Hey /3/
Just finished this Judy rig I've been working on over at /co/, and I though I may as well post it here. It is for >Blender, and can be acquired here: mediafire.com/download/5u5h59bmmifuxcx
It is also up on blendswap if you prefer.
There are some things I'll be fixing soon, but I'll wait for feedback to make other changes as needed and then update it.
Anyways, hopefully you guys have some fun with it.
>>517547
Can you do Elsa too ?
>>517548
Well, I don't know, but I'd image there must be a half decent rig already by now...
I couldn't in the short term at least because I've got a backlog of homework from trying to get this done.
>>517550
Theres only one available, But...
Its low poly models from a mobile game...
>>517550
There's one user on TurboSquid with a bunch of amazing Frozen recreations, but they all cost over $200 USD.
>>517554
Not $200
It was $600
>>517555
Hence why I said OVER $200 dollars. The cheapest I saw was $300 but I only checked out the Frozen content.
>>517547
That's crazy, so well done. How long did this take you?
>>517557
Also is not worth 600 dollars though since the model is kinda uncanny
Sorry, massive noob to Blender here. How can I reset the pose to be the same as it looks when I select the Armature in the Outliner?
>>517565
To reset the pose select all the bones in pose mode and hit alt-g, alt-r, alt-s
Nice, looks like the official model
>>517566
I tried that, and it doesn't work.
It only changes the pose a little bit.
I noticed however that even when pressing A in the viewport to select all, only some bones were selected. So I sat there and selected them all by hand, pressed Alt-G+R+S, and it still didn't work.
>>517547
Can you upload an fbx. Thanks.
>>517569
That looks quite bizarre, I don't quite know what went wrong there unfortunately without being able to see more. To be honest this is a fairly complex rig, so it will be hard to work with if you don't have much blender experience.
"a" will toggle selection of all the bones in pose mode by the way.
What I think is going on is that you need to change the IK/FK properties and the pivot property. In the readme I explain where those properties are located when the rig script has executed. Make sure it has run by opening the script and pressing alt-p over it.
>>517570
mediafire.com/download/uj4di687b8oey69
Do note that a lot of work is required to get the fbx working, as a lot of not exportable features are used in the blender rig.
teach me your ways
>>517575
Lots of image layering.
>>517576
I'm still real new to the 3D stuff, this just seems amazing to me.
>>517577
Not OP, by the way. Just seems like that's how it was made seeing how movie accurate it is.
Kinda wish an IK-less version was packed with the OP's .blend, it's a pain disabling all the constraints just to see what's connected to what.
>>517578
Im still tryin to texture my first character and now I'm playin action figure.
>>517578
You can change if it uses IK or FK by using the slider underlined after selecting any arm/leg bones. That Rig tab might not show up until you run the judy_rig_ui.py script from Blender's text editor.
>>517580
Oh shit anon, thanks.
Just one of the perks of using rigify or whatever, I guess.
Too bad there's not a way to save Cycles hair settings as a mesh. (That I know of.)
this stuff's pretty fun.
>>517599
blender fur looks awesome
>>517600
apparently so. that'll be a fun thing to learn.
>>517564
> under two weeks
did you really had to lie about it ?...
>>517602
>did you really had
Not everybody is as clearly retarded as you anon.
2 weekss to make this is very reasonable. There is very little detail on the model so if you know what your'e doing the actual workload isn't going to consume a lot of time.
>>517599
how do you control the face, I can't find the face controls
>>517607
Check if there is a camera named something to do with facial controls.
>>517603
> guise I made the same thing a pixar team made in over a month in less than 2 weeks xDD
This is cringeworthy...
>>517601
not much to learn, really, you get a virtual brush that you can use to brush it in 3D, you get to control length, shape, kinks/twirls/etc, amount etc, and you can put any shader on it you like
it's pretty intuitive, I would say, the first time I tried it out (without a tutorial) I pretty much immediately got photorealistic results (just make sure to put a partially translucent, partially anisotropic shader on there -- translucency and anisotropy are the two defining features of the "hair look")
rolling for epic name
>>517614
epicccc
>>517614
>Skinner
That is great
>>517614
The fuck is actuallu habben here and why do i got vivian rose on my last post ?
Wait... vivian... vivian... vivian.. i think that sound familiar..
>>517612
it's by disney studio, not pixar. And while this model is really nice, it's clearly not nearly as detailed or finely rigged as the original one. Also, the disney team made many characters, not just one. This one also just has the default blender fur applied to it, probably just based on a default human rig, etc. You can bet everything is custom on the original disney one.
I have no big issues believing he made this one in two weeks.
>>517612
A skilled person could make this over the weekend if they poured every ounce of their time into it. OP probably worked on and off over those two weeks, and you can still tell that he had to be dedicated as fuck to get the level of accuracy he did.
Would take me months to make this as I am so autistic. Can you bake fur to a texture in blender?
>>517612
Actually the body is pretty basic and generic, he might have just took it from somewhere. The face is just as simple as well. And if he just slapped a readymade rig this can easily be done under 2 weeks.
So..SFM port anyone..? :)
Perhaps a nude bunny version? Yeah?
>>517631
No. Fuck you.
Get the Fuck out. Rabbit Fucker.
>>517635
Why the fuck not?
Give me 2 legit reasons that don't include learning, as to why anyone would want to use this model, or any copyrighted character for that matter.
>>517640
1. You are an Furfags.
2. People who make Furry Porn should die.
Simple
>>517642
Excellent my good friend.
Excellent.
>>517547
>>517642
>>517644
Oh god, No.
This is Your fault, OP.
This is Your fault
>>517547
Couldn't you have used this as a portfolio piece. Now you will be associated with whatever these lunatics come up with.
>>517647
Who says he can't use it as a portfolio piece?
One of the artists from Steven Universe drew porn of their characters. Cartoon Network didn't care.
Stop being such a fucking sour grape.
>>517647
I wouldn't be the one making the porn, so that is a non issue for use in my portfolio.
>>517650
post your folio
>>517548
You again. Fuck off with your fap fantasies.
>>517652
You too. Fuck off with your furry fap fantasies.
>>517653
I haven't even seen the movie.
>>517655
But you want to fap to this model.
Furfag.
>>517657
>and say that they made this model
That's incredibly fucking retarded logic.
First off, no decent 3D artist is going to claim works that aren't theirs, especially when applying for a job.
Second, since only a shitty artist would claim works that aren't theirs, it would be blatantly fucking obvious that the work doesn't belong to them.
You're basically saying people shouldn't release source files since others can misuse/claim its theirs.
>>517656
Nice perspective projection matrix you got there.
>>517659
I'll just take this bunny model he gave and release it under another name that I made up just to make a point. I'll even pose it like a pornstar^, add a rigged furry dick and port it to SFM people so they can turn his work into just another furporn character that amateur animators can abuse all they want.
You can always claim other peoples art as being yours. woop-de-do.
>>517612
didn't check but just from the pics i've seen it seems far, far beyond AAA studios standards.
Not undermining OP's work though, it looks nice and it's great of him to share it, but yeah
Alioto should make a Judy model.
>>517686
mouth, tongue, individual facial muscles, fingers, toes etc are all rigged
it's pretty far up there
>>517689
> i did this in less than 2 weeks guise trust me xDD
kek
>>517689
I'm a complete blender noob, I've ran the script and see the options but moving the handles around does nothing? How can I control these?
>>517692
first off, on startup it asks you whether you want to run scripts or not, say yes, it will reload the file.
then go into pose mode, this allows you to move bones around by rotating (r) and grabbing (g).
when in pose mode, you should now on the left side get a panel with extra controls (below the grease pencil) with options to switch between IK/FK, rig head, face, mouth, arms, legs, toes, etc separately
also note the many different layers below in the layer-switcher. Bones are on layer #2 (but just keep all layers visible at all times)
>>517693
I have the rig panel, but moving these does nothing to the mouth/lips.
I'm probably missing something obvious lol.
>>517694
nvm the script didnt run properly, Reloading it fixed it.
>>517694
are you grabbing them with g while in rig mode?
>>517696
Also make sure you reloaded trusted, otherwise the controls don't work.
< example
>>517689
>mouth, tongue, individual facial muscles, fingers, toes etc are all rigged
i certainly would hope so, these are pretty much the minimum requirement for a character rig.
Again, I don't want to be a cunt since it's great that OP shared his work (and everyone commenting on it looks pleased with it), but seeing the screenshots here i don't believe for a second this compares to a feature film rig. But hey, no biggie, i was merely responding to the dude who thinks it's impossible to rig a charcter in 2 weeks
>>517699
I interpreted the "AAA" as meaning an AAA game production. I would say this is easily up-to-par in terms of quality with many AAA game rigs I've seen. I've not worked in film, so I don't really know what the rigs look like there. I can imagine that some of them are much more complex still and have many more features.
>>517641
Making furry porn is a good way to make a good amount of money.
>>517701
TFW you are thinking about doing it because you need the money but you would rather do ass to ass.
>>517698
thats what it was.
All is working now.
>>517702
There is a fairly good couple sayings to go with this.
''Do what you like and the money will come.''
''If you are great at anything someone will pay you for it.''
With furries you don't really even have to be great to get paid.
>>517707
>implying SFM consumers are better
>implying any cartoon porn consumers are better
I hope you're not serious.
>>517709
Not really implying anything. Someone was being pissy about furries. I am merely saying that it's a good option for commission money.
I'm going to try and convert it for Luxrender. Thanks for the new training exercise, OP.
>>517704
neato.
>>517707
I never understood why furries in particular are so derided on the internet. Guess I don't really give enough of a shit to find out either.
>>517713
Do you even need to do much conversion for that? If you just load it up in blender with the luxrender plugin, shouldn't you be able to basically just press the render button?
>>517715
Because Furries = Animals
>>517716
So? Some people are into kids, poop, cannibalism, ... seems rather harmless in the big picture.
>>517717
>So?
You're the part of Autism, anon. Along the people who into kids, poop, cannibalism, etc.
>>517547
Uh Oh anon.
You stole it, didnt you ?
Its ok if you stole it.
its 4chan anyway.
http://www.cgrecord.net/2016/04/download-zootopias-judy-hopps-rigged-3d.html
>>517718
kek. oh well. I guess my levels of giving-a-shit are just below the rest of the internet populace.
>>517715
>Do you even need to do much conversion for that? If you just load it up in blender with the luxrender plugin, shouldn't you be able to basically just press the render button?
No. Lux and Cycles have completely different node options. And I believe that goes with every other renderer too. I think the Luxrender team are trying to make an option that will completely convert a Cycles material into a Lux material. It works well with simple materials. Although from doing a little work in it already it Luxrender makes material setups a lot easier. With that cloth material I don't have to mess with all those cloth bump maps.
>>517723
The model is unmodified and the credits to the author (matching the author from that page you linked) are in there unchanged. License is also unchanged.
OP might or might not be the original creator, but he is re-distributing the model legally as per the license and with the original credits.
>>517723
No, check the threads on /co/ in the archive. I posted multiple wips there that you won't find elsewhere.
>>517689
To be honest I must agree with those saying this isn't all that close to a real production rig. I would need to add a lot more controls and flexibility to get there. I could to that if I put more time into it, and I might improve upon it soon, but in its current state anyways the rig itself is not terribly impressive.
>>517718
Tone down the absolutism shit, son, will you?
>>517718
>Complaining about autism on 4chan
Make a naked one please.
To put clothes on her of course.
>>517657
If you try and say you did it but couldn't make it you'll be fired immediately anyway.
Finished. Jody Hopps, Luxrender edition. Still a bit noisy. This was literally my first time posing anything so pls no bully. Thanks OP for providing this model.
Also fun fact: The belt is made out of leather.
>>517715
They used to be very annoying in the early days of the internet but that's all gone now and pretty much only 4chan cares anymore.
>>517715
Remember how bronies were in the beginning? That's why. But possibly worse.
>>517757
>>517758
Except people have given animals human bodies basically since we learned to read and write. It's nothing new.
>>517765
We're talking about on the internet.
Is there a way to "delete" an IK setup, and just keep the regular bones?
I'm not an advanced user in the slightest, 3DCG is just a passtime for me, and I have no desire to learn how to work with IK. (Unless it's actually really simple.)
>>517547
This is absolutely one of those days I'm so happy I logged into 4chan instead of listening to my conscience.
Thank you for this
>>517547
this shits fuckin weird
I hate blender so much, WHY cant it be normal at all.
>>517779
um... you can just disable IK and use FK instead, but we use IK because it's way easier than FK.
IK is like "put your hand here" and then all the other bones follow suit and do whatever is necessary to move the hand there
FK is like "put this angle in the elbow, put this angle in the shoulder, put this angle in the wrist, ..."
>>517792
Both have their merits, in my experience. FK allows for more explicit control without having to fuck with the pole target, for example. IK is usually best for endpoints you don't want to move, like planted feet or hands.
>>517647
I don't think it would look good on you to remake something someone else made.
I couldn't figure out how to do face movements right away so I scrapped that bit for later. I'll get around to it next time. Took 22 god damned minutes to render on my corpse of a computer.
>>517800
more lewd poses
for the people asking for SFM ports, I'm pretty sure you're going to need to make a decent fur texture first.
posting costanza
>>517717
It is because people who are into kids, poop, cannibalism, doesn't go into the streets talking about how they like kids, poop, cannibalism.
Also, they don't usually have events where they gather and wear suits that looks like kids, poop, or cannibalism.
>>517803
The problem here is that, aside from poop, being into those two other things is illegal, but being a furry isn't.
>>517547
>blender
You wasted all that time, half of it was probably spent fighting the interface anyway.
>>517810
Shitpost harder m8
>>517810
I know this is bait, but I'll reply anyways
There some number of people are going to try and port it for Maya, chances are it is just a matter of time. I've used Maya a little, but since I used blender first and have been doing so for 6 years, I hardly consciously think about the interface anymore, and I work fastest in it. Use what you know. Besides, I enjoy scripting in Blender much more, as the application and api is brilliantly designed around that. Modifying the interface is super easy if you can handle baby tier python, which I'd know because I hardly know much python myself, and you don't even need the source code to change most of it.
>>517812
do you have steam ?
>>517813
I'm assuming you mean stream? Yeah, I do. But I'd make a new account for this.
In the off change you mean steam account, yeah.
>>517814
Steam as in Gaben account
>>517547
I'm not a rig or animation guy, so my pose sucks, but great job OP!
>>517818
why u no use steem :'c
>>517819
literally not enough memory. While making this for example, I crashed my computer at least 20 times. I have 8GB, but since this is a >laptop, 2GB is shared with the video card, so it is more like 6ish effectively. Things like stream tend to be quite heavy when added up.
>>517820
Nope. I doubt it will be very long before something is made however...
>>517802
Fuck I was going to do that when I get home. With a baseball bat and everything.
Hey op how did you get so much hair with a low particle count?
>>517823
There are about 8000 main hairs on the head alone, with 65 child particles for each of those. The child particles are the final hairs you see, while the 8000 hairs define where the generated child particles should point. There is a panel for child particle setting in the particle menu. In total, that gives about 520,000 hairs.
This is amazingly done OP. Is there any chance you could do a Nick rig too?
>>517837
noice
>>517850
Is there any other way I can contact you ?
>>517852
got it thx :)
>>517756
After letting it render while at work, this is the cleaner result.
Please rate.
>>517856
Doesn't look as good as the cycle ones, IMO. Fur color etc is also a bit off, but whatever.
Do you have SSS on the ears? The ears look way better in cycles, IMO.
The lux fur on the face also looks really weird, IMO. On the ears it's nice, but on the face it just looks really sparse and sporadic.
Nose and mouth also look like they are missing SSS
fur on the feet also looks a bit weird, not as rabbit-like as the cycles one.
>>517857
>Doesn't look as good as the cycle ones, IMO. Fur color etc is also a bit off, but whatever.
Cycles has a more dedicated hair shader and also has more tuning options. Whereas For Lux I had to just mix a glossy and transparent shader together. The color might be because OP might have tweaked the color values a bit on the texture. I didn't.
>Do you have SSS on the ears? The ears look way better in cycles, IMO.
No. SSS in Luxrender is a bit more complicated. In Cycles there is a dedicated SSS shader but in Lux you have to use volumes and mess with scattering scales, scattering colors, absorptions and absorption values.
>The lux fur on the face also looks really weird, IMO. On the ears it's nice, but on the face it just looks really sparse and sporadic.
Not sure what you mean by this.
>Nose and mouth also look like they are missing SSS
See reason for SSS above.
>fur on the feet also looks a bit weird, not as rabbit-like as the cycles one.
Maybe I still need to mess with the material some more.
>>517859
If you look at e.g.
>>517853
or
>>517817
, the hair on the face looks pretty fluffy, loose and regular. In the luxrender one it looks more like it's only a couple white hairs on a really gray skin. Especially if you look at the bottom of the head, where it almost looks like there's no hair at all except for some sporadic white hairs that are sticking out.
Makes it look kinda ugly, IMO. The cycles one has a more luxurious, even, soft look to it, I think.
Except for the top of the ears, where the lux one looks really fluffy.
>>517860
I see what you mean. And it could be my material, or it could be the angle it is at and the light brightness. Maybe there would be more detail if I cranked up the lights a bit. I'm trying to fix my material right now.
What makes better looking hair, solids or triangle ribbons?
>>517866
blenderguru.com/tutorials/how-to-render-hair-with-cycles/
This has a good breakdown of the hair settings.
I may not be a furry, but damn is this bunny cute.
>>517871
You are now
>>517860
I figured out what was wrong with the hair. With Lux's new auto conversion feature it also make a light grey hemi lamp causing to be lit from every angle. Now with that gone I'll see how it looks in a while.
>>517871
;))))
(pubic bones a little fucked up because the vertex weight in the original model was a bit fucked, and I didn't bother fixing it...)
>>517880
>(pubic bones a little fucked up
No, that's a bulge.
>>517882
yeah.... oh well.
>>517883
'tis a fine line to walk. Pubic bones so hot tho.
>>517887
>'tis
>>517547
after playing around with it for a bit (I'm not an experienced animator or anything), some feedback:
- I think the mouth could be a bit more flexible
- tail should be rigged IMO
- pouches could be rigged
- extra drivers would be nice so that you could just e.g. close eyes with a slider or use a single slider to make ears flop backwards/down etc.
>>517792
Well thanks for actually telling me how to do that, because the script doesn't appear to be doing anything when I highlight FK and unhighlight IK.
I played around with it a little, it's a really nice rig setup, probably the best I've used out of all the ones I've messed around with that are available on Blendswap.
I did notice though that the head fur can easily clip through the chest piece. Had to comb it for this image for example. Sucks that Blender is still so shitty with particle hair systems that it doesn't have any means of temporary hair edits for animating, as far as I know. Probably wouldn't be easy working with this for animations.
>>517898
There's probably a solution for that, since e.g. cosmos laundromat and other blender-made videos feature a huge amount of fur.
I don't know how to do it, but I bet you can keyframe the hair settings/combing/length.
Is there a way for this rig to work with maya?
>>517910
You could try exporting to collada, no idea if it'll work. collada does at least support bones and such, but you'll probably end up having to do the materials, hairs etc, at least.
>>517872
post the webm
Can someone tell me where the camera is/how to operate it? When I render, all I get is a teeny-tiny judy in the middle of a 1080x1920 view
>>517915
I gotchu senpai
>>517547
Wow! That was made with blender? Wow that's amazing
This would work a lot better if someone made a Nick model. Sadly I just don't know how to do that.
>>517917
Can someone tell me how to change the fov on this rig? It renders judy too small..
>>517924
fov is unrelated to rig, it is set by your camera. I don't think the .blend comes with a camera by default, just add your own.
>>517924
At the top click "reload trusted". I don't know why it does this.
>>517927
One problem though. If you want to save your work you have to use 'save as' instead of just normal saving and just save over the original file.
>>517926
The reload trusted is required because of the scripts and drivers. You can enable a auto run python scripts option in the settings to avoid it in the future.
Finished a little animation.
Sound version here: puu sh/o46PC.webm
>>517898
Basically the correct/endorsed way to achieve stuff not clipping through eachother is to enable physics, which will take care of it.
If you really do want to manually control it though, enable AnimAll and then you can weight-paint things such as Density, Length, Clump, Kink and Roughness separately for each keyframe (see my shitty 5-minute render)
>>517931
>puu sh/o46PC.webm
noice
>>517547
Any chance you'll make her Meter Maid outfit since it's so similar to the police outfit? All you'd have to add is the vest and hat.
>>517931
Speed it up faster and it'd be awesome.
Took me like three hours to make this little thing
test
Is there a version for Max/Maya?
>>517547
Thank you for putting this on Mediafire. I wanted to get it, but really hate the paywall of blendswap that doesn't benefit the artist... I'd love to make a donation to you for the effort you put into this.
>>517958
>paywall
Wat? It's a free website. You only need to pay if you want unlimited downloads. They don't pay artists anything because it's just a hosting site, not a store.
>>517947
>That bunny's got a gun
dunno if it was just me but felt like the fingers needed one extra level of articulation. Couldn't make a fist.
>>517931
woah that's crazy
did you do everything by yourself?
>>517955
Convert it yourself. Blender can spit out a .fbx file but good luck not breaking everything b/c the model uses a complex rig, cycles shaders, and hair particles.
>>517992
I can get all the textures if you want.
>>518006
This is a Christian Mongolian clay sculpting board.
>>518008
every board is porn board
>>518009
Unless you like getting b& all the time, then sure every board is a porn board.
Finished this, but I'm rendering a 48 fps version now.
Sound version here: puu sh/o4IdO.webm
>>518025
it looks like shit and everyone here thinks you're wasting your time. Its literally disturbing to look at.
>>518030
/3/ at its finest
>>518032
accept reality dude, this is horrible, the same level or even worse as helen parr
>>518025
the face needs more articulation / natural motion, just pop into edit mode, select all dem bones and hit the randomize tool a couple times
image related, it's so ez to create dynamic and awesome poses
>>518032
It actually surprised me. I was expecting half these posts to be shitposts, but people actually appreciate stuff now. I'm glad that /3/ changed for the good.
>>518041
literally nobody appreciates stolen model + furry
I'll be honest, the only reason I'm sticking around is for a nude version to pop up.
Once that happens I can die a happy man.
Tried it myself but it looked terrible.
>>518044
According to the dozens of people in the thread, everybody does.
>>518045
kthxbye
>>518047
>According to the dozens of people in the thread, everybody does.
youre delusional, its the same people over and over, this is the first time for me checking this board in a week
>>518048
> same people over and over
> 53 posters
kek
>>518050
>grasping at straws
75% of these posters are just carryovers from /co/
oy vey the hatful retard has entered the thread.
>>518054
> grasping at straws
> its just samefagging
> no no they are real people from another board
there there my butttmad friend. Maybe one day you will learn to appreciate talent :^)
>>518057
I appreciate talent already, what I see ITT is stolen models. furfags, bad attitudes, and shit
>>518058
> stolen models
stolen from where exactly ?
> furfags
you don't like animals ?
> bad attitudes
the guy gave it away for free. thats more than expected niceness you'll get around 4chan
> shit
yeah, the shit will go away as soon as you stop posting
>>518058
OP here, just curious as to why you think the model might be stolen? As I mentioned, there are wips posted on co in the archive, and in case of and doubt, see pic related. I have just short of 100 version saves of the project all the way through making the model.
>>518062
the model is from a movie thats still in theaters, Zootopia. It doesnt matter if its a recreation or not. Its stolen. Its not original. Its furry. This is the worst type of shit. Gb2 wahtever furry board you were on previously pls, this is not the place
>>518062
[spoiler]Can you zip them all and upload them somewhere pls[/spoiler]
>>518025
not bad, but could use some more determination and flow between movements (looks a little robotic as is).
not sure if it helps, but i'd look into traditional animation techniques (e.g. squash/stretch and exaggeration) since disney seem to incorporate those quite successfully in their 3d animation as well.
>>518064
Right, why would spoilers be enabled on /3/? Stupid me.
>>518056
there must always be one in every thread, it's practically a rule at this point
>>518063
Why are you here in this thread!
>>518071
so this type of thread never happens again.
>>518063
Ahh, I see. I'll agree that original work is more interesting, and I typically enjoy it more. This project was mainly to learn more about getting hair/fur to work, as I haven't done any projects with that before. I copied the model because that is one of the best ways to learn, study from the masters.
That aside, >you'll care or believe me, I'm no furry. Just enjoyed the movie, and as above this was a learning project. Now, I'll preempt the obvious response, that I'm being a furry enabler by simply saying that's not my problem.
>>518064
4.1GB is more that I can upload reasonable. Besides, there is little point.
>>518065
Yeah, I'm backlogged with a bunch of homework, but after I'll work some more on it. I mostly need to exaggerate a lot of the motion, add more movement to the face, and "sharpen" the motions. I didn't have time to do that before rendering however. I'll look into how squashing/stretching looks too, thanks for the tip.
>>518073
>Besides, there is little point.
>I copied the model because that is one of the best ways to learn, study from the masters.
Literally the same post, friend.
>>518073
>This project was mainly to learn more about getting hair/fur to work,
If you want to learn how this works you have to read and understand the source code and papers behind it. You have a shallow understanding now at best, and you're results arent good, barely above Nvidia HairFX level. You wasted a lot of time and you have a bad attitude, like you know everything. This is one of the reasons why you get hate
>>518077
HAHAHAHAHAHA oh wow this guy
I've been on the internet for a good 20 years now, but this must be in the top 10 of the most retarded things I've ever read
>>518077
> you have to read and understand the source code and papers
Reading source is not how you become a good artist. Reading source does almost never further your understanding of how to apply something artistically.
Secondly, there isn't much to how fur works. I have read the source of particlesystems before, written some myself. At the basic level, it is just "take a tube/cone/fan and extrude it along this [bspline/bezier-curve/other subdivision curve]. No point in reading papers about something so simple.
Now, modern renderers are a bit more advanced than that, they let you do things such as have forces act on the particles (to get clumping, twisting, kinking, ...) and can do physics with them. But there's nothing fundamentally interesting/new, it's all basic geometry, numerical interpolation.
> shallow understanding now at best
He certainly has a better understanding now from an artistical perspective than you will likely ever have.
> you're results arent good
The only thing here that isn't good is your grammar. That aside (and that everyone in this thread -- and elsewhere -- agrees that cycles fur rendering looks great), feel free to show us something you made that's better! j/k, of course you can't, because you've never done anything of worth whatsoever.
> Nvidia HairFX level
Ah, I see you've never seen nvidia hairfx. Granted, in recent years game-hair has become acceptable, but it's still worlds away from OPs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKpPiXRnPkg look at this or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Md4Hmgtl8q0 this. This doesn't look nearly as good as what the OP got, even though the camera stays a mile away from the hair at all times to avoid showing you the ugly.
> you have a bad attitude
only one here with a bad attitude is you; OP is a pretty humble guy. He even posted his rig for us to play around with and critique, and it's the most quality post /3/ has seen in months.
> why you get hate
you are the only one in this thread hating
>All these people this gluteus grumpy over one model
>>518072
>the hero /3/ deserves
>>518082
Will you do Nick eventually, OP?
That one insecure closet furfag shitting up the thread with >MUH STOLEN
>>518142
Did you uncheck *both* the eye icon and the camera icon? Unchecking the eye will only remove it from your viewport, but unchecking the camera removes it from your render, too.
>>518145
Thank you. I knew it had to be something stupid simple I was overlooking.
>>518025
LOL! That was awesome. :^)
>>518153
LOL
>>518144
Your moronic self never once adhered to even one of those points. Therefore neither me nor anybody else is required to since this started as a shitpost fest. Thanks for playing, better luck next time, loser.
Polite sage.
>>518063
le ebin post bru, many euphoric up boats :^)
>>518181
IT'S TIME.
>>518200
> no vagina
> no tits
> no ass
> nothing sexual
im okay with this.
>>518200
>da filename
>>518209
Yeah, there's a signature too.
Don't ever expect this to not happen when releasing a model of something from a popular cartoon.
P.S. Don't be surprised when whomever first ports it to Garry's mod is accredited for it's creation forever more.
>>518200
I hate you guys so fucking much.
>>518213
>accredited
*credited
Fuck me.
>>518200
aaaand someone stole OPs work. Told you this would happen.
>>518219
Calm down, the account's probably OP's.
>>518221
I doubt that's OP, Xanaeth is a different person, and I don't think Xanaeth uses Blender.
If OP would like to clarify please do.
>>518223
Why are there wips from March then?
>>518205
It'd be really easy to add those on though.
A 10 minute job.
>>517701
Whore by proxy
>>518234
you have something against sexworkers or something?
>>518200
This is most definitely not my model. Not only are there copies of this image that existed before I even stared making my version according to reverse image search, it doesn't look all that similar.
>>518219
>someone stole OPs work
Isn't OP's work considered open source since he uploaded everything that has to do with it?
>>518257
Depends on the licence.
>>518257
>lololol I can claim I'm skilled at something when I'm actually not
I mean, I wouldn't give two shits about some manchild playing pretend if there wasn't a concrete possibility of others actually believing you.
>>518258
Creative commons zero.
That means anyone can do anything with it, right?
>>518260
It's public domain then.
>>518259
I know it is retarded to do so but I'm saying legally he can do that.
>>518262
Nope.
Moral rights aren't waivable in the civilized world.
And CC0 is a special kind of public domain. OP can't release his work in the public domain, he doesn't hold the rights to it, Disney does. Judy Hopps is a copyrighted character.
He may choose to distribute his file freely, but Disney can take it down whenever they want, just like any other piece of fanart.
Not just that, even if it was a completely original piece, some jurisdictions prohibit you from voluntarily surrendering your copyrights.
Public domain means the copyrights have expired, or they never existed in the first place due to some special law.
CC0 means the author wishes for his work to be public domain, but a court of law may not recognize it as such.
>>518200
>>518025
>>517871
>>517802
>>517800
>>517723
That's all i can do. The first time i ever used a 3d software.
>>518267
11/10
>>517723
Wait, so did OP steal the work or what?
I never bothered making a blendswap account, what's the difference between what OP posted and this .blend?
If OP took it and improved it somehow, I'm sort of okay with that. If they just look really similar that's pretty understandable too, since so much concept art and actual shots from the movie exist (and it's a relatively uncomplicated / cartoony character)
>>518270
I can't edit facial animation(i move teeth and such), what am i doing wrong?
>>517871
You've changed her personality in a single pose. Interesting.
