ITT: shit that pisses you off

>>138666957
You.

File: Lucy.png (513KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

513KB, 1280x720px

>>138666957

Too many high schoolers not enough young professionals or cakes.

What does cute mean? Fuckable?

>>138667048
That too

File: ce6042e9a3d98e6ca87efe10426dae78231afd8ba87b8845e773e3e2202b4dba_1.jpg (61KB, 780x820px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

61KB, 780x820px

>>138666957

>>138667675
C or am i retarded?

>>138668320
It's a paradox. If 0% was the correct answer, it would mean 0% cannot be the answer.

File: natsu-no-zenjitsu-4935505.jpg (160KB, 728x1049px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

160KB, 728x1049px

>>138666957

File: 1427315757326.png (189KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

189KB, 500x281px

This bitch right here

>>138668655

The Mc was such a fucking faggot, holy shit. How can one guy be such a fucking idiot? Where's truck-kun when you need him the most.

>>138667048
/thread

>>138666957
Korean shit and their authors that always feel the need to have a long ass break.

>>138667048
>not enough young professionals or cakes
At least we have Kawaii Joushi o Komasaretai

>>138668381
Same with B and A and D
If B were the answer that'd make it only 25% since there are four options. BUT if A or D are the answer, that'd make it 50% since they're listed twice.

File: 1388790442064.jpg (24KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

24KB, 300x300px

>>138668655
fuck this manga

>>138671086
>at least we have Kawaii Joushi
We have 1. Manga today has a plethera of middle-high school female protagonists. Don't be thankful for the measles that we receive. Get angry >:(

>>138666957
She's not even cute

>>138672206
>Manga today has a plethera of middle-high school female protagonists
Because that's mostly who buy manga. That and older men wanting to be young again.

>>138668655
Fuck him. He didn't deserve her.
Akira dodged a bullet when they broke up.

>>138667675
People get stumped at these questions only because they never study set theory and understand exactly why you don't touch self-referentiality with a ten-foot pole.

>>138674869
So what's the answer then?

>>138675345
Null, no answer.

>>138675345
Constructing that question is logically equivalent to Russel's Paradox and as such as meaningful as dividing by zero or trying to take the square root of a negative number.

>>138666957
Cute girls piss you off?
I think you're on the wrong board.

>>138666957
monkeys

>>138678219
You got something to say, punk?

>>138666957
You