Who sock fetish here?
>>144184531
You called?
>>144185163
>Smelling them
That's gross! I'm talking about just the look of them on a cute girl's feet.
>>144185225
>not smelling
Hmph. What about touching?
>>144185438
Touching is nice but I wouldn't want them in my face.
>>144185469
You're triggering me.
>>144184531
Legs and socks.
>>144185547
Good taste.
>>144185507
also bare feet are gross. Feet are only tolerable when covered.
>>144185624
Then you'll hate this.
Wish artists would draw them with more detail.
>>144185547
Sauce? Reverse search gives me nothing
>>144186121
Yuyushiki
>>144184531
Socks arn't the fetish, they are the frame to the ZR zone.
I have a sock fetish but it's more of an extension of a leg fetish than a foot fetish.
>>144185690
You best post source since google is shit at img search now.
I mostly focus on barefoot shots, but I do have a couple of sock-related shots.
>>144187269
>>144187068
whats this from?
>>144187089
see
>>144186357
you gentleman of taste.
Who are the best stocking fetish artists?the best ones I know are Shinooka Homare, Oouso and Akaza
>>144187320
And this, if stockings count.
>>144184531
>I'm starting to develop a foot fetish thanks to socks
I'm perfectly fine with this
>>144187254
Usually you just search with the image on exhentai, and it'll come up if it is uncropped. Try it now. It'll help you in future.
>>144184786
ONE
MORE
FUCKING
TIME
I swear.
>>144184531
Here
>>144187387
That one scene where Ruri tells the MC to rub her feet.
>>144187415
>>144184603
I want to worship Kumiko's feet.
Is there a collection of sock shots in anime? I'm sure there's an audience for it.
Stop anon I can only get so hard.
uff
Aw hell yeah
Thigh socks and a short skirt, with a little gap where you can see the skin on their thighs? That shirts the best my dude
>>144187320
>>144187378
Forgot I had this one.
Someone post that shot of Rin's socks from UBW
>>144191434
What is she saying?
>>144192305
"Archer, give me a foot rub."
>>144185624
>bare feet are gross. Feet are only tolerable when covered.
I literally only entered this thread to post that opinion. This is exactly true. I don't think that means I have a sock fetish, but socks are always better than no socks.
>>144192369
Nice
>>144187610
>twins
>different cup sizes
>different hair
>probably opposite personalities
I wish this shit would stop
>>144192680
>>144185624
Laughable.
>like ZR
>most sock threads are about feet
suffering
Would you cum in someone else's stockings, /a/?
>>144196292
Yes, and I'd make them wear it.
>>144196292
That's perverted
>>144184531
I can't decide between knee socks or pantyhose.
>>144196531
That fucking artist, man. So good.
HUFF
>>144186121
Use the tools you have available, anon. This isn't the stone age anymore.
>>144186174
>spoonfeeding
You can give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. You can give a man a fishing rod, and he'll eat for life.
>>144200187
Knee socks are great.
>>144196292
I'd sniff and lick them first
>>144200705
>>144200185
Not everyone has the extension, no need to be so pedantic.
>>144203790
Lurk more.
>>144203790
>implying you need the extension
and if you really wanted source you'd put some effort into searching.
>>144204182
I'm not the original anon. If he tried to find it but failed, there's no issue with giving him the source. I don't know why you wouldn't want someone to enjoy the same thing you enjoyed. You're just being a pedant at this point.
>>144203910
Lurking has nothing to do with finding sources. You could be here for years and there would be a time where you cannot find the source at all. Instead of trying this hard, think for youself a little.
>>144204496
>If he tried to find it but failed,
He claims he failed. "reverse gives me nothing" might just be a fig leaf for idiots. many have lied about that before. Because there are many reverse searches (google, archive, saucenao, iqdb, wait, ex, ...) just claiming that it doesn't work hardly shows any effort at all.
>there's no issue with giving him the source
give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime
>>144204569
He knows how to fish already. Granted, you will never know whether he is lying or not, but I, myself, have also had moments where none of the searches worked, so I can, at the very least, empathise with that anon. At that point where the anon already tried to find it himself, refusing to give source is just silly. Who are you trying to prove yourself to?
In any case, he got his source from a kinder anon, who decided to not be a finicky piece of work. For every person who thinks like you, there will be at least others who think the opposite. Just like the anons in OPTs.
>>144200980
>The ones with the stripes on top
Perfection.
>>144204785
>He knows how to fish already.
No, he doesn't. I searched out of curiosity and found the source within seconds.
>none of the searches worked
Doesn't apply to this situation.
>At that point where the anon already tried to find it himself
Wrong.
I understand your point, but spoonfeeding is only warranted when people actually put in some fucking effort, rather than just doing a GIS, throwing your hands up, and running here to get spoonfed. Part of being a responsible adult is learning to do things for yourself. Obliging this kind of behavior stunts self-improvement, leads to further request/recommendationfagging, and worse, leads others to believe that this sort of behavior is encouraged. There's no need for you to defend someone who didn't even try.
>>144205249
Indeed, spoonfeeding shouldn't be encouraged, but not being able to find the source, while using all the searches, does and can apply to this situation. If google has an idea of what you read and watch (history, cache etc.), you'd be able to find the source much easier. That's why one individual will be able to find the source while the other is unable. How can you tell whether the person put a load of effort and couldn't find it?
Point is, there are certain situations where giving the source isn't wrong. I'm not disagreeing with you.
If someone tried to find the source of this image and was unable, I wouldn't mind giving them the artist name.
>>144205700
>Point is, there are certain situations where giving the source isn't wrong.
This isn't one of them. I often check whether something can be found before telling someone to fuck off.
If anon wants extended fishing lessons he should say so.
>i tried google, but ...
At least I could tell him why that's the wrong tool. But when he just says "lol, reverse search gib nutting!" then all I can do is roll my eyes because that statement is so generic that it's like there's only a single type of reverse search in existence. It just signals no effort an outright lie.
>>144205700
>wanting Google to know about your habits
Kill yourself.
>>144205700
>but not being able to find the source, while using all the searches, does and can apply to this situation
As I said before, he clearly didn't use all of the searches because I was able to find it using iqdb. Google is not the only search engine. But since that's all in the past, I'll agree to disagree.
I just want to fill my footfag folder, goddamnit.
>>144196292
>>144184531
Me. Though I hate it when people take it as a foot thing and not a leg thing.
What a faggot.
>>144206584
They already do.
>>144206730
I'm not really disagreeing with you, just pointing out that there are some exceptions.
>>144207684
meant for you >>144206831
Can't you see we are discussing sauce policies and regulations.
As a rule of thumb you should only give source ifyou're a fucking faggot.
>>144207668
This, footfags are the worst.
>>144207745
good taste
>>144207984
Feet are the icing atop the cake that is the beautiful lower half, while a nice ass is good, a pair of nice legs are a vital ingredient to the dish, gly feet is the same as drenching the dish in a single sauce, ruining the entire dish. The feet are important, and their adornments all the same.
While the ass can be a separate entity in many cases, the feet are even more vital with their interpersonal relationship with the legs; a long, slender, soft pair of legs must be adorned with equally attractive feet, without this cohesion, all might as well be gone.
tights > stockings
>>144208042
This guy.
Pantsu is really as far as I am willing to go.
>>144208582
I love both, but with pantyhose you have to either lift them up or tear a hole in it in order to fuck properly. With stockings you can keep them on as is.
>>144209715
they make crotchless ones for such special occasions. alas, artists rarely make use of those.
>>144209753
>crotchless ones
Porn intellectual.
>>144209753
Personally, I find crotchless/breastless clothing kinda tacky, though I can see why it's hot.
>>144191434
>>144210306
>>144210344
>bare feet
So close, but no cigar.