Because everywhere I see, its always talk about how Taker buried Bray. I mean why do people care so much? Its not like Bray was ever in Taker's league? And its not like he squashed a up and coming mega-star or something. Its just a rambling fatass who bores people on the mic on a routine basis. Taker's legacy shouldn't be tarnished over something like this.
Because he stayed way too long and is a shell of his former self
> Bray Wyatt
> not an up-and-coming megastar
kys
>>838561
That's simply not true, Taker worked a great few matches with Brock and managed to tell a story - A quality that the vast majority of wrestlers in WWE today lack.
>>838560
Yeah. People actually though taker should had lost another Wrestlemania just to push some fedora neckbeard.
Now suddenly if you are defeated by lesnar you should job to anyone.
>>838561
>> Bray Wyatt
>> not an up-and-coming megastar
hes an up and coming midcarder, Vince has already shown that he was the new mastodon to be the best and that big luke is the real talent of the family.
>>838560
Cena buried Bray 2 years ago at mania. Bray has yet to fully recover from that shit.
>>838562
> nostalgiafagging
Neither of the wholly unnecessary Lesnar matches were "great" by any means and wrestlers outside of top guys don't get to book their own matches
But Bray is shit, you can't pull a "scary" gimmick with PG audience
the way of the business is that on your way out you put the young guys over. He lost his streak and lost to Brock, he has nothing but his legacy, he's done and on his way out.
>>838624
Undertaker debuted in 1990 which was as "PG" as it gets
>>838560
Cena buried Bray though
>>838629
Undertaker wasn't "scary" until, like, eight years after he debuted
>>838648
> being this wrong
18+