A safe space to post girls with penises.
No insecure heterosexuals allowed! This fetish is within board rules and much less degenerate than fart/diaper threads.
>inb4 faggots and their "futa/shemale" argument
>>517852
Since you're focusing on the dicks, you're gay, bruh.
>>518099
I never said I wasn't.
>>518099
Your point?
>>517852
Sorry, if there's no pussy, it's just a dude with tits.
>>518234
Epic, simply epic! I too love the films of Seth MacFarlane, my atheist /b/retheren
>>517852
hey man. The diaper thread doesn't take potshots at you.Can't you understand that we're in the same boat? People hating us just for being here?
>>518510
nope, artist is mofuringu
>>518549
>tfw my fetish is frowned upon everywhere
You guys have it lucky, at least the mods aren't banning you for no reason other than "eww that's gross and taboo for some subjective reason"
>>518583
>"eww that's gross and taboo for some subjective reason"
This reaction is probably a reason why you fetish it, even if its subconsciously. You're attracted to it because it's different, because it's taboo.
>>518099
>dicks are gay
get out fag
>>517852
It's there a way to find that pic without dicks?
>>519849
Top left corner of the picture.
>>517852
>hermaphroditic freaks of nature
>less degenerate than thick fluffy underwear
>>519897
>these people must like the same cartoon porn that i like
stop being a faggot
>>519938
Just fighting fire with fire.
<- Any source on this ?
>>520064
That's -8's self-insert.
Go on swfchan and search for him if you want to see the flashes with him in it.
No source on that particular image, sorry.
>>519897
>>520103
thx. ur a legend.
>>519897
If you like fart/diaper, you should literally be executed.
>>519897
Even scat is better than diaper faggotry. Yet, there have been hundreds of threads on this board
>>517965
>Male character given female parts given male parts
nice
>>520103
Searching "-8" on swfchan comes up with nothing
Pls help
>>521562
foun it http://gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3065061
>>520064
http://swfchan.com/37/182881/?You%26%23039%3Bll_vomit.swf
you're welcome mate
>>520115
More like:
>Diaperfags
>Perfectly normal and respectable people who happen to enjoy comfy underwear
>Traps
>Delusional fags who are only one step removed from mutilating their genitals
>>520388
>>520403
No, diapers are objectively just as normal of a fetish as panties. Stating otherwise just reveals you to be a retarded bigot.
>>518099
Were already masturbating to cartoons, it cant get more degenerate than that, just embrace it and accept the dick.
>>521656
>diaper fetish
>normal
Ok kid
>>521618
FUCKING BASED ANON
What's the difference between a flat chested futa and a trap?
>>522155
most people either draw flatchested futa with a vagina or stop deluding themselves and just draw traps
>>518099
Wow amazing news
>>517852
>trap/futa
>a safe place to post girls with penis
But dosent that defeat the very purpose of traps? The whole point is That they aren't girls.
>>517869
the divide is real. You're just to much of a slant-eye envy weebfag to understand that people might like a flavor of dickgirl other then your nippon garbage.
On another topic this thread is exactly what people want. If even the furry-tier fetishes can keep themselves to cycling threads, why can't this
>>526461
ew
>>517852
That artist draws some seriously cute dicks
>>526489
Because it's a body type fetish and not a specific subject. An example of both would be freckles or short hair versus bondage or cuckolding. The first two are simply body types and can be combined with any other fetish. They're more a variation than a fetish unto themselves.
Take this hypothetical. If there's a BatmanChicks thread and a Big Tits general thread at the same time, you'd probably post the picture of a giant-jugged Catwoman in the former and not the latter since it's a lot more relevant to the topic at hand. It's the same thing with futanari.
>>517852
>safe space
>"girls" with penises
>insecure heterosexuals
Excuse me sir, I believe you have the wrong website, as this is 4chan.org, where we do not service SOCJUS. You may be looking for: www.Tumblr.com
Thank you and have a nice day.
>>527795
>Another Trumpfag falling for obvious bait
Why am I not surprised?
>>521656
>>527795
Found the retards
If you're here you're a fucked up weirdo just like us. The fact that you're bothering to troll this thread proves that you're retarded as well.
Liking diapers is not fucking normal
Neither is liking futas
And yeah, if you're bothering to troll this thread you're either an insecure heterosexual or (far more likely) you're a little gay, just like the rest of us. Point is, there's a hide thread button and yet here you are, looking at penises
>>527936
>insecure heterosexual or (far more likely) you're a little gay, just like the rest of us.
I was with you until this point. Chalking all the hate a fetish gets up to insecurity is kind of a cowardly way to write it off. By all means, write off whatever hate you want to, but knee-jerking with the "insecurity!" accusation is nothing more than a glorified "no u!"
Furthermore, plenty of us into futanari are hetero while plenty of people who dislike it are gay. Traps I couldn't care less about.
Anyone have that comic where a female mage in training didn't start brewing their potion on time and they add some sands of time or something to it to make it brew faster and the result makes her grow a dick?
>>520115
>Someone literally took time out of their day to make this
>>519897
Nobody asked you to come in here, you must be here for a reason
>closeted homosexual
>>526461
This is not okay
>>526461
This would be hot if it weren't butt ugly.
>>521656
diaper fags are so delusional.
>>527936
I just want to see more shemales. Call them guys with tits or girls with just a cock and balls but that's my flavor and we almost exclusively see the "futa"strain
>>527795
You are aware that trump is pro-trans right? Probably faps to dickgirls himself.
>>532059
The funniest thing about this is that 4chan has a long history of trap support. We made fucking Baily J, and there's always been a decently large trans contingent on 4chan. For a long time between 2004 and 2010, this was easily the best place on the internet for trans stuff, since otherwise all you had was absolute bullshit like susansplace. While there has also always been an anti-trans group on 4chan... the two have really not mixed that much, historically, and the anti-trans group tends to come out the worse for wear when they do.
>>532150
Probably isn't so much the case anymore since the last couple of years have seen the politics surrounding trans issues go completely bat-fucking-shit insane.
But you're right in that as long as the pro-trans people keep themselves relatively sane and don't make everyone else have to live through the hell of a SJW buzzword minefield they're fine on most of 4chan. Hell, Bailey Jay herself abhors that crowd too.
>>527795
>>532059
Most people into futa/dickgirls aren't exactly into the concept of transgender porn. Futanari took off and became popular precisely because it expunges all the gender baggage and issues surrounding trans porn and simplifies the form into a fantastical chick with a dick.
It's like when people used unrealistically dark-skinned elves (Drow for example) to have a skin color contrast while avoiding the political bullshit that has embedded itself into interracial on both sides.
>>527948
Those boobs look off to me.... Very not-modeseven-looking
>>528068
There's plenty of insecure heterosexuals. Just look at any thread on chans that involves chicks with dicks (real or drawn) and you'll find at least one asshole who keeps spamming
>her
>her
>her
>her
>her
>her
>>520064
high rez version
>>532393
Good eye :^]
>>532609
That has more to do with the fact idiots can't resist that low-effort bait.
And nothing about spamming that nonsense indicates the person doing so is an insecure heterosexual when, as mentioned, there are bisexuals, gays and lesbians who dislike futanari and the largely heterosexual fanbase based around it.
In fact, insecure heterosexuals are probably just as likely to start fighting with someone spamming >her >her >her because it's calling into question their heterosexuality.
>>521656
It is literally a bag to shit on that you wear
>>519817
Any sauce on this?
>>518099
Why do you mention this? We're all in the thread. We know what we are doing.
>>519897
>thick fluffy underwear caked in piss and shit
Hey, I'm not judging, but if you wanna go there
can you nignogs stop being autistic and just post dicks
>>521656
>literally wallowing in your own excrement like a toddler
>better than literally just liking dicks, feminine men, or chicks with dicks
also
>>Perfectly normal and respectable people
>>enjoy comfy underwear
diaperfag pls go
shouldn't you be microwaving the used diapers you found in a dumpster so you can wear them?
i swear this board should be image only after the OP
>>534237
>>535297
No. It's thick fluffy underwear that also happens to have the entirely optional function of being possible to use as a bathroom. Diapers have absolutely nothing to do with piss or shit on their own.
>>537462
If you associate diapers with shit, then that would make you Pamperchu, retard. Most diaper fetishists like clean diapers.
Dirty diapers are disgusting because there's shit in them, not because the shit is in a diaper. Do you find panties disgusting because of pantypooping porn too?
>>537865
this is cool.
>>537865
>associate diapers with shit
That's literally what they're for, are you daft?
>>518099
>2014
>Still trying to gaybash people for fapping to traps and futa
We're beyond apathy at this point
if fapping to futas and traps makes me gay, I'll gladly be the gayest of all the gays on gaychan
/discussion
Diaperfags, your fetish litterally only caters to you and like maybe 200 other cucks in that inhabit this weird blue anal bead...
>>539283
>what is urinary incontinence
>what is people wearing them without going in them at all
No, but clearly you are. Once again, using diapers as a bathroom is entirely optional. Even among those who do go in them, the main purpose they serve is to be underwear. Hence, it's irrational to ignore the fact that it's underwear and fixate on shit of all things, so doing so says quite a bit about you.
>>539402
Nah, it's one of the more normal fetishes, actually. It's just illiterate retards like you overreacting to it.
>>540058
I can say with SE certainty that diaper fetish is pretty rare. Just look at the relative rareness of it on fetish sites, plus the (generally) poor quality of the hentai of it. I will grant that there are exceptions the the last point. But they are just that, exceptions.
>>540093
Nope, it's common as fuck. The issue is just that many feel like they have to hide it due to people overreacting to it.
>>540058
>it's one of the more normal fetishes,
t. diaper autist
kill yourself
>>540753
Nah. Maybe you should do that if you can't deal with the fact there's nothing wrong with diapers, though? Being disgusted by diapers is pretty damn autistic, unlike being turned on by them, which is a completely normal reaction to how they feel between ones legs. Try wearing one, and you'll understand.
>>541017
I don't like the fetish police, but anon you're being straight up delusional here. People will engage in vore or gore-free snuff RP before they even think to touch diapers or scat.
>>537865
>Diapers have absolutely nothing to do with piss or shit on their own.
how fucking stupid can one be
>>521656
>More like:
>>Diaperfags
>>Perfectly normal and respectable people
ha ha ha ha ha enjoy shitting yourself
>>542323
If they're into vore and snuff, they're hardly in any position to judge an underwear fetish. Thinking underwear is worse than outright lethal stuff is as delusional as it gets.
>>542601
Apparently stupid enough to think clean diapers have to do with piss and shit, while also failing at punctuation. This site is 18+, you know.
>>542658
>ha ha ha ha ha
Diaper haters, everyone.
>>542713
And you must be either 18- or 65+ to wear a diaper. Which one are you?
I'm surprised at all the judgement in this thread. Usually /d/ is one of the least judgmental boards. Of course the diaperfags aren't helping since they are just feeding the trolls.
>>542733
You mean it's normal for kids and teens to be wearing diapers now?
Also, the word adult generally refers to people between 18-65. You know, adult diapers?
>>543159
I meant 18-, so I might as well have said 5- and it'd still cover babies.
And with 65+ I meant adult diapers
>>542737
Probably becauase /aco/ is a catch-all thread for western art. /d/ has a mixture of people looking at weird fetishes. /aco/ has people browsing for totally vanilla stuff.
>>520115
Source on those cute traps?
>intense diaper-related shitposting
>no qt traps
stop
>>520115
>Diapers: comic sans
>Traps: FF DIN
>>544710
Too bad, that's not what "adult" means. Adult means 18-65. You know what else adult means? Sexy.
>>545004
It's fucking impossible to have a a Futa thread these days, because the OPs always feel like starting some dumbass shit.
How about we post some porn for a change, huh guys?
>>545364
Holy shit i didnt know Niku Ringo had made new stuff.
>>542713
Whether you want to admit it or not, diapers are an extremely niche fetish and by that, not normal. Hell, not even major fetishes like BDSM or Futa are considered normal.
>>542737
This isn't /d/. There are a lot more normalfags around here who hate any kind of deviant fetish whatsoever.
The diaperfags are also making this incredibly worse by insisting, quite delusionally, that their fetish is in any way not extremely niche even when it comes to deviant hentai fetishists, let alone vanilla normalfags.
>>545349
It's not like a futa thread is going anywhere special without a more specific theme anyway. It's a bodytype fetish, unless you narrow the criteria a bit it's going to be a vague smattering of unrelated stuff.
>>547187
The only delusional ones are the fags overreacting to what's literally no worse than being into panties or leather. There's nothing "degenerate" about being into diapers, whether diaper hating bigots want to admit it or not.
>>547270
Again, you're missing the whole fucking point. I didn't say it's degenerate. I never even stated an opinion on the fetish. I'm simply saying that it is not a popular fetish by any stretch of the imagination and pretending it's normal (as in average and common) is being delusional by definition.
If you think your fetish has the same scale of appeal that panties or leather does you're fucking delusional. That's not a statement of like or dislike towards your fetish, that's telling you to come back down to Earth and get a grip on reality.
Thread was going fine until people started having arguments of "my fetish is less degenerate than yours."
Enough with the subjective bullshit, everybody's fetish is niche and considered abnormal by society, nobody's better or worse. As long as your fetish doesn't bring harm to people there's nothing wrong with it. Now all of you shut the fuck up and post dickgirls or so help me.
>>547282
Sounds like you're missing the point, though. It's not about how many people think something (remember, it was "normal" to think the earth was flat), it's about the facts. And the fact is, diapers are a tactile underwear fetish. Therefore, it obviously is on the same level as similar fetishes like panties and leather to any rational person. Hatred and disgust for them is literally pathological, caused by bad parenting during potty training. Therefore, the issue isn't with diapers, but with the negative attitude towards them. Simple as that.
>>547469
The problem is we have diaperfags in this thread arguing against what you just said, that their fetish is abnormal in reference to the rest of society.
They're so defensive of their fetish and so closed off from the rest of the world that they can't take a neutral statement pertaining to the scale of appeal their fetish has without screaming about "bigotry."
>>548600
Jesus fucking Christ are you actually paying attention to yourself here? Fetishes are always subjective things. That's there very nature, so taking into account how widely their appeal is when judging it if they're normal is part and parcel to discussing them in the first place.
I never said anything bad or positive about your fetish, I merely stated that considering it normal is delusion.
You want to discuss the facts here? How about the fact diapers are made solely for potty training infants and incontinent adults? The second there are twenty-somethings parading down a runway wearing leather diapers then I'll concede to your asinine assertions, until then shut the fuck up and get a grip on reality.
Your fetish is a tiny obscure and abnormal niche. There's nothing about recognizing that fact that means it's terrible or stupid or you should stop liking it. Stop conflating the two.
>>545371
Does a version of this without the text exist? Couldn't find it via reverse image search.
>>550018
No. The problem is retards like you and the OP talking shit about other fetishes, then getting butthurt when you get educated on the facts.
>Fetishes are always subjective things.
Yeah... no. That's not how things work. All you're saying is that you can't think for yourself.
>How about the fact diapers are made solely for potty training infants and incontinent adults?
That's not a fact. That's an ignorant assumption derived from nothing but an ignorant cultural stigma. Meanwhile, back in reality, the fact is that diaper brands made for fetishists are a large thriving market.
>The second there are twenty-somethings parading down a runway wearing leather diapers then I'll concede to your asinine assertions, until then shut the fuck up and get a grip on reality.
Other way around, fuckface. The reality is that there is no reason that shouldn't happen, considering diapers are underwear, so YOU need to shut the fuck up so it can happen. If you think it's abnormal, you are the problem.
>>551068
>If you think it's abnormal, you are the problem.
Actually, this is the problem. Not that guy btw
>>551068
Never talked shit about your fetish once. Never said it was stupid, never said it was wonderful. Point to where I did in any of my posts. (>>542323 >>547187 >>547282 >>550018)
If I say a hypothetical genre of music, like heavy polka dance metal, is not normal that's not a statement of taste or worth. It's remarking on how said genre is not in the realm of ordinary, average, common or widely accepted. I'm not using the word "normal," as a tool to measure quality here.
The absolute worst kind of fetishist is the one who fails to recognize their fetish for what it is and insists - despite common sense and facts - the normality of their niche fetish. The fact you're conflating my statement with one pertaining to quality while delusionally arguing how normal your fetish is shows you're one of those idiots who thinks normal equals good.
If you were not, you wouldn't be so bent out of shape about this, you'd not care whether your fetish is abnormal or not. You really need to deal with that insecurity surrounding your tastes anon, we're all into abnormal stuff, that doesn't mean it's bad, but refusing to recognize what is or isn't abnormal shows a profound disconnect from reality.
>The reality is that there is no reason that shouldn't happen
But it doesn't happen and until it does your assertions are baseless. Show me glamorous models strutting about in leather diapers or a major brand marketed to someone other than parents of newborns and incontinent adults.
Again, get a fucking grip on reality anon. This is embarrassing.
>>536231
>this will never be me
jdimsa
>>526489
Actually, the nips are the ones who get futa right most of the time.
>>517852
Really want to commission them some day. Maybe if they have a sale.
>>552625
The part where you claim it's worse than vore and snuff, perhaps? Or where you call people delusional for pointing out facts? The list goes on.
>The absolute worst kind of fetishist is
Hypocritical bigots like you. The best kind are the ones who educate and speak out against ones like you. The fact that it can be done is a sign of security in ones fetish.
>a major brand marketed to someone other than parents of newborns and incontinent adults.
Oh, let's see... Bambinos, ABUniverse, Tykables... and that's just off the top of my head. Lots of new ABDL diaper companies popping up recently too.
>This is embarrassing.
Yeah, you are, so learn to agree or shut the fuck up.
I prefer futa, just because I like preggo futa. Cant get that with shemales.
>>554810
>A major brand
>lists a bunch of literally whos
Alright. Get back to me when Hanes, Fruit of the Loom, or Victoria Secret starts making diapers. You know, major underwear brands, because like you said they're just fluffy underwear.
By the way, not that guy but I agree you're either delusional or trolling. I'll concede diapers being a normalfag fetish as soon as a shitty book about diapers marketed towards sexually frustrated housewives makes millions and gets an even shittier film adaption. Or you bring some hard empirical data to back up your claims.
>>555179
They're major diaper brands, faggot. Don't move the goalposts just because you got told.
>not that guy
>implying
Who remembers when this thread was about posting dick?
>>554810
>The part where you claim it's worse than vore and snuff perhaps?
I didn't say your fetish was worse than snuff or vore, I said your fetish has less wide appeal. This is the point you keep frustratingly not getting. Abnormal doesn't equal bad and normal doesn't equal good so making a statement that pertains to those two things is not a statement of quality.
>Or where you call people delusional for pointing out facts?
What facts? Your fetish is a small niche and if you think otherwise you're delusional. There is nothing wrong with that. Drop the insecurity and stop thinking normality equals quality.
>Oh, let's see... Bambinos, ABUniverse, Tykables... and that's just off the top of my head. Lots of new ABDL diaper companies popping up recently too.
I never said there weren't brands who'd cater to the fetish, I said show me MAJOR brands doing so. You can't even find latex manufacturers advertising their products on a major scale and their interests have much wider appeal than diapers do.
>Yeah, you are, so learn to agree or shut the fuck up.
Learn to agree or shut the fuck up? The hell is this? Your lack of reading comprehension that allows you to conflate someone talking about the scale of appeal your fetish enjoys as disparaging remarks to its quality is what's embarrassing. Your insecure insistence that your fetish is so super duper normal despite that having no relevance on it as a fetish is what's embarrassing.
>>555213
He didn't move the goalposts because he wasn't me. Goalposts were not moved either since you skipped a very key word. Don't get pissy that other people can see the delusion you're engaging in.
>>555229
I've been posting dick despite arguing.
>>555906
>I said your fetish has less wide appeal.
And you're wrong. Get over it.
>What facts?
Everything I said.
>I said show me MAJOR brands doing so.
And they are major diaper brands. Once again, stop moving the goalposts.
>The hell is this?
What you should do, so get to it already. And no, there's nothing embarrassing about calling out your nonsense.
>He didn't move the goalposts because he wasn't me.
Keep telling yourself that, samefag.
>>555229
Let it be a lesson not to talk shit about other fetishes.
>>557348
Nah, I won't get over it, because I'm perfectly fine with other people enjoying other fetishes. Straight up delusional bullshit kinda irks me though.
You haven't posted any facts. You said you're right and everyone should agree with you. Those aren't facts.
And then when asked for major brands of diaper manufacturers designed to cater to a supposedly normal sexual interest you provided a list of niche brands for fetishists.
Let's compare it to latex fetishism for a moment here. You can list all the fetish brands you want, Libidex, Polymorphe, WestwardBound, but in the end they're all fetish oriented. They don't cater to normalfag markets. You CAN however say that latex fetishism does have some normalcy to it since there are large mainstream celebs parading around in it, like Katy Perry or Ariana Grande and it regularly shows up in shitty music videos.
Forgive me for not specifying. When I asked for a major brand, I meant a brand that manufactures diapers for the sake of the fetish on a mainstream scale. There being brands set up for the obscure fetish does not change how popular it is as every fetish has some market catering to it in some way.
I'm glad you finally got the point on quality =/= scale of appeal though, kudos there! Unless of course you just gave up, but judging by the shortening length of your increasingly terse replies, that's just as likely.
Also, >>555179 wasn't me. Not everyone disagreeing with you is the same person. I was >>542323>>547187>>547282>>550018>>552625>>555906
>>557499
>>557499
> when asked for major brands of diaper manufacturers designed to cater to a supposedly normal sexual interest you provided a list of niche brands for fetishists.
Nope. You don't get to define what's major and what's niche. Who do you think is more knowledgeable about the diaper market?
>You CAN however say that latex fetishism does have some normalcy to it since
Since it's a tactile clothing fetish that's realistic, has an understandable appeal, and doesn't go against any basic instincts. Hey, just like diapers! Diapers not getting as much exposure doesn't make them "less normal", it just means there's some irrational bigotry to overcome. The fetish itself is no different.
>There being brands set up for the obscure fetish does not change how popular it is
Good thing it's not obscure, huh?
>that's just as likely.
Sorry to break it to you, but anything other than you being wrong is 0% likely.
>>557507
>5 seconds in MS Paint
Not that it'd matter either way. You'd still be wrong no matter how many of you there were.
>Normal:
> 1. conforming to the standard or the common type; usual; regular; natural.
> 5. free from any mental disorder; sane.
You guys do realize your entire argument is based on two completely different definitions of "normal", right? It's no wonder it's not going anywhere when you're talking right past eachother.
>>532950
Was this ever released?
I know it was part of some charity thing.
I need more brown traps in my life.
What is it that drives people with the more polarizing fetishes to so agressively and violently defend themselves and their choice of smut? It seems that the more the fetish weirds out others the more the people who like it try to defend and push it.
>>558725
The thing with diapers is that the dislike for them is caused solely by social conditioning rather than any inherent issue with them. Nobody is born with an instinctual distaste or fear for diapers like would be the case with things like guro, vore and scat, and yet some people seem to go blind with hatred whenever they see diapers. The reason for this lies solely within what we are told during potty training - which, by the way, is the period of life where child abuse is the most common.
Furthermore, as there is a quite realistic and direct appeal to diapers, considering they're real objects and worn over the crotch, it can hardly said to be a bizarre fetish in the way that things like transformation or balloons are.
Most importantly, though, the hatred for diapers doesn't stop just at fetishists, but severely affects those who are incontinent and have a legitimate need for wearing them. While there are certainly some who are sympathetic towards the issue, there are undisputably several venues of society where incontinent people are rejected, made fun of and even abused for their medical condition (Imagine being incontinent at high school, for example). The fact that there are adult diaper brands that have being easy to hide as their selling point says it all. Would it be reasonable for people with impaired sight to have to desperately hide their glasses at all times because others say glasses are for nerds?
In short, while everyone has their own tastes in fetishes, there is a good reason why speaking negatively of diapers isn't taken well, since it's demonstrably connected to negative attitudes towards disabled people.
>>557839
The problem is the diaperfag doesn't get that. The difference in definitions was explained to him repeatedly.
>>558725
Fuck if I know. If someone simply telling them in a neutral way their porn isn't that popular causes them to react this badly that might explain why everyone hates them. It's starting to feel like old school furry fandom here.
>>559002
People are born with an instinctive disgust of shit though and considering most people's only experience with diapers is tied to that body function the association exists for a reason. You can twist yourself into all kinds of mental knots arguing otherwise, but it won't change that reality.
>>560086
No, faggot. YOU are the one who doesn't get it. You're the one obsessing with how commonly it's portrayed, despite it being explained over and over why that's a retarded way of thinking.
It sure is neutral to compare an underwear fetish to scat and furry while claiming everyone hates it, by the way. You happen to be wrong on all accounts.
And yeah, associating diapers with shit in an attempt to justify irrational hatred happens to be the very definition of twisting yourself into mental knots. The reality is that that's not what diapers are, nor is it what diaper fetishism is about. Assuming diapers must be connected to shit is what we call - all together now - ignorance.
>>560190
I didn't say everyone hates IT, I said everyone hates THEM, as in stupid delusional fans like yourself who think associating shit and diapers is a crazy idea people shouldn't do despite the two being tied for pretty much everyone who uses diapers for their original intention. I never compared diaper fetishism and scat. I said it's fucking lunacy to act like it's spontaneously conditioned bigotry when others associate them for reasons that are seemingly obvious to everyone but yourself.
People hate YOU, not your fetish. I've never said anything disparaging of it, all my remakrs have been directed at YOU for failing to understand the simple points that have been repeated over and over again while you've been burying your head so far in the sand you wouldn't know reality if it came up and bit you in the ass.
You're behaving like the worst examples of the furry fandom of yore and that's why that fetish was mentioned. I wasn't comparing your diaper fetish to the furry fetish. You really need to deal with that insecurity and persecution complex distorting your reading comprehension to the point you're misinterpreting simple phrases.
You and people like you are the reason why /d/'s diaper threads are the absolute worst part of that board by far.
>>560301
>everyone hates THEM
Nope, just ignorant fags like you who can't handle having your incorrect worldview dismantled do.
>the two being tied for pretty much everyone who uses diapers for their original intention
You mean... being worn? Because I'm pretty sure they were always intended to be worn. Also, if we're talking adult diapers, by the way, then those who defecate in them are far from the majority, considering how rare fecal incontinence is in comparison to urinal incontinence (you know, even before we factor in fetishists, considering your ignorance of anything you haven't heard of before).
>YOU for failing to understand the simple points that have been repeated over and over again
That's you, though.
>You're behaving like the worst examples of the furry fandom of yore
No, I'm actually behaving in a great and respectable way. You just can't handle getting told.
>You and people like you are the reason why /d/'s diaper threads are the absolute worst part of that board by far.
Nope, we're the best. Stay mad.
>>560396
What valid reason is that? Because from my perspective he's throwing a fit because someone told him it's not bigotry when most people associate an item with its intended use.
I never said diaper fetishism is terrible. I said acting like you're persecuted because others won't entertain your delusions is terrible.
>I'm half considering looking up diapered trap material and dumping it to see if it improves the thread.
Dumping... I see what you did there. But I'm not sure why you think I'd object to this. I've stated repeatedly my contention is with this anon's perspective, not his fetish.
Please, post whatever you want, because while I may be annoying, at least I'm posting content to go with my bullshit, unlike you two.
>>560425
>>560425
>>560425
Just so you don't feel alone, I do feel that the anon you've been arguing with is so deluded as to be almost cultish or trolling you very very well. While I personally find diapers to be an antithesis to sexy, I'm 100% A-OK with them having their own threads and posting related content in other threads where it is wanted/not unwanted
>>560425
You also seem to be looking at things solely from your perspective, then calling others delusional for noticing things you haven't. The point he's making about diapers getting flak solely for other things that people happen to associate with it rather than what's actually relevant to the fetish is pretty clear. Makes me think of how people used AIDS to justify homophobia despite few gay people actually having it. You're basically saying "well, that's a thing, so there" as if it matters more than whether it should be or not.
>>560369
I'm sorry diaperetard. But that guy destroyed you.
Diaper fetish isn't common, first off. Compared to futanari/dickgirls/traps, which is the most common thing for men to be into. I really could give a fuck less anyway, you're a grown man into fucking diapers.
Kill yourself please, thank you.
>>563527
>samefagging this hard
You're the one who got destroyed, faggot. It is a common fetish, and that'll be even more clear if retards like you who overreact to it kill yourselves.
>>563527
>futanari/dickgirls/traps, which is the most common thing for men to be into
You're a special kind of retard, aren't you? You're into hermaphroditic literal freaks of nature, and you think you can judge others over an underwear fetish? Seriously?
>>563644
>everyone arguing with me is a samefag!
Of course when someone posts proof they're not you'll just scream "MSPAINT!" again.
>>563527
I doubt futanari/dickgirls/traps is the most common thing for men to be into. Also there's nothing wrong with any given fetish, my beef with this guy was always his approach to this and not his actual fetish.
>>560859
That's precisely my point though. He's looking at people who don't share his fetish and assuming bigotry because of a logical connection they have between the object of that fetish and its intended use.
Instead of understand why that is and explaining his fetish has nothing to do with said intended use he starts lashing out, labeling any realistic view as brainwashing and bigotry. It's the difference between being self-aware of what your fetish is and what associations it might have with people who don't share it and acting like you're a persecuted victim simply because that reality exists
A hard vore fetishist might explain a large part of his roleplaying fetish isn't actually about death itself, but to anyone who doesn't share his fetish the death is an unbreakable association. If they were acting like this diaperanon they'd immediately label anyone with that association a brainwashed bigot persecuting them instead of seeing why that association exists.
>>563664
Now you wouldn't be hypocritically attacking a fetish to retaliate against an attack on yours would you?
>>563753
>>563527 wasn't me.
>>563753
>>563762
>>563753
He did explain that in earlier posts, though.
>>563794
By labeling child abuse and brainwashing as the origin of that association instead of a natural progression of object -> intended use. He did nothing but label anyone with that association as mentally damaged versus his fetishism as an enlightened break from that thought and moreover he did it by asserting his fetish is super common as if that has any bearing on its quality.
>>517852
Is there any kind of rule enforcement or anything to keep those "fetish" retards away at all?
>>563797
I think he does have a point there, though. Potty training definitely does involve ruthless social pressure that can easily cross over into outright child abuse. It could very well be that people's aversions to diapers are a conditioned defense mechanism against what they feel is a slight to their maturity.
>>563805
Ever heard of "talk shit, get hit"? You brought it on yourself, really.
>>563820
And you're accusing others of samefagging?
People have an aversion to diapers because their intended use and reason of being is tied to defecation. That doesn't mean that's their only use, but that is the use people who don't have a fetish for them see and associate them with. And no, not all of it stems from Daddy raising his voice because the potty training is taking longer than expected.
If a parent is using "ruthless social pressure crossing over into child abuse," then that's child abuse by an unfit parent, not a flaw in teaching children proper hygiene and waste disposal.
>>563826
Not talking about trap/futa.
>>563854
Could everyone just shut up about fetishes other than futa or traps in this thread?
It seems bafflingly stupid to me that we are STILL fighting about the presence of futa on this board.
>>528030
Fortune removing her head to suck her own dick
Lick her own ass
etc.
Why can't I have detachable body parts?
>>563849
Fun fact: More than one person can disagree with you.
>>563849
Repeating that over and over won't make it true, you know.
>>564008
This I know since the person I was arguing with was shouting samefag despite me posting proof otherwise.
But you have to admit, someone chiming in with "he's right," and then reiterating a core part of his argument with the exact same word choice, syntax and sentence structure looks incredibly suspicious.
As does two responses (>>564014) less than three minutes apart on a board that doesn't move quite that fast.
Holy fuck is the diaperfag still here?
What is wrong with you?
>>563886
This always happens, I swear to God.
I blame OP for playing the Less Degenerate Than Thou card.
Frankly, we're all into some weird shit so let's just have an amnesty here.
>>566260
Nothing, as thoroughly proven earlier.
I think this counts as futa.
>>569795
>>569795
>>569800
>>569792
Wh-wha?
>>569805
Fuck, that face. What even.
>>563805
>Is there any kind of rule enforcement or anything to keep those "fetish" retards away at all?
Spam their threads with gore. Only thing that works. Remember: You are talking about mentally ill people here.
>futa thread
Aw, nic--
>it's mixed with traps
Fuck this thread.
>>570805
>They're mentally ill ones
>Let's spam art depicting extremely graphic violence, dismemberment and disembowelment
You're kind of contradicting yourself a bit there.
>>570856
I'm not a huge fan of them either but I don't see the harm as long as people don't conflate the two.
>>570805
You mean the people overreacting to underwear fetishes due to being conditioned through abuse into doing it? Yeah, that's a mental illness alright, as your eagerness to spam gore shows.
>>564781
What is this from? I must know!
>>550048
your best bet is on of Elzi Edits threads on /d/ thats his stuff
>>571731
http://necrosmos.tumblr.com/archive
>>532950
new movie?!
>>571675
The artist's JJFrenchie
>>520115
>>545366
Cum in/on food from dickgirls is the best. Why do I have such a weird fetish.
![].png](https://i.imgur.com/FxVYRkP.png "].png")
