn to read

5

File: donbsour.jpg (44 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]

44 KB, 500x500

>>685653421

>>685652510

How many melon's worth? At least 2.5, at most 5.

How many melons were used to make that image? No less than 6, no more than 16.

There could be fucking cantaloupes on the bottom half for all you fuckers know.

>>685671613
>16

??????????????

>>685670163
what are you talking about? you can treat the 3/4 melons as whole melons because you need 1 whole melon to make them, there is no use for the 1/4 melon left over. but two of the half melons can be made from 1 whole melon. technically yeah you could use 3 1/4 melons to make a the fourth 3/4 melon giving 5 in total but in this image there are no 1/4 melons.

TLDR 6 is a feasible answer

>>685671613

Scratch that, it could be as few as 3 making up the image.

>>685670435
you people still don't get the problem...
you cant just imply your beliefs on how the person who used the picture cut watermelons, with that logic the answer can also be 6.5 or 7.5...

>You are supposed to count what you see on the picture, not what you don't see, that is the point. and you are supposed to treat the halves in the middle as bisected watermelons, because, again, you are counting whats on the picture.

>>685652510
there is no watermellon..... /thread

>>685671178
the original says that, I guess OP was too retarded to copy paste text.

>>685668599
At first I thought it too, but the two in the down left corner look quite alike. And why would someone waste money on buying an extra watermelon just for that?

>>685670163
6 is how many watermelons minimum to make the photo, not by volume, you fucking mong

>>685652510
0 those are grapefruits painted to look like watermelon

>>685672023
There are 4 watermelons halves on the middle.
They are not composed of two watermelon quarters each.

I can use 2 watermelons for the middle bit and have no leftover. I can use 4 watermelons and have 4 halves left over. I can even use 3 and have 2 halves left over.

You can use 6, 7 or 8 since neither of the pieces themselves is composed by smaller ones.

>>685653114
>there are parts from no fewer than 6 and no more than 8 watermelons
/thread

If I ripped a child in half and stuck it's head+ shoulders on the torso+ legs of another child does that mean I now have one whole child?

No, you retards. I have 2 mangled children.
There are 6 watermelons.

>>685671799
If you count what's happening off picture, all of the answers are 5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8.

The first most logically correct answer would be 5, counting the watermelons by parts. Second most logically correct answer would be 8, counting the watermelons centers.

There are only 2 correct answers and those are 5 and 8. Other answers do not matter as they are based on suggestions and assumptions, which only give them a possibility of being correct IF the main suggestion or assumption is true.

You can google it, even mathematicians say the correct answers are either 5 or 8.

>>685674285
8 is also based on an assumption, you retard. 8 is based upon the same assumptions as an answer of 6 or 7.

You people are literally all fucking retarded. Watermelons don't just stand up. They would have to be cut on the bottom so there's a flat base for them to rest on. There's obviously less than 5 watermelons, but more than 2.5

File: Wodda Melm.jpg (24 KB, 474x630) Image search: [Google]

24 KB, 474x630

>>685652510

File: meme support.png (81 KB, 403x195) Image search: [Google]

81 KB, 403x195

EVERYONE IN THIS THREAD SHUT THE FUCK UP

NEW MEME

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raZkWL2mndY